Virtual Balancing: How Digital Environments Influence the Participation and Efficiency of Cross-Sector Partnerships

References

• Abrahamsson Lindeblad, P., Voytenko, Y., Mont, O., & Arnfalk, P. (2015). Organisational effect of virtual meetings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(2016), 113–123. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.058
   Google Scholar
• Adami, E., & Kress, G. R. (2010). The social semiotics of convergent mobile devices: New forms of composition and the transformation of habitus. In G. R. Kress, Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication (pp. 184–197). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2014). Kommunikation, makt och organisation: Närläsning och multipla tolkningar. [Communication, power and organization: Close reading and multiple interpretations.]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 2008. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. R. (2021). For everyone” means “For no one: ”: Membership tensions in community collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(3), 392–417. doi:10.1177/08933189211000324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2015). Organizational discourse: Communication and constitution. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2020). Media: Why it matters. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2010). Environmental communication and the public sphere (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester P.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J. S., Cooper, K. R., & Shumate, M. (2019). Use and affordances of ICTs in interorganizational collaboration: an exploratory study of ICTs in nonprofit partnerships. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 219–237. doi:10.1177/0893318918824041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science, 6(4), 337–349. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.4.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2000). Participation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 177–180. doi:10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.177
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., & Purdy, J. (2018). Collaborating for our future: Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., Leppänen, V., & Åkerström, M. (2019). Mötesboken: tolkningar av arbetslivets sammanträden och rosévinsmingel [Book of meetings: Interpretations of the sittings and mingles at work]. Malmö: Égalité.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T., & Phillips, N. (2006). Swimming with sharks: Creating strategic change through multi-sector collaboration. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 1(1/2), 96–112. doi:10.1504/IJSCM.2006.011105
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G., & Isbell, M. G. (2017). Interorganizational collaboration: Complexity, ethics, and communication. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, J. (2017). Collaboration. In C. R. Scott, L. Lewis, J. R. Barker, J. Keyton, T. Kuhn, & P. K. Turner (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 280–295). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, J., & Stallworth, V. (2003). On the verge of collaboration: Interaction processes versus group outcomes. In R. Frey Lawrence (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2 ed., pp. 235–260). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M. A. (2020). Collabrocation: Thinking communicatively about collaboration. In M. A. Koschmann & M. L. Sanders (Eds.), Understanding nonprofit work – a communication perspective (pp. 77–107). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M. A., & Burk, N. R. (2016). Accomplishing authority in collaborative work. Western Journal of Communication, 80(4), 393–413. doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1159728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 332–354. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0314
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M. A., & Sanders, M. L. (2020). Developing a communication perspective on the nonprofit. In M. A. Koschmann & M. L. Sanders (Eds.), Understanding nonprofit work – a communication perspective (pp. 1–27). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. W., Hoelscher, C. S., Nguyen, C., Day, E. A., & Cooper, O. D. (2017). Structuration processer in an interagency collaboration: Enabling and constraining participation and efficiency. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(4), 429–444. doi:10.1080/00909882.2017.1355558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2018). Doing visual analysis: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K. (2006). Collaborative interaction: Review Of communication scholarship and a research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 197–247. doi:10.1080/23808985.2006.11679058
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L., Isbell, M. G., & Koschmann, M. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners’ experience of interorganizational relationships. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 460–479. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.523605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markaki, V., & Mondada, L. (2012). Embodied orientations towards co-participants in multinational meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 31–52. doi:10.1177/1461445611427210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, C. (2003) Doing “Groupness” in a spatially distributed work group: The case of videoconferences at technics In: R. Frey Lawrence (Ed.). Group communication in context: studies of Bona Fide Groups. (2. ed.) Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Meyrowitz, J. (1995). Taking McLuhan and “Medium theory” Seriously: Technological change and the evolution of education. In S. T. Kerr (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling, 95th yearbook (pp. 73–110). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. (2015). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes (7th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, J., & Mathiassen, L. (2012). Knowledge coordination in distributed software management: An analysis of breakdowns in multimodal virtual meetings. ECIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 1.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, J. S., & Mathiassen, L. (2014). Investigating multimodal communication in virtual meetings: The sharing of dynamic representations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1). doi:10.17705/1CAIS.03479
   Google Scholar
• Saffer, A. J., Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2018). Reconsidering power in multistakeholder relationship management. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 121–139. doi:10.1177/0893318917700510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shumate, M., Atouba, Y., Cooper, K. R., & Pilny, A. (2017). Interorganizational communication. In C. R. Scott & L. K. Lewis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1317- 1339). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stenglin, M. (2014). Space & communication in exhibitions: Unravelling the nexus. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 419–430). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. (2015). Meeting in the global workplace: Air travel, telepresence and the body. Mobilities, 10(4), 592–608. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.902655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2012). Interaction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 3–10. doi:10.1177/1461445611427203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2014). When organization fails: Why authority matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Coping with problems of understanding in interorganizational relationships: Using formalization as a means to make sense. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1617–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. E. (2019). Collaboration in environmental conflict management and decision-making: Comparing best practices with insights from collaborative learning work. Frontiers in Communication, 4. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00002
   Google Scholar