417
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Gist Knowledge and Misinformation Acceptance: An Application of Fuzzy Trace Theory

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Amazeen, M. A., Thorson, E., Muddiman, A., & Graves, L. (2018). Correcting political and consumer misperceptions: The effectiveness and effects of rating scale versus contextual correction formats. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016678186
  • Blalock, S. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2016). Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review. Health Psychology, 35(8), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000384
  • Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
  • Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
  • Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2021). Correction experiences on social media during COVID-19. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 205630512110088. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211008829
  • Broniatowski, D. A., & Reyna, V. F. (2018). A formal model of fuzzy-trace theory: Variations on framing effects and the Allais paradox. Decision, 5(4), 205–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000083
  • Cheng, J. W., & Nishikawa, M. (2022). Effects of health literacy in the fight against the COVID-19 infodemic: The case of Japan. Health Communication, 37(12), 1520–1533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2065745
  • Ecker, U. K. H., O’Reilly, Z., Reid, J. S., & Chang, E. P. (2020). The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12383
  • Erku, D. A., Belachew, S. A., Abrha, S., Sinnollareddy, M., Thomas, J., Steadman, K. J., & Tesfaye, W. H. (2021). When fear and misinformation go viral: Pharmacists’ role in deterring medication misinformation during the ‘infodemic’ surrounding COVID-19. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(1), 1954–1963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.032
  • Graves, L., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016). Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 102–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12198
  • Hawley, S. T., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P., Jancovic, A., Lucas, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.023
  • Hmielowski, J. D., Kirkpatrick, A. W., & Boyd, A. D. (2021). Understanding public support for smart meters: Media attention, misperceptions, and knowledge. Journal of Risk Research, 24(11), 1388–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1863844
  • Humprecht, E. (2020). How do they debunk “fake news”? A cross-national comparison of transparency in fact checks. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691031
  • Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2023a). Education-based gap in misinformation acceptance: Does the gap increase as misinformation exposure increases? Communication Research, 50(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221121509
  • Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2023b). Misinformation exposure and acceptance: The role of information seeking and processing. Health Communication, 38(3), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1964187
  • Hwang, Y., So, J., & Jeong, S.-H. (2022). Does COVID-19 message fatigue lead to misinformation acceptance? An extension of the risk information seeking and processing model. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111636
  • Joram, E., Roberts-Dobie, S., Mattison, S. J., Devlin, M., Herbrandson, K., Hansen, K., & Eslinger, D. (2012). The numeracy demands of health education information: An examination of numerical concepts in written diabetes materials. Health Communication, 27(4), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.586987
  • Keating, D. M., Totzkay, D., & Galper, E. (2022). Norms message features in an alcohol consumption context: Testing the roles of functional matching and numeracy. Health Communication, 37(11), 1432–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1895427
  • Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied linear statistical models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Lee, S. J., Lee, C.-J., & Hwang, H. (2022). The role of deliberative cognitive styles in preventing belief in politicized COVID-19 misinformation. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2125119
  • Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K., & Larson, H. J. (2021). Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
  • Mills, B., Reyna, V. F., & Estrada, S. (2008). Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking. Psychological Science, 19(5), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02104.x
  • Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
  • Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
  • Pulido, C. M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., & Gómez, A. (2020). COVID-19 infodemic: More retweets for science-based information on coronavirus than for false information. International Sociology, 35(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920914755
  • Reyna, V. F. (2012). Risk perception and communication in vaccination decisions: A fuzzy-trace theory approach. Vaccine, 30(25), 3790–3797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.070
  • Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Difference, 7(1), 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4
  • Reyna, V. F., Broniatowski, D. A., & Edelson, S. M. (2021). Viruses, vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and improving risky decision-making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004
  • Reyna, V. F., Estrada, S. M., DeMarinis, J. A., Myers, R. M., Stanisz, J. M., & Mills, B. A. (2011). Neurobiological and memory models of risk decision making in adolescents versus young adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023943
  • Reyna, V. F., & Mills, B. A. (2014). Theoretically motivated interventions for reducing sexual risk taking in adolescence: A randomized controlled experiment applying fuzzy-trace theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1627–1648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036717
  • Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
  • Rothman, R. L., Montori, V. M., Cherrington, A., & Pignone, M. P. (2008). Perspective: The role of numeracy in health care. Journal of Health Communication, 13(6), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802281791
  • Smith, S. G., Raine, R., Obichere, A., Wolf, M. S., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2015). The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z
  • Southwell, B. G., Niederdeppe, J., Cappella, J. N., Gaysynsky, A., Kelley, D. E., Oh, A., Peterson, E. B., & Chou, W.-Y.S. (2019). Misinformation as a misunderstood challenge to public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.009
  • Tan, A. S., Lee, C.-J., & Chae, J. (2015). Exposure to health (mis) information: Lagged effects on young adults’ health behaviors and potential pathways. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12163
  • van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Jin, Y. (2020). Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication, 35(5), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295
  • Vegetti, F., & Mancosu, M. (2020). The impact of political sophistication and motivated reasoning on misinformation. Political Communication, 37(5), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1744778
  • Walter, N., Brooks, J. J., Saucier, C. J., & Suresh, S. (2021). Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 36(13), 1776–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553
  • Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
  • Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
  • Wolfe, C. R., Reyna, V. F., Widmer, C. L., Cedillos, E. M., Fisher, C. R., Brust-Renck, P. G., & Weil, A. M. (2015). Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: A fuzzy-trace theory approach. Medical Decision Marking, 35(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14535983
  • Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S., & Goldring, A. (2018). Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: Evaluating FactCheck.Org and FlackCheck.Org. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017710453

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.