A lake management framework for global application: monitoring, restoring, and protecting lakes through community engagement

References

• Aceves-Bueno E, Adeleye AS, Bradley D, Brandt WT, Callery P, Feraud M, Garner KL, Gentry R, Huang Y, McCullough I, et al. 2015. Citizen science as an approach for overcoming insufficient monitoring and inadequate stakeholder buy-in in adaptive management: criteria and evidence. Ecosystems. 18(3):493–506. doi: 10.1007/s10021-015-9842-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler RW. 2010. Resilience, restoration, and sustainability: revisiting the fundamental principals of the Clean Water Act. Wash Univ J Law Pol. 32:139–173.
   Google Scholar
• Albert JS, Destouni G, Duke-Sylvester SM, Magurran AE, Oberdorff T, Reis RE, Winemiller KO, Ripple WJ. 2021. Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Ambio. 50(1):85–94. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01318-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almendinger JE. 1998. A method to prioritize and monitor wetland restoration for water-quality improvement. Wetl Ecol and Manag. 6(4):241–252. doi: 10.1023/A:1008439031165.
   Google Scholar
• [AWWA] American Water Works Association 2016. Cyanotoxins in US drinking water: occurrence, case studies and state approaches to regulation. Denver, CO: AWWA.
   Google Scholar
• Andreen WL. 2007. Motivating enforcement: institutional culture and the Clean Water Act. Pace Environ Law Rev. 24(1):67–98. doi: 10.58948/0738-6206.1054.
   Google Scholar
• Andreen WL. 2013. Success and backlash: the remarkable (continuing) story of the Clean Water Act. J Energ Environ Law. 25:25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell C, Gash A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Pub Adm Res Theory. 18(4):543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arhonditsis GB, Neumann A, Shimoda Y, Kim DK, Dong F, Onandia G, Yang C, Javed A, Brady M, Visha A, et al. 2019. Castles built on sand or predictive limnology in action? Part A: evaluation of an integrated modeling framework to guide adaptive management implementation in Lake Erie. Ecol Inform. 53:100968. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Kramer L, de Senerpont Domis LN, van Wijk D, Gsell AS, Mooij WM, Teurlincx S. 2021. Flipping lakes: explaining concepts of catchment-scale water management through a serious game. Limnol Ocean Methods. 19(7):443–456. doi: 10.1002/lom3.10436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacigalupi J, Staples DF, Treml MT, Bahr DL. 2021. Development of fish-based indices of biological integrity for Minnesota lakes. Ecol Indic. 125:107512. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart BL, Golden HE, Kasprzyk JR, Pauer JJ, Jones CE, Sawicz KA, Hoghooghi N, Simon M, McKane RB, Mayer PM, et al. 2018. Embedding co-production and addressing uncertainty in watershed modeling decision-support tools: successes and challenges. Environ Model Softw. 109:368–379. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker ME, Becker TJ, Bellucci CJ. 2018. Diatom tolerance metrics to identify total phosphorus as candidate cause of aquatic life impairment in Connecticut, USA freshwater streams. Ecol Indic. 93:638–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendtsen EB, Clausen LPW, Hansen SF. 2021. A review of the state-of-the-art for stakeholder analysis with regard to environmental management and regulation. J Environ Manage. 279:111773. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion H, Battarbee RW, Sayer CD, Simpson GL, Davidson TA. 2010. Defining reference conditions and restoration targets for lake ecosystems using palaeolimnology: a synthesis. J Paleolimnol. 45(4):533–544. doi: 10.1007/s10933-010-9419-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion H, Kelly MG, Juggins S, Yallop ML, Burgess A, Jamieson J, Krokowski J. 2014. Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshw Sci. 33(2):639–654. doi: 10.1086/675447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 10(5):1251–1262. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake C, Rhanor A, Pajic C. 2020. The demographics of citizen science participation and its implications for data quality and environmental justice. Citiz Sci Theory Pract. 5:21.
   Google Scholar
• Blocksom KA, Kurtenbach JP, Klemm DJ, Fulk FA, Cormier SM. 2002. Development and evaluation of the lake macroinvertebrate integrity index (LMII) for New Jersey lakes and reservoirs. Environ Monit Assess.Assess 77(3):311–333. doi: 10.1023/a:1016096925401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouleau G, Pont D. 2015. Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive. Environ Sci Policy. 47:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton AJ. 1999. An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biol. 41(2):469–479. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne L. 2022. The stakeholder circle. [cited 22 July 2022]. http://www.stakeholdermapping.com/stakeholder-circle-methodology/
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi M. 2009. Beyond technocracy: science, politics and citizens. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns J, McCormick PV, Niederlehner BR. 1993. A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia. 263(1):1–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00006084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CRWD] Capitol Region Watershed District 2019. Como Lake Management plan. St. Paul, MN: Prepared by LimnoTech.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti CGB, Pinto MT, de Freitas HJ, Moreira RCA. 1997. Paranoá Lake restoration: impact of tertiary treatment of sewage in the watershed. Int Ver the. 26(2):689–693. doi: 10.1080/03680770.1995.11900803.
   Google Scholar
• [CDC] Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2022. Inclusive communication principals. [cited 11 Jan 2023]. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/Health_Equity.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman D. 1996. Water quality assessments: a guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chidammodzi CL, Muhandiki VS. 2015. Development of indicators for assessment of Lake Malawi Basin in an Integrated Lake Basin Management (ILBM) framework. Int J Commons. 9(1):209–236. doi: 10.18352/ijc.479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin RM, Witt GB, Lacey J. 2016. Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects. Land Use Policy. 52:266–276. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad CT, Daoust T. 2008. Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environ Manage. 41(3):358–366. doi: 10.1007/s00267-007-9042-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke B, Kothari U, editors. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? 5th ed. New York, NY: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Creed R, Baily B, Potts J, Bray M, Austin R. 2018. Moving towards sustainable coasts: a critical evaluation of a stakeholder engagement group successfully delivering the mechanism of adaptive management. Mar Policy. 90:184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig LS, Olden JD, Arthington AH, Entrekin S, Hawkins CP, Kelly JJ, Kennedy TA, Maitland BM, Rosi EJ, Roy AH, et al. 2017. Meeting the challenge of interacting threats in freshwater ecosystems: a call to scientists and managers. Elem Sci Anth. 5:72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling S, Harvey B, Hickey GM. 2023. From ‘stakeholders’ to rights holders: How approaches to impact assessment affect indigenous participation in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Environ Impact Assess. 99:107025. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LF, Ramírez-Andreotta MD, Buxner SR. 2020. Engaging diverse citizen scientists for environmental health: recommendations from participants and promotoras. Cstp. 5(1):7. doi: 10.5334/cstp.253.
   Google Scholar
• Davis LF, Ramírez-Andreotta MD. 2021. Participatory research for environmental justice: a critical interpretive synthesis. Environ Health Persp. 129:026001–1–026001-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, Phillips T, Purcell K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecol & Environ. 10(6):291–297. doi: 10.1890/110236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds WK, Carney E, Angelo RT. 2006. Determining ecoregional reference conditions for nutrients, Secchi depth and chlorophyll a in Kansas lakes and reservoirs. Lake Reserv Manage.22(2):151–159. doi: 10.1080/07438140609353892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson S. 2005. Introduction to limnology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton WM, Brasier KJ, Burbach ME, Whitmer W, Engle EW, Burnham M, Quimby B, Chaudhary AK, Whitley H, Delozier J, et al. 2021. A conceptual framework for social, behavioral, and environmental change through stakeholder engagement. Soc Natur Resour.34(8):1111–1132. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2021.1936717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ECCC and USEPA] Environment and Climate Change Canada and the US Environmental Protection Agency 2022. State of the Great Lakes 2022 report: an overview of the status and trends of the Great Lakes ecosystem. EPA 905-R-22-004.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Canada 1972. Guidelines for water quality objectives and standards. Ottawa, CA: Technical Bulletin No. 67.
   Google Scholar
• Failing L, Gregory R, Higgins P. 2013. Science, uncertainty, and values in ecological restoration: a case study in structured decision-making and adaptive management. Restor Ecol. 21(4):422–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00919.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL. 2011. Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Policy. 7(1):46–59. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett LL, Sorice MG, Cobourn KM, Boyle KJ, Klug JL, Weathers KC. 2020. Pathways to enhanced lake integrity: a framework to assess the effectiveness of local lake associations. Lakes Reserv. 25(2):258–268. doi: 10.1111/lre.12308.
   Google Scholar
• Gari SR, Newton A, Icely JD. 2015. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast Manage. 103:63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gémesi Z, Downing JA, Cruse RM, Anderson PF. 2011. Effects of watershed configuration and composition on downstream lake water quality. J Environ Qual. 40(2):517–527. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson GR, Bowman ML, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD. 2000. Estuarine and coastal marine waters: bioassessment and biocriteria technical guidance. Washington, DC: EPA 822-B-00-024.
   Google Scholar
• Government of British Columbia 2023. Terminology in Indigenous context. [cited 5 Sep 2023]. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/service-experience-digital-delivery/web-content-development-guides/web-style-guide/writing-guide-for-indigenous-content/terminology
   Google Scholar
• Green OO, Gamestani AS, Van Rijswick HFMW, Keessen AM. 2013. EU water governance: striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement? Ecol Soc. 18:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grennfelt P, Engleryd A, Forsius M, Hov Ø, Rodhe H, Cowling E. 2020. Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress in environmental science and policy. Ambio. 49(4):849–864. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01244-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn JM. 1995. Restoration and recovery of an industrial region: progress in restoring the smelter-damaged landscape near Sudbury, Canada. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, ter Maat J. 2013. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environ Chang. 23(2):485–498. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay M. 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild M, editors. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. London: Springer, Dordrecht. p. 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Haith DA, Mandel R, Wu RS. 1992. GWLF: generalized watershed loading functions Version 2.0, User’s Manual. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Haith DA, Shoemaker LL. 1987. Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrients. J American Water Resour Assoc. 23(3):471–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb00825.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins CP, Olson JR, Hill RA. 2010. The reference conditions: predicting benchmarks for ecological and water-quality assessments. J N Am Benthol Soc. 29(1):312–343. doi: 10.1899/09-092.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Sun X, He J. 2015. Spatial disparities of the willingness of the residents to pay for the wetland restoration of Taihu Lake and its integration into decision making: a case study on Wuxi, China. Environ Monit Assess. 187(8):492. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4654-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker S, Haklay ME, Bowser A, Makuch Z, Vogel J, Bonn A. 2018. Citizen science. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heink U, Kowarik I. 2010. What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecol Indic. 10(3):584–593. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldt S, Budryte P, Ingensiep HW, Teichgräber B, Schneider U, Denecke M. 2016. Social pitfalls for river restoration: how public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance. Environ Earth Sci. 75(13):1053. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho JC, Michalak AM, Pahlevan N. 2019. Widespread global increase in intense lake phytoplankton blooms since the 1980s. Nature 574(7780):667–670. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1648-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holifield R, Williams KC. 2019. Recruiting, integrating, and sustaining stakeholder participation in environmental management: a case study from the Great Lakes Areas of Concern. J Environ Manage. 230:422–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huser BJ, Futter M, Lee JT, Perniel M. 2016. In-lake measures for phosphorus control: the most feasible and cost-effective solutions for long-term management of water quality in urban lakes. Water Res. 97:142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ILEC] International Lake Environment Committee Foundation 2005. Managing lakes and their basins for sustainable use: a report for lake basin managers and stakeholders. Kusatsu: ILEC.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin A. 1995. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvie HP, Johnson LT, Sharpley AN, Smith DR, Baker DB, Bruulsema TW, Confesor R. 2017. Increased soluble phosphorus loads to Lake Erie: unintended consequences of conversation practices? J Environ Qual. 46(1):123–132. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.07.0248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff S. 2003. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva. 41(3):223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny J-P, Anneville O, Arnaud F, Baulaz Y, Bouffard D, Domaizon I, Bocaniov SA, Chèvre N, Dittrich M, Dorioz J-M, et al. 2020. Scientists’ warning to humanity: rapid degredation of the world’s largest lakes. J Great Lakes Res. 46(4):686–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson T, Setzer M. 2014. A freshwater predator hit twice by the effects of warming accross trophic levels. Nat Commun. 6(1):5992. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6992.
   Google Scholar
• Kalcic MM, Kirchhoff C, Bosch N, Muenich RL, Murray M, Gardner JG, Scavia D. 2016. Engaging stakeholders to define feasible and desirable agricultural conservation in Western Lake Erie watersheds. Environ Sci Technol. 50(15):8135–8145. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper JJ, van Wijk D, Mooij WM, Remme RP, Peterson GD, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S, Mooij CJ, Leltz GM, Pereira LM. 2022. Exploring desirable nature futures for National Park Hollandse Duinen. Ecosyst People. 18(1):329–347. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2022.2065360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson DC, Helstab M, Docker MF, Bangs B, Clemens BJ. 2020. Landlocked Pacific lamprey Entosphenus tridentatus in the Middle Fork Willamette River, Oregon. Environ Biol Fish. 103(3):291–298. doi: 10.1007/s10641-020-00958-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson DM, Hall KR, Yung L, Enquist CAF. 2017. Building translational ecology communities of practice: insights from the field. Frontiers in Ecol & Environ. 15(10):569–577. doi: 10.1002/fee.1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettenmaier DP, Hooper ER, Wagoner C, Faris KB. 1991. Trends in stream quality in the continental United States, 1978–1987. Water Resour Res. 27(3):327–339. doi: 10.1029/90WR02140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewenstein BV. 2022. Is citizen science a remedy for inequality? Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 700(1):183–194. doi: 10.1177/00027162221092697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likens G. 2010. The role of science in decision making: does evidence-based science drive environmental policy? Front Ecol Environ. 8:e1–e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE. 2009. Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol. 24(9):482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes FA, Davies-Colley R, Piazi J, Silveira JS, Leite AC, Lopes NIA. 2020. Challenges for contact recreation in a tropical urban lake: assessment by a water quality index. Environ Dev Sustain. 22(6):5409–5423. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00430-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyet V, Schlaepfer R, Parlange MB, Buttler A. 2012. A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. J Environ Manage. 111:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay EB, Maberly SC, Pan G, Reitzel K, Bruere A, Corker N, Douglas G, Egemose S, Hamilton DP, Hatton-Ellis T, et al. 2014. Geoengineering in lakes: welcome attraction or fatal distraction? IW. 4(4):349–356. doi: 10.5268/IW-4.4.769.
   Google Scholar
• Markogianni V, Kalivas D, Petropoulos GP, Dimitriou E. 2022. Modeling of Greek lakes water quality using earth observation in the framework of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Remote Sens-Basel. 14(3):739. doi: 10.3390/rs14030739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor D. 2008. Anishnaabe-kwe, traditional knowledge and water protection. Canadian Woman Studies/Les Cahiers de la femme 26:26–30.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor D, Whitaker S, Sritharan M. 2020. Indigenous environmental justice and sustainability. Curr Opin Env Sust. 43:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar EE, Hazell EC, Melles SJ. 2019. The ‘cottage effect’ in citizen science? Spatial bias in aquatic monitoring programs. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 33(8):1612–1632. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1423686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar EE, Melles S, Klug JL, Rees T. 2023. Stewarding relations of trust: citizen scientist perspectives on fostering community trust in science. Environ Sociol. 9(1):31–50. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2022.2112888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MILCC] Minnesota Interagency Lakes Coordinating Committee 1996. Developing a lake management plan. St. Paul, MN: MILCC.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BC, Christensen D. 2009. Newman Lake restoration: a case study. Part 1. Chemical and biological responses to phosphorus control. Lake Reserv Manage. 25(4):337–350. doi: 10.1080/07438140903172907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshi HA, Kimirei I, Shilla D, O’Reilly C, Wehrli B, Ehrenfels B, Loiselle S. 2022. Citizen scientist monitoring accurately reveals nutrient pollution dynamics in Lake Tanganyika coastal waters. Environ Monit Assess. 194(10):689. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10354-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulyuk A, Barton M, Hauxwell J, Hein C, Kujawa E, Minahan K, Nault ME, Oele DL, Wagner KI. 2017. A macrophyte bioassessment approach linking taxon-specific tolerance and abundance in north temperate lakes. J Environ Manage. 199:172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhandiki VS, Chidammodzi CL, Dumba N. 2014. The six pillars of integrated lake basin management: insights from Lakes Chivero and Malawi/Nyasa. J Hum Environ Syst. 25:63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Myers JH, Bazely D. 2003. Ecology and control of introduced plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakatsuka N, Kosaka S, Taki K, Nakamura M, Nakagawa H. 2020. Better governance for integrated management of the Lake Biwa-Yodo River Basin. Lakes Reserv. 25(1):93–104. doi: 10.1111/lre.12309.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe R. 2003. From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Constr Manag Econ. 21(8):841–848. doi: 10.1080/0144619032000072137.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi GJ, McDonald ME. 2004. Application of ecological indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. Syst. 35(1):89–111. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130132.
   Google Scholar
• Nikraftar Z, Parizi E, Mossa Hosseini S, Ataie-Ashtiani B. 2021. Lake Urmia restoration success story: a natural trend or a planned remedy? J Great Lakes Res. 47(4):955–969. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2021.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. 2003. Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva.41(3):179–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1025505528250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nürnberg G. 1996. Trophic state of clear and colored, soft- and hardwater lakes with special consideration of nutrients, anoxia, phytoplankton and fish. Lake Reserv Manage. 12(4):432–447. doi: 10.1080/07438149609354283.
   Google Scholar
• Nygrén NA. 2019. Scenario workshops as a tool for participatory planning in a case of lake management. Futures 107:29–44. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell EL, Talbot-Jones J. 2018. Creating legal rights for rivers: lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecol Soc. 23:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Folke C. 2001. Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems. 4(2):85–104. doi: 10.1007/s100210000061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood RA. 2017. Inadequacy of best management practices for restoring eutrophic lakes in the United States: guidance for policy and practice. Inland Waters. 7(4):401–407. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2017.1368881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmond DL, Shober AL, Sharpley AN, Duncan EW, Hoag DLK. 2019. Increasing the effectiveness and adoption of agricultural phosphorus management strategies to minimize water quality impairment. J Environ Qual. 48(5):1204–1217. doi: 10.2134/jeq2019.03.0114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1992. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer SCJ, Kutser T, Hunter PD. 2015. Remote sensing of inland waters: challenges, progress and future directions. Remote Sens Environ. 157:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandya RE. 2012. A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Front Ecol Environ. 10(6):314–317. doi: 10.1890/120007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman R, Dyke A, West S. 2021. The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citiz Sci Theory Pract. 6:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters ETHM, Gerritsen AAM, Seelen LMS, Begheyn M, Rienks F, Teurlincx S. 2022. Monitoring biological water quality by volunteers complements professional assessments. PlosOne. 17(2):e0263899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LM, Davies KK, den Belder E, Ferrier S, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S, Kim H, Kuiper JJ, Okayasu S, Palomo MG, Pereira HM, et al. 2020. Developing multiscale and integrative nature-people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework. People Nat. 2(4):1172–1195. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10146.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhananga A, Davenport M, Green E. 2019. Cultural narratives on constraints to community engagement in urban water restoration. Contemporary Water Res. 166(1):79–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2019.03303.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner BD, Mam K, Halpern G. 2014. Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia’s Tonle Sap Lake. Ecol Soc. 19:31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 141(10):2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, de Vente J, Frewer L, Hohenwallner-Ries D, Huber T, Neumann RK, Oughton EA, Sidoli del Ceno J, et al. 2018. A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restor Ecol. 26:S7–S17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PTJ, Kidd KA, MacCormack TJ, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, et al. 2019. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 94(3):849–873. doi: 10.1111/brv.12480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [RIVM] Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 2020. Blauwalgen protocol 2020 [Blue green algae protocol 2020]. RIVM-briefrapport 2020-0107. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4(2):155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rood SB, Kaluthota S, Philipsen LJ, Rood NJ, Zanewich KP. 2017. Increasing discharge from the Mackenzie River system to the Arctic Ocean. Hydrol Process. 31(1):150–160. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J, Hutcheson MS, West CR, Pancorbo O, Hulme K, Cooperman A, Decesare G, Isaac R, Screpetis A. 2009. Fish mercury distribution in Massachusetts, USA lakes. Enviro Toxic Chem. 18(7):1370–1379. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620180705.
   Google Scholar
• Rose KC, Weathers KC, Hetherington AL, Hamilton DP. 2016. Insights from the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON). Inland Waters. 6(4):476–482. doi: 10.1080/IW-6.4.1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Frewer LJ. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Val. 25(1):3–29. doi: 10.1177/016224390002500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Frewer LJ. 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Val. 30(2):251–290. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan E, Curry H, Rule H. 2020. Environmental rights for the 21st century: a comprehensive analysis of the public trust doctrine and rights of nature movement. Cardozo Law Rev. 42:2447–2576.
   Google Scholar
• Safford TG, Carlson ML, Hart ZH. 2009. Stakeholder collaboration and organizational innovation in the planning of the Deschutes Estuary Feasibility Study. Coast Manage. 37(6):514–528. doi: 10.1080/08920750903044774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders BA, Rast W, Lopes V. 2014. Stakeholder evaluation of the feasibility of watershed management alternatives, using Integrated Lake Basin Management principals. Lakes Reserv. 19(4):255–268. doi: 10.1111/lre.12075.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman EM, Steenhuis TS, Thongs DJ, Easton ZM, Zion MS, Neal AL, Mendoza GF, Walter MT. 2007. Incorporating variable source area hydrology into a curve-number-based watershed model. Hydrol Process. 21(25):3420–3430. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfstein JM. 2016. Banishing “stakeholders. Milbank Q. 94(3):476–479. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Richardson DC, Woolway RI, Imrit MA, Bouffard D, Blagrave K, Daly J, Filazzola A, Granin N, Korhonen J, et al. 2021. Loss of ice cover, shifting phenology, and more extreme events in northern hemisphere lakes. J Geophys Res-Biogeo. 126:e2021JG006348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe LM, Harwell MC, Jackson CA. 2021. Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. J Environ Manage. 282:111719. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpley A, Jarvie HP, Buda A, May L, Spears B, Kleinman P. 2013. Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. J Environ Qual. 42(5):1308–1326. doi: 10.2134/jeq2013.03.0098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth RL, Fatima U, Segarra M, Borre L, Zilio MI, Reid B, Pincetl S, Astorga A, Huamantinco Cisneros MA, Conde D, et al. 2021. Engaging stakeholders across a socio-environmentally diverse network of water research sites in North and South America. Environ Dev. 38:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelen LMS, Teurlincx S, Armstrong MR, Lürling M, van Donk E, de Senerpont Domis LN. 2021. Serving many masters at once: a framework for assessing ecosystem services delivered by quarry lakes. Inland Waters. 12(1):121–137. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2021.1944765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settele J, Scholes R, Betts R, Bunn S, Leadley P, Nepstad D, Overpeck JT, Taboada MA. 2014. Terrestrial and inland water systems In: Field B, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL, editors. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 271–359.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton RT,Adriaens TIM,Brundu G,Dehnen-Schmutz K,Estévez RA,Fried J,Larson BMH,Liu S,Marchante E,Marchante H, et al. 2019. Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species. J Environ Manage.229:88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044. 30077401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharip Z, Zakaria S, Noh MNM, Nakamura M, Muhandiki V. 2021. A review of the importance, gaps and future directions of Integrated Lake Basin Management Planning in Malaysia. Lakes Reserv. 26:e12355.
   Google Scholar
• Slough T, Rubenson D, Levy R, Alpizar Rodriguez F, Bernedo del Carpio M, Buntaine MT, Christensen D, Cooperman A, Eisenbarth S, Ferraro PJ, et al. 2021. Adoption of community monitoring improves common pool resource management across contexts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 118(29):e2015367118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015367118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen TL, Skov C, Van Nes EH, Roijackers R, Lammens E, Portielje R. 2007. Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects. J Appl Ecol. 44(6):1095–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01363.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears BM, Chapman DS, Carvalho L, Feld CK, Gessner MO, Piggott JJ, Banin LF, Gutiérrez-Cánovas C, Lyche Solheim A, Richardson JA, et al. 2021. Making waves. Bridging theory and practice towards multiple stressor management in freshwater ecosystems. Water Res. 196:116981. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears BM, Hamilton DP, Pan Y, Zhaosheng C, May L. 2022. Lake management: is prevention better than cure? Inland Waters. 12(1):173–186. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2021.1895646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke JR, Van Rijswick HFMW. 2021. Exemptions of the EU Water Framework Directive deterioration ban: comparing implementation approaches in Lower Saxony and The Netherlands. Sustainability. 13(2):930. doi: 10.3390/su13020930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan HG, Hondzo M, Fang X, Eaton JG, McCormick JH. 1996. Simulated long term temperature and dissolved oxygen characteristics of lakes in the north-central United States and associated fish habitat limits. Limnol Oceanogr. 41(5):1124–1135. doi: 10.4319/lo.1996.41.5.1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner RW, Keeler B, Polasky S, Poudel R, Rhude K, Rogers M. 2020. Ecosystem services of Earth’s largest freshwater lakes. Ecosyst Serv. 41:101046. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stow CA, Glassner-Shwayder K, Lee D, Wang L, Arhonditsis G, DePinto JV, Twiss MR. 2020. Lake Erie phosphorus targets: an imperative for active adaptive management. J Great Lakes Res. 46(3):672–676. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svarstad H, Kjerulf Petersen L, Rothman D, Siepel H, Wätzold F. 2008. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy. 25(1):116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swallow BM, Garrity DP, van Noordwijk M. 2002. The effects of scales, flows and filters on property rights and collective action in watershed management. Water Policy. 3(6):457–474. doi: 10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00011-9.
   Google Scholar
• Tammeorg O, Chorus I, Spears B, Nõges P, Nürnberg Tammeorg P, Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Paerl H, Huser B, Horppila J, et al. 2023. Sustainable lake restoration: from challenges to solutions. WIRES Water. 2023:e1689. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1689.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill I, Loiselle S, Lind K, Ophof D. 2016. The citizen science opportunity for researchers and agencies. BioScience. 66(9):720–721. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [UNEP] United Nations Environmental Programme 2016. A snapshot of the world’s water quality: towards a global assessment. Nairobi: Dew/1975/Na.
   Google Scholar
• [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency 2019. Recommended human health recreational ambient water quality criteria or swimming advisories for microcystins and cylindrospermopsin. Washington, DC: EPA 822-P-16-002.
   Google Scholar
• [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency 2022. National lakes assessment: the third collaborative survey of lakes in the United States. Washington, DC: EPA 841-R-22-002.
   Google Scholar
• [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency 2023. Secondary Drinking Water Standards: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals. Washington, DC: USEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Vaes G, Willems P, Swartenbroekx P, Kramer K, de Lange W, Kober K. 2009. Science-policy interfacing in support of the Water Framework Directive implementation. Water Sci Technol.Technol. 60(1):47–54. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler D, Macey S, Sigouin A. 2017. Stakeholder analysis in environmental and conservation planning. Lessons Conserv. 7:5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Vörösmarty CJ, Pahl-Wostl C, Bunn SE, Lawford R. 2013. Global water, the Anthropocene and the transformation of a science. Curr Opin Env Sust. 5(6):539–550. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [WFD] Water Framework Directive. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Offic J Europ Commun. 22(2000): 1–93.
   Google Scholar
• [WFD] Water Framework Directive 2003. Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Guidance Document No 10: River and lakes - typology, reference conditions and classification systems. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the Europeans Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Whittier TR, Paulsen SG, Larsen DP, Peterson SA, Herlihy AT, Kaufman PR. 2002. Indicators of ecological stress and their extent in the population of Northeastern lakes: a regional-scale assessment. BioScience. 52(3):235–247. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0235:IOESAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BK, Brown ED. 2016. Technical challenges in the application of adaptive management. Biol Conserv. 195:255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson CE, Dodds W, Kratz TK, Palmer MA. 2009. Lakes and streams as sentinels of environmental changes in terrestrial and atmospheric processes. Front Ecol Environ. 6(5):247–254. doi: 10.1890/070140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson NJ, Inkster J. 2018. Respecting water: Indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environ Plann E. 1(4):516–538. doi: 10.1177/2514848618789378.
   Google Scholar
• Woolway RI, Merchant CJ. 2019. Worldwide alteration of lake mixing regimes in response to climate change. Nat Geosci. Geosci. 12(4):271–276. doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0322-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [WHO] World Health Organization 2021. Guidelines on recreational water quality. Volume 1: coastal and fresh waters. Geneva (Switzerland): Licence CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• [WHO] World Health Organization 2022. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda. Geneva (Switzerland): Licence CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• Zellmer SB, Glicksman RL. 2013. Improving water quality antidegradation policies. Geo Wash J Energ Environ Law. 4:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Hu XD, Wu PP, Chen WM, Wu SS, Li ZQ, Zhu L, Xi YL, Huang R. 2021. Development and testing of the phytoplankton biological integrity index (P-IBI) in dry and wet seasons for Lake Gehu. Ecol Indic. 129:107882. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar