Information Systems Adoption and Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms Linking Individual and Organizational Performance

References

• Abelsen, S. N., Vatne, S. H., Mikalef, P., & Choudrie, J. (2021). Digital working during the COVID-19 pandemic: How task–technology fit improves work performance and lessens feelings of loneliness. Information Technology & People.
   Google Scholar
• Anggara, R., Budiyanto, C. W., & Hatta, P. (2019). Comparison between TAM, EUCS, TTF analysis to evaluate user acceptance for conference management system. AIP Conference Proceedings, Surakarta, Indonesia, 2194 (1), 020005. AIP Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2018). Nesting and equivalence testing for structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1513795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 194(4), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900415
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj, A., & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998). A feedback model to understand information system usage. Information & Management, 33(4), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00026-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barillot, Pascal. (2001). Pilotage de la performance et stratégie d'entreprise: l'exemple du Tableau de Bord Prospectif. Recherches et publications en management ABSL.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd edition ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Bernard, Carrière. (1999). La vision stratégique en contexte de PME: cadre théorique et étude empirique. Revue Internationale de PME, 301–325.
   Google Scholar
• Chechen, L., Palvia, P., & Jain-Liang, C. (2009). Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a technology continuance theory (TCT). International Journal of Information Management, 29(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Elbashir, M., Peng, X., & Zhu, D. (2016). The effect of ERP systems competences on business process and organizational performance. International Journal of Management Theory and Practices, 17(1), 5–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y.M. (2020). Understanding cloud ERP continuance intention and individual performance: A TTF-driven perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(4), 1591–1614. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2019-0208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, E. P. (1980). The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method ( (2nd Edition ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• El Sawah, S., El Fattah Tharwat, A. A., & Rasmy, M. H. (2008). A quantitative model to predict the Egyptian ERP implementation success index. Business Process Management Journal, 14(3), 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810876643
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 10(2), 177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forza, Cipriano, & Filippini, Roberto. (1998). Tqm impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. (2016). Key small business statistics – June 2016, Retrieved August 28th, 2020 https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/061.nsf/FRA/h_03018.html
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: International version. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hajji, A., Pellerin, R., Gharbi, A., Léger, P. M., & Babin, G. (2016). Toward valuable prediction of ERP diffusion in North American automotive industry: A simulation-based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajji, A., Pellerin, R., Léger, P. -M., Gharbi, A., & Babin, G. (2012). Dynamic pricing models for ERP systems under network externality. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassabelnaby, H., Hwang, D., & Vonderembse, M. (2012). The impact of ERP implementation on organizational capabilities and firm performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4/5), 618–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771211258043
   Google Scholar
• JJPA, Hsieh, & Wang, W. (2007). Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 216–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, R., Nor Shahriza Abdul, K., & Selamat, M. H. (2007). The impact of technological factors on information systems success in the electronic-government context. Business Process Management Journal, 13(5), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150710823110
   Google Scholar
• Issor, Z. (2017). La performance de l’entreprise: un concept complexe aux multiples dimensions. Projectics/Proyéctica/Projectique, 2, 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 88–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, S. (2011). Management de la performance : des concepts aux outils. Centre de Ressources en Économie Gestion (CREG), 18 http://www.creg.ac-versailles.fr/spip.php?article525
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. (1984). The evolution of management accounting. The Accounting Review, LIX(3), 390–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_27
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (1998). Advanced management accounting (3rd edition ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balance scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayanda, A., Busagala, L., & Tedre, M. (2020). User perceptions on the use of academic information systems for decision making support in the context of Tanzania higher education. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 16(1), 72–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. G., Folkeringa, M., De Jong, J. P., & Wubben, E. F. (2003). Innovation and firm performance. EIM (No. H 200207).
   Google Scholar
• Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand’s community health centers: applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(6), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilmon, C., FaganVivek, M. H., & Belt, P. P. (2008). Using the task technology fit model as a diagnostic tool for electronic medical record evaluation. Issues in Information Systems, 9(2), 196–204.
   Google Scholar
• Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal, 22(1), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O., & Osei-Bryson, K. (2006). An exploration of factors that impact individual performance in an ERP environment: An analysis using multiple analytical techniques. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., & Sholihin, M. (2005). Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction? The British Accounting Review, 37(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 31(4), 705–737. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamboundou, J. P. (2003). Profil du propriétaire-dirigeant et performance de la PME africaine: une illustration à travers le cas gabonais. Gestion 2000, 3, 35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K., & Keil, M. (1998). Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task/technology fit. Information & Management, 34(4), 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Michel. (1999). La performance des PMI dans l’attaque des marchés internationaux: Une étude de cas dans un contexte d’île périphérique de la CEE. Revue Internationale P.M.E., 12(3), 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• Naceur, R., Cimon, Y., & Pellerin, R. (2021). A systematic review for predictive models of is adoption. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2021010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazifi, A., El-Manstrly, D., Tregear, A., & Auxtova, K. (2020). The impact of termination severity on customers’ emotional, attitudinal and behavioral reactions. Journal of Service Theory & Practice, 31(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-10-2019-0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nwankpa, J. K. (2015). ERP system usage and benefit: A model of antecedents and outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T. (1978). Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 16(1), 12–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D., & Pollanen, R. M. (2000). Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: A critical appraisal using new evidence. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 25(4–5), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00031-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panorama Consulting Group. (2020). 2019 ERP Report, Retrieved January 10th, 2021 https://www.panorama-consulting.com/
   Google Scholar
• Paolo, A. M., Bonaminio, G. A., Gibson, C., Patridge, T., & Kallail, K. (2000). Response rate comparisons of e‐mail and mail distributed student evaluations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12(2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1202_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorino, Paul. (1997). Méthodes et pratiques de la performance (pp. 512). Les Editions d’organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza, M., & Rohlf, K. (2008). Learning and performance in ERP implementation projects: A learning-curve model for analyzing and managing consulting costs. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1985). Creating and sustaining superior performance. Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinbolt, M. (2021). ERP market share and buyer trends for 2021, SelectHub Confidence in Software, Retrieved January 16th, 2021, from https://www.selecthub.com/enterprise-resource-planning/erp-market/
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (1994). Trust as a moderator of the effect of performance evaluation style on job related tension: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, K. A., & Abdinnour-Helm, S. (2008). Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post-adoption usage of information systems. Information & Management, 45(6), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirelli, G. (2000). Innovation and firm performance. Conference innovation and enterprise creation: Statistics and indicators, summary of session C, France, 23-24 11 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sirkin, H. L., Keenan, P., & Jackson, A. (2005). The hard side of change management. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamelos, I., Angelis, L., Morisio, M., Sakellaris, E., & Bleris, G. L. (2003). Estimating the development cost of custom software. Information & Management, 40(8), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00099-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, D. S., Wong, I., & Seddon, P. B. (2002). Having expectations of information systems benefits that match received benefits: Does it really matter? Information & Management, 40(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00138-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Teng, J. T. C. (2012). Information systems use: Construct conceptualization and scale development. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1564–1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton, G. F. (2011). A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: implications and recommendations for IS research. Communications of the association for information systems, 28(1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, G. F., & Burney, L. L. (2017). Using a two-step transformation to address non-normality from a business value of information technology perspective. Journal of Information Systems, Summer 2017. 31(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51510
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system USE: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 32(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L. G., & Sheetz, S. D. (2014). The adoption of software measures: A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Information & Management, 51(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, R., & Wallace, J. (1998). The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10(3), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., & Su, Y. F. (2009). The relationship between benefits of ERP systems implementation and its impacts on firm performance of SCM. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(6), 722–752. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910999602
   Google Scholar
• Ya-Yueh, S. (2006). The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500168103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainudin, A. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. UiTM Press.
   Google Scholar