Architecture and Governance of Digital Business Ecosystems: A Systematic Literature Review

References

• Adi, S., & Heripracoyo, S. (2018). Potential benefits and logical design of web collaboration to support tourism promotion and marketing at provincial level in Indonesia. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(11). http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=9&IType=11
   Google Scholar
• Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alreshidi, E., Mourshed, M., & Rezgui, Y. (2016). Cloud-based BIM governance platform requirements and specifications: Software engineering approach using BPMN and UML. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, C., Oliveira, J., & Jansen, S. (2017). Software ecosystems governance a systematic literature review and research agenda. ICEIS 2017 - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 3. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006269402150226
   Google Scholar
• Amoretti, M., Grazioli, A., & Zanichelli, F. (2016). An autonomic approach for P2P/cloud collaborative environments. Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications, 9(6), 1226–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-015-0367-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appio, F. P., Cimino, M. G. C. A., Lazzeri, A., Martini, A., & Vaglini, G. (2018). Fostering distributed business logic in open collaborative networks: An integrated approach based on semantic and swarm coordination. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9691-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardolino, M., Saccani, N., Adrodegari, F., & Perona, M. (2020). A business model framework to characterize digital multisided platforms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6010010
   Google Scholar
• Aryan, V., Bertling, J., & Liedtke, C. (2021). Topology, typology, and dynamics of commons-based peer production: On platforms, actors, and innovation in the maker movement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulkemeier, F., Iacob, M. E., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2019). Platform-based collaboration in digital ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 29(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00341-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autiosalo, J., Ala Laurinaho, R., Mattila, J., Valtonen, M., Peltoranta, V., & Tammi, K. (2021). Towards integrated digital twins for industrial products: Case study on an overhead crane. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(2), 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averian, A. (2018). A reference architecture for digital ecosystems. Internet of Things - Technology, Applications and Standardization. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77395
   Google Scholar
• Baghizadeh, Z., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Schlagwein, D. (2020). Review and critique of the information systems development project failure literature: An argument for exploring information systems development project distress. Journal of Information Technology, 35(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396219832010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkat, A., Kechadi, M. T., Verticale, G., Filippini, I., & Capone, A. (2018). Green approach for joint management of geo-distributed data centers and interconnection networks. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 26(3), 723–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-017-9441-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios-Rubio, A., & Gutiérrez-García, M. (2017). Reconfiguration of the dynamics of the Colombian radio industry in the digital ecosystem. Cuadernos.Info, 41, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.41.1146
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, S. (2022). Introduction to the handbook on digital business ecosystems: strategies, platforms, technologies, governance and societal challenges. In S. Baumann (Ed.), Handbook on Digital Business Ecosystems (pp. 1–9). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107191.00005
   Google Scholar
• Bazarhanova, A., Yli-Huumo, J., & Smolander, K. (2020). From platform dominance to weakened ownership: How external regulation changed Finnish e-identification. Electronic Markets, 30(3), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00331-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetson, S. J., Pradhan, S., Gordon, G., & Ford, J. (2020). Building a digital entrepreneurial platform through local community activity and digital skills with Ngemba First Nation, Australia. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18584/IIPJ.2020.11.1.10211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Kraus, S., & Damke, E. J. (2019). Dynamics of digital entrepreneurship and the innovation ecosystem: A multilevel perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2019-0397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellini, P., Mesiti, M., Nesi, P., & Perlasca, P. (2018). Protection and composition of crossmedia content in collaborative environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(2), 2083–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4382-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Arfi, W., & Hikkerova, L. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship, product innovation, and knowledge conversion: the role of digital platforms. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1191–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00262-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benešová, D., Kubičková, V., & Prváková, M. (2020). Open innovation model in the knowledge intensive business services in the Slovak Republic. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 1340–1358. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(79)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2020). Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, M., Riss, U., Haki, K., & Aier, S. (2019). Design principles for digital value co-creation networks: A service-dominant logic perspective. Electronic Markets, 29(3), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00356-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government information quarterly, 37(3), 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Platforms, Markets and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803311.00014
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G. (2010). Complex adaptive digital ecosystems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, MEDES’10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1936254.1936262
   Google Scholar
• Capilla, R., Nava, F., & Dueñas, J. C. (2007). Modeling and documenting the evolution of architectural design decisions. In Proceedings - ICSE 2007 Workshops:Second Workshop on SHAring and Reusing Architectural Knowledge Architecture, Rationale, and Design Intent, SHARK-ADI’07. https://doi.org/10.1109/SHARK-ADI.2007.9
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, F., & Nocera, S. (2022). Integration of passenger and freight transport: A concept-centric literature review. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2018). Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekfoung, T., Sunil, D., & Binita, G. (2020). Conceptualising capabilities and value co-creation in a digital business ecosystem (DBE): A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/jisem/7826
   Google Scholar
• Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & de Sousa, J. P. (2020). Industrial business associations improving the internationalisation of SMEs with digital platforms: A design science research approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Croitor, E., Adam, M., & Benlian, A. (2021). Perceived input control on digital platforms: A mixed-methods investigation of web-browser platforms. Journal of Decision Systems, 30(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1815440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croitor, E., & Benlian, A. (2019). Perceived input control on online platforms from the application developer perspective: conceptualisation and scale development. Journal of Decision Systems, 28(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2019.1616977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., Ouyang, T., Chen, J., & Li, C. (2019). From peripheral to core: A case study of a 3D printing firm on business ecosystems reconstruction. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(12), 1381–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1614554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., & Taohua-Ouyang. (2017). Research from the perspective of resource orchestration on digital ecosystem. Cluster Computing, 21(1), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0906-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., Yoffe, D. B., & Gawer, A. (2020). The future of platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(3), 46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam, N. A. K., Le Dinh, T., & Menvielle, W. (2020). Customer co-creation through the lens of service-dominant logic: A literature review. AMCIS 2020 Proceedings, 29. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2020/data_science_analytics_for_decision_support/data_science_analytics_for_decision_support/29
   Google Scholar
• Demichev, A., Kryukov, A., & Prikhod’ko, N. (2021). Business process engineering for data storing and processing in a collaborative distributed environment based on provenance metadata, smart contracts and blockchain technology. Journal of Grid Computing, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-021-09544-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. In Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203412497
   Google Scholar
• Drewel, M., Özcan, L., Koldewey, C., & Gausemeier, J. (2020). Pattern-based development of digital platforms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(2), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayoumi, A. (2016). Ecosystem-inspired enterprise modelling framework for collaborative and networked manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 80, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferronato, P., & Moore, J. F. (2007). Architecture for digital ecosystems, beyond service oriented architecture. In Proceedings of the 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference, DEST 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2007.372047
   Google Scholar
• Figay, N., Ghodous, P., Khalfallah, M., & Barhamgi, M. (2012). Interoperability framework for dynamic manufacturing networks. Computers in Industry, 63(8), 749–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, T. (2018). A design-information-flow view of industries, firms, and sites. In T. Fujimoto & F. Ikuine (Eds.), Industrial Competitiveness and Design Evolution, Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science 12 (pp. 5–41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_16
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J., Jacobides, M. G., & Reeves, M. (2019). The myths and realities of business ecosystems. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation: An introduction. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803311
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2020). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça, P., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2017). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems — Literature review and trends. Technological forecasting and social change, 116, 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., & Ruch, T. J. (2018). IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2019). Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the revolution. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y. (2020). A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of enterprises’ behaviour in the platform ecosystem. Discrete Dynamics in Nature & Society, 2020, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.0.4.131/2020/8256091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen, M. (2020). Review of studies on digital transaction platforms in marketing journals. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(2), 164–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2019.1651380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., & Modol, J. R. (2021). The dynamics of architecture-governance configurations: An assemblage theory approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Multiple-case analysis on governance mechanism of multi-sided platforms. In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2016: Technische Universität Ilmenau (pp. 1613–1624).
   Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 37(3), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2020). Complementors as connectors: managing open innovation around digital product platforms. R&D Management, 50(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2021). Sustaining complement quality for digital product platforms: A case study of the Philips Hue Ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard, R. (2001). Viewpoint modeling. ICSE Workshop on Describing Software Architecture with UML, 7. https://web.mit.edu/richh/www/writings/hilliard01b-viewpoint-modeling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hinkelmann, K., & Pasquini, A. (2014). Supporting business and IT alignment by modeling business and IT strategy and its relations to enterprise architecture. In 2014 Enterprise Systems Conference (pp. 149–154). https://doi.org/10.1109/ES.2014.65
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, N. B., & Brad, S. (2021). Managing business model innovation: an innovative approach towards designing a digital ecosystem and multi-sided platform. Business Process Management Journal, 27(2), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2020-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurni, T., Huber, T. L., Dibbern, J., & Krancher, O. (2021). Complementor dedication in platform ecosystems: rule adequacy and the moderating role of flexible and benevolent practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1779621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE. (1990). IEEE Std 610.12-1990 — IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.1990.101064
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, J., & Venable, J. (2009). Action research and design science research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In 17th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2009. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/73
   Google Scholar
• Immonen, A., Ovaska, E., & Paaso, T. (2018). Towards certified open data in digital service ecosystems. Software Quality Journal, 26(4), 1257–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-017-9378-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization of Standardization. (2011). ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011 - Systems and software engineering-Architecture description. ISOIECIEEE 420102011E Revision of ISOIEC 420102007 and IEEE Std 14712000, 2011(March). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.6129467
   Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8), 1200–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardim-Goncalves, R., Agostinho, C., Sarraipa, J., Grilo, A., & Mendonça, J. P. (2013). Reference framework for enhanced interoperable collaborative networks in industrial organisations. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(1/2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2012.687130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed, A., Kubler, S., Malhi, A., Nurminen, A., Robert, J., & Framling, K. (2020). BIoTope: Building an IoT open innovation ecosystem for smart cities. IEEE Access, 8, 224318–224342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. Evaluation & Research in Education, 24(3), 219–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2011.581509
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2021). Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, 118, 102218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2019). Design of an O2O citizen participation ecosystem for sustainable governance. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09910-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannisto, P., Hästbacka, D., & Marttinen, A. (2018). Information exchange architecture for collaborative industrial ecosystem. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(3), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9877-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassahun, A., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2016). Architecture viewpoint for modeling business collaboration concerns using workflow patterns. Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Software Technologies-ICSOFT-EA (pp. 27–38). SciTePress.
   Google Scholar
• Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1086/208674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. (2018). Adopting and managing open data: Stakeholder perspectives, challenges and policy recommendations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. (2020). Open data and its peers: understanding promising harbingers from Nordic Europe. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(5), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2019-0364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., Serhan, H., & Trystram, G. (2020). Digitization and platforms in agriculture: Organizations, power asymmetry, and collective action solutions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3638547
   Google Scholar
• Khanagha, S., Ansari, S., Paroutis, S., & Oviedo, L. (2020). Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of cisco and fog computing. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., & Kim, B. H. (2018). Implementation of young children English education system by AR type based on P2P network service model. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 11(6), 1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-017-0612-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. L. (1983). Centralized versus decentralized computing: Organizational considerations and management options. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 15(4), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1145/289.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. A., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Tech. Rep. No. 2007-001,Ver. 2.3). EBSE Technical Report. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Köhn, A. (2018). The determinants of startup valuation in the venture capital context: A systematic review and avenues for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 68(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0131-5
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, K., Ritala, P., Vilko, J., & Hallikas, J. (2013). A management and orchestration model for integrating digital business ecosystems. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 8(1–3), 24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2013.055066
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, G., & Janssen, M. (2013). Assembling infrastructures and business models for service design and innovation. Information Systems Journal, 23(5), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity, M. C., Khan, S. A., & Willcocks, L. P. (2009). A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(3), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Cao, J., Liu, Z., & Luo, X. (2020). Sustainable business model based on digital twin platform network: The inspiration from haier’s case study in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3), 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A. Q., Claes, B., Kumar, M., & Found, P. (2022). Exploring the governance mechanisms for value co-creation in PSS business ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., Henriksson, A., & Zdravkovic, J. (2021). Data-driven requirements elicitation: A systematic literature review. SN Computer Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00416-4
   Google Scholar
• Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological forecasting and social change, 166, 120614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. W., Miller, B., Durand, J., Joshi, R., Didier, P., Chigani, A., Torenbeek, R., Duggal, D., Martin, R., Bleakley, G., & King, A. (2015). Industrial internet reference architecture (Tech. Rep. No. tech-arch.tr.001,Ver. 1.7). In Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18076.90249
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, M., Pisani, P., Zarrilli, M., & Palmà, I. (2020). Ipse Parsit public-subscribe Iot platform for optimal management of circular economy processes. Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management, 7(2), 153–160. https://www.procedia-esem.eu/pdf/issues/2020/no2/2_18_Lombardi_20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MacCormack, A., Baldwin, C., & Rusnak, J. (2012). Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis. Research policy, 41(8), 1309–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancha, R., & Gordon, S. (2021). Multi-sided platform strategies for organizations: transforming the business model. Journal of business strategy, 43(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2020-0203
   Google Scholar
• Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A. (2020). Design and development of digital twins: a case study in supply chains. Mobile Networks and Applications, 25(6), 2141–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01557-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márton, A. (2021). Steps toward a digital ecology: Ecological principles for the study of digital ecosystems. Journal of Information Technology, 37(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211043222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matopoulos, A., Herdon, M., Várallyai, L., Péntek, Á., & Matopoulos, A. (2012). Digital business ecosystem prototyping for SMEs. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(4), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261211279026
   Google Scholar
• Menzel, T., & Teubner, T. (2020). Green energy platform economics – understanding platformization and sustainabilization in the energy sector. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 15(3), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2020-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merschbrock, C. (2012). Unorchestrated symphony: The case of inter-organizational collaboration in digital construction design. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 17(22), 333–350. https://www.itcon.org/2012/22
   Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2020). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mili, R. Z., & Steiner, R. (2008). Modeling agent-environment interactions in adaptive MAS. In International Workshop on Engineering Environment-Mediated Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 135–147). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85029-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., & Gupta, S. (2020). Mobile learning under personal cloud with a virtualization framework for outcome based education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2129–2156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10043-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., & Bouwman, H. (2019). Orchestration and governance in digital platform ecosystems: a literature review and trends. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(4), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2018-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., Bouwman, H., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2019). An open platform centric approach for scalable government service delivery to the poor: The Aadhaar case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., De Reuver, M., & Bouwman, H. (2016). Effectiveness of control mechanisms in mobile platform ecosystem. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachira, F. (2002). Toward a network of digital business ecosystems fostering the local development. https://web.archive.org/web/20130903235803/http://digital-ecosystems.org/doc/discussionpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nachira, F., Nicolai, A., & Dini, P. (2007). Introduction-The digital business ecosystems: Roots, processes and perspectives. In F. Nachira, A. Nicolai, P. Dini, M. Le Louarn, L. R. Leon (Eds.). Digital business ecosystem (pp. 1–20). https://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbt_derivate_00015105/ISBN_92-79-01817-5_Cover.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nepal, S., Sinnott, R. O., Friedrich, C., Wise, C., Chen, S., Kanwal, S., Yao, J., & Lonie, A. (2017). TruXy: Trusted storage cloud for scientific workflows. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 5(3), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2015.2489638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nucciarelli, A., Li, F., Fernandes, K. J., Goumagias, N., Cabras, I., Devlin, S., Kudenko, D., & Cowling, P. (2017). From value chains to technological platforms: The effects of crowdfunding in the digital game industry. Journal of Business Research, 78, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10(26). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, H. H., & Bosch, J. (2020). Going digital: Disruption and transformation in software-intensive embedded systems ecosystems. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E., & Wamelink, H. (2017). Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM. Building Research & Information, 45(6), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1301718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perks, C., & Beveridge, T. (2004). Guide to enterprise IT architecture. In C. Perks & T. Beveridge (Eds.), Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98880
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
   Google Scholar
• Pidun, U., Reeves, M., & Knust, N. (2021). How do you manage a business ecosystem?. Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pidun, U., Reeves, M., & Schüssler, M. (2019). Do you need a business ecosystem?. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/do-you-need-business-ecosystem
   Google Scholar
• Pidun, U., Reeves, M., & Schüssler, M. (2020). Why do most business ecosystems fail?. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/why-do-most-business-ecosystems-fail
   Google Scholar
• Pikkarainen, M., Hyrkäs, E., & Martin, M. (2020). Success factors of demand-driven open innovation as a policy instrument in the case of the healthcare industry. Journal of Open Innovation, 68(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020039
   Google Scholar
• Pomegbe, W. W. K., Li, W., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Otoo, C. O. A. (2021). Closeness or opportunistic behavior? Mediating the business ecosystem governance mechanisms and coordination relationship. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 28(3), 530–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2020-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranata, I., Athauda, R., & Skinner, G. (2013). Modeling decentralized reputation-based trust for initial transactions in digital environments. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 12(3), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2461321.2461323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, M., Lotan, H., Legrand, J., & Jacobides, M. (2019). How business ecosystems rise (and often fall). MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 1–6. https://mitsmr.com/333bZ5Q
   Google Scholar
• Reforgiato Recupero, D., Castronovo, M., Consoli, S., Costanzo, T., Gangemi, A., Grasso, L., Lodi, G., Merendino, G., Mongiovì, M., Presutti, V., Rapisarda, S. D., Rosa, S., & Spampinato, E. (2016). An innovative, open, interoperable citizen engagement cloud platform for smart government and users’ interaction. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0361-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reim, W., Sjödin, D. R., & Parida, V. (2019). Servitization of global service network actors – A contingency framework for matching challenges and strategies in service transition. Journal of Business Research, 104, 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, R., & Gleasure, R. (2021). Those who control the code control the rules: How different perspectives of privacy are being written into the code of blockchain systems. Journal of Information Technology, 36(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220944406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roukouni, A., Lukosch, H., Verbraeck, A., & Zuidwijk, R. (2020). Let the game begin: Enhancing sustainable collaboration among actors in innovation ecosystems in a playful way. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 8494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2014). What literature review is not: Diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukanova, B., de Reuver, M., Henningsson, S., Nikayin, F., & Tan, Y. H. (2020). Emergence of collective digital innovations through the process of control point driven network reconfiguration and reframing: the case of mobile payment. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00352-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadatmand, F., Lindgren, R., & Schultze, U. (2019). Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement. Research Policy, 48(8), 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarikko, T. (2016). Platform provider by accident: A case study of digital platform coring. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 58(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0426-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadigh, B. L., Unver, H. O., Nikghadam, S., Dogdu, E., Ozbayoglu, A. M., & Kilic, S. E. (2017). An ontology-based multi-agent virtual enterprise system (OMAVE): Part 1: domain modelling and rule management. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(2–3), 320–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2016.1145811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (No. 14). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sawy, O. A. E., Amsinck, H., Kræmmergaard, P., & Vinther, A. L. (2016). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429286797-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavone, F., Mancini, D., Leone, D., & Lavorato, D. (2021). Digital business models and ridesharing for value co-creation in healthcare: A multi-stakeholder ecosystem analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeiss, J., Hoelzle, K., & Tech, R. P. G. (2019). Designing governance mechanisms in platform ecosystems: Addressing the paradox of openness through blockchain technology. California Management Review, 62(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619883618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, U., & Gill, T. G. (2020). Gifts, contexts, means, and ends differing: Informing task scenarios to serve knowledge workers’ needs in dynamic complex settings. Informing Science, 23, 119–145. https://doi.org/10.28945/4667
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Design and governance of platform ecosystems - Key concepts and issues for future research. Proceedings of 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2016), Istanbul, Turkey. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/76/
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Governing nonprofit platform ecosystems–an information platform for refugees. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1335280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). How platform governance changes when customers become developers. In 79th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2019: Understanding the Inclusive Organization, AoM 2019. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.155
   Google Scholar
• Senyo, P. K., Liu, K., & Effah, J. (2019). Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International journal of information management, 47, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazian, A., Kyu Lee, Y., Le, D., Brun, Y., & Medvidovic, N. (2018). Recovering architectural design decisions. In Proceedings - 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Architecture, ICSA 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA.2018.00019
   Google Scholar
• Shahzad, A., Zhang, K., & Gherbi, A. (2020). Intuitive development to examine collaborative iot supply chain system underlying privacy and security levels and perspective powering through proactive blockchain. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(13), 3760. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsuzzoha, A., Ferreira, F., Azevedo, A., & Helo, P. (2017). Collaborative smart process monitoring within virtual factory environment: an implementation issue. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2016.1185156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Gilbert, B. A., Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolander, K., Hoikka, K., Isokallio, J., Kataikko, M., & Mäkelä, T. (2002). What is included in software architecture? A case study in three software organizations. In Proceedings - 9th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, ECBS 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2002.999831
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souri, A., Rahmani, A. M., Navimipour, N. J., & Rezaei, R. (2020). A hybrid formal verification approach for QoS-aware multi-cloud service composition. Cluster Computing, 23(4), 2453–2470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-019-03018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, E., Calvo-Mora, A., Roldán, J. L., & Periáñez-Cristóbal, R. (2017). Quantitative research on the EFQM excellence model: A systematic literature review (1991–2015). European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suuronen, S., Ukko, J., Eskola, R., Semken, R. S., & Rantanen, H. (2022). A systematic literature review for digital business ecosystems in the manufacturing industry: Prerequisites, challenges, and benefits. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 37, 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, F. T. C., Ondrus, J., Tan, B., & Oh, J. (2020). Digital transformation of business ecosystems: Evidence from the Korean pop industry. Information Systems Journal, 30(5), 866–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Lu, X., & Huang, L. (2015). The role of is capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(4), 248–280. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, F. T. C., Tan, B., & Pan, S. L. (2016). Developing a leading digital multi-sided platform: Examining IT affordances and competitive actions in Alibaba.com. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38(1), 738–760. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03836
   Google Scholar
• Tatsumoto, H. (2018). Evolution of business ecosystems. In Industrial Competitiveness and Design Evolution (pp. 155–188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Tianual, P., & Pohthong, A. (2019). Defects detection technique of use case views during requirements engineering. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F147956. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316615.3316631
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06625-2
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2015a). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2015b). Platform desertion by app developers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 40–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1138365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research Commentary —Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. H., & Zdravkovic, J. (2020). A survey of roles and responsibilities in digital business ecosystems. In Proceedings of the Forum at Practice of Enterprise Modeling 2020 Co-Located with the 13th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2020) (pp. 44–53). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-188851
   Google Scholar
• Tutuba, N. B., Tundui, H. P., & Msamula, J. S. (2019). Business ecosystems as the approach to create value and appropriate value for small firms in emerging markets. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 14(5), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v14i5.2525
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2018). International standard industrial classification of all economic activities (ISIC), rev. 4. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vatankhah Barenji, R. (2022). A blockchain technology based trust system for cloud manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33(5), 1451–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01735-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P. (2021). Connecting the parts with the whole: Toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 45(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Bi, L., Wang, L., Jia, M., & Mao, D. (2019). A mining technology collaboration platform theory and its product development and application to support China’s digital mine construction. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(24), 5373. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2011). Basic content analysis. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xii–xxiii. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Geiger, S., & Vize, R. (2019). A platform approach in solution business: How platform openness can be used to control solution networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, R. H. (1970). The biochemical ecology of higher plants. In E. Sondheimer & J. B. Simeone (Eds.), Chemical Ecology. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-654750-4.50009-8
   Google Scholar
• Xi, Z. (2020). The comparison of decentralized and centralized structure of network communication in different application fields. In 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Economy (MSIE 2019) (pp. 50–54). https://doi.org/10.2991/msie-19.2020.10
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Ahokangas, P., Turunen, M., Mäntymäki, M., & Heikkilä, J. (2019). Platform-based business models: Insights from an emerging ai-enabled smart building ecosystem. Electronics (Switzerland), 8(10), 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8101150
   Google Scholar
• Yablonsky, S. (2018). A multidimensional framework for digital platform innovation and management: From business to technological platforms. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 35(4), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yablonsky, S. (2020). A multidimensional platform ecosystem framework. Kybernetes, 49(7), 2003–2035. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2019-0447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Cao, D., Chen, J., Xiao, Z., & Daowd, A. (2020). AI and IoT-based collaborative business ecosystem: A case in Chinese fish farming industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 82(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2020.107856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharewicz, G., Diallo, S., Ducq, Y., Agostinho, C., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Bazoun, H., Wang, Z., & Doumeingts, G. (2017). Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: State of the art and future challenges. Information Systems & E-Business Management, 15(2), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0317-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., Khan, Z., & De Silva, M. (2019). The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks. International Business Review, 28(6), 101598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., von Delft, S., Morgan-Thomas, A., & Buck, T. (2020). The evolution of platform business models: Exploring competitive battles in the world of platforms. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar