Building a Blockchain-Based Platform for Interbank Collaboration

References

• ABI Lab. Spunta Banca DLT. AbiLab, 2020. https://www.abilab.it/documents/20124/0/Descrizione+iniziativa+Spunta+Banca+DLT.pdf/1a458e5c-29d7-cdbc-2bda-554ea70bd3e8?t=1590615492283 (accessed February 4, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• ABI Lab. Verso l’Euro digitale: fare tesoro dell’esperienza delle banche italiane. AbiLab, 2021. https://www.abi.it/mercati/innovazione (accessed on February 4, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• ABI Lab. Spunta Conti Ordinari e Esteri DLT. AbiLab, 2022. https://www.abilab.it/documents/20124/1610406/ABI+Lab_Spunta+Conti+Ordinari+e+Esteri+DLT.pdf/4753a77a-8b65-2233-1535-902d7a48cf02?t=1673455338152 (accessed February 5, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Adner, R. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43, 1 (2017), 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H.E., and Fiol, C.M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 4 (1994), 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, O.; Ally, M.; Clutterbuck; and Dwivedi, Y. The state of play of blockchain technology in the financial services sector: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 54 (2020), 102199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attanasio, S. The Spunta Project—Blockchain for Italian Interbank Reconciliation. European Payments Council, 2021. https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/news-insights/insight/spunta-project-blockchain-italian-interbank-reconciliation (accessed on February 4, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Aulkemeier, F.; Iacob, M. E.; and van Hillegersberg, J. Platform-based collaboration in digital ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 29, 4 (2019), 597–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Müller-Bloch, C.; and King, J. L. Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 10 (2018), 1020–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E.; Bryman, A.; and Harley, B. Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P.L.; Berger, B.; and Kellner, H. The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. New York: Random House, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Catalini, C.; and Gans, J.S. Some simple economics of the blockchain. Communications of the ACM, 63, 7 (2020), 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.; Pereira, I.; and Patel, P. C. Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Journal of Management, 47, 5 (2020), 1305–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R.; Stevenson, M.; and Aitken, J. Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24, 4 (2019), 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P.; and Barrett, M. (2014). Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Information Systems Research, 26, 1 ( 2015), 40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, A.; Corbo, L.; and Aversa, P. Digital platform-based ecosystems: The evolution of collaboration and competition between incumbent producers and entrant platforms. Journal of Business Research, 126 (2021), 385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucari, N.; Lagasio, V.; Lia, G.; and Torriero, C. The impact of blockchain in banking processes: The Interbank Spunta case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34, 2 (2021), 138–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta, C.; Ruesta, M.; Tuesta, D.; and Urbiola, P. The digital transformation of the banking industry. BBVA Research, 1 (2015), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, W.L.; Gozman, D.P.; and Seddon, J.J. Dialectic tensions in the financial markets: A longitudinal study of pre- and post-crisis regulatory technology. Journal of Information Technology, 33, 4 (2018), 304–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M.A.; Gawer, A.; and Yoffie, D.B. The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. New York: Harper Business, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S.; de Filippi, P.; and Potts, J. Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14, 4 (2018), 639–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, S.; Aniello, L.; Baldoni, R.; Lombardi, F.; Margheri, A.; and Sassone, V. PBFT vs proof-of-authority: Applying the CAP theorem to permissioned blockchain. Italian Conference on Cybersecurity, 2018, 11––20.
   Google Scholar
• De Reuver, M.; Verschuur, E.; Nikayin, F.; Cerpa, N.; and Bouwman, H. Collective action for mobile payment platforms: A case study on collaboration issues between banks and telecom operators. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14, 5 (2015), 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, H.; and Phillips, R.A. Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: Corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 3 (2009), 403–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frizzo-Barker, J.; Chow-White, P.A.; Adams, P.R.; Mentanko, J.; Ha, D.; and Green, S. Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management, 51 (2020), 102029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, P.; Gupta, B.; Chauhan, A.K.; Sivarajah, U.; Gupta, S.; and Modgil, S. Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163 (2021), 120407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginzel, L.E.; Kramer, R.M.; and Sutton, R.I. Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. Organizational Identity (2000), 223–261.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A.; Corley, K.G.; and Hamilton, A.L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 1, (2012), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O.; and Lyytinen, K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1 (2010), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, W.L.; and Wonglimpiyarat, J. Blockchain platform and future bank competition. Foresight, 21, 6 (2019), 625–639.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, A.; Schreieck, M.; Riasanow, T.; Setzke, D. S.; Wiesche, M.; Böhm, M.; and Krcmar, H. Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30, 1 (2020), 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herian, R. Regulating disruption: Blockchain, GDPR, and question of data sovereignty. Journal of Internet Law, 22, 2 (2018), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M.; Cennamo, C.; and Gawer, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 8 (2018), 2255–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, M.; Kostić, N.; Sebastian, I.M.; and Sedej, T. Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of TradeLens. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184 (2022), 121981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaniadakis, A.; and Constantinides, P. Innovating financial information infrastructures: The transition of legacy assets to the securitization market. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 5 (2014), 244–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kołodziej, M. Classification of blockchain technology implementations in finance industry. Finanse, 1 (2019), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, J.; Zhang, Y.; and Yu, J. Legitimacy building and e-commerce platform development in China: The experience of Alibaba. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, (2019), 115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumineau, F.; Wang, W.; and Schilke, O. Blockchain governance—A new way of organizing collaborations? Organization Science, 32, 2 (2021), 500–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R.F.; and Nambisan, S. Service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39, 1 (2015), 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., O’Neill, H., and Stowell, P. Thinking strategically about blockchain adoption and risk mitigation. Business Horizons, 65, 2 (2022), 159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W.; and Rowan, B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 2 (1977), 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, E. Scaling information infrastructure: The case of next-generation IP in the Internet. The Information Society, 14, 3 (1998), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S.; and Bouwman, H. Orchestration and governance in digital platform ecosystems: A literature review and trends. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21, 4 (2019), 329–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I.O.; Mikalef, P.; Giannakos, M.N.; Krogstie, J.; and Lekakos, G. Big data and business analytics ecosystems: Paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16, 3 (2018), 479–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, J.; Tavalaei, M.M.; and Ozalp, H. Blockchain-based platforms: Decentralized infrastructures and its boundary conditions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146 (2019), 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollari, I. The rise of Fintech opportunities and challenges. Jassa, 3 (2016), 15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W.W.; and DiMaggio, P.J. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ritala, P.; Golnam, A.; and Wegmann, A. Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 2 (2014), 236–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W.; and LaCroix, J. Multiple meanings of trust in negotiation theory and research: A literature review and integrative model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 4 (1996), 314–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saheb, T.; and Mamaghani, F.H. Exploring the barriers and organizational values of blockchain adoption in the banking industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 32, 2 (2021), 100417.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeiss, J.; Hoelzle, K.; and Tech, R.P. Designing governance mechanisms in platform ecosystems: Addressing the paradox of openness through blockchain technology. California Management Review, 62, 1 (2019), 121–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In P.S. Goodman and J.M. Pennings (Eds.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977, pp. 63–96.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnoletti, P.; Resca, A.; and Lee, G. A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: A multiple case study. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 4 (2015), 364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahiu, E.; Spagnoletti, P.; and Federici, T. Beyond scattered applications. In P. De Giovanni (ed.), Blockchain Technology Applications in Businesses and Organizations, IGI Global, 2022, p. 264.
   Google Scholar
• Stasi, R.; and Attanasio, S. Moving an entire banking sector onto DLT: The Italian banking sector use case. Journal of Digital Banking, 5 (2021), 313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 (1995), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiblmaier, H. Toward more rigorous blockchain research: Recommendations for writing blockchain case studies. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2 (2019), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Valkokari, K.; Seppänen, M.; Mäntylä, M.; and Jylhä-Ollila, S. Orchestrating innovation ecosystems: A qualitative analysis of ecosystem positioning strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7, 3 (2017), 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vella, G., and Gastaldi, L. Blockchain Platform Ecosystem: An Empirical Analysis on the Italian Banking Sector. 3rd Symplatform, 2021, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Y. Rightful resistance: How do digital platforms achieve policy change?. Technology in Society, 74, (2023), 102266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, M. A.; Boneva, R.; and Di Giacomo, D. Interoperability Governance: A Definition and Insights from Case Studies in Europe. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, (2018), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Yablonsky, S. A multidimensional platform ecosystem framework. Kybernetes, 49, 7 (2020), 2003–2035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoffie, D. B.; Gawer, A.; and Cusumano, M. A. A study of more than 250 platforms a reveal why most fail. Harvard Business Review (2019). https://hbr.org/2019/05/a-study-of-more-than-250-platforms-reveals-why-most-fail (accessed February 14, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Zutshi, A.; Grilo, A.; and Nodehi, T. The value proposition of blockchain technologies and its impact on digital platforms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 155, (2021), 107187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar