Subordinate or Entitled Partner? The Effects of Taxpayer News on Political Trust and Demands for Government Accountability

References

• Althaus, S., Edy, J., & Phalen, P. (2001). Using substitutes for full-text news stories in content analysis: Which text is best? American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 707–723. doi:10.2307/2669247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, B. C. (2007). Media-generated shortcuts: Do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(2), 24–43. doi:10.1177/1081180X07299795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., & Moy, P. (2017). The media and the fostering of political (dis)trust. In K. Kenski & K. Jamieson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 581–594). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, C. R., Fraedrich, J. P., & Iyer, R. (2002). Framing effects within the ethical decision making process of consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(1), 119–140. doi:10.1023/A:1014229124279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US. Political Communication, 25(3), 269–289. doi:10.1080/10584600802197434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., & Livingston, S. (2006). None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press Independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467–485. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleich, E., Nisar, H., & Vazquez, C. (2018). Investigating status hierarchies with media analysis: Muslims, Jews, And Catholics in the new york times and the guardian headlines, 1985–2014. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 59(3), 239–257. doi:10.1177/0020715218775142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D. (2002). Building Leviathan: Revenue, state capacity, and governance. IDS Bulletin, 33(3), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D. (2008). Taxation and governance in Africa: Take a second look. Development Policy Outlook, 1, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2010). Studying the effects of framing on public opinion about policy issues: Does what we see depend on how we look? In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 159–186). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broms, R. (2015). Putting up or shutting up: On the individual-level relationship between taxpaying and political interest in a developmental context. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 93–109. doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.957276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, E., Flynn, D. J., & Druckman, J. N. (2018). Studying framing effects on political preferences: Existing research and lingering questions. In P. D’Angelo (Ed.), Doing News Framing Analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 27–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of Cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casal, S., Kogler, C., Mittone, L., & Kirchler, E. (2016). Tax compliance depends on voice of taxpayers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citrin, J., & Luks, S. (2001). Political Trust Revisited. (J. R. Hibbing & E. Theiss-Morse, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics, 67(3), 784–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122. doi:10.1080/105846001750322934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dor, D. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 695–721. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, G. (2007). The Founders' legal case: ”No taxation without representation” versus Taxation no tyranny. Houston Law Review, 44, 1377–1414.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1015006907312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, F. (2001). Breaching powerful boundaries: A postmodern critique of framing. In S. D. Reese, J. Oscar, H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp.123–136). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, L., & Frey, B. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87–99. doi:10.1007/s101010100032
   Google Scholar
• Feld, L., & Frey, B. (2007). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law & Policy, 29(1), 102–120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00248.x
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. doi:10.1037/h0041593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Liberman, N. (2013). Knowledge activation. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 201–231). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1988). The 1987 distinguished lecture: A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion. Symbolic Interaction, 11(2), 161–174. doi:10.1525/si.1988.11.2.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M., & Rudolph, T. (2018). Political trust and polarization. In E. Uslaner (Ed.), The oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 579–597). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E., & Kirchler, E. (2008). Preconditions of voluntary tax compliance: Knowledge and evaluation of taxation, norms, fairness, and motivation to cooperate. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216(4), 209–217. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.4.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johann, D., Königslöw, K. K.-V., Kritzinger, S., & Thomas, K. (2018). Intra-campaign changes in voting preferences: The impact of media and party communication. Political Communication, 35(2), 261–286. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1339222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kananovich, V. (2018). Framing the taxation-democratization link: An automated content analysis of cross-national newspaper data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 247–267. doi:10.1177/1940161218771893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kananovich, V., & Young, R. (2019). Too hard to shout over the loudest frame: Effects of competing frames in the context of the crystallized media coverage on offshore outsourcing. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27(2), 99–113. doi:10.1080/15456870.2019.1574795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, M., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Stark, J., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Individual attitudes and social representations of taxation, tax avoidance and tax evasion. In Nigar Hashimzade & Yuliya Epifantseva (Eds.), The Routledge companion to tax avoidance research (pp. 289–303). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, J., & Martin, I. (2012). What we talk about when we talk about taxes. Symbolic Interaction, 35(2), 123–145. doi:10.1002/symb.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-E. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611–635. doi:10.1177/0095399705278596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebanov, B., Diermeier, D., & Beigman, E. (2008). Automatic annotation of semantic fields for political science research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5(1), 95–120. doi:10.1080/19331680802149640
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (1989). Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, I. (2012). The face of the enemy: The effect of press-reported visual information regarding the facial features of opponent politicians on support for peace. Political Communication, 29(3), 243–256. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.694987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I. W., & Prasad, M. (2014). Taxes and fiscal sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A., & Craig, S. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. doi:10.1037/a0028085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E. (2013). Issue framing. In G. C. Edwards & L. R. Jacobs (Eds.), The oxford handbook of American politic opinion and the media (pp. 189–203). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties con-flict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paler, L. (2013). Keeping the public purse: An experiment in windfalls, taxes, and the incentives to restrain government. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 706–725. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2019, April 11). Public trust in government: 1958-2019. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/04/11/public-trust-in-government-1958-2019/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020, September 14). Americans’ views of government: Low trust, but some positive performance ratings. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/09/14/americans-views-of-government-low-trust-but-some-positive-performance-ratings/
   Google Scholar
• Price, R. (2006). Taxpayers: An analysis of taxpayer discourse and a sketch of taxpayers as social types ( Master’s_thesis). York University, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, W. (2015). Taxation, responsiveness and accountability in Sub-Saharan Africa: The dynamics of tax bargaining. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, W., Salardi, P., & Segal, P. (2018). Taxation, non-tax revenue and democracy: New evidence using new cross-country data. World Development, 109, 295–312. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. (2018). Foreword. In P. D’Angelo (Ed.), Doing News Framing Analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. xiii–xv). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Geiger, S. (1994). Designing experiments that assess psychological responses to media messages. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 165–180). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. (2004). Does taxation lead to representation? British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 229–249. doi:10.1017/S0007123404000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner, B. F., & Atkinson, M. L. (2010). Taxing death or estates? When frames influence citizens’ issue beliefs. In B. F. Schaffner & P. J. Sellers (Eds.), Winning with Words: The origins and impact of political framing (pp. 121–135). NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2012). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political communication theories (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J., & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398–417. doi:10.2307/2991764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Boyle, M. P., Schmierbach, M., Keum, H., & Armstrong, C. L. (2010). Specificity, complexity, and validity: Rescuing experimental research on framing effects. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 215–232). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2013). Tax crusaders and the politics of direct democracy. NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. (2016). Legitimacy gaps, taxpayer conflict, and the politics of austerity in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(2), 389–406. doi:10.1177/1369148115615031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upham-Bornstein, L. (2009). The taxpayer as reformer: “Pocketbook politics” and the law, 1860–1940 ( PhD Dissertation). University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Veneti, A., Karadimitriou, A., & Poulakidakos, S. (2016). Media ecology and the politics of dissent: Representations of the Hong Kong protests in the guardian and china daily. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R. (2012). Framing in mass communication research–An overview and assessment. Sociology Compass, 6(12), 937–948. doi:10.1111/soc4.12003
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Carr, D. J., Nytes, J. P., & Shah, D. V. (2010). Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum: Understanding the underpinnings of message effects. Political Communication, 27(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10584600903297927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2018). Racial taxation: Schools, segregation, and taxpayer citizenship, 1869–1973. Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, V. (2017). Read My Lips: Why Americans are Proud to Pay Taxes. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, V. (2018). Who are “the taxpayers”? The Forum, 16(3), 399–418. doi:10.1515/for-2018-0027
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, K. (2019). Mobilizing political strategy: The global practices of taxpayer groups. In D. Laycock (Ed.), Political ideology in parties, policy, and civil society: Interdisciplinary insights (pp. 132–148). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelenak, L. (2013). Learning to love form 1040: Two cheers for the return-based mass income tax. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar