Designing a Blockchain-Based Data Market and Pricing Data to Optimize Data Trading and Welfare

References

• Agarwal, A.; Dahleh, M.; and Sarkar, T. A marketplace for data: An algorithmic solution. In Association for Computing Machinery, ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC ’19), May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (1970), 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azcoitia, S.A.; and Laoutaris, N. A Survey of Data Marketplaces and Their Business Models (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, I.; Parra-Moyano, J.; Schmedders, K.; and Schwabe, G. Multi-party certification on blockchain and its impact in the market for lemons. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 2 (2022), 395–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, I.; Zavolokina, L.; Leisibach, F.; and Schwabe, G. Exploring blockchain value creation: The case of the car ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui, HI, 2019, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, I.; Zavolokina, L.; Leisibach, F.; and Schwabe, G. Value creation from a decentralized car ledger. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, I.; Zavolokina, L.; and Schwabe, G. Is there a market for trusted car data? Electronic Markets, 30, 2 (September 2019), 211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W.J.; and Bradiford, D.F. Optimal departures from marginal cost pricing. American Economic Review, 60, (1970), 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Avital, M.; Rossi, M.; and Thatcher, J.B. Blockchain technology in business and information systems research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 6 (2017), 381–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Czepluch Stemi, J.; Lollike, N.; and Malone, S. Blockchain—The gateway to trust-free cryptographic transactions. In Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems. Istanbul, Turkey, 2016, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Müller-Bloch, C.; and King, J. Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 10 (2018), 1020–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R.; Gu, R.; Leth-Petersen, S.; Low, H.; and Meghir, C. Durables and lemons: Private information and the market for cars. US National Bureau of Economic Research,Working Paper Series, 26281 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, Supplement 3 (2002), 7280–7287.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, E.W. A Direct test of the “lemons” model: The market for used pickup trucks. American Economic Review, 72, 4 (1982), 836–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.J.; and Heal, G.M. Marginal vs. average cost pricing in the presence of a public monopoly. American Economic Review, 73, 2 (1983), 189–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. Ethereum white paper, 2013. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. DAOs, DACs, DAs and more: An incomplete terminology guide. Ethereum Blog, 2014. https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/05/06/daos-dacs-das-and-more-an-incomplete-terminology-guide.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso. Caruso-Dataplace. 2022. https://www.caruso-dataplace.com.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation. Business Horizons, 61, 4 (2018), 567–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J.; and Ainsworth, J. Enabling patient control of personal electronic health records through distributed ledger technology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 245 (2017), 45–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dai, W.; Dai, C.; Choo, K.-K.R.; Cui, C.; Zou, D.; and Jin, H. SDTE: A secure blockchain-based data trading ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15 (2020), 725–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Filippi, P.; and Loveluck, B. The invisible politics of Bitcoin: Governance crisis of a decentralized infrastructure. Internet Policy Review, 5, 4 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, P.; and Saunders, C. The inter-organizational perspective in blockchain adoption within an ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems, An Online AIS Conference, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Drasch, B.J.; Fridgen, G.; Manner-Romberg, T.; Nolting, F.M.; and Radszuwill, S. The token’s secret: the two-faced financial incentive of the token economy. Electronic Markets (March 2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, D.; O’Hara, M.; and Basu, S. From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees. Journal of Financial Economics, 134, 1 (2019), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z.; Fang, H.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Improving fairness for data valuation in horizontal federated learning. In 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2022, pp. 2440–2453.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, R. On W. Arthur Lewis’ contributions to economics. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 82, 1 (1980), 62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, W.; Hatcher, W.G.; and Yu, W. A survey of blockchain: Techniques, applications, and challenges. In 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) (2018), pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, F. Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: A framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gozman, D.; Liebenau, J.; and Aste, T. A case study of using blockchain technology in regulatory technology. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19, 1 (2020), 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. and Baroody, A.J. Electronic health records and the logics of care: Complementarity and conflict in the U.S. healthcare system. Information Systems Research, 31, 1 (2020), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A.R. A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19, 2 (2007), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A.R.; March, S.T.; Park, J.; and Ram, S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, No. 1, 28 (2004), 75–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. The foundations of welfare economics. Economic Journal, 49, 196 (1939), 696–712.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, D.; Li, Y.; Pan, L.; Li, M.; and Zheng, S. A blockchain-based trading system for big data. Computer Networks, 191, (May 2021), 107994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J.E.; and Xu, X. Does scarcity add value in influencing consumers in the try-before-you-buy model? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 26, 1 (January 2022), 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiman, V.; and Urovi, V. A consent model for blockchain-based health data sharing platforms. IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 143734–143745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T.; Hedman, J.; and Henningsson, S. How TradeLens delivers business value with blockchain technology. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18, 4 (2019), 221–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C.; Stocker, A.; Viscusi, G.; Fellmann, M.; and Richter, A. Conceptualising value creation in data-driven services: The case of vehicle data. International Journal of Information Management, 59 (2021), 102335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutris, P.; Upadhyaya, P.; Balazinska, M.; Howe, B.; and Suciu, D. Toward practical query pricing with QueryMarket. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Management of Data—SIGMOD ’13. New York: ACM Press, 2013, p. 613.
   Google Scholar
• Koutroumpis, P.; Leiponen, A.; and Thomas, L.D.W. Markets for data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29, 3 (2020), 645–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S.; Pries-Heje, J.; and Baskerville, R. Theorizing in design science research. In H. Jain, A.P. Sinha and P. Vitharana (eds.), token. Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.-P.; Kohli, R.; Huang, H.-C.; and Li, Z.-L. What drives the adoption of the blockchain technology? A fit-viability perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 2 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindman, J.; Rossi, M.; and Virpi, K.T. Opportunities and risks of blockchain technologies in payments—A research agenda. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A.W. Efficient Markets Hypothesis (2007).
   Google Scholar
• López, D.; and Farooq, B. A multi-layered blockchain framework for smart mobility data-markets. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111, (2020), 588–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, C.; Li, J.; Ding, M.; et al. When federated learning meets blockchain: A new distributed learning paradigm. 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09338.
   Google Scholar
• Macal, C.M.; and North, M.J. Agent-based modeling and simulation. In Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). IEEE, Austin, TX, 2009, pp. 86–98.
   Google Scholar
• March, S.T.; and Smith, G.F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 4 (1995), 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand, M.G. The economic principles of telephone rates under a budgetary constraint. Review of Economic Studies, 40, 4 (1973), 507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marella, V.; Upreti, B.; Merikivi, J.; and Tuunainen, V.K. Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: The case of Bitcoin. Electronic Markets, 30, 2 (2020), 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli, M. Disclosing big data. Minnesota Law Review, 99 (2014), 534–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, H.B.; Moore, E.; Ramage, D.; Hampson, S.; and Arcas, B.A. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05629.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, H.B.; and Ramage, D. Federated learning: Collaborative machine learning without centralized training data. 2017. https://ai.googleblog.com/2017/04/federated-learning-collaborative.html.
   Google Scholar
• Miscione, G.; Goerke, T.; Klein, S.; Schwabe, G.; and Ziolkowski, R. From authentication to “Hanseatic governance”: Blockchain as organizational technology. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Miscione, G.; Richter, C.; and Ziolkowski, R. Authenticating deeds/organizing society: Considerations for blockchain-based land registries. In W. De Vries (ed.), Responsible and Smart Land Management Interventions: An African Context. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, 2020, pp. 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Moor, D.; Seuken, S.; Grubenmann, T.; and Bernstein, A. The design of a combinatorial data market. Technical report, University of Zurich (2019), 41.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M.D.; and Newman, M. The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17, 1 (2007), 2–26.
   Google Scholar
• Naerland, K.; Müller-Bloch, C.; Beck, R.; and Palmund, S. Blockchain to rule the waves—Nascent design principles for reducing risk and uncertainty in decentralized environments. Seoul, South Korea, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. The Cryptography Mailing List, 2008. http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Y.-K.; and Weisser, M. Optimal pricing with a budget constraint—The case of the two-part tariff. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 3 (1974), 337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D.C.; Ding, M.; Pham, Q.-V.; et al. Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges. 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01776.
   Google Scholar
• Notheisen, B.; Cholewa, J.B.; and Shanmugam, A.P. Trading real-world assets on blockchain: An application of trust-free transaction systems in the market for lemons. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 6 (2017), 425–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocean Protocol Foundation. Ocean Protocol: A decentralized substrate for AI data & services. Technical whitepaper. Ocean Protocol Foundation1 with BigchainDB GmbH2 and Newton Circus (DEX Pte. Ltd.)3, Version 2019-MAR-05 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ostern, N.K. Blockchain in the IS research discipline: A discussion of terminology and concepts. Electronic Markets (December 2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra-Moyano, J.; Schmedders, K.; and Pentland, A. What managers need to know about data exchanges. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61, 4 (2020), 39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, M.E. Blockchain world—Do you need a blockchain? This chart will tell you if the technology can solve your problem. IEEE Spectrum, 54, 10 (2017), 38–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K.; Tuunanen, T.; Rothenberger, M.A.; and Chatterjee, S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 3 (2007), 45–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, J. A Survey on data pricing: From economics to data science. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34, 10 (2022), 4586–4608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risius, M.; and Spohrer, K. A blockchain research framework: What we (don’t) know, where we go from here, and how we will get there. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 6 (2017), 385–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, M.; Mueller-Bloch, C.; Thatcher, C.; Bennett, J.; and Beck, R. Blockchain research in information systems: Current trends and an inclusive future research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 9 (2019), 1388–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saichev, A.; Malevergne, Y.; and Sornette, D. Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Henningsson, S.; Jensen, T.; and Hedman, J. Blockchain as a strategy for combating corruption in global shipping: An interpretive case study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 2 (2021), 338–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallbruch, M.; Schweitzer, H.; and Wambach, A. Europa stutzt die Digitalkonzerne. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 2021. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/europa-stutzt-die-digitalkonzerne-kampf-gegen-monopolstellungen-17158280.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schomm, F.; Stahl, F.; and Vossen, G. Marketplaces for data: An initial survey. ACM SIGMOD Record, 42, 1 (2013), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwill, F.C. Towards decentralized and privacy-preserving data marketplaces to unlock data for AI: An examination of Ocean Protocol. White paper (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Seebacher, S.; and Schüritz, R. Blockchain—Just another IT implementation? A comparison of blockchain and interorganizational information systems. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems. Stockholm–Uppsala, Sweden, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C.; and Varian, H. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Spychiger, F.; Zavolokina, L.; and Schwabe, G. Incentivizing data quality in blockchain-based systems—The case of the digital cardossier. ACM Distributed Ledger Technologies (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, H. Decentralized blockchain-based electronic marketplaces. Commun. ACM, 61, 1 (2018), 78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunyaev, A.; Kannengießer, N.; Beck, R.; et al. Token economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering (February 2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadeneke, A. case study on data markets in India and Japan show what is possible. Public Engagement, World Economic Forum, [email protected], 2021. https://www.weforum.org/press/2021/08/case-study-on-data-markets-in-india-and-japan-show-what-is-possible.
   Google Scholar
• Tasca, P.; and Tessone, C.J. A taxonomy of blockchain technologies: Principles of identification and classification. Ledger, 4 (February 2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. The juicy market for lemons. Can you buy a good second-hand car? The Economist (September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Toral, R.; Tessone, C.J.; and Lopes, J.V. Collective effects induced by diversity in extended systems. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 143, 1 (2007), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H.R. Pricing Information Goods. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J.; Pries-Heje, J.; and Baskerville, R. A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger, and B. Kuechler (eds.), Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp. 423–438.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, S.; and Anandalingam, G. Pricing strategies for information goods. Sadhana, 30, 2 (2005), 257–274.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, P.K.; Huang, L.; and Holtskog, H. Blockchain-enabled information sharing within a supply chain: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 49645–49656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.; Rausch, J.; Zhang, C.; Jia, R.; and Song, D. A principled approach to data valuation for federated learning. In Q. Yang, L. Fan and H. Yu (eds.), Federated Learning: Privacy and Incentive. Cham: Springer International, 2020, pp. 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• WEF. Data for common purpose: Enabling Colombia’s Transition to a data-driven economy. In Collaboration with PwC Colombia and the Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Colombia, 2021. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/data-for-common-purpose-enabling-colombia-s-transition-to-a-data-driven-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U.; and Rand, W. An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wingreen, S.C.; Kavanagh, D.; Dylan-Ennis, P.; and Miscione, G. Sources of cryptocurrency value systems: The case of Bitcoin. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 4 (2020), 474–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wörner, D.; Bomhard, T.V.; Schreier, Y.-P.; and Bilgeri, D. The Bitcoin ecosystem: Disruption beyond financial services? European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Zavolokina, L.; Miscione, G.; and Schwabe, G. Buyers of “lemons”: How can a blockchain platform address buyers’ needs in the market for “lemons”? Electronic Markets, 30 (2020), 227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavolokina, L.; Zani, N.; and Schwabe, G. Designing for trust in blockchain platforms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (2020), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zavolokina, L.; Ziolkowski, R.; Bauer, I.; and Schwabe, G. Management, governance, and value creation in a blockchain consortium. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19, 1 2020), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W.; Wei, C.P.; Jiang, Q.; Peng, C.H.; and Zhao, J.L. Beyond the block: A novel blockchain-based technical model for long-term care insurance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 2 (2021), 374–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.; Zha, X.; Zhang, H.; and Dan, B. Information sharing in a cross-border e-commerce supply chain under tax uncertainty. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 26, 1 (2022), 123–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.; Chen, X.; and Wang, H. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In Big Data (BigData Congress), 2017 IEEE International Congress on. IEEE, 2017, pp. 557–564.
   Google Scholar
• Zwass, V. Editor’s introduction. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22, 4 (2018), 477–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwass, V. Editorial introduction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 2 (2021), 277–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson, Roger B. “Optimal Auction Design.” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 1981, pp. 58–73. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3689266. Accessed 4 Jan. 2024.
   Google Scholar