Evaluating the New York Times: Content Analysis of Student Responses to Open-Ended Tutorial Questions

References

• American Library Association. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. (2018). Binge drinking on college campuses: Statistics and minimizing exposure. The Ranch at Dove Tree. https://ranchatdovetree.com/blog/binge-drinking-college-minimizing-exposure/
   Google Scholar
• Branch, R. M. (2008). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. http://link.springer.com/openurl.asp?genre=book&isbn=978-0-387-09505-9
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, T., & Chiang, C.-H. (2012). Understanding undergraduate students’ experience: A content analysis using NSSE open-ended comments as an example. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1113–1123. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9549-3
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, E. (2010). Using a targeted rubric to deepen direct assessment of college students’ abilities to evaluate the credibility of sources. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(1), 31–43. doi:10.1080/10691310903584767
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, T. (2018). Closing the loop: Engaging in a sustainable and continuous cycle of authentic assessment to improve library instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 12(2), 64–85. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanson, C., & Sponsel, J. (2019). From syndication to misinformation: How undergraduate students engage with and evaluate digital news. Communications in Information Literacy, 13(2), 228–250. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsett, M. (2020). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102163. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderman, R. B. M. D. P., & Ladowski, J. M. B. A. (2013). Inherent limitations of multiple-choice testing. Academic Radiology, 20(10), 1319–1321. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2013.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber, N., & Mitchell, T. N. (2017). Using formative & summative assessment to evaluate library instruction in an online first year writing course. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 11(3-4), 300–313. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2017.1324549
   Google Scholar
• Haber, N. (2023). Evaluating New York Times data set: Coded for credibility reasoning. https://scholar.utc.edu/research-data/2/
   Google Scholar
• Iliana, M. (2018). Britain’s ‘new Puritans’: Youth drinking falls dramatically: Foreign desk. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, K. Y. L., Kong, Q., Song, Y., Deng, L., Kang, Y., & Hu, A. (2019). What predicts adolescents’ critical thinking about real-life news? The roles of social media news consumption and news media literacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100570. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leporati, B. R., Bach, P., & Hong, L. (2019). Learning to evaluate sources: Comparing teaching modalities and student outcomes. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19(2), 233–252. doi:10.1353/pla.2019.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2005). Evaluating the credibility of scholarly information on the web: A cross cultural study. International Information & Library Review, 37(2), 99–106. doi:10.1080/10572317.2005.10762670
   Google Scholar
• Maksl, A., Craft, S., Ashley, S., & Miller, D. (2017). The usefulness of a news media literacy measure in evaluating a news literacy curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 72(2), 228–241. doi:10.1177/1077695816651970
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., Salminen, T., & Utriainen, J. (2021). Student evaluations of the credibility and argumentation of online sources. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 294–305. doi:10.1080/00220671.2021.1929052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. doi:10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091. doi:10.1002/asi.20672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. G., Jeffrey, Barthel, M., & Sumida, N. (2018). Distinguishing between factual and opinion statements in the news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/06/18/distinguishing-between-factual-and-opinion-statements-in-the-news/
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Media Literacy. (n.d.). Media literacy defined. https://namle.net/resources/media-literacy-defined/
   Google Scholar
• NCSU Libraries. (2015). Evaluating sources for credibility. https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/videos/evaluating-sources-for-credibility
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781071802878
   Google Scholar
• News Literacy Project. (2020). A future founded on facts. https://www.paperturn-view.com/?pid=MTA108528&v=1.1
   Google Scholar
• Oakleaf, M. (2009). The information literacy instruction assessment cycle. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 539–560. doi:10.1108/00220410910970249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakleaf, M. J. (2008). Dangers and opportunities: A conceptual map of information literacy assessment approaches. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 8(3), 233–253. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, C. T. (2021). Trust in congruent sources, absolutely: The moderating effects of ideological and epistemological beliefs on the relationship between perceived source congruency and news credibility. Journalism Studies, 22(7), 896–915. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2021.1904273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno, S., & Jarsonk, J. (2018). Moving beyond opinion and assumption: An information literacy activity to foster students’ critical thinking about popular press. Currents in Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 288–290.
   Google Scholar
• Trolian, T. L., An, B. P., & Pascarella, E. T. (2016). Are there cognitive consequences of binge drinking during college? Journal of College Student Development, 57(8), 1009–1026. doi:10.1353/csd.2016.0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UTC Library. (2019a). Archive: English 1020 online library instruction tutorial [Online tutorial, LibWizard]. https://utc.libwizard.com/f/engl-1020-2020-archive
   Google Scholar
• UTC Library. (2019b). Keep it credible [Infographic]. https://www.utc.edu/library/help/tutorials/research-basics#keep-it-credible
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, A. (2009). Information literacy assessment: Where do we start? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1), 19–28. doi:10.1177/0961000608099896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Hartig, J., Goldhammer, F., & Krstev, J. (2021). Students’ online information use and learning progress in higher education – A critical literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(10), 1996–2021. doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1953336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar