Speech Repression and Outrage from Orthodox Activists as Attempts at Facilitating Mobilization and Gaining Status among Allies

References

• Amnesty International. (2021). Amnesty International Report 2021. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/east-asia/china/report-china/
   Google Scholar
• Atran, S. (2016). The devoted actor: Unconditional commitment and intractable conflict across cultures. Current Anthropology, 57(S13), S192–S203. https://doi.org/10.1086/685495
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. (2022). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumard, N., André, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaine, T., & Boyer, P. (2018). Origins of sinister rumors: A preference for threat-related material in the supply and demand of information. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P., & Parren, N. (2015). Threat-related information suggests competence: A possible factor in the spread of rumors. PloS One, 10(6), e0128421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B., & Kurzban, R. (2014). Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1797), 20142112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disinvitation Database. (2022). FIRE. https://www.thefire.org/research/disinvitation-database/
   Google Scholar
• Donald Trump wants to jail flag burners for one year if he wins second term. (2020, October 15). The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-biden-flag-burn-jail-protest-us-election-2020-b1053709.html
   Google Scholar
• Fessler, D. M. T., Pisor, A. C., & Navarrete, C. D. (2014). Negatively-biased credulity and the cultural evolution of beliefs. PloS One, 9(4), e95167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-001
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., & James, A. S. (2020). Moral grandstanding and political polarization: A multi-study consideration. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., James, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict. PloS One, 14(10), e0223749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Lukianoff, G. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D., & Andrews, P. W. (2015). The evolution of cognitive bias. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 724–746). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch25
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. (1950). Enemies from within. Digital History Project, University of Texas. https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/1950%20McCarthy%20Enemies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laustsen, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2015). Does a competent leader make a good friend? Conflict, ideology and the psychologies of friendship and followership. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laustsen, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2020). Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukianoff, G., & Weiss, R. (2020, June 24). Campus cancel culture: What you need to know—past, present, and future. FIRE. https://www.thefire.org/campus-cancel-culture-what-you-need-to-know-past-present-and-future/
   Google Scholar
• Marie, A., & Petersen, M. B. (in press). Moralization of rationality can stimulate sharing of hostile and false news on social media, but intellectual humility inhibits it. https://osf.io/k7u68/
   Google Scholar
• Marie, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2022b). Political conspiracy theories as tools for mobilization and signaling. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mchangama, J. (2022). Free speech: A History from Socrates to social media. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McWhorter, J. (2021). Woke racism: How a new religion has betrayed Black America. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2020). Not born yesterday: The science of who we trust and what we believe. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(19), E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettle, D. (2016). Tyneside Neighbourhoods: Deprivation, social life and social behaviour in one British city. In Tyneside Neighbourhoods: Deprivation, social life and social behaviour in one British city. Open Book Publishers. http://books.openedition.org/obp/1893
   Google Scholar
• Nechepurenko, I., & Kramer, A. E. (2021, December 28). Russian court orders prominent human rights group to shut. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/28/world/europe/russia-memorial-human-rights.htm
   Google Scholar
• Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35(1), 1–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4600969 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B. (2020). The evolutionary psychology of mass mobilization: How disinformation and demagogues coordinate rather than manipulate. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., & Aarøe, L. (2013). Politics in the mind’s eye: Imagination as a link between social and political cognition. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2020). Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Arceneaux, K. (2018). A “need for chaos” and the sharing of hostile political rumors in advanced democracies. [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6m4ts
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W. (1960). TOWARDS AN EXPLANATION OF McCARTHYISM1. Political Studies, 8(3), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1960.tb01144.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M., Toch, H. H., & Rottman, T. (1960). The effect of threat on the dogmatization of Catholicism. In The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems (pp. 376–388). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Z. K., & Keefer, L. A. (2017). A cleansing fire: Moral outrage alleviates guilt and buffers threats to one’s moral identity. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9601-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russia bans Memorial, a seminal human-rights group. (n.d). The Economist. Retrieved May 14, 2022, from https://www.economist.com/europe/2022/01/01/russia-bans-memorial-a-seminal-human-rights-group
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, K. (2016, November 16). Donald Trump: Flag burners should spend a year in jail. Time. https://time.com/4584614/donald-trump-burn-us-flag/
   Google Scholar
• Sherstoboeva, E. (2020). Regulation of online freedom of expression in Russia in the context of the council of europe standards. In S. Davydov (Ed.), Internet in Russia: A study of the runet and its impact on social life (pp. 83–100). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33016-3_5
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language, 12(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. W. (1981). The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Animal Behaviour, 29(2), 628–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80128-5
   Google Scholar
• Stouffer, S. A. (1954). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties study, 1954: Version 2. [Data set]. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07202.V2
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In H. Høgh-Olesen (Ed.), Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 91–234). Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics: MDE, 27(2–3), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 13(6), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, D. (2022). Signalling, commitment, and strategic absurdities. Mind & Language, 37(5), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar