Distinguishing preeclampsia using the falling scaled slope (FSS) --- a novel photoplethysmographic morphological parameter

References

• Poon LC, Shenan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynecol Obst. 2019;145(S1):1–10. DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameil NA, Khan FA, Khan MF, et al. A brief overview of Preeclampsia. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(1):1–7. DOI:10.4021/jocmr1682w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9694):979–988. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60736-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi TM, Argyro S, Poon LC, et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(6):756–760. DOI:10.1002/uog.17455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005;330(7491):565–567. doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana S, Powe CE, Salahuddin S, et al. Angiogenic factors and the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia. Circulation. 2012;125(7):911–919. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.054361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenburg HCS. Prevention of pre-eclampsia: status and perspectives 2000. EJOG. 2001;94(1):13–22. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00303-1.
   Google Scholar
• Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantranine F, et al. Predictive value of the sFlt-1: pIGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. NEJM. 2016;374(1):13–22. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1414838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu XL, Wang J, Jiang RZ, et al. Pulsatility index in combination with biomarkers or mean arterial pressure for the prediction of pre-eclampsia: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2015;47(5):414–422. DOI:10.3109/07853890.2015.1059483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LC, Maiz N, Valencia C, et al. First-trimester maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and pre-eclampsia. UOG. 2009;33(1):23–33. DOI:10.1002/uog.6280
   Google Scholar
• Duhig KE, Myers J, Seed PT, et al. Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10183):1807–1818. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33212-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevalainen J, Korpimaki T, Kouru H, et al. Performance of first trimester biochemical markers and mean arterial pressure in prediction of early-onset pre-eclampsia. Metabolism. 2017;75:6–15. DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2017.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su F, Li Z, Sun X, et al. The pulse wave analysis of normal pregnancy: investigating the gestational effects on photoplethysmographic signals. BIO-Med mater Eng. 2014;24(1):209–219. DOI:10.3233/BME-130801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thadhani R, Ecker JL, Kettyle E, et al. Pulse pressure and risk of preeclampsia: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(4):515–520. DOI:10.1097/00006250-200104000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fava C, Nesta E, Amen G, et al. Vascular function in Preeclampsia. Analysis of digital volume pulse by photoplethysmography. Artery Res. 2010;4(4):183–183. DOI:10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.132
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Drzymalski D, Zhao B, et al. Measurement of area difference ratio of photoplethysmographic pulse wave in patients with pre-eclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2018;18(1):1–5. DOI:10.1186/s12884-018-1914-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen H, Jiang F, Drzymalski D, et al. A novel parameter derived from photoplethysmographic pulse wave to distinguish preeclampsia from non-preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;15:166–170. DOI:10.1016/j.preghy.2019.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz MB, Burmann M, Neubauser A, et al. Augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in normotensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. AOGS. 2013;92(8):960–966. DOI:10.1111/aogs.12145
   Google Scholar
• Euliano TY, Michalopoulos K, Singh S, et al. Photoplethysmography and heart rate variability for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):913–919. DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty DM, Neisius U, Rooney LK, et al. Pulse wave analysis for the prediction of preeclampsia. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28(2):98–104. DOI:10.1038/jhh.2013.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsipi I, Stylianou K, Petrakis I, et al. The use of pulse wave velocity in predicting pre-eclampsia in high-risk women. Hypertens Res. 2014;37(8):733–740. DOI:10.1038/hr.2014.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun XR, Su FG, Chen XL, et al. Doppler ultrasound and photoplethysmographic assessment for identifying pregnancy‑induced hypertension. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19:1955–1960. DOI:10.3892/etm.2019.8405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomsin K, Mesens T, Molenberghs G, et al. Venous pulse transit time in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. 2012;19(4):431–436. DOI:10.1177/1933719111424440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alian AA, Shelley KH. Photoplethysmography. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28(4):395–406. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2014.08.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mabie WC, DiSessa TG, Crocker LG, et al. A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. AJOG. 1994;170(3):849–856. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70297-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvekot JJ, Cheriex EC, Pieters FAA, et al. Early pregnancy changes in hemodynamics and volume homeostasis are consecutive adjustments triggered by a primary fall in systemic vascular tone. AJOG. 1993;169(6):1382–1392. DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90405-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodratigohar M, Ghanadian H, Osman HA. A remote respiration rate measurement method for non-stationary subjects using ceemdan and machine learning. IEEE Sens J. 2020;20(3):1400–1410. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2946132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy AM, Louie AK, Roberts LW. Machine learning and the profession of medicine. JAMA. 2016;315(6):551–552. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.18421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future-big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216–1219. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1606181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottaci L, Drew PJ, Hartley JE, et al. Artificial neural networks applied to outcome prediction for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions. Lancet. 1997;350(9076):469–472. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)11196-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frizzell JD, Liang L, Schulte PJ, et al. Prediction of 30-day all-cause readmissions in patients hospitalized for heart failure: comparison of machine learning and other statistical approaches. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(2):204–209. DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhee JH, Lee SH, Park Y, et al. Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221202. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0221202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny LC, Duun WB, Eills DI, et al. Novel biomarkers for pre-eclampsia detected using metabolomics and machine learning. Metabolomics. 2005;1(3):227–234. DOI:10.1007/s11306-005-0003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Velasco A, Martínez-Villaseñor L, Miralles-Pechuán L. Machine learning approach for pre-eclampsia risk factors association. Goodtechs’18: International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good;2018 Nov 28-30; Bologna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Aljameel SS, Alzahrani M, Almusharraf R, et al. Prediction of preeclampsia using machine learning and deep learning models: a review. NDPI. 2023;7(1):1–18. DOI:10.3390/bdcc7010032
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhang ZY, Li HC, et al. A cost-effective machine learning-based method for preeclampsia risk assessment and driver genes discovery. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):1–12. DOI:10.1186/s13578-023-00991-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansbacher-Feldman Z, Syngelaki A, Meirim H, et al. Machine-learning-based prediction of pre-eclampsia using first-trimester maternal characteristics and biomarkers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(6):739–745. DOI:10.1002/uog.26105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simbolon O, Widyawati MN, Kurnianingsih K, et al. Predicting the risk of preeclampsia using soft voting-based ensemble and its recommendation. 2020 International Symposium on Community-Centric Systems; 2020 Sep 23-26; Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang M, Wang Y, Fu Q, et al. Preeclampsia risk prediction model for Chinese pregnant patients with systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72(11):1602–1610. DOI:10.1002/acr.24265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoffe L, Gilam A, Yaron O, et al. Early detection of preeclampsia using circulating small non-coding RNA. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–12. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-21604-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awodeyi AE, Alty SR, Ghavami M. On the filtering of photoplethysmography signals. IEEE 14th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering. 2014 Nov 10-12, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wei C, Sheng L, Hua GL, et al. Study on conditioning and feature extraction algorithm of photoplethysmography signal for physiological parameters detection. 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing; 2014 Oct 15-17; China, Shanghai.
   Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. JMLR. 2011;12(85):2825–2830.
   Google Scholar
• Altman NS. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Stat. 1992;46(3):175–185. DOI:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utgoff PE. Incremental induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. 1989;4(2):161–186. doi:10.1023/A:1022699900025.
   Google Scholar
• Ho TK. Random decision forests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition; 1995 Aug 14-16, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar