716
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Stroke survivors’ acceptance and satisfaction of telerehabilitation delivery of physiotherapy services: a systematic review

& ORCID Icon
Pages 261-277 | Received 23 Sep 2022, Accepted 13 Sep 2023, Published online: 23 Oct 2023

References

  • Appleby E, Gill ST, Hayes LK, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225150.
  • Brouns B, van Bodegom-Vos L, de Kloet AJ, et al. The effect of a comprehensive eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation, on disability and health-related quality of life: a pre-post comparison. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53:85.
  • Torriani-Pasin C, dos Santos Palma GC, Makhoul MP, et al. Adherence rate, barriers to attend, safety, and overall experience of a remote physical exercise program during the COVID-19 pandemic for individuals after stroke. Front Psychol. 2021;12:647883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647883.
  • Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, et al. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(12):2660–2668. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014.
  • Klaic M, Galea MP. Using the technology acceptance model to identify factors that predict likelihood to adopt tele-neurorehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2020;11:580832. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.580832.
  • Caldeira C, Costa Figueiredo M, Dodakian L, et al. Towards supporting data-driven practices in stroke telerehabilitation technology. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2021;5(CSCW1):1–33. doi: 10.1145/3449099.
  • Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, et al. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(9):1079–1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.
  • da Fonseca EP, da Silva NM, Pinto EB. Therapeutic effect of virtual reality on post-stroke patients: randomized clinical trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.035.
  • Held JP, Ferrer B, Mainetti R, et al. Autonomous rehabilitation at stroke patients home for balance and gait: safety, usability and compliance of a virtual reality system. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(4):545–553. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04802-X.
  • Wittmann F, Held JP, Lambercy O, et al. Self-directed arm therapy at home after stroke with a sensor-based virtual reality training system. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13(1):1.
  • Gillespie D, MacLellan C, Ferguson-Pell M, et al. Balancing access with technology: comparing in-person and telerehabilitation berg balance scale scores among stroke survivors. Physiother Can. 2021;73(3):276–285. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0095.
  • Niknejad N, Ismail W, Bahari M, et al. Understanding telerehabilitation technology to evaluate stakeholders’ adoption of telerehabilitation services: a systematic literature review and directions for further research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(7):1390–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.014.
  • Ramage E, Fini N, Lynch E, et al. Look before you leap: interventions supervised via telehealth involving activities in Weight-Bearing or standing positions for people after stroke—a scoping review. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab073. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab073.
  • Laver KE, Adey‐Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):CD010255.
  • Tyagi S, Lim DS, Ho WH, et al. Acceptance of tele-rehabilitation by stroke patients: perceived barriers and facilitators. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(12):2472–2477.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.033.
  • Chumbler NR, Li X, Quigley P, et al. A randomized controlled trial on stroke telerehabilitation: the effects on falls self-efficacy and satisfaction with care. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(3):139–143. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15571995.
  • Rabanifar N, Abdi K, Department of Rehabilitation Management, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Barriers and challenges of implementing telerehabilitation: a systematic review. IRJ. 2021;19(2):121–128. doi: 10.32598/irj.19.2.1404.1.
  • Sharma S, Ward EC, Burns C, et al. Assessing dysphagia via telerehabilitation: patient perceptions and satisfaction. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15(2):176–183. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.689333.
  • Cook EJ, Randhawa G, Sharp C, et al. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1379-5.
  • Eriksen MB, Frandsen TF. The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):420.
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
  • Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. EFI. 2018;34(4):285–291. doi: 10.3233/EFI-180221.
  • Bernocchi P, Vanoglio F, Baratti D, et al. Home-based telesurveillance and rehabilitation after stroke: a real-life study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(2):106–115. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2015.1120453.
  • Galloway M, Marsden DL, Callister R, et al. The feasibility of a telehealth exercise program aimed at increasing cardiorespiratory fitness for people after stroke. Int J Telerehabil. 2019;11(2):9–28. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2019.6290.
  • Sarfo FS, Adusei N, Ampofo M, et al. Pilot trial of a tele-rehab intervention to improve outcomes after stroke in Ghana: a feasibility and user satisfaction study. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387:94–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.039.
  • Simpson DB, Bird ML, English C, et al. Connecting patients and therapists remotely using technology is feasible and facilitates exercise adherence after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(2):93–102. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1690779.
  • Bellomo RG, Paolucci T, Saggino A, et al. The WeReha project for an innovative home-based exercise training in chronic stroke patients: a clinical study. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2020;12:1179573520979866. doi: 10.1177/1179573520979866.
  • Murrock CJ, Bekhet A, Zauszniewski JA. Psychometric evaluation of the physical activity enjoyment scale in adults with functional limitations. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016;37(3):164–171. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2015.1088904.
  • Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2003;12(1):50.
  • Brooke J. SUS: a retrospective. J Usability Stud. 2013;8(2):29–40.
  • Reker DM, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al. Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):750–756. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.99736.
  • Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, et al. ‘Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it’: older rehabilitation patients’ experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect. 2017;20(1):120–129. doi: 10.1111/hex.12443.
  • Cranen K, Drossaert CH, Brinkman ES, et al. An exploration of chronic pain patients’ perceptions of home telerehabilitation services. Health Expect. 2012;15(4):339–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00668.x.
  • Kairy D, Tousignant M, Leclerc N, et al. The patient’s perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(9):3998–4011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10093998.
  • Eriksson L, Lindström B, Ekenberg L. Patients’ experiences of telerehabilitation at home after shoulder joint replacement. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):25–30. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100317.
  • Cottrell MA, Russell TG. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102193. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102193.