An Analysis and Comparison of the Instructor-Student Relationship Using Relational Framing Theory

References

• Allen, M., Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21–31. doi:10.1080/03634520500343368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby-King, D. T. (2021). More than just a variable: COVD-19 and the call to complicate communication education research. Communication Education, 70(2), 205–207. doi:10.1080/03634523.2020.1857417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. -J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51(3), 193–214. doi:10.1080/03637758409390195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54(1), 19–41. doi:10.1080/03637758709390214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2017). A relative commitment approach to understanding power in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 68(1), 115–130. doi:10.1080/10510974.2016.1268639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/01463379909370120
   Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2018). Too close for comfort? Faculty–student multiple relationships and their impact on student classroom conduct. Ethics & Behavior, 28(1), 23–44. doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1206475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Solomon, D. H. (2005). Measuring the relevance of relational frames: A relational framing theory perspective. In V. Manusov (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 325–334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1996). Framing social reality. Communication Research, 23(6), 703–724. doi:10.1177/009365096023006004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher‐student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223. doi:10.1080/01463370409370193
   Google Scholar
• Docan-Morgan, T., & Manusov, V. (2009). Relational turning point events and their outcomes in college teacher-student relationships from students’ perspectives. Communication Education, 58(2), 155–188. doi:10.1080/03634520802515713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., Watson, W. K., Pollino, M. A., & Shetterly, J. R. (2021). “Treat me like a person, rather than another number”: University student perceptions of inclusive classroom practices. Communication Education, 70(1), 92–111. doi:10.1080/03634523.2020.1812680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2014). Interpersonal communication’s peculiar identity crisis. Communication Studies, 65(4), 429–431. doi:10.1080/10510974.2014.927291
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B., Dillow, M., Gaughan, S., & Nordlund, J. (2011). Flirtatious communication: An experimental examination of perceptions of social-sexual communication motivated by evolutionary forces. Sex Roles, 64(9–10), 682–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9864-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Hosek, A. M., & Beck, A. C. (2020). The role of classroom relationships as sources of academic resilience and hope. Communication Quarterly, 68(3), 289–305. doi:10.1080/01463373.2020.1779099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B., & Martin, M. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1994). The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(2), 87–105. doi:10.1080/00909889409365391
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 197–212. doi:10.1080/01463370500089896
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Goldman, Z. W., & Claus, C. J. (2019). Why nonverbal immediacy matters: A motivation explanation. Communication Quarterly, 67(5), 526–539. doi:10.1080/01463373.2019.1668442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49(3), 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Cranmer, G. A., Sollitto, M., LaBelle, S., & Lancaster, A. L. (2017). What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics. Communication Education, 66(3), 280–298. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1265135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golish, T. D., & Olson, L. N. (2000). Students’ use of power in the classroom: An investigation of student power, teacher power, and teacher immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 48(3), 293–310. doi:10.1080/01463370009385598
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Kashy, D. A. (2017). Interpersonal communication research in instructional contexts: A dyadic approach. Communication Education, 66(1), 113–115. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1221515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Revisiting instructor misbehaviors: A revised typology and development of a measure. Communication Education, 64(2), 133–153. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. E. (2004). Relational Communication Scale. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication Research Measures: A sourcebook. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.921613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A. (2016). Interpreting social-sexual communication: Relational framing theory and social-sexual communication, attraction, and intent. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 138–164. doi:10.1111/hcre.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communications Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, R., Dillard, J., Tusing, K., & Solomon, D. (2014). Relational framing theory: Utterance form and relational context as antecedents of frame salience. Communication Quarterly, 62(5), 518–535. doi:10.1080/01463373.2014.949387
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. J., & Cheney, G. (1996). The student as consumer: The implications and limitations of a metaphor. Communication Education, 45(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/03634529609379028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWorthy, L., & Henningsen, D. D. (2014). Looking at favorable and unfavorable superior-subordinate relationships through dominance and affiliation lenses. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(2), 123–137. doi:10.1177/2329488414525195
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1971). Nonverbal communication. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 19, 107–161.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Frymier, A. B., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). Theorizing about instructional communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 255–282). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2017). The instructor-student relationship as an alternative form of superior–subordinate relationship. Communication Education, 66(1), 110–112. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1221513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Huebner, A. D. (2011). The relationship between students’ motives to communicate with their instructors and perceived instructor credibility, attractiveness, and homophily. College Student Journal, 45(1), 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Tindage, M. F., & Atkinson, J. (2016). The evolution of instructional communication research. In P. Witt (Ed.), Handbook of communication and science: Communication and learning (pp. 13–42). De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9781501502446
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41(2), 167 180. doi:10.1080/03634529209378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F., & Scott, M. D. (1980). Student learning as a relational outcome of teacher-student interaction. Communication Yearbook, 4(1), 553–564. doi:10.1080/23808985.1980.11923824
   Google Scholar
• Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., & Arias, V. S. (2017). The interplay between interpersonal communication and instructional communication. Communication Education, 66(1), 118–120. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1221512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pytlak, M. A., & Houser, M. (2014). Because I’m the teacher and I said so: GTA use of behavior alteration techniques to establish power and credibility in the college classroom. Western Journal of Communication, 78(3), 287–309. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.893010
   Google Scholar
• Rudick, C. K., & Golsan, K. B. (2014). Revisiting the relational communication perspective: Drawing upon relational dialectics theory to map an expanded research agenda for communication and instruction scholarship. Western Journal of Communication, 78(3), 255–273. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.905796
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. D., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). Student perceptions of instructor communication behaviors and their relationship to student evaluation. Communication Education, 30(1), 44–53. doi:10.1080/03634528109378452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2002). Episode type, attachment orientation, and frame salience: Evidence for a theory of relational framing. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 136–152. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2004). Relational power, marital schema, and decisions to withhold complaints: An investigation of the chilling effect on confrontation in marriage. Communication Studies, 55(1), 146–167. doi:10.1080/10510970409388610
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., & McLaren, R. M. (2008). Relational framing theory: Drawing inferences about relationships from interpersonal interactions. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 103–115). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Straits, W. (2007). “She’s teaching me”: Teaching with care in a large lecture course. College Teaching, 55(4), 170–175. doi:10.3200/CTCH.55.4.170-175
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & Herring, J. E. (2005). Teacher influence in the classroom: A preliminary investigation of perceived instructor power, credibility, and student satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 22(3), 235–246. doi:10.1080/00036810500230685
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S. (2017). Improving situational awareness for instructional communication research: A forum response. Communication Education, 66(1), 122–125. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1245861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turman, P. D., & Schrodt, P. (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55(3), 265–279. doi:10.1080/03634520600702570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallade, J. I., & Kaufmann, R. (2021). Instructor misbehavior and student outcomes: Replication and extension in the online classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(2), 206–222. 10.1080/15391523.2020.1766389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallade, J. I., Kaufmann, R., & Frey, T. K. (2020). Facilitating students’ motivation in the basic communication course: A self-determination theory perspective. Basic Communication Course Annual, 32, 124–147.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. Annals of the International Communication Association, 24(1), 207–229. doi:10.1080/23808985.2001.11678987
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., & LaBelle, S. (2016). Theoretical and methodological approaches to instructional communication. In P. Witt (Ed.), Handbook of communication and science: Communication and learning (pp. 67–104). De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9781501502446
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2011). The development and testing of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 60(1), 51–74. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., & Houser, M. (2007). Student communication motives and interpersonal attraction toward instructor. Communication Research Reports, 24(3), 215–224. doi:10.1080/08824090701439091
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P., Wheeless, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A Meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar