The blind obedience of others: a better than average effect in a Milgram-like experiment

References

• Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. I. Krueger (Eds.), Studies in self and identity (pp. 85–106). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Crossman, M. T. (2009). Reducing sexual violence on campus: The role of student leaders as empowered bystanders. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bègue, L., Beauvois, J. -L., Courbet, D., Oberlé, D., Lepage, J., & Duke, A. A. (2015). Personality predicts obedience in a Milgram paradigm. Journal of Personality, 83(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bègue, L., & Vezirian, K. (2022a). Instrumental harm toward animals in a Milgram-Like experiment: The role of non-pathological personality traits. In O. Chan & R. Wong (Eds.), Animal abuse and interpersonal violence: A psycho-criminological understanding. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bègue, L., & Vezirian, K. (2022b). Sacrificing animals in the name of scientific authority: The relationship between pro-scientific mindset and the lethal use of animals in biomedical experimentation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(10), 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211039413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blass, T. (1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? The American Psychologist, 64(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0010932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspar, E. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26(5), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (2003). Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codol, J. P. (1975). On the so-called ‘superior conformity of the self’ behavior: Twenty experimental investigations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(4), 457–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420050404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, Pt.1), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doliński, D., Grzyb, T., Folwarczny, M., Grzybała, P., Krzyszycha, K., Martynowska, K., & Trojanowski, J. (2017). Would you deliver an electric shock in 2015? Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 years following the original studies. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693060
   Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., & Mullin, B. -A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1995). The perceived influence of AIDS advertising: Third-person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, A., & Milgram, S. (1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative commands. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1(4), 289–292.
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, S. D., Carson, D., & Pope, T. J. (2019). “I would never fall for that”: The use of an illegitimate authority to teach social psychological principles. Teaching of Psychology, 46(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319834200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C. A., Clarke, J. A., & Packard, G. A. (2018). Can I see the real me? Leadership ability and the better-than-average effect. Military Psychology, 30(5), 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2018.1478545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. (2013). Milgram’s obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02070.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graupmann, V., & Frey, D. (2014). Bad examples: How thinking about blind obedience can induce responsibility and courage. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(2), 124–134.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. The American Psychologist, 35(7), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzyb, T., & Dolinski, D. (2017). Beliefs about Obedience Levels in Studies Conducted within the Milgram Paradigm: Better than Average Effect and Comparisons of Typical Behaviors by Residents of Various Nations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2017). 50 years of “Obedience to authority”: From blind conformity to engaged followership. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113710
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Millard, K., & McDonald, R. (2015). ‘Happy to have been of service’: The Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram’s ‘obedience’ experiments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12074
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, Y. H., Kwon, H., & Chiu, C. Y. (2017). The better-than-average effect is observed because “Average” is often construed as below-median ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00898
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein, N., & Epley, N. (2017). Less evil than you: Bounded self-righteousness in character inferences, emotional reactions, and behavioral extremes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(8), 1202–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217711918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviston, Z., & Uren, H. V. (2020). Overestimating one’s “Green” behavior: Better-than-average bias may function to reduce perceived personal threat from climate change. The Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12365
   Google Scholar
• Logg, J. M., Haran, U., & Moore, D. A. (2018). Is overconfidence a motivated bias? Experimental evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(10), 1445–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loughnan, S., Leidner, B., Doron, G., Haslam, N., Kashima, Y., Tong, J., & Yeung, V. (2010). Universal biases in self-perception: Better and more human than average. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X487779
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social Influence Effects on Automatic Racial Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mojzisch, A., Elster, C., & Germar, M. (2022). People perceive themselves to adhere more strictly to COVID-19 guidelines than others. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27(2), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1906435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujal, G. N., Taylor, M. E., Fry, J. L., Gochez-Kerr, T. H., & Weaver, N. L. (2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, W., & van der Pligt, J. (1996). Context effects in the measurement of optimism in probability judgment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_4
   Google Scholar
• Perry, G. (2012). Behind the shock machine: The untold story of the notorious Milgram psychology experiments. Scribe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2011). After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram ‘obedience’ studies: Social identity and the Milgram studies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02015.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., Haslam, A., & Smith, J. (2012). Working toward the experimenter: Reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M. D., & Taylor, S. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, Y., & Mols, F. (2018). Our followers are lions, theirs are sheep: How social identity shapes theories about the nature of followership and the mechanisms of social influence. Political Psychology, 39(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., Lemos, K., & Stewart, H. L. (2002). Self-esteem, construal, and comparisons with the self, friends, and peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violato, E., King, S., & Bulut, O. (2022). Conformity, obedience, and the Better than Average Effect in health professional students. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 13(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.71970
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. The Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdunek, R. Z., Czarna, A. Z., & Sedikides, C. (2022). Grandiose (communal and agentic) narcissism and predicted disobedience in the Milgram paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 189, 11154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziano, I., Mok, P. Y., & Feldman, G. (2021). Replication and Extension of Alicke (1985) Better-Than-Average Effect for Desirable and Controllable Traits. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 1005–1017.
   Google Scholar