The Price is Right: Exploring Pricing of Digital Industrial Platforms

References

• Araujo, M., Confraria, J., & Ekenberg, L.(2018). A utility based price model for high capacity rural networks in the European Union. Proceedings of the IEEE 29th PIMRC Annual International Symposium, Bologna, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2018.8580709
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, L., Jöhnk, J., Vogt, F., & Urbach, N. (2021). A Taxonomy of Industrial IoT Platforms’ Architectural Features. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings, 404–421, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_28
   Google Scholar
• AWS. (2019). AWS IoT Core, Developer Guide https://docs.aws.amazon.com/en_en/iot/latest/developerguide/what-is-aws-iot.html
   Google Scholar
• AWS. ( 2022a.) AWS Billing, User Guide Retrieved October, 15, 2022, from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/awsaccountbilling/latest/aboutv2/useconsolidatedbilling-discounts.html
   Google Scholar
• AWS. (2022b.) AWS Io Core Partners. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://aws.amazon.com/de/iot-core/partners/?partner-solutions-cards
   Google Scholar
• AWS. (2022c.) AWS Pricing Calculator, User Guide. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/pricing-calculator/latest/userguide/what-is-pricing-calculator.html
   Google Scholar
• AWS. (2022d). Configure AWS IoT Core. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://calculator.aws/#/addService/IoTCore
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, A., de Boer, E., Kasah, E., Koerder, B., Mohr, B., & Richter, G. (2021, February 05). Leveraging Industrial IoT and advanced technologies for digital transformation. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/a-manufacturers-guide-to-generating-value-at-scale-with-industrial-iot
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, W., & Tieman, A. F. (2008). Heavily skewed pricing in two-sided markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(5), 1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Broekhuizen, T. L. J., Emrich, O., Gijsenberg, M. J., Broekhuis, M., Donkers, B., & Sloot, L. M. (2021). Digital platform openness: Drivers, dimensions and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 122, 902–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C. (2019). Competing in digital markets: A Platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravorti, S., & Roson, R. (2006). Platform competition in two-sided markets: The case of payment networks. Review of Network Economic, 5(1), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1092
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. P., & Huang, Y. C. (2009). A search-matching model of the two-sided platforms. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal, 1, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1477203
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, W. A., Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2020). (Re)considering the concept of literature review reproducibility. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(5), 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. (2007). The changing labyrinth of software pricing. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1272516.1272531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation and power. Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Daas, D., Keijzer, W., & Bouwman, H. (2014). Optimal bundling and pricing of multi-service bundles from a value-based perspective. BLED 2014 Proceedings, Bled, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2017). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, H., Indulska, M., Ghosh, A., Baiyere, A., & Broser, S. (2019). Industrial internet of things (IIoT) business model classification. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S. (2003). Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Review of Network Economics, 2(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1026
   Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz, J. J., Laussel, D., & Sonnac, N. (2005). Does advertising lower the price of newspapers to consumers? A theoretical appraisal. Economic Letters, 87(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaugher, J. M., & Wang, Y.-M. (2002). Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from web server pricing. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner. (2021). Gartner Magic Quadrant IIoT Report. Retrieved from https://www.ptc.com/de/resources/iiot/white-paper/gartner-mq-for-iiot
   Google Scholar
• Gawer A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2020). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giessmann, A., & Legner, C. (2013). Designing Business Models for Platform as a Service: Towards a Design Theory. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. L., & Vessey, I. (1995). Contemporary application-domain taxonomies. IEEE Software, 12(4), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.391837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A. (2006). Pricing and Commitment by Two-Sided Platforms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., & Hałaburda, H. (2014). Information and two-sided platform profits. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 34, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, R., Demirkan, H., Hefley, B., & Auseklis, N. (2009). Pricing Strategies for Information Technology Services: A Value-Based Approach. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa Village, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.350
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, M. (2022). State of IoT 2022: Number of connected IoT devices growing 18% to 14.4 billion globally. Retrieved from https://iot-analytics.com/number-connected-iot-devices
   Google Scholar
• Hinterhuber, A. (2008). Customer value‐based pricing strategies: Why companies resist. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(4), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660810887079
   Google Scholar
• Hinterhuber, A., & Liozu, S. M. (2014). Is innovation in pricing your next source of competitive advantage? Business Horizons, 57(3), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodapp, D., Remane, G., Hanelt, A., & Kolbe, L. M. (2019). Business models for internet of things platforms: Empirical development of a taxonomy and archetypes. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings, Siegen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jullien, B., & Pavan, A. (2019). Information management and pricing in platform markets. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4), 1666–1703. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamprath, M., & Halecker, B. (2012). A Systematic Approach for Business Model Taxonomy - How to operationalize and compare large quantities of business models? Proceedings of the 5th ISPIM Innovation Symposium, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Kansal, S., Singh, G., Kumar, H., & Kaushal, S. (2014). Pricing Models in Cloud Computing. Proceedings of the ICTCS, Udaipur, India. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677855.2677888
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspective, 8(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskin, T., & Kennedy,D. (2015). Strategies in Smart Service Systems Enabled Multi-sided Markets: Business Models for the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa Village, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kittlaus, H.-B., & Clough, P. (2009). Software Product Management and Pricing. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kundisch, D., Muntermann, J., Oberländer, A. M., Rau, D., Röglinger, M., Schoormann, T., & Szopinski, D. (2021). An update for taxonomy designers. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00723-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laatikainen, G., & Ojala, A. (2021). The pricing capability lifecycle of digital innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1974377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laatikainen, G., Ojala, A., & Mazhelis, O. (2013). Cloud services pricing models. In G. Herzwurm & T. Margaria (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 150, pp. 117–129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39336-5_12
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, K. R., Hovorka, D. S., Dennis, A. R., & West, J. D. (2019). Understanding the Elephant: The Discourse Approach to Boundary Identification and Corpus Construction for Theory Review Articles. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(7), 887–927. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Mädche, A., Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, S., & Buxmann, P. (2009). Pricing strategies of software vendors. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(6), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-009-0075-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., Wendelin, R., & Westerlund, M. (2020). Industrial internet of things business models in the machine-to-machine context. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., Li, S., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). Innovation and Price Competition in a Two-Sided Market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), 171–202. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liozu, S. M., & Hinterhuber, A. (2013). Pricing orientation, pricing capabilities, and firm performance. Management Decision, 51(3), 594–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311309670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueth, K. L. (2019). IoT Platform Companies Landscape 2019/2020: 620 IoT Platforms globally. Retrieved October 19, 2022, from https://iot-analytics.com/iot-platform-companieslandscape-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Mancha, R., Gordon, S., & Stoddard, D. (2019). Seven mistakes to avoid in launching and scaling digital platforms. Journal of Business Strategy, 42(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-06-2019-0126
   Google Scholar
• Marheine, C., Engel, C., & Back, A. (2021). How an Incumbent Telecoms Operator Became an IoT Ecosystem Orchestrator. MIS Quarterly Executive, 20(4), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft. (2022). Pricing calculator. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/
   Google Scholar
• Mihale-Wilson, C. A., Zibuschka, J., & Kubach, M. (2019). Consumer-based Ranking for Strategic Selection of IoT Business Models. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, F., Stachon, M., Azkan, C., Schoormann, T., & Otto, B. (2022). Designing business model taxonomies – synthesis and guidance from information systems research. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 701–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00507-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, F., Stachon, M., Hoffmann, C., Bauhaus, H., & Otto, B. (2020). Data-Driven Business Models in Logistics: A Taxonomy of Optimization and Visibility Services. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, USA. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.661
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013). A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., Koh, B., & Raghunathan, S. (2015). Value appropriation between the platform provider and app developers in mobile platform mediated networks. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer, Ö., & Phillips, R. (2012). The Oxford handbook of pricing management. OUP Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199543175.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., & van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., & van Alstyne, M. W. (2008). Managing platform ecosystems. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform ecosystems: how developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli, T., Fielt, E., & Matzner, M. (2021). Digital industrial platforms. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00681-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrik, D., & Herzwurm, G. (2018). Platform Ecosystems for the Industrial Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software-intensive Business, Espoo, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Petrik, D., & Herzwurm, G. (2020). Towards the IIoT Ecosystem Development - Understanding the Stakeholder Perspective. Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (1992). The organizational taxonomy: Definition and design. The Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.2307/258807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2021). Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1528–1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320969791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltan, A., & Smolander, K. (2021a). Bridging the state-of-the-art and the state-of-the-practice of SaaS pricing: A multivocal literature review. Information and Software Technology, 133, 106510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltan, A., & Smolander, K. (2021b). How SaaS companies price their products: Insights from an industry study. In E. Klotins & K. Wnuk, Eds. Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 407). Springer. (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67292-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Schermuly, L., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Developing an industrial IoT platform–Trade-off between horizontal and vertical approaches. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings. Siegen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Fellmann, M., & Knackstedt, R. (2021). On your mark, ready, search: A framework for structuring literature search strategies in information systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Hakes, C., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Governing Platforms in the Internet of Things. In A. Ojala, H. Holmström Olsson, & K. Werder (Eds.), Software business. icsob 2017. lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 304, pp. 32–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69191-6_3
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems- Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2022). From product platform ecosystem to innovation platform ecosystem: An institutional perspective on the governance of ecosystem transformations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(6), 1354–1385. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2019). MindSphere Rocket Club – the launch pad for the best startups. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/mindsphere/mindsphere-rocket-club-the-launch-pad-for-the-best-startups/
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021a). Experience Solutions built on MindSphere. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://siemens.mindsphere.io/en/solutions/mindsphere-solutions
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021b). MindSphere Capability Packages Product Sheet. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://siemens.mindsphere.io/content/dam/mindsphere/documentation/pdf/MSPH_CapabilityPackages_ProductSheet_v1.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021c). MindSphere Regions. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://documentation.mindsphere.io/MindSphere/concepts/concept-regions.html
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021d). SIMATIC IOT gateways. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://new.siemens.com/global/en/products/automation/pc-based/iot-gateways.html
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021e). Step 4 Book Apps and Extras. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://www.dex.siemens.com/mindsphere/step-4-book-apps-and-extras
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021f). Test drive MindSphere for free. Retrieved October 11, 2022: https://siemens.mindsphere.io/en/start/industry
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2021g). What’s new in MindSphere – Pricing and packaging. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/mindsphere/whats-new-in-mindsphere-pricing-and-packaging/
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2022a). Change Log for Developer Documentation. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://documentation.mindsphere.io/MindSphere/changelog.html
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2022b). Meet the partners shaping the future of IoT. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://siemens.mindsphere.io/en/partner/featured-partners
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2022c). Mission. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://mindsphereworld.org/about-us.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, V., & Petrik, D. (2021). Towards a taxonomy of impact factors for digital platform pricing. In P. Gregory & P. Kruchten (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 426, pp. 115–124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88583-0_11
   Google Scholar
• Staub, N., Haki, K., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2023). Governance mechanisms in digital platform ecosystems: addressing the generativity-control tension. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 51(1), 906–939. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05137
   Google Scholar
• Stummer, C., Kundisch, D., & Decker, R. (2018). Platform Launch Strategies. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0520-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukkrajang, K., Duangsoithong, R., & Chalermyannont, K. (2021). Trade distance and price model for electric vehicle charging using blockchain-based technology. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on ECI-CON. Chiang Mai, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTI-CON51831.2021.9454741
   Google Scholar
• Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., & Kundisch, D. (2020). Criteria as a prelude for guiding taxonomy evaluation. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui, USA. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.622
   Google Scholar
• Tan, B., Anderson, E. G., Jr., & Parker, G. G. (2020). Platform Pricing and Investment to Drive Third-Party Value Creation in Two-Sided Networks. Information Systems Research, 31(1), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from Innovation in the Digital Economy: Enabling Technologies, Standards, and Licensing Models in the Wireless World. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408066-9.00001-1
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H. R. (1995). Pricing information goods. Proceedings Research Libraries Group Symposium on Scholarship in the New Information Environment. Cambridge, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Vial, G. (2019). Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2015). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(9), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03709
   Google Scholar
• Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weking, J., Hein, A., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). A hierarchical taxonomy of business model patterns. Electronic Markets, 30(3), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0322-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woroch, R., & Strobel, G. (2021). Understanding Value Creation in Digital Companies - a Taxonomy of IoT Enabled Business Models. Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Buyya, R., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2019). Cloud pricing models: Taxonomy, survey, and interdisciplinary challenges. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, N., Feng, H., Li, M., & Feng, N. (2022). Penetration or skimming? pricing strategies for software platforms considering asymmetric cross-side network effects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(4), 966–998. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar