More-Than-Human Ethics of Care in the Poetry of Mary Oliver

References

• Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. T. (2019). Naming, mourning, and the work of earthly coexistence. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 287–299. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1561485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonds, D. S. (1992). The language of nature in the poetry of Mary Oliver. Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. S. (2002). Introduction. In J. Scott Bryson (Ed.), Ecopoetry: A critical introduction (pp. 1–13). Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1965). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Clary-Lemon, J. (2019). Planting the anthropocene: Rhetorics of natureculture. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, B. (2010). Fresh woods: Elegy and ecology among the ruins. In K. Weisman (Ed.), The oxford handbook of elegy (pp. 324–342). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deckha, M. (2018). Postcolonial. In L. Gruen (Ed.), Critical terms for animal studies (pp. 160–174). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2012). “Nothing comes without its world”: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, F. (2019). Mama’s last hug: Animal emotions and what they tell us about ourselves. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Farrier, D. (2019). Anthropocene poetics: Deep time, sacrifice zones, and extinction. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, R. (2017, November 27). What Mary Oliver’s critics don’t understand. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/27/what-mary-olivers-critics-dont-understand
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. (2017). Critical ecofeminism. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, V. J., Martin, K. N., & Ma, M. (2011). Visual wellbeing: Intersections of rhetorical theory and design. Design Issues, 27(2), 27–40. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00075-Martin
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, V. (1994). “Into the body of another”: Mary Oliver and the poetics of becoming other. Papers on Language and Literature, 30(4), 352–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. New York, NY: Lantern Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawhee, D. (2009). Moving bodies: Kenneth Burke at the edges of language. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawhee, D. (2015). Rhetoric’s sensorium. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, L. (2017). Recomposing ecopoetics: North American poetry of the self-conscious anthropocene. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. J. (2015). Dangerous crossings: Race, species, and nature in a multicultural age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, E. (2019, May 17). Unconcerned foxes: Guest post. Living Alongside Wildlife. https://livingalongsidewildlife.com/?p=5685
   Google Scholar
• McNew, J. (1989). Mary Oliver and the tradition of romantic nature poetry. Contemporary Literature, 30(1), 59–77. doi:10.2307/1208424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. D. (2017, April 13). Why we need Mary Oliver’s poems. The Christian Century. https://www.christiancentury.org/article/critical-essay/why-we-need-mary-oliver-s-poems
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. D. (2019, January 24). Remembering Mary Oliver and her prose. The Christian Century. https://www.christiancentury.org/article/faith-matters/remembering-mary-oliver-and-her-prose
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2022). What we owe our fellow animals. The New York Review of Books, LXIX(no. 4). https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/03/10/what-we-owe-our-fellow-animals-ethics-martha-nussbaum/
   Google Scholar
• O’connell, P. A. (2017). Enargeia, persuasion, and the vividness effect in athenian forensic oratory. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 20(3), 225–251. doi:10.1080/15362426.2017.1384766
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2008). Red bird. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2017). Devotions: The selected poems of Mary Oliver. New York City, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Peeples, J. A., & DeLuca, K. M. (2006). The truth of the matter: Motherhood, community and environmental justice. Women’s Studies in Communication, 29(1), 59–87. doi:10.1080/07491409.2006.10757628
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C., & Cox, R. (2022). Environmental communication and the public sphere (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quartz, S. (2022). Becoming more-than-human: Realizing earthly eudaimonia to (e)coflourish through an entangled ethos. Journalism and Media, 3(2), 235–253. doi:10.3390/journalmedia3020018
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Schutten, J. K. (2004). The gender of water and the pleasure of alienation: A critical analysis of visiting hoover dam. The Communication Review, 7(3), 259–283. doi:10.1080/10714420490492166
   Google Scholar
• Sand, K. (2016). “Tiny arctic ice.” Kaia Sand. http://kaiasand.net/tiny-arctic-ice/
   Google Scholar
• Seegert, N. (2016). Rewilding rhetoric with animate tthers. Review of Communication, 16(1), 77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology, and the stories we live by. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T. (2014). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, B. (2010). New York times environmental rhetoric: Constituting artists of living. Rhetoric Review, 30(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/07350198.2011.530101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (1994). Who cares? Women, care, and culture. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zona, K. H. (2011). An attitude of noticing: Mary Oliver’s ecological ethic. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 18(1), 123–142. doi:10.1093/isle/isr001
   Google Scholar