Bridging the expectation gap: a survey of Australian PhD candidates and supervisors in politics and international relations

References

• Alter, Karen J., Jean Clipperton, Emily Schraudenbach, and Laura Rozier. 2020. “Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy?” Perspectives on Politics 18 (4): 1048–1067. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719004985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsler, Sarah, and Sara C. Motta. 2019. “The Marketised University and the Politics of Motherhood.” Gender and Education 31 (1): 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1296116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angervall, Petra, Dennis Beach, and Jan Gustafsson. 2015. “The Unacknowledged Value of Female Academic Labour Power for Male Research Careers.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (5): 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1011092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenault, Amelia, Andrew Heffernan, and Michael Murphy. 2021. “What is the Role of Graduate Student Journals in the Publish-or-Perish Academy? Three Lessons from Three Editors-in-Chief.” International Studies 58 (1): 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881720981222.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2022. Selected Higher Education Statistics - 2021. www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/student-data/selected-higher-education-statistics-2021-student-data.
   Google Scholar
• Barham, Elena, and Colleen Wood. 2022. “Teaching the Hidden Curriculum in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (2): 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., A. Barth, and K. R. Rutherford. 2003. “Do We Preach What We Practice? A Survey of Methods in Political Science Journals and Curricula.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (3): 373–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, Peter James, and V. Lynn Meek. 2018. “Development and Future Directions of Higher Degree Research Training in Australia.” In Doctoral Education for the Knowledge Society, edited by Jung Cheol Shin, Barbara M. Kehm, and Glen A. Jones, 123–146. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berdahl, Loleen, Jonathan Malloy, and Lisa Young. 2020. “Faculty Perceptions of Political Science PhD Career Training.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (4): 751–756. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, I. 2018. 100 Years of the PhD in the UK. Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, Barry, and Jan Youtie. 2016. “Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-Authoring.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (6): 1717–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broms, Rasmus, and Jenny de Fine Licht. 2019. “Preparing Political Science Students for a Non-Academic Career: Experiences from a Novel Course Module.” Politics 39 (4): 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719828651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardilini, Adam, Alice Risely, and Mark Richardson. 2022. “Supervising the PhD: Identifying Common Mismatches in Expectations between Candidate and Supervisor to Improve Research Training Outcomes.” Higher Education Research & Development 41 (3): 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1874887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, Daniel, and Mark Fletcher. 2023. “Proudly ‘Disinterested’: A Public Administration Career for Social Science PhD Graduates.” In Non-Academic Careers for Quantitative Social Scientists: A Practical Guide to Maximizing Your Skills and Opportunities, edited by Natalie Jackson, 87–96. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Daniel, Serrin Rutledge-Prior, Lisa Young, Jonathan Malloy, and Loleen Berdahl. 2023. “Hard Work and You Can’t Get It: An International Comparative Analysis of Gender, Career Aspirations, and Preparedness among Politics and International Relations PhD Students.” PS: Political Science & Politics 56 (3): 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, Denise, and Tebeje Molla. 2015. “PhD Crisis Discourse: A Critical Approach to the Framing of the Problem and Some Australian ‘Solutions’.” Higher Education 69 (1): 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9760-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, Nikki. 2022. “How Lab Leaders Can Support Students’ Non-Academic Career Plans.” Nature 601 (7894): 655–657. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00162-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilbert, Danielle, Sam Gubitz, Jennifer Kavanagh, and Kelly Piazza. 2022. “Pushing the Boundaries of Your PhD: Exploring Careers Outside the Ivory Tower.” In Strategies for Navigating Graduate School and Beyond, edited by Kevin G. Lorentz II, Daniel J. Mallinson, Julia Marin Hellwege, Davin Phoenix, and J. Cherie Strachan, 261–270. Washington, DC: APSA.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, Cally. 2020. “Stories of Moving on HASS PhD Graduates’ Motivations and Career Trajectories Inside and Beyond Academia.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 19 (3): 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022219834448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, Kathleen J., Matthew A. Baum, and Marijke Breuning. 2013. “Women and Pre-Tenure Scholarly Productivity in International Studies: An Investigation into the Leaky Career Pipeline.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, Kathryn, and Anne Fearfull. 2008. “Exploring Ourselves: Exploiting and Resisting Gendered Identities of Women Academics in Accounting and Management.” Pacific Accounting Review 20 (2): 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580810892508.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Trevor. 2002. “A Quantitative Analysis of PhD Students’ Views of Supervision.” Higher Education Research & Development 21 (1): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220124648.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Allyson, Kylie Shaw, Jill Scevak, Sid Bourke, Robert Cantwell, and Janene Budd. 2014. “PhD Candidate Expectations: Exploring Mismatch with Experience.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 9: 329–346. https://doi.org/10.28945/2078.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J. 2008. “‘Why Do All the Women Disappear?’ Gendering Processes in a Political Science Department.” Gender, Work & Organization 15: 202–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefford, Glenn, and Lee Morgenbesser. 2013. “Bridging the Information Gap: A Survey of Politics and International Relations PhD Students in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosa, Amrinder, Steven Burch, Esin Ozdil, and Carla Wilkin. 2020. “Current Issues in PhD Supervision of Accounting and Finance Students: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand.” The British Accounting Review 52 (5): 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, Anne. 2022. “Supporting Students' Non-Academic Career Plans”. Nature 601: 655–657.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laver, Michael. 2005. “The Objectives and Design of European Doctoral Programmes in Political Science.” European Political Science 4 (1): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210016.
   Google Scholar
• Löfström, Erika, and Kirsi Pyhältö. 2020. “What are Ethics in Doctoral Supervision, and How Do They Matter? Doctoral Students’ Perspective.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 64 (4): 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokhtina, Irina, Erika Löfström, Solveig Cornér, and Montserrat Castelló. 2022. “In Pursuit of Sustainable Co-Authorship Practices in Doctoral Supervision: Addressing the Challenges of Writing, Authorial Identity and Integrity.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59 (1): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1799839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magoqwana, Babalwa, Qawekazi Maqabuka, and Malehoko Tshoaedi. 2019. ““Forced to Care” at the Neoliberal University: Invisible Labour as Academic Labour Performed by Black Women Academics in the South African University.” South African Review of Sociology 50 (3–4): 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2020.1730947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, P. 2012. “Politics at the University of Adelaide.” In A History of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Adelaide 1876–2012, 359–385. University of Adelaide Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, Mike, and Margaret Kiley. 2000. “Arguing for PhD Coursework.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems 7 (2): 52–59. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v7i2.276.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Sara, and Vicki Hesli. 2013. “Women Don’t Ask? Women Don’t Say No? Bargaining and Service in the Political Science Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (02): 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513000073.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, Rodrigo. 2014. “Management of the Level of Coursework in PhD Education: A Case of Sweden.” Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research 4 (3): 168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray, Susan, and Christine Halse. 2010. “The Purpose of the PhD: Theorising the Skills Acquired by Students.” Higher Education Research & Development 29 (6): 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.487199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Skills Commission. 2022. “Internet Vacancy Index – Detailed Occupation.” March 2006–September 2022. Accessed January 3, 2023. https://www.nationalskillscommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/IVI_DATA_Detailed_Occupation%20-%20March%202006%20onwards.xlsx.
   Google Scholar
• O'keefe, T., and A. Courtois. 2019. “‘Not One of the Family’: Gender and Precarious Work in the Neoliberal University.” Gender, Work & Organization 26 (4): 463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollilainen, Marjukka. 2020. “Ideal Bodies at Work: Faculty Mothers and Pregnancy in Academia.” Gender and Education 32 (7): 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflaeger Young, Zoe, Fran Amery, Stephen Holden Bates, Stephen McKay, Cherry Miller, Taylor Billings, Rebecca Hayton, et al. 2021. “Women in the Profession: An Update on the Gendered Composition of the Discipline and Political Science Departments in the UK.” Political Studies Review 19 (1): 12–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920905503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümper, T., and C. Radaelli. 2004. “Publish or Perish? Publications and Citations of Italian Political Scientists in International Political Science Journals.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (6): 1112–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, Alex, Bruce Christensen, and Elizabeth Rieger. 2019. “The Essential Ingredients of Research Supervision: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (7): 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge-Prior, Serrin, and Daniel Casey. 2023. ““An Isolating Experience Aggravated by COVID”: Exploring Disconnections Between Political Science PhD Candidates and Supervisors.” PS: Political Science & Politics 56 (3): 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharmini, Sharon, and Rachel Spronken-Smith. 2020. “The PhD – Is It Out of Alignment?” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (4): 821–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1693514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakni, Isabelle. 2018. “Doctoral Studies as an Initiatory Trial: Expected and Taken-for-Granted Practices that Impede PhD Students’ Progress.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (8): 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Amy Erica, Shauna N. Gillooly, and Heidi Hardt. 2022. “Assessing Racial/Ethnic and Gender Gaps in Political Science PhD Students’ Methodological Self-Efficacy.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (1): 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorlakson, Lori. 2005. “Models of Doctoral Training in European Political Science.” European Political Science 4 (1): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210010.
   Google Scholar
• Van Veelen, Ruth, and Belle Derks. 2022. “Academics as Agentic Superheroes: Female Academics’ Lack of Fit with the Agentic Stereotype of Success Limits their Career Advancement.” British Journal of Social Psychology 61 (3): 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallaschek, Stephan, and Raphael Heiberger. 2019. “Kudos to You! Comparing Co-Authorships and Acknowledgements in Political Science Journals from Germany.” SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/bg4qz.
   Google Scholar
• White, Kate. 2004. “The Leaking Pipeline: Women Postgraduate and Early Career Researchers in Australia.” Tertiary Education and Management 10 (3): 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2004.9967129.
   Google Scholar