What Makes a City “Smart” and Who Decides? From Vision to Reality in the USDOT Smart City Challenge

References

• Z. Allam, P. Newman, “Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance,” Smart Cities 1: 1 (2018) 4–25.
   Google Scholar
• M. Angelidou, “The Role of Smart City Characteristics in the Plans of Fifteen Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 4 (2017) 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Aoyama, L. F. Alvarez Leon, “Urban Governance and Autonomous Vehicles,” Cities 119 (2021) 103410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Aurigi, N. Odendaal, “From ‘Smart in the Box’ to ‘Smart in the City’: Rethinking the Socially Sustainable Smart City in Context,” Journal of Urban Technology 28: 1–2 (2021) 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Beck, “Smart Security?: Evaluating Security Resiliency in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Smart City Challenge,” Transportation Research Record 2604: 1 (2017) 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• M. Belotto, “Data Analysis Methods for Qualitative Research: Managing the Challenges of Coding, Interrater Reliability, and Thematic Analysis,” The Qualitative Report 23: 11 (2018) 2622–2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bradshaw, R. Kitchin, “Charting the Design and Implementation of the Smart City: The Case of Citizen-Centric Bikeshare in Hamilton, Ontario,” Urban Geography 43: 4 (2022) 567–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley, L. Coenen, N. Frantzeskaki, C. Hartmann, A. Kronsell, L. Mai, S. Marvin, K. McCormick, F. van Steenbergen, Y. Voytenko Palgan, “Urban Living Labs: Governing Urban Sustainability Transitions,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22 (2016) 13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. van den Buuse, A. Kolk, “An Exploration of Smart City Approaches by International ICT Firms,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 220–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Cardullo, R. Kitchin, “Being a ‘Citizen’ in the Smart City: Up and Down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation in Dublin, Ireland,” GeoJournal 84: 1 (2019a) 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Cardullo, R. Kitchin, “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe,” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37: 5 (2019b) 813–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Carr, M. Hesse, “Technocratic Urban Development: Large Digital Corporations as Power Brokers of the Digital Age,” Planning Theory & Practice 23: 3 (2022) 476–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Cocchia, “Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review,” in R.P. Dameri and C. Rosenthal-Sabroux, eds., Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, Progress in IS (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• City of Columbus, Project Management Plan (Version 3), Smart Columbus Program (2021). January 25, 2021
   Google Scholar
• City of Columbus, Demonstration Site Map & Installation Schedule Webinar. SMRT Columbus (n.d.a).
   Google Scholar
• City of Columbus, Smart Columbus Operating System. SMRT Columbus (n.d.b).
   Google Scholar
• City of Columbus, Smart City Projects. SMRT Columbus (n.d.c).
   Google Scholar
• J. Clark, Uneven Innovation: The Work of Smart Cities (Illustrated Edition) (New York: Columbia University Press, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• A. D’Auria, M. Tregua, M. C. Vallejo-Martos, “Modern Conceptions of Cities as Smart and Sustainable and Their Commonalities,” Sustainability 10: 8 (2018) 2642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. P. Dameri, “Searching for Smart City Definition: A Comprehensive Proposal,” International Journal of Computers & Technology 11: 5 (2013) 2544–2551.
   Google Scholar
• R. P. Dameri, “Smart City Definition, Goals and Performance,” in R. P. Dameri, ed., Smart City Implementation: Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems, Progress in IS (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• C. Del-Real, C. Ward, M. Sartipi, “What do People Want in a Smart City? Exploring the Stakeholders’ Opinions, Priorities and Perceived Barriers in a Medium-Sized City in the United States,” International Journal of Urban Sciences 27 (2023) 50–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Evans, A. Karvonen, R. Raven, eds., The Experimental City (London: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• A. Flynn, M. Valverde, “Planning on the Waterfront: Setting the Agenda for Toronto’s ‘Smart City’ Project,” Planning Theory & Practice 20: 5 (2019) 769–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gasson, “Rigor in Grounded Theory Research: An Interpretive Perspective on Generating Theory from Qualitative Field Studies,” in M. Whitman and A. Woszczynski, eds., The Handbook of Information Systems Research (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• R. Giffinger, N.: Pichler-Milanović, Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities (Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• S. Ghosh, S. Byahut, C. Masilela, “Metropolitan Regional Scale Smart City Approaches in a Shrinking City in the American Rust Belt—Case of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,” in T.M. Vinod Kumar, ed., Smart Metropolitan Regional Development: Economic and Spatial Design Strategies, Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements (Singapore: Springer, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. Grovert, C.: Sambo, B. Meier, Y. Ko, “The Contributions of Smart City Initiatives to Urban Resilience: The Case of San Francisco, California, United States,” in A. Sharifi and P. Salehi, eds., Resilient Smart Cities: Theoretical and Empirical Insights, The Urban Book Series (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• B. D. Haig, “Grounded Theory as Scientific Method,” Philosophy of Education 28: 1 (1995) 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• R. E. Hall, B. Bowerman, J. Braverman, J. Taylor, H. Todosow, U. Von Wimmersperg, The Vision of a Smart City, No. BNL-67902; 04042 (Brookhaven National Lab. [BNL], Upton, NY, 2000)
   Google Scholar
• T. Harris, “Grounded theory,” Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987) 29: 35 (2015) 32–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. Harvey, “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism,” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71: 1 (1989) 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. He, “Knowledge Discovery through Co-Word Analysis,” Library Trends 48: 1 (1999) 133–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hodson, A. McMeekin, “Global Technology Companies and the Politics of Urban Socio-Technical Imaginaries in the Digital Age: Processual Proxies, Trojan Horses and Global Beachheads,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53: 6 (2021) 1391–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Hollands, “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?,” City 12: 3 (2008) 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• R. G. Hollands, “Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 1 (2015) 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Hu and Y. Zheng, “Smart City Initiatives: A Comparative Study of American and Chinese Cities,” Journal of Urban Affairs 43: 4 (2021) 504–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Joss, F. Sengers, D. Schraven, F. Caprotti, Y. Dayot, “The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures across 27 Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 26: 1 (2019) 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Karvonen, B. van Heur, “Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38: 2 (2014) 379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. B. Kelley, B. W. Lane, B. W. Stanley, K. Kane, E. Nielsen, S. Strachan, “Smart Transportation for All? A Typology of Recent U.S. Smart Transportation Projects in Midsized Cities,” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110: 2 (2020) 547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, N. Moore-Cherry, “Fragmented Governance, the Urban Data Ecosystem and Smart City-Regions: The Case of Metropolitan Boston,” Regional Studies 55: 12 (2021) 1913–1923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. R. Kummitha, “Entrepreneurial Urbanism and Technological Panacea: Why Smart City Planning Needs to Go Beyond Corporate Visioning?,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 137 (2018) 330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Liu, S. Mostafa, S. Mohamed, T. S. Nguyen, “Emerging Themes of Public-Private Partnership Application in Developing Smart City Projects: A Conceptual Framework,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management 11: 1 (2020) 138–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Lung-Amam, A. H. Bierbaum, S. Parks, G. -J. Knaap, G. Sunderman, L. Stamm, “Toward Engaged, Equitable, and Smart Communities: Lessons From West Baltimore,” Housing Policy Debate 31: 1 (2021) 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Luque-Ayala, S. Marvin, “Developing a Critical Understanding of Smart Urbanism?,” Urban Studies 52: 12 (2015) 2105–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J. Martin, J. Evans, A. Karvonen, “Smart and Sustainable? Five Tensions in the Visions and Practices of the Smart-Sustainable City in Europe and North America,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 133 (2018) 269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mattern, A City is not a Computer: Other Urban Intelligences (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. McGuirk, R. Dowling, P. Chatterjee, “Municipal Statecraft for the Smart City: Retooling the Smart Entrepreneurial City?,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53: 7 (2021) 1730–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Miller, K. Ward, R. Burns, V. Fast, A. Levenda, “Worlding and Provincialising Smart Cities: From Individual Case Studies to a Global Comparative Research Agenda,” Urban Studies 58: 3 (2021) 655–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. T. Neves, M. de Castro Neto, M. Aparicio, “The Impacts of Open Data Initiatives on Smart Cities: A Framework for Evaluation and Monitoring,” Cities 106 (2020) 102860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nilssen, “To the Smart City and Beyond? Developing a Typology of Smart Urban Innovation,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. T. O’Brien, The Urban Commons: How Data and Technology Can Rebuild Our Communities (Illustrated edition) (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. Patton, Transporting Our City to the Future: Five Lessons Learned Since the Smart City Challenge | SmartColumbus Smart Columbus (2021) <https://smartcolumbus.com/playbook-assets/our-journey/transporting-our-city-to-the-futurer-five-lessons-learned-since-the-smart-city-challenge> Accessed April 29, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• R.W.S. Ruhlandt, “The Governance of Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review,” Cities 81 (2018) 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Shelton, T. Lodato, “Actually Existing Smart Citizens: Expertise and (Non)participation in the Making of the Smart City,” City 23: 1 (2019) 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• T. Shelton, A. Poorthuis, “The Nature of Neighborhoods: Using Big Data to Rethink the Geographies of Atlanta’s Neighborhood Planning Unit System,” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109: 5 (2019) 1341–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Shelton, M. Zook, A. Wiig, “The ‘Actually Existing Smart City,’” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 1 (2015) 13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart Cities Council. Members & Partners. Smart Cities Council. (2022) <https://www.smartcitiescouncil.com/members> Accessed 25 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Spicer, N. Goodman, N. Olmstead, “The Frontier of Digital Opportunity: Smart City Implementation in Small, Rural and Remote Communities in Canada,” Urban Studies 58: 3 (2021) 535–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Taylor Buck, A. While, “Competitive Urbanism and the Limits to Smart City Innovation: The UK Future Cities Initiative,” Urban Studies 54: 2 (2017) 501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technology Strategy Board (TSB). Solutions for Cities: An Analysis of the Feasibility Studies from the Future Cities Demonstrator Programme. Technology Strategy Board (2013). <http://www.arup.com/en/publications/research/section/solutions-for-cities>
   Google Scholar
• D. Toppeta, “The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT Can Build Smart, “Livable”, Sustainable Cities,” The Innovation Knowledge Foundation, 5: 1 (2010), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge, Notice of Funding Opportunity Number DTFH6116RA00002, (2015) December 7, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge—Phase 2, Notice of Funding Opportunity Number DTFH6116RA00002, (2016) March 25, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT).: Smart City Challenge Finalists Project Proposals Dataset. (2017a). <https://data.transportation.gov/Research-and-Statistics/Smart-City-Challenge-Finalists-Project-Proposals-C/4zfz-amsd>.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). Beyond Traffic 2045, (2017b). <https://www.transportation.gov/policy-initiatives/beyond-traffic-2045-final-report>.
   Google Scholar
• J. Viitanen, R. Kingston, “Smart Cities and Green Growth: Outsourcing Democratic and Environmental Resilience to the Global Technology Sector,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46: 4 (2014) 803–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Wiig, “The Empty Rhetoric of the Smart City: From Digital Inclusion to Economic Promotion in Philadelphia,” Urban Geography 37: 4 (2016) 535–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Wilson, A. Chakraborty, “Planning Smart(er) Cities: The Promise of Civic Technology,” Journal of Urban Technology 26: 4 (2019) 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. van Winden, D. van den Buuse, “Smart City Pilot Projects: Exploring the Dimensions and Conditions of Scaling Up,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 4 (2017) 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Yigitcanlar, H. Han, Md. Kamruzzaman, G. Ioppolo, J. Sabatini-Marques, “The Making of Smart Cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the Best We Could Build?,” Land Use Policy 88 (2019) 104187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Zheng, J. Yuan, L. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Q. Shao, “From Digital to Sustainable: A Scientometric Review of Smart City Literature between 1990 and 2019,” Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar