In vivo biodegradation and biological properties of a Mg-Zn-Ca amorphous alloy for bone defect repair

References

• Migliorini F, La Padula G, Torsiello E, et al. Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00593-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumhauer J, Pinzur MS, Donahue R, et al. Site selection and pain outcome after autologous bone graft harvest. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(2):104–19. doi: 10.1177/1071100713511434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kar AK, Kaja A, et al. More weighted cancellous bone can be harvested from the proximal tibia with less donor site pain than anterior iliac crest corticocancellous bone harvesting: retrospective review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:220. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02364-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternheim A, Drexler M, Kuzyk PR, et al. Treatment of failed allograft prosthesis composites used for hip arthroplasty in the setting of severe proximal femoral bone defects. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):1058–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederauer GG, Lee DR, Sankaran S. Bone grafting in arthroscopy and sports medicine. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2006;14(3):163–168. doi: 10.1097/00132585-200609000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodham PL, Giannoudis VP, Kanakaris NK, et al. Biological aspects to enhance fracture healing. EFORT Open Rev. 2023;8(5):264–282. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Xu H, Wang Y, et al. Hot tearing analysis and process optimisation of the fire face of Al-Cu alloy cylinder head based on MAGMA numerical simulation. Mater Technol. 2023;38(1):2165245. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2165245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK . Enabling manufacturing of multi-axial forging-induced ultrafine-grained strong and ductile magnesium alloys: a perspective of process-structure-property paradigm. Mater Technol. 2023;38(1):2189769. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2189769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning H, Li X, Meng L, et al. Effect of Ni and Mo on microstructure and mechanical properties of grey cast iron. Mater Technol. 2023;38(1):2172991. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2172991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Challa VSA. VSY injeti, phase reversion-induced nanostructured austenitic alloys: an overview. Mater Technol. 2022;37(7):437–449. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2022.2065621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Zuo H, Feng J, et al. Strain rate and temperature sensitivity on the flow behaviour of a duplex stainless steel during hot deformation. Mater Technol. 2023;38:2166216. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2166216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu G, Zurob HS, Misra RDK, et al. Superior fracture toughness in a high-strength austenitic steel with heterogeneous lamellar microstructure. Acta Materialia. 2022;226:117642. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Su X, Dai L, et al. Strain ageing embrittlement behaviour of X80 self-shielded flux-cored girth weld metal. Mater Technol. 2023;38(1):2164978. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2164978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Li J, Liu ZQ, et al. Towards strength-ductility synergy in nanosheets strengthened titanium matrix composites through laser power bed fusion of MXene/Ti composite powder. Mater Technol. 2023;38:2181680. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2181680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro AGB, Polini A, Azami Z, et al. Incorporation of PLLA micro-fillers for mechanical reinforcement of calcium-phosphate cement. J Mech Behav Biom Mat. 2017;71:286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Dong J, Fu H, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies on the biodegradable behavior and bone response of Mg69Zn27Ca4 metal glass for treatment of bone defect. J Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35(10):2254–2262. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK. Strong and ductile texture-free ultrafine-grained magnesium alloy via three-axial forging. Mater Lett. 2023;331:133443. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver MR, Maldonado AJ, Banuelos JL, et al. On precipitation hardening behaviour in a triaxial forged Mg-2Zn-2Gd alloy and relationship to mechanical properties. Mater Technol. 2023;38:2215038. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2023.2215038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xu J, Ruan YC, et al. Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats. Nat Med. 2016;22(10):1160–1169. doi: 10.1038/nm.4162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Xie X, Tang H, et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation behavior of Mg-2Sr-Ca and Mg-2Sr-Zn alloys. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(2):275–285. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Wu H, Zan R, et al. Microstructure controls the corrosion behavior of a lean biodegradable Mg-2Zn alloy. Acta Biomater. 2020;107:349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parande G, Manakari V, Prasadh S, et al. Strength retention, corrosion control and biocompatibility of Mg-zn-Si/HA nanocomposites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103584. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte F, Fischer J, Nellesen J, et al. In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1013–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus T, Fischerauer SF, Hänzi AC, et al. Magnesium alloys for temporary implants in osteosynthesis: in vivo studies of their degradation and interaction with bone. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(3):1230–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biały M, Hasiak M, Łaszcz A. Review on biocompatibility and prospect biomedical applications of novel functional metallic glasses. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(4):245. doi: 10.3390/jfb13040245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zberg B, Uggowitzer PJ, Löffler JF. MgZnCa glasses without clinically observable hydrogen evolution for biodegradable implants. Nat Mater. 2009;8(11):887–891. doi: 10.1038/nmat2542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Zheng Y, Zhong S, et al. Corrosion of, and cellular responses to Mg-zn-ca bulk metallic glasses. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1093–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhu X, Etim IP, et al. Comparative study of the effects of MAO coating and Ca-P coating on the biodegradation and biocompatibility of Mg69Zn27Ca4metal glass. Mater Technol. 2022;37:21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Tan L. Effect of simulated body fluid environment on degradation performance of Mg66Zn30Ca4 amorphous alloy. Chin. J Nonferrous Met. 2023;33(02):531–539. doi: 10.11817/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2021-42508
   Google Scholar
• ISO 10993-15:2019. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 15: Identification and quantification of degradation products from metals and alloys. 2nd ed; 2019. p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM G31-72(2004). standard practice for laboratory immersion corrosion testing of metals. Vol. 03.02. Phila-delphia, PA, USA: Annual Book of ASTM Standards., American Society for Testing and Materials; 2004. p. 8. doi: 10.1520/G0031-72R04
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Sanchez AH, Luthringer BJ, Feyerabend F, et al. Mg and Mg alloys: how comparable are in vitro and in vivo corrosion rates? A review. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:16–31. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Jia B, Yang H, et al. Biodegradable ZnLiCa ternary alloys for critical-sized bone defect regeneration at load-bearing sites: in vitro and in vivo studies. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(11):3999–4013. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng ZW, Chen YH, Wu DY, et al. Development of an accurate and proactive immunomodulatory strategy to improve bone substitute material-mediated osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Theranostics. 2018;8(19):5482–5500. doi: 10.7150/thno.28315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Byun H, Madhurakkat Perikamana SK, et al. Current advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(4):e1801106. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Shen D, Zhou W, et al. Regulation of extracellular bioactive cations in bone tissue microenvironment induces favorable osteoimmune conditions to accelerate in situ bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(8):2315–2330. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajarinen J, Lin T, Gibon E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials. 2019;196:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller KL, Nassiri S, Witherel CE, et al. Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015;37:194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparuhova MB, Caballé-Serrano J, Buser D, et al. Bone-conditioned medium contributes to initiation and progression of osteogenesis by exhibiting synergistic TGF-β1/BMP-2 activity. Int J Oral Sci. 2018;10:20. doi: 10.1038/s41368-018-0021-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Song D, Wu K, et al. Sequential activation of M1 and M2 phenotypes in macrophages by mg degradation from ti-mg alloy for enhanced osteogenesis. Biomater Res. 2022;26(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40824-022-00262-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costantino MD, Schuster A, Helmholz H, et al. Inflammatory response to magnesium-based biodegradable implant materials. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:598–608. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessa-Gonçalves M, Silva AM, Brás JP, et al. Fibrinogen and magnesium combination biomaterials modulate macrophage phenotype, NF-kB signaling and crosstalk with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Acta Biomater. 2020;114:471–484. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Wu C, Zhang X, et al. Regulation of immune response by bioactive ions released from silicate bioceramics for bone regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018;66:81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, et al. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials. 2006;27(9):1728–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao DW, Du CM, Zuo KQ, et al. Calcium–zinc phosphate chemical conversion coating facilitates the osteointegration of biodegradable zinc alloy implants by orchestrating macrophage phenotype. Adv Healthcare Materials. 2023;12(9):e2202537. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Chen Q, Mao X. Magnesium Enhances Osteogenesis of BMSCs by Tuning Osteoimmunomodulation. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7908205. doi: 10.1155/2019/7908205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojyo S, Fukada T. Roles of zinc signaling in the immune system. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:6762343. doi: 10.1155/2016/6762343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar