Reducing complexity, signaling, and the pathways to nonsensical policy

References

• Alcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6(2), 2053168019848554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D. M., & Howell, J. W. (Eds.). (2020). Groupthink in science: Greed, pathological altruism, ideology, competition, and culture. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organization. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194–1220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Spcier, A. (2016). The stupidity paradox: The power and pitfalls of functional stupidity at work. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. F., & Richardson, G. P. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 107–129. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson, I. G. (2018). Partisanship, political knowledge, and the Dunning‐Kruger effect. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1173–1192. doi:10.1111/pops.12490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astbury, C. C., McGill, E., Egan, M., & Penney, T. L. (2021). Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: A systematic scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 11(9), e049878. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2020). Rallying around the flag in times of COVID-19: Societal lockdown and trust in democratic institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2), 172. doi:10.30636/jbpa.32.172
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, V., & Zamponi, L. (2020). Social media time, identity narratives and the construction of political biographies. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 592–608. doi:10.1080/14742837.2020.1718489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2020). Social media, echo chambers, and political polarization. Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J. L., Power, E. A., Heap, S., Puurtinen, M., & Sosis, R. (2019). Content, cost, and context: A framework for understanding human signaling systems. Evolutionary Anthropology, 28(2), 86–99. doi:10.1002/evan.21768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., & Thompson, F. (2010). Back to the future: Making public administration a design science. Public Administration Review, 70, S295–S297. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 221–248. doi:10.1086/427115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2014). Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 238–248. doi:10.1002/acp.2995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. E., Kim, Y., & Eckerd, A. M. (2015). Rethinking environmental justice in sustainable cities: Insights from agent-based modeling. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. P., & May, P. J. (2020). Making sense of the U.S. Covid-19 pandemic response: A policy regime perspective. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(2), 265–277. doi:10.1080/10841806.2020.1758991
   Google Scholar
• Cerase, F. P. (1999). The unsustainable demise of public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(4), 419–426. doi:10.1080/10841806.1999.11643397
   Google Scholar
• Chabay, I., Koch, L., Martinez, G., & Scholz, G. (2019). Influence of narratives of vision and identity on collective behavior change. Sustainability, 11(20), 5680. doi:10.3390/su11205680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, G., Yarnal, C., & Purrington, A. (2012). Play and mate preference: Testing the signal theory of adult playfulness. American Journal of Play, 4(4), 407–440.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, R. S., McBeth, M. K., Peterson, R. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2020). The narrative policy framework and sticky beliefs: An experiment studying islamophobia. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 27(3), 472–500. doi:10.1163/15718115-02702002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. doi:10.1177/0149206310388419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantino, S. M., & Weber, E. U. (2021). Decision-making under the deep uncertainty of climate change: The psychological and political agency of narratives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D. & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as tools for influencing policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217–234. doi:10.1332/030557318X15230061022899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., & Head, B. W. (2017). The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: Revisiting Rittel and Webber. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 539–547. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9302-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. T. (2013). Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 5791–5796. doi:10.1073/pnas.1217220110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, E., Molina, K., Sanders, M., Lee, F., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Belonging and achieving: The role of identity integration. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 15, 241–273.
   Google Scholar
• de Warren, N. (2018). The maturity of stupidity: A philosophical attempt on Flaubert and others. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, 9(2), 17–42. doi:10.26913/avant.2018.02.02
   Google Scholar
• Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and Institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. doi:10.1177/1745691617746796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerd, A. (2014). Risk management and risk avoidance in agency decision making. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 616–629. doi:10.1111/puar.12240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., & Jensen Schleiter, A. (2021). Organizational identity struggles and reconstruction during organizational change: Narratives as symbolic, emotional and practical glue. Organization Studies, 42(6), 891–910. doi:10.1177/0170840619854484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., Light, N., Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 251–256. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., Rogers, T., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2013). Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological Science, 24(6), 939–946. doi:10.1177/0956797612464058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M., & Keil, F. C. (2016). The curse of expertise: When more knowledge leads to miscalibrated explanatory insight. Cognitive Science, 40(5), 1251–1269. doi:10.1111/cogs.12280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M., Goddu, M., & Keil, F. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 144(3), 674–687. doi:10.1037/xge0000070
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, M., & Gibbs, P. (2020). Contagion of violence: The role of narratives, worldviews, mechanisms of transmission and contagion entrepreneurs. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9(2), 37–59. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. J. (2002). Forum: What do we mean when we say ‘rationality’ in public affairs? Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(2), 347–354. doi:10.1080/10841806.2002.11029354
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. R., & Muselli, V. (2013). Reexamining climate change debates: Scientific disagreement. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 777–795. doi:10.1177/0002764212458274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L., Hunt, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2003). The views of scientific  experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 6(1), 75–85. doi:10.1080/1366987032000047815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funkhouser, E. (2022). A tribal mind: Beliefs that signal group identity or commitment. Mind & Language, 37(3), 444–464. doi:10.1111/mila.12326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, T. (2001). Analytical paradigms: The epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public. Risk Analysis, 21(3), 443–455. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.213124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., & Guilbeault, D. (2020). Unpacking the social media bot: A typology to guide research and policy. Policy & Internet, 12(2), 225–248. doi:10.1002/poi3.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. (2008). Ideologies of certainty in a risky reality: Beyond the hauntology of planning. Planning Theory, 7(2), 186–206. doi:10.1177/1473095208090434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. P., & Raimi, K. T. (2018). Is belief superiority justified by superior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76(2), 290–306. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. doi:10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerdink, M. W., Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Fischer, A. H. (2013). On the social influence of emotions in groups: interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 262–284. doi:10.1037/a0033362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211–231. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Ni, A. Y., Poocharoen, O. O., Yang, K., & Zhao, Z. J. (2011). The case for public administration with a global perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 1), i45–i51. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq070
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, J. O. (2010). Knowledge, belonging, and communities of practice. In Communication and organizational knowledge (pp. 57–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5(6), 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (2008). Groupthink. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 36–36. doi:10.1109/EMR.2008.4490137
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. doi:10.5751/ES-03802-160146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424. doi:10.1017/S1930297500005271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karasek, R., III, & Bryant, P. (2012). Signaling theory: Past, present, and future. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 91.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 1993, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Maroulis, S. (2018). Rethinking social welfare fraud from a complex adaptive systems perspective. Administration & Society, 50(1), 78–100. doi:10.1177/0095399715587520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. S. (2000). Talking beyond the rational. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(3), 271–291. doi:10.1177/02750740022064678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. S., Geng, Y. C., Shinwari, R., Yangjie, W., & Rjoub, H. (2021). Does renewable energy electricity and economic complexity index help to achieve carbon neutrality target of top exporting countries? Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113386. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, R., Xiao, L., & Glass, J. (Eds.). (2021). Democracy in the disinformation age: Influence and activism in American politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mamykina, L., Nakikj, D., & Elhadad, N. (2015, April). Collective sensemaking in online health forums. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3217–3226). doi:10.1145/2702123.2702566
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. C. (2008). The emergence of narrative identity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1685–1702. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00124.x
   Google Scholar
• McMorris, C., Zanocco, C., & Jones, M. (2018). Policy narratives and policy outcomes: An NPF examination of Oregon’s Ballot Measure 97. Policy Studies Journal, 46(4), 771–797. doi:10.1111/psj.12263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication, 7, 34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morçöl, G. (2005). A new systems thinking: Implications of the sciences of complexity for public policy and administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 297–320.
   Google Scholar
• Morçöl, G. (2005). Phenomenology of complexity theory and cognitive science: Implications for developing an embodied knowledge of public administration and policy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/10841806.2005.11029483
   Google Scholar
• Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 211(2018), 274–281. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.032
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 163–181. doi:10.1177/1745691610362351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, M. (2003). Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict. Policy Sciences, 36(3/4), 307–341. doi:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000017484.35981.b6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and complexity. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–396. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, E., Koliska, M., & Guha, P. (2019). “Shouting Matches and Echo Chambers”: Perceived identity threats and political self-censorship on social media. International Journal of Communication, 13, 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrooz, D. C., & Densley, J. A. (2016). Selection into street gangs: Signaling theory, gang membership, and criminal offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(4), 447–481. doi:10.1177/0022427815619462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1999). Harmful tax competition in the EU: Policy narratives and advocacy coalitions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 661–682. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1995). Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22(3), 147–156. doi:10.1093/spp/22.3.147
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, D. (2009). Managing with the brain in mind: Neuroscience research is revealing the social nature of the high-performance workplace. Strategy and Business, 56(4), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ronell, A. (2002). Stupidity. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. D., Rouse, S. M., & Mobley, W. (2019). Polarization of climate change beliefs: The role of the millennial generation identity. Social Science Quarterly, 100(7), 2625–2640. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schkade, D., Sunstein, C. R., & Hastie, R. (2010). When deliberation produces extremism. Critical Review, 22(2–3), 227–252. doi:10.1080/08913811.2010.508634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, F. E. (2001). Reconsidering a therapeutic role for the state: Anti-modernist governance and the reunification of the self. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23(2), 231–242. doi:10.1080/10841806.2001.11643513
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535–561. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkansky, I. (2002). Politics and policymaking: In search of simplicity. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Situmorang, D. D. B. (2021). ‘Herd stupidity’ as a result of ‘irrational beliefs’: The mental health issues in the COVID-19 outbreak. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 65, 102851. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, M., Batiste, F., & Cronk, L. (2014). In the eye (and ears) of the beholder: Receiver psychology and human signal design. Evolutionary Anthropology, 23(4), 136–145. doi:10.1002/evan.21413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R. (2006). Religious behaviors, badges, and bans: Signaling theory and the evolution of religion. Where god and science meet: How Brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion, 1, 61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1989). Causal stories and formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300. doi:10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Taves, A., Asprem, E., & Ihm, E. (2018). Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 207–217. doi:10.1037/rel0000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50–58. doi:10.1002/acp.3301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770–788. doi:10.1177/1745691618774270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578. doi:10.1177/1948550614567356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. (2020). Overclaiming knowledge predicts anti-establishment voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 356–363. doi:10.1177/1948550619862260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlastos, G. (1985). Socrates’ disavowal of knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 35(138), 1–31. doi:10.2307/2219545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S. E. (2013). How to choose between policy proposals: A simple tool based on systems thinking and complexity theory. Emergence, 15(3), 94–120.
   Google Scholar
• Westra, E. (2021). Virtue signaling and moral progress. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 49(2), 156–178. doi:10.1111/papa.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. D. (2013). “It’s just a theory”: Trainee science teachers’ misunderstandings of key scientific terminology. Evolution, 6(1), 1–9. doi:10.1186/1936-6434-6-12
   Google Scholar
• Zanocco, C., Song, G., & Jones, M. (2018). Fracking bad guys: The role of narrative character affect in shaping hydraulic fracking policy preferences. Policy Studies Journal, 46(4), 978–999. doi:10.1111/psj.12278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Shen, L. (2022). Confirmation bias and the persistence of misinformation on climate change. Communication Research, 49(4), 500–523. 00936502211028049. doi:10.1177/00936502211028049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingale, N. C., Cook, D., & Mazanec, M. (2018). Change calls upon public adminstrators to act, but in what way: Exploring administration as a platform for governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(3), 180–199. doi:10.1080/10841806.2018.1485447
   Google Scholar