320
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Mobile phones as an autoethnographic resource for constructing modern gendered subjectivity

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Adey, P. (2006). If mobility is everything then it is nothing: Towards a relational politics of (im)mobilities. Mobilities, 1(1), 75–94. doi:10.1080/17450100500489080
  • Anderson, B. (2013). Tricks, lies and mobile phones: Phone friend stories in Papua, New Guinea. Culture, Theory & Critique, 54(3), 318–334. doi:10.1080/14735784.2013.811886
  • Archambault, J. (2011). Breaking up ‘because of the phone’ and the transformative potential of information in Southern Mozambique. New Media & Society, 13(3), 444–456. doi:10.1177/1461444810393906
  • Asiedu, C. (2012). Information communication technologies for gender and development: A review of the literature. Information, Communication & Society, 15(8), 1186–1216. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.610467
  • Avle, S., Quartey, E., & Hutchful, D.2018Research on mobile phone data in the global south: Opportunities and challengesIn B. Welles & S. Gonzalez-BailonEds.The oxford handbook of networked communicationonline10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190460518.013.33
  • Benz, A. (2014). Mobility, multilocality and translocal development: Changing livelihoods in the karakoram. Geographica Helvetica, 69(4), 259–270. doi:10.5194/gh-69-259-2014
  • Benz, A. (2016). Framing modernization interventions: Reassessing the role of migration and translocality in sustainable mountain development in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Mountain Research & Development, 36(2), 141–152. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00055.1
  • Burrell, J. (2010). Evaluating shared access: Social equality and the circulation of mobile phones in rural Uganda. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 230–250. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01518.x
  • Butz, D. (2001). Autobiography, autoethnography and intersubjectivity: analyzing communication in northern Pakistan. In P. Moss (Ed.), Placing Autobiography in Geography: History, Method and Analysis (pp. 149–166). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  • Butz, D. (2010). Autoethnography as sensibility. In D. DeLyser, S. Aitken, S. Herbert, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative geography (pp. 138–155). London: Sage.
  • Butz, D., & Besio, K. (2004). The value of autoethnography for field research in transcultural settings. The Professional Geographer, 6(3), 350–360. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05603004.x
  • Butz, D., & Besio, K. (2009). Autoethnography. Geography Compass, 3(5), 1660–1674 .
  • Butz, D., & Cook, N. (2018). Autoethnography, knowledge governance and the PANOS oral testimony program in Shimshal, Pakistan. Naveiñ Reet: Nordic Journal of Law & Social Research, 8, 27–44.
  • Chipps, J., Pimmer, C., Brysiewicz, P., Walters, F., Linxen, S., Ndebele, T., & Grohbiel, U. (2015). Using mobile phones and social media to facilitate education and support for rural-based midwives in South Africa. Curationis, 38(2), 1500. doi:10.4102/curationis.v38i2.1500
  • Chuma, W. (2014). The social meanings of mobile phones among South Africa’s ‘digital natives’: A case study. Media, Culture & Society, 36(3), 398–408. doi:10.1177/0163443713517482
  • Cook, N., & Butz, D. (2017). Gendered mobilities in the making: Moving from a pedestrian to vehicular mobility landscape in Shimshal, Pakistan. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(5), 606–625 .
  • Cook, N., & Butz, D. 2021. Reference removed to preserve blind review ‘The road changes everything’: Shifting gendered mobilities, spatialities and subjectivities in Shimshal, Pakistan. Gender, Place & Culture, 28(10), 800–822.
  • Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. London: Routledge.
  • Dalakoglou, D. (2010). The road: An ethnography of the Albanian-Greek cross-border motorway. American Ethnologist, 37(1), 132–149. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01246.x
  • Demenge, J. (2012). The road to lingshed: Manufactured isolation and experienced mobility in Ladakh. Himalaya, 32(1), 51–60.
  • Donner, J., & Escobari, M. (2010). A review of evidence on mobile use by micro and small enterprises in developing countries. Journal of International Development, 22(5), 641–658. doi:10.1002/jid.1717
  • Elliot, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. London: Routledge.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Goggin, G., & Clark, J. (2009). Mobile phones and community development: A contact zone between media and citizenship. Development in Practice, 19(4/5), 585–597. doi:10.1080/09614520902866371
  • Hahn, H., & Kibora, L. (2008). The domestication of the mobile phone: Oral society and the new ICT in Burkina Faso. Journal of Modern African Studies, 46(1), 87–109. doi:10.1017/S0022278X07003084
  • Handapangoda, W., & Kumara, A. (2013). The world after fingertips? Examining the empowerment potential of mobile phones among poor housewives in Sri Lanka. Gender, Technology & Development, 17(3), 361–385. doi:10.1177/0971852413498742
  • Harvey, P., & Knox, H. (2012). The enchantments of infrastructure. Mobilities, 7(4), 521–536. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.718935
  • Jouhki, J. (2013). A phone of one’s own? Social value, cultural meaning and gendered use of the mobile phone in south India. Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 38(1), 37–58.
  • Kwami, J. (2016). Development from the margins? Mobile technologies, transnational mobilities and livelihood practices among Ghanaian women traders. Communication, Culture & Critique, 19(1), 148–168. doi:10.1111/cccr.12136
  • Larsen, J., Urry, J., & Axhausen, K. (2006). Mobilities, networks, geographies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Martinez, I., Aguado, J., & Tortajada, I. (2012). Managing the unbalanced: Gendered mobile appropriation, identity boundaries and social role construction. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 506–515. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.741867
  • Mostowlansky, T. (2017). Azan on the moon: Entangling modernity along Tajikistan’s Pamir Highway. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Murphy, L., & Priebe, A. (2011). My co-wife can borrow my mobile phone: Gendered geographies of cell phone usage and significance for rural Kenyans. Gender, Technology & Development, 15(1), 1–23. doi:10.1177/097185241101500101
  • Porter, G. (2012). Mobile phones, livelihoods and the poor in sub-saharan Africa: Review and prospect. Geography Compass, 6(5), 241–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00484.x
  • Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E. … Owusu, S. (2020). Mobile phones, gender and female empowerment in sub-saharan Africa: Studies with African youth. Information Technology for Development, 26(1), 180–193. doi:10.1080/02681102.2019.1622500
  • Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rahim, S., Qutoshi, S., Sahar, G., Jabeen, G., & Ali, I. (2020). Mobile phone technologies in coping with the challenges and opportunities of CPEC by the Youth of Rural Mountainous Areas of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Mobile Information Systems, ID, 5816803. doi:10.1155/2020/5816803
  • Rettie, R. (2008). Mobile phones as network capital: Facilitating connections. Mobilities, 3(2), 291–311. doi:10.1080/17450100802095346
  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
  • Sey, A. (2011). We use it different, different: Making sense of trends in mobile phone use in Ghana. New Media & Society, 13(3), 375–390. doi:10.1177/1461444810393907
  • Sey, A., & Ortoleva, P. (2014). All work and no play? Judging the uses of mobile phones in developing countries. Information Technologies & International Development, 10(3), 1–17.
  • Sheller, M.2011MobilitySociopedia Isa1–12 Retrieved fromwww.sagepub.net/isa/admin/viewPDF.aspx?&art=Mobility.pdf
  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268
  • Smith, M., Spence, R., & Rashid, A. (2011). Mobile phones and expanding human capabilities. Information Technologies & International Development, 7(3), 77–88.
  • Spivak, G. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Steinberg, J. (2011). Isma’ili modern: Globalization and identity in a Muslim community. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Svensson, J., & Larsson, C. (2016). Situated empowerment: Mobile phones practices among market women in Kampala. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(2), 205–220. doi:10.1177/2050157915619212
  • Sylvester, G. (2016). Use of mobile phones by the rural poor: Gender perspectives from selected Asian countries. Ottawa, CA: IDRC.
  • Tacchi, J., Kitner, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Meaningful mobility: Gender, development and mobile phones. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 528–537. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.741869
  • Tawah, S. (2013). Market women and mobile phones in the northwest region of Cameroon: Managing informal market livelihoods and trade routes through mobile phones. Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 38(1), 59–82.
  • Taylor, A. (2012). More than mobile: Migration and mobility impacts from the technologies of change for aboriginal communities in the remote northern territory of Australia. Mobilities, 7(2), 269–294. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.654997
  • Thinyane, H., Sieböorger, I., & Reynell, E. (2015). The potential of mobile phones for increasing public participation in local government in South Africa. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 10(3), 241–259. doi:10.4102/td.v11i3.65
  • Walter, A. (2020). Establishing intimacy through mobile phone connections. In P. Schorch, M. Saxer, & M. Elders (Eds.), Exploring materiality and connectivity in anthropology and beyond (pp. 135–142). London: UCL Press.
  • Watson, A., & Duffield, L. (2016). From garamut to mobile phone: Communication change in rural Papua New Guinea. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(2), 270–287. doi:10.1177/2050157915622658
  • Wiley, S., & Packer, J. (2010). Rethinking communication after the mobilities turn. The Communication Review, 13(4), 263–268. doi:10.1080/10714421.2010.525458