Procedural Detailing: A Patient’s Practice for Normalizing Routine Behaviors

References

• Albert, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2018). Improving human interaction research through ecological grounding. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.132
   Google Scholar
• Barry, M. J., & Edgman Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making: The pinnacle of patient-centered care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanger, E. (2017). Shared decision-making in palliative care: Research priorities to align care with patients’ values. Palliative Medicine, 31(7), 585–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317713864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, L., & Legare, F. (2015). Is shared decision making a utopian dream or an achievable goal? Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research, 8(6), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0117-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boa, S., Duncan, E., Haraldsdottir, E., & Wyke, S. (2019). Mind the gap: Patients’ experiences and perceptions of goal setting in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care, 27(6), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2019.1672131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett, M., Pino, M., Moghaddam, N., & Schroder, T. (2019). “It sounds silly now, but it was important then”: Supporting the significance of a personal experience in psychotherapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bye, R. A. (1998). When clients are dying: Occupational therapists’ perspectives. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 18(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929801800101
   Google Scholar
• Chochinov, H. M. (2002). Dignity-conserving care—A new model for palliative care: Helping the patient feel valued. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(17), 2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.17.2253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (2006). Occupational therapy in oncology and palliative care (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-nl/Occupational+Therapy+in+Oncology+and+Palliative+Care%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781118709658
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1984). Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 129–151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.010
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: An analysis of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(3), 211–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94133001
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/discursive-psychology/book203291
   Google Scholar
• Eva, G., & Morgan, D. (2018). Mapping the scope of occupational therapy practice in palliative care: A European association for palliative care cross-sectional survey. Palliative Medicine, 32(5), 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318758928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faull, C. (2015). The context and principles of palliative care. In C. Faull, Y. H. Carter & L. Daniels (Eds.), Handbook of palliative care (2nd ed., pp. 1–21). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426869.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Günthner, S. (2011). Between emergence and sedimentation: Projecting constructions in German interactions. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp. 156–185). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229080
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, K., Bye, R., & Cook, C. (2014). Occupational therapy for people living with a life-limiting illness: A thematic review. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77(11), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802214x14151078348594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, K., Bye, R., & Cook, C. (2019). Occupational engagement of people living with a life-limiting illness: Occupational therapists’ perceptions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2017). Transcribing for social research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920460
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984a). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press. https://www.wiley.com/en-nl/Garfinkel+and+Ethnomethodology-p-9780745600611
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359–417). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2020). When conversation lapses: The public accountability of silent copresence. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/when-conversation-lapses-9780190947651
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Cleup.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and as a resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63–92). University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004a). “At first I thought”: A normalizing device for extraordinary events. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 131–167). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.09jef
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004b). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–32). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, B., Larkin, P., Connolly, M., Barry, C., Narayanasamy, M., Ostlund, U., & McIlfatrick, S. (2015). Dignity-conserving care in palliative care settings: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(13–14), 1743–1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., & Berggren, I. (2011). Dignified end-of-life care in the patients’ own homes. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011398100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, D. B., & Dzierzewski, J. M. (2015). Sleep in the context of healthy aging and psychiatric syndromes. Sleep Medicine Clinics, 10(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsmc.2014.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesing, S., & Rosenwax, L. (2011). Is occupation missing from occupational therapy in palliative care? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(5), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00958.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, A. (2015). Performing an action one cannot do: Participation, scaffolding and embodied interaction. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 6(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v7i1.26986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, L., Hupli, M., Ahtiluoto, S., & Haavisto, E. (2021). Patient participation in shared decision‐making in palliative care–An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(23–24), 3415–3428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, V., Parry, R., & Seymour, J. (2017). Communication practices that encourage and constrain shared decision making in health‐care encounters: Systematic review of conversation analytic research. Health Expectations, 20(6), 1228–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, F., Stacey, D., Briere, N., Robitaille, H., Lord, M. C., Desroches, S., & Drolet, R. (2014). An interprofessional approach to shared decision making: An exploratory case study with family caregivers of one IP home care team. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), Article 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1994). Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94131002
   Google Scholar
• Maersk, J. L., Johannessen, H., & la Cour, K. (2019). Occupation as marker of self: Occupation in relation to self among people with advanced cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1378366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H. (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1816–1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostlund, U., Blomberg, K., Soderman, A., & Harstade, C. W. (2019). How to conserve dignity in palliative care: Suggestions from older patients, significant others, and healthcare professionals in Swedish municipal care. BMC Palliative Care, 18(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0393-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parry, R. (2004). Communication during goal-setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(6), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr745oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, R. (2013). Giving reasons for doing something now or at some other time. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.754653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino, M., & Land, V. (2022). How companions speak on patients’ behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a conversation analytic study of palliative care consultations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. W. (2017). Indexing a contrast: The do-construction in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K., Connolly, M., Charnley, K., Ainscough, A., Crinion, J., Hayden, C., Keegan, O., Larkin, P., Lynch, M., McEvoy, D., McQuillan, R., O’Donoghue, L., O’Hanlon, M., Reaper-Reynolds, S., Regan, J., Rowe, D., & Wynne, M. (2014). Palliative care competence framework 2014. Health Service Executive. https://www.lenus.ie/handle/10147/322310
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary. In J. K. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.024
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other‐initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 499–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 517–720. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.715
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
   Google Scholar
• Schoeb, V., Staffoni, L., Parry, R., & Pilnick, A. (2014). “What do you expect from physiotherapy?”: A detailed analysis of goal setting in physiotherapy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(20), 1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.867369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). Handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. D. (1978). ‘K is mentally ill’ the anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12(1), 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200103
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Heritage, J. (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering ‘more than the question’ during comprehensive history taking. Text & Talk, 21(1–2), 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.151
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Heritage, J., Barnes, R. K., McCabe, R., Thompson, L., & Toerien, M. (2018). Treatment recommendations as actions. Health Communication, 33(11), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1350913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Timmermans, S. (2020). Medical authority under siege: How clinicians transform patient resistance into acceptance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 61(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146520902740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2012). The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S. (2020). The engaged patient: The relevance of patient–physician communication for twenty-first-century health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 61(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146520943514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Post, H., & Wagman, P. (2019). What is important to patients in palliative care? A scoping review of the patient’s perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1378715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiste, E. (2016). Formulations in occupational therapy: Managing talk about psychiatric outpatients’ emotional states. Journal of Pragmatics, 105, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiste, E. (2018). Relational interaction in occupational therapy: Conversation analysis of positive feedback. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1282040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, A., & Schoeb, V. (2020). Facilitating patient participation in physiotherapy: Symptom-talk during exercise therapy from an Asian context. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 36(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1485800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar