Does Values-Based Interpretation Make a Difference? Testing Impacts on Visitors’ Environmental Learning and Reported Adoption of Environmentally Responsible Behaviors

References

• Adelman, L., Haley-Goldman, K., & Falk, J. H. (2001). Phase 2 impact study: The National Aquarium in Baltimore. Institute for Learning Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R. (2007). Post-visit ‘action resourcing’: Promoting and supporting visitor adoption of environmentally sustainable behaviours [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the CAUTHE 2007 Conference: Tourism-Past Achievements, Future Challenges, Sydney. University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., Lee, J., Packer, J., & Sneddon, J. (2018). Visitors’ values and environmental learning outcomes at wildlife attractions: Implications for interpretive practice. Tourism Management, 64, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., Sneddon, J., Packer, J., & Lee, J. (2021). Facilitating visitors’ adoption of environmentally sustainable behaviour: Developing a values-based interpretation matrix. Tourism Management, 84, 104243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free-choice learning experiences: What’s the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500081145
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2011). Using tourism free-choice learning experiences to promote environmentally sustainable behaviour: The role of post-visit ‘action resources’. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.530645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2016). Visitors’ perceptions of the conservation education role of zoos and aquariums: Implications for the provision of learning experiences. Visitor Studies, 19(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1220185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Falk, J. (2011). Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Gill, C. (2018). Post-visit reinforcement of zoo conservation messages: The design and testing of an action resource website. Visitor Studies, 21(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Sutherland, L. (2011). Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management, 32(4), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. J., Ham, S. H., & Hughes, M. (2010). Picking up litter: An application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(7), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003721281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueddefeld, J. N. H., & Van Winkle, C. M. (2018). The role of post-visit action resources in facilitating meaningful free-choice learning after a zoo visit. Environmental Education Research, 24(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1198952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dreu, C., & Boles, T. (1998). Share and share alike or winner take all?: The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(3), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierking, L. D., Adelman, L. M., Ogden, J., Lehnhardt, K., Miller, L., & Mellen, J. D. (2004). Using a behavior change model to document the impact of visits to Disney’s Animal Kingdom: A study investigating intended conservation action. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00128.x
   Google Scholar
• Esson, M., & Moss, A. (2014). Zoos as a context for reinforcing environmentally responsible behaviour: The dual challenges that zoo educators have set themselves. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 2(1), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Grajal, A. (2013). Zoos as ecotourism experiences. In R. Ballantyne, & J. Packer (Eds.), International handbook on ecotourism (pp. 464–469). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grajal, A., Luebke, J. F., & Kelly, L. D. (2018). Why zoos have animals: Exploring the complex pathway from experiencing animals to pro-environmental behaviors. In B. A. Minteer, J. Maienschein, & J. P. Collins (Eds.), The ark and beyond: The evolution of zoo and aquarium conservation (pp. 192–203). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S. (1992). Environmental interpretation – a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Fulcrum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S. (2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose. Fulcrum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S., & Weiler, B. (2007). Isolating the role of on-site interpretation in a satisfying experience. Journal of Interpretation Research, 12(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258720701200202
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, K., & Hughes, K. (2018). Protecting the Great Barrier Reef: Analysing the impact of a conservation documentary and post-viewing strategies on long-term conservation behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1303820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K. (2011). Designing post-visit action resources for families visiting wildlife tourism sites. Visitor Studies, 14(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.557630
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K. (2013). Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: Do positive intentions equate to long-term changes in conservation behaviour? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.681788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., & Ballantyne, R. (2013). Winning hearts and minds through interpreting ecotourism experiences: Walking the talk. In R. Ballantyne & J. Packer (Eds.), International handbook on ecotourism (pp. 322–335). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., & Moscardo, G. (2019). ICT and the future of tourist management. Journal of Tourism Futures, 5(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-12-2018-0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2011). Using post‐visit action resources to support family conservation learning following a wildlife tourism experience. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.540644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., Airey, D., & Szivas, E. (2011). The multiple assessment of interpretation effectiveness: Promoting visitors’ environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 50(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, B. K., & Ham, S. H. (2003). Assessment of communication focused on human-black bear conflict at Yosemite National Park. Journal of Interpretation Research, 8(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258720300800103
   Google Scholar
• Learmonth, M. J., Chiew, S. J., Godinez, A., & Fernandez, E. J. (2021). Animal-visitor interactions and the visitor experience: Visitor behaviors, attitudes, perceptions, and learning in the modern zoo. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 8(4), 632–649. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.08.04.13.2021
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. A., Evers, U., Sneddon, J. N., Rahn, O., & Schwartz, S. H. (2019). What do we value? How our values influence everyday behaviours. Center for Human and Cultural Values, University of Western Australia, http://whatdowevalue.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Values-Report-Final-2019-SM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Luebke, J. F., & Grajal, A. (2011). Assessing mission-related learning outcomes at zoos and aquaria: Prevalence, barriers and needs. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.608013
   Google Scholar
• Malamud, R., Broglio, R., Marino, L., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nobis, N. (2010). Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? A critical evaluation of the American zoo and aquarium study. Society & Animals, 18(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853010X491980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, J., & Reid, S. (2007). Minimizing visitor impacts to protected areas: The efficacy of low impact education programs. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost593.0
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, G., Dyer, P., & Richins, H. (2004). Dolphin-human interaction: Pro-environmental attitudes, beliefs and intended behaviours and actions of participants in interpretation programs: A pilot study. Annals of Leisure Research, 7(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2004.10600938
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. (2009). “Me it’s all happening at the zoo”: Discourse, power, and conservationism. Environmental Communication, 3(1), 25–48. Somethin’tells https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802674174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscardo, G. (1998). Interpretation and sustainable tourism: Functions, examples and principles. Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(1), 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, O. E., Jr, Saunders, C. D., & Birjulin, A. A. (2004). Emotional dimensions of watching zoo animals: An experience sampling study building on insights from psychology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00127.x
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (Eds.). (2013). Encouraging reflective visitor experiences in ecotourism. In International handbook on ecotourism (pp.169–177). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., Sneddon, J., & Lee, J. (2022). Differences between zoo/aquarium staff and visitors’ values, attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors: Consequences for environmental communication. Visitor Studies, 25(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2022.2032927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, P. G., & Caplow, S. (2018). Identifying the foci of mission statements of the zoo and aquarium community. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1438205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. B., & Ham, S. H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(4), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802154223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). American Psychological Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2021). A repository of Schwartz value scales with instructions and an introduction. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1173
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., Broad, S., & Weiler, B. (2008). A closer examination of the impact of zoo visits on visitor behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(5), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802159628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L., Weiler, B., Smith, A., & van Dijk, P. (2012). Applying visitor preference criteria to choose pro-wildlife behaviors to ask of zoo visitors. Curator: The Museum Journal, 55(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2012.00168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K., & Moscardo, G. (2014). Encouraging sustainability beyond the tourist experience: Ecotourism, interpretation and values. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22(8), 1175–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.918134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, M., Ardoin, N. M., Hunt, C., Schuh, J. S., Kresse, M., Menke, C., & Durham, W. (2016). Using web and mobile technology to motivate pro-environmental action after a nature-based tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(4), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1081600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. (2015). Committing to conservation: The world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy. Retrieved September 1, 2021, from https://www.waza.org/priorities/conservation/conservation-strategies/
   Google Scholar