The Effects of Organizational Structure on MBSE Adoption in Industry: Insights from Practitioners

References

• Alexiou, A., Khanagha, S., & Schippers, M. C. (2019). Productive organizational energy mediates the impact of organizational structure on absorptive capacity. Long Range Planning, 52(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, H., Herzog, E., Johansson, G., & Johansson, O. (2010). Experience from introducing unified modeling language/systems modeling language at saab aerosystems. Systems Engineering, 13(4), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, C. (2020). The limitations of online surveys. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(6), 575–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620957496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldrige. (2021). 2021–2022 Baldrige excellence framework: Proven leadership and management practices for high performance. https://www.nist.gov/baldrige
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, B. S., & Blyer, J. E. (2016). Organization for system engineering. In B.S. Blanchard & J.E. Blyer (Eds.), System engineering management (pp. 372–425).
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., Parry, E., & Furtmueller, E. (2017). Electronic HRM: Four decades of research on adoption and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1245672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone, M., & Cloutier, R. (2010). The current state of model based systems engineering: Results from the omg™ SysML request for information 2009 [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgault, M., Drouin, N., & Hamel, É. (2008). Decision making within distributed project teams: An exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants of success. Project Management Journal, 39(1_suppl), S97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20063
   Google Scholar
• Bradner, E., Mark, G., & Hertel, T. D. (2005). Team size and technology fit: Participation, awareness, and rapport in distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2004.843299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, L., Kaiser, L., & Dumitrescu, R. (2019). An analysis of barriers for the introduction of systems engineering. Procedia CIRP, 84, 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.178
   Google Scholar
• Broodney, H., Dotan, D., Greenberg, L., & Masin, M. (2012). 1.6. 2 generic approach for systems design optimization in MBSE 1 [Paper presentation]. INCOSE International Symposium, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bruque-Cámara, S., Vargas-Sánchez, A., & Hernández-Ortiz, M. J. (2004). Organizational determinants of IT adoption in the pharmaceutical distribution sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R., DeSanctis, G., & Obel, B. (2006). Organizational design: A step-by-step approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, B., & Adsit, D. M. (2020). Model-based systems engineering uptake in engineering practice. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(1), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2863041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chami, M., Aleksandraviciene, A., Morkevicius, A., & Bruel, J. M. (2018). Towards solving MBSE adoption challenges: The D3 MBSE adoption toolbox [Paper presentation]. INCOSE International Symposium, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chami, M., & Bruel, J.-M. (2018). A survey on MBSE adoption challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, R. (2015). Current modeling trends in systems engineering. Insight, 18(2), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12013
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, R. J., & Bone, M. (2015). The ongoing adoption of model based systems engineering [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2015 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference, Nashville, TN, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., Mazzone, R., & Lin, W. (2013). NASA Integrated Model-Centric Architecture (NIMA) model use and re-use [Paper presentation]. 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• David-West, O., Iheanachor, N., & Kelikume, I. (2018). A resource-based view of digital financial services (DFS): An exploratory study of Nigerian providers. Journal of Business Research, 88, 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, R. D., Whetten, D. A., & Boje, D. (1980). An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales of centralization, formalization, and task routineness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., Winslow, A. B., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2003). Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795–827. https://doi.org/10.2307/256316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, C., & Gron, A. (2005). Vertical integration and information technology adoption: A study of the insurance industry [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., & Steiner, R. (2014). A practical guide to SysML: The systems modeling language. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido Azevedo, S., Ferreira, J., & Leitão, J. (2007). The role of logistics’ information and communication technologies in promoting competitive advantages of the firm.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, L. (1999). Future organizational design: The scope for the IT-based enterprise. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Goslar, M. D. (1993). The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in US organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517994
   Google Scholar
• Hax, A. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1981). Organizational design: A survey and an approach. Operations Research, 29(3), 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.29.3.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heihoff-Schwede, J., Bretz, L., Kaiser, L., & Dumitrescu, R. (2019). An explanatory model as basis for the introduction of systems engineering and capable IT-infrastructures in industry [Paper presentation]. 2019 International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Edinburgh, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K., & Salado, A. (2021). Is CAD a Good Paradigm for MBSE? [Paper presentation] INCOSE 31st Annual International Symposium, Virtual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, E., Andersson, H., & Hallonquist, J. (2010). 4.5. 3 experience from introducing SysML into a large project organisation [Paper presentation]. INCOSE International Symposium, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P., & McDaniel, R. R. (1986). The decision-making paradigm of organizational design. Management Science, 32(5), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huldt, T., & Stenius, I. (2019). State‐of‐practice survey of model‐based systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 22(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D. (1998). Institutionalized resistance to asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(2), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Johari, J., & Yahya, K. K. (2009). Linking organizational structure, job characteristics, and job performance construct: A proposed framework. International Journal of Business & Management, 4(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n3p145
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. F., Klassen, R. D., Leenders, M. R., & Awaysheh, A. (2007). Utilizing e-business technologies in supply chains: The impact of firm characteristics and teams. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1255–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, B., Noble, J., & Anslow, C. (2019). Agile practices in practice: Towards a theory of agile adoption and process evolution. In P. Kruchten, S. Fraser, & F. Coallier (Eds.), Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming. XP 2019. Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 355). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kamaruddin, N. K., & Udin, Z. M. (2009). Supply chain technology adoption in Malaysian automotive suppliers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 20(3), 385–403.
   Google Scholar
• Keathley, H. R. (2016). Empirical investigation of factors that affect the successful implementation of performance measurement systems. Virginia Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. A., Scott, W. R., Shirvani, F., & Campbell, A. P. (2020). Modeling the evolution of organizational systems for the digital transformation of heavy rail. A Framework of Human Systems Engineering: Applications and Case Studies, 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119698821.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Kouzari, E., Gerogiannis, V. C., Stamelos, I., & Kakarontzas, G. (2015). Critical success factors and barriers for lightweight software process improvement in agile development: A literature review [Paper presentation]. 2015 10th International Joint Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT), Colmar, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Wen, Y., Liu, Q., Gürdür, D., & Törngren, M. (2018). MBSE applicability analysis in Chinese industry [Paper presentation]. INCOSE International Symposium, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Madni, A. M., & Sievers, M. (2018). Model‐based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Systems Engineering, 21(3), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanti, A. (2006). Challenges in enterprise adoption of agile methods-A survey. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 14(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.2006.03.03
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, T., Hutchison, N., Clifford, M., Van Aken, E., Salado, A., & Henderson, K. (2020). Benchmarking the benefits and current maturity of model-based systems engineering across the enterprise (SERC-2020-SR-001). https://sercuarc.org/results-of-the-serc-incose-ndia-mbse-maturity-survey-are-in/
   Google Scholar
• McVittie, T. I., Sindiy, O. V., & Simpson, K. A. (2012). Model-based system engineering of the Orion flight test 1 end-to-end information system [Paper presentation]. 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Meijaard, J., Brand, M. J., & Mosselman, M. (2005). Organizational structure and performance in Dutch small firms. Small Business Economics, 25(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-4259-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millham, R., & Eid, C. (2010). Business process reengineering subsequent to IT adoption in hierarchically structured organizations [Paper presentation]. 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, B. A., Harvey, D., Robinson, K. P., & Cook, S. C. (2016). Issues in conceptual design and MBSE successes: Insights from the model‐based conceptual design surveys [Paper presentation]. INCOSE International Symposium, Edinburgh, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Motamedian, B. (2013). MBSE applicability analysis. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(2), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Nahm, A. Y., Vonderembse, M. A., & Koufteros, X. A. (2003). The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00107-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, D.-L. (2011). An empirical study of IT potential absorptive capacity [Paper presentation]. 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC), Deng Feng, China.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., & Fraga, M. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110‑121.
   Google Scholar
• Papke, B. L., Wang, G., Kratzke, R., & Schreiber, C. (2020). Implementing MBSE–An enterprise approach to an enterprise problem [Paper presentation]. INCOSE International Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, J. (1973). Measures of organizational structure: A methodological note. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1086/225590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, R., Endres, H., & Bouncken, R. B. (2021). Digital product innovation management: Balancing stability and fluidity through formalization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Qumer, A., & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2008). A framework to support the evaluation, adoption and improvement of agile methods in practice. The Journal of Systems & Software, 81(11), 1899–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A., & Patnayakuni, R. (1996). A structural model for CASE adoption behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518129
   Google Scholar
• Ramayah, T., & Abdullah, H. S. (2007). An examination of the validity and reliability of the organizational structure scale in the Malaysian context: Preliminary results. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship (JIBE), 13(1), 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structures, designs, and applications, 3/e. Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. In Organizational Research Methods (Vol. 10, pp. 195–209). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294693
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenfeld, G. D. (2004). Surveys: An introduction. Respiratory Care, 49(10), 1181–1185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. (2014). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics (3rd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. Jr. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17(4), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinde Cantorna, A. I., Álvarez-Llorente, G., & Diéguez-Castrillón, I. (2013). From steam to diesel in the Spanish fisheries sector: A multilevel perspective in the study of technology diffusion processes. Coastal Management, 41(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2013.803920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, Y. E., Prastacos, G. P., & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). The relationship between information and communication technologies adoption and management. Information & Management, 39(8), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00141-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington books.
   Google Scholar
• Tower, J. (2013). Model based systems engineering-the state of the nation [Paper presentation]. INCOSE UK Annual Systems Engineering Conference (ASEC), Oxfordshire, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, Q., & Tian, Y. (2013). Organizational structure: Influencing factors and impact on a firm. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2013.32028
   Google Scholar
• Trauth, S. L., Carroll, E. R., Matta, A. P., Salguero, L. M., & Griego, R. M. (2017). MBSE culture configuration and integration at Sandia national laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/257550
   Google Scholar
• Walton, E. J. (1981). The comparison of measures of organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/257149
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Izygon, M., Okon, S., Wagner, H., & Garner, L. (2016). Effort to accelerate MBSE adoption and usage at JSC. In AIAA SPACE 2016 (p. 5542).
   Google Scholar
• Weilkiens, T., Scheithauer, A., DiMaio, M., & Klusmann, N. (2016). Evaluating and comparing MBSE methodologies for practitioners [Paper presentation]. 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, W., Cavanaugh, M. R., Bouffard, J. A., & Nobles, M. R. (2012). Non-response bias with a web-based survey of college students: Differences from a classroom survey about carrying concealed handguns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9148-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar