129
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sensitivity to moral goodness under different aesthetic contexts

, , , &

References

  • Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(8), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1476
  • Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 143–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X
  • Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 15(3), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.556
  • Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real‐world scenes: Effects of object–scene consistency. Visual Cognition, 16(2–3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280701453623
  • Bublatzky, F., Kavcolu, F., Guerra, P., Doll, S., & Junghfer, M. (2020). Contextual information resolves uncertainty about ambiguous facial emotions: Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates. NeuroImage, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116814
  • Cornelissen, T. H. W., & Melissa, L. V. (2016). Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 79(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1203-7
  • Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychology Science, 15(8), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
  • Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2005). The locus of semantic priming in rsvp target search. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195313
  • De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868064
  • Draschkow, D., & Võ, M. L. H. (2017). Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 16471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16739-x
  • Droll, J. A., & Eckstein, M. P. (2008). Expected object position of two hundred fifty observers predicts first fixations of seventy seven separate observers during search. Journal of Vision, 8(6), 320. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.6.320
  • Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17(11), 973–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x
  • Fernandes, E. G., Phillips, L. H., Slessor, G., & Tatler, B. W. (2021). The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(5), 1954–1970. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02242-z
  • He, X. Y., Chen, Y. J., Yang, D. N., & He, D. X. (2019). The influence of fluidity on aesthetic appreciation. Journal of South China Nanormal University, 3(7), 71–76.
  • Heinzelmann, N. C., Weber, S. C., & Tobler, P. N. (2020). Aesthetics and morality judgments share cortical neuroarchitecture. Cortex, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.018
  • Heise, N., & Ansorge, U. (2014). Scene priming and location priming in scene-object consistency effects. Perception Ecvp Abstract, 43, 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00520
  • Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L., & Schandl, C. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 850–856. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.850
  • Hietanen, J. K., & Astikainen, P. (2013). N170 response to facial expressions is modulated by the affective concurrency between the emotional expression and preceding affective picture. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.10.005
  • Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394775
  • Lam, S. Y., Ho-Ying Fu, J., & Li, D. (2017). The influence of thematic product displays on consumers: An elaboration‐based account. Psychology & Marketing, 34(9), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21028
  • LaPointe, M. R. P., Lupianez, J., & Milliken, B. (2013). Context congruency effects in change detection: Opposing effects on detection and identification. Visual Cognition, 21(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.787133
  • LaPointe, M. R. P., & Milliken, B. (2016). Semantically incongruent objects attract eye gaze when viewing scenes for change. Visual Cognition, 24(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1185070
  • Lee, K. E., Williams, K. J. H., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S. G., & Johnson, K. A. (2015). 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42(6), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003
  • Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(4), 565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
  • Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8
  • Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009
  • Pannasch, S., Helmert, J. R., Roth, K., Herbold, A. K., & Walter, H. (2008). Visual fixation durations and saccade amplitudes: Shifting relationship in a variety of conditions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.2.4
  • Paris, P. (2019). Moral beauty and education. Journal of Moral Education, 48(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1584554
  • Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187(4180), 965–966. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145183
  • Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692
  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  • Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Norbert, S. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science 9(1), 45–48
  • Rest, J. R. (1984). Research on moral development: Implications for training counseling psychologists. The Counseling Psychologist, 12(3), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000084123003
  • Romero-Ferreiro, V., Aguado, L., Torío, I., Sánchez-Morla, E. M., Caballero-González, M., & Rodriguez-Jimenez, R. (2018). Influence of emotional contexts on facial emotion attribution in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 270, 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.034
  • Schirmer, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Beyond the right hemisphere: Brain mechanisms mediating vocal emotional processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.009
  • Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(2), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00108-8
  • Shen, H., Jiang, Y., & Rashmi, A. (2010). Contrast and assimilation effects of processing fluency. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1086/612425
  • Spears, D. F., Fernández-Linsenbarth, I., Okan Gil, Y., Ruz Cámara, M., & González Reyes, F. (2018). Disfluent fonts lead to more utilitarian decisions in moral dilemmas. Psicológica Journal, 39(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/psicolj-2018-0003
  • Spotorno, S., Tatler, B. W., & Faure, S. (2013). Semantic consistency versus perceptual salience in visual scenes: Findings from change detection. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.009
  • Torralba, A. (2003). Contextual priming for object detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 53(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023052124951
  • Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(11), 1931–1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500416342
  • Underwood, G., Templeman, E., Lamming, L., & Foulsham, T. (2008). Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.008
  • Võ, M.L. -H., Boettcher, S. E., & Draschkow, D. (2019). Reading scenes: How scene grammar guides attention and aids perception in real-world environments. Current Opinion Psychology, 29, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.009
  • Võ, M. L. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.3.24
  • Wu, C., & He, X. (2021). Environmental aesthetic value influences the intention for moral behavior: Changes in behavioral moral judgment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126477
  • Zhang, X., Liu, Z., & Xuan, Y. (2013). The role of emotional scenes in facial expressional recognition: Priming versus contextual effect. International Conference on Information Science & Technology. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2013.6747489
  • Zheng, X. J., & Cen, G. Z. (2007). The Development and Prospect of Researches on Moral Sensitivity, Advances in Psychological Science, 15 (1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2007.01.017

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.