348
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The role of ethics in technology acceptance: analysing resistance to new health technologies on the example of a COVID-19 contact-tracing app

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 164-194 | Received 07 Sep 2022, Accepted 18 Jan 2023, Published online: 29 Jan 2023

References

  • Abeler, J., Bäcker, M., Buermeyer, U., & Zillessen, H. (2020). COVID-19 contact tracing and data protection can go together. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(4), e19359. https://doi.org/10.2196/19359
  • Abramova, O., Wagner, A., Olt, C.M., & Buxmann, P. (2022). One for all, all for one: Social considerations in user acceptance of contact tracing apps using longitudinal evidence from Germany and Switzerland. International Journal of Information Management, 64, 102473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102473
  • Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security & Privacy, 3(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2005.22
  • Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., & Jha, A.K. (2010). The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0327
  • Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
  • Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
  • Ahadzadeh, A.S., Sharif, S.P., Ong, F.S., & Khong, K.W. (2015). Integrating health belief model and technology acceptance model: An investigation of health-related internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(2), e3564. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3564
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Springer.
  • Albastaki, Y. (2022). Assessing the perceived usability of an intelligent contact tracing app to prevent the spread of COVID-19 using SUS and TAM: Be aware Bahrain. Journal of Decision Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2076299
  • Al-Maroof, R.S., Alhumaid, K., Alhamad, A.Q., Aburayya, A., & Salloum, S. (2021). User acceptance of smart watch for medical purposes: An empirical study. Future Internet, 13(5), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13050127
  • Al-Natour, S., Cavusoglu, H., Benbasat, I., & Aleem, U. (2020). An empirical investigation of the antecedents and consequences of privacy uncertainty in the context of mobile apps. Information Systems Research, 31(4), 1037–1063. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0931
  • Altinay, L., Madanoglu, M., Daniele, R., & Lashley, C. (2012). The influence of family tradition and psychological traits on entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.07.007
  • Altmann, S., Milsom, L., Zillessen, H., Blasone, R., Gerdon, F., Bach, R., Kreuter, F., Nosenzo, D., Toussaert, S., & Abeler, J. (2020). Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: Cross-country survey study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(8), e19857. https://doi.org/10.2196/19857
  • Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Anderson, E.C., Hinton, A., Lary, C.W., Strout, T., Antov, A., Edelman, E., Helbig, P., Reed, K., Rueter, J., & Han, P.K. (2021). The influence of uncertainty and uncertainty tolerance on attitudes and self-efficacy about genomic tumor testing. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(7), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1764989
  • Angst, C.M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650295
  • Arts, J.W., Frambach, R.T., & Bijmolt, T.H. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002
  • Bandalos, D.L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510
  • Bansal, G., & Gefen, D. (2010). The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 138–150.
  • Beauchamp, T.L. (2003). A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2003.0019
  • Beauchamp, T.L., & Childress, J.F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Becker, M. (2018). Understanding users’ health information privacy concerns for health wearables, In Proceedings, 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Big Island, Hawaii (pp.3261–3270), HICSS.
  • Becker, M., Matt, C., & Hess, T. (2020). It’s not just about the product: How persuasive communication affects the disclosure of personal health information. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 51(1), 37–50.
  • Behne, A., Krüger, N., Beinke, J.H., & Teuteberg, F. (2021). Learnings from the design and acceptance of the German COVID-19 tracing app for IS-driven crisis management: A design science research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01579-7
  • Birkmeyer, S., Wirtz, B.W., & Langer, P.F. (2021). Determinants of mHealth success: An empirical investigation of the user perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102351
  • Blom, A.G., Wenz, A., Cornesse, C., Rettig, T., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., & Krieger, S. (2021). Barriers to the large-scale adoption of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in Germany: Survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e23362.
  • Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: A meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 649–669.
  • Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.
  • Bull, T.P., Dewar, A.R., Malvey, D.M., & Szalma, J.L. (2016). Considerations for the telehealth systems of tomorrow: An analysis of student perceptions of telehealth technologies. JMIR Medical Education, 2(2), e11.
  • Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G.S. (2005). Individual differences and usage behavior: Revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 58–77.
  • Cao, Y., Li, J., Qin, X., & Hu, B. (2020). Examining the effect of overload on the mHealth application resistance behavior of elderly users: An SOR perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6658.
  • Cham, H., West, S.G., Ma, Y., & Aiken, L.S. (2012). Estimating latent variable interactions with nonnormal observed data: A comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 840–876.
  • Chan, E.Y., & Saqib, N.U. (2021). Privacy concerns can explain unwillingness to download and use contact tracing apps when COVID-19 concerns are high. Computers in Human Behavior, 119 , 106718.
  • Chen, S.C., Jong, D., & Lai, M.T. (2014). Assessing the relationship between technology readiness and continuance intention in an e-appointment system: Relationship quality as a mediator. Journal of Medical Systems, 38(9), 1–12.
  • Chung, J., Demiris, G., & Thompson, H.J. (2016). Ethical considerations regarding the use of smart home technologies for older adults: An integrative review. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 34(1), 155–181.
  • Churchill, G.A., Jr., & Peter, J.P. (1984). Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(4), 360–375.
  • Claudy, M.C., Garcia, R., & O’Driscoll, A. (2015). Consumer resistance to innovation – A behavioral reasoning perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 528–544.
  • Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982–1003.
  • Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
  • De Andrés-Sánchez, J., Arias-Oliva, M., & Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2021). The influence of ethical judgements on acceptance and non-acceptance of wearables and insideables: Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Technology in Society, 67 , 101689.
  • Dedding, C., Van Doorn, R., Winkler, L., & Reis, R. (2011). How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. Social Science & Medicine, 72(1), 49–53.
  • Delaney, J.J., & Martin, D. (2017). Therapy, enhancement, and medicine: Challenges for the doctor–patient relationship and patient safety. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 831–844.
  • De Oca, A.M.M., & Nistor, N. (2014). Non-significant intention-behavior effects in educational technology acceptance: A case of competing cognitive scripts? Computers in Human Behavior, 34 , 333–338.
  • Derbyshire, S., Field, J., Vennik, J., Sanders, M., & Newell, D. (2021). “Chiropractic is manual therapy, not talk therapy”: A qualitative analysis exploring perceived barriers to remote consultations by chiropractors. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29(1), 1–8.
  • De Roeck, K., El Akremi, A., & Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency matters! How and when does corporate social responsibility affect employees’ organizational identification? Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141–1168.
  • Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S.D. (2007). Innovations, stakeholders & entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 267–283.
  • Dhagarra, D., Goswami, M., & Kumar, G. (2020). Impact of trust and privacy concerns on technology acceptance in healthcare: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 141 , 104164.
  • Ding, Y., & Savani, K. (2020). From variability to vulnerability: People exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1101–1117.
  • Dou, K., Yu, P., Deng, N., Liu, F., Guan, Y., Li, Z., Yumeng, J., Ningkai, D., Xudong, L., & Duan, H. (2017). Patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology for chronic disease management: A theoretical model and empirical test. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(12), e177.
  • Duan, S.X., & Deng, H. (2022). Exploring privacy paradox in contact tracing apps adoption. Internet Research, 32(5), 1725–1750.
  • Dubov, A., & Shoptawb, S. (2020). The value and ethics of using technology to contain the COVID-19 epidemic. American Journal of Bioethics, 20(7), W7–11.
  • Edison, S.W., & Geissler, G.L. (2003). Measuring attitudes towards general technology: Antecedents, hypotheses and scale development. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12(2), 137–156.
  • Farooq, M.S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329–348.
  • FeldmanHall, O., & Shenhav, A. (2019). Resolving uncertainty in a social world. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(5), 426–435.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
  • Fisher, E., Boenink, M., Van Der Burg, S., & Woodbury, N. (2012). Responsible healthcare innovation: Anticipatory governance of nanodiagnostics for theranostics medicine. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 12(8), 857–870.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  • Fox, G., Clohessy, T., van der Werff, L., Rosati, P., & Lynn, T. (2021). Exploring the competing influences of privacy concerns and positive beliefs on citizen acceptance of contact tracing mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106806.
  • Free, C., Phillips, G., Watson, L., Galli, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., & Haines, A. (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine, 10(1), e1001363.
  • Garrouch, K. (2021). Does the reputation of the provider matter? A model explaining the continuance intention of mobile wallet applications. Journal of Decision Systems, 30(2–3), 150–171.
  • Gasser, U., Ienca, M., Scheibner, J., Sleigh, J., & Vayena, E. (2020). Digital tools against COVID-19: Taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid. Lancet Digital Health, 2(8), e425–e434.
  • Gauttier, S. (2019). ‘I’ve got you under my skin’ – the role of ethical consideration in the (non) acceptance of insideables in the workplace. Technology in Society, 56, 93–108.
  • Geels, F.W., Sovacool, B.K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463–479.
  • Geirsson, H., & Holmgren, M.R. (2018). Ethical theory: A concise anthology (3rd ed.). Broadview Press.
  • Gruskin, S., Mills, E.J., & Tarantola, D. (2007). History, principles, and practice of health and human rights. The Lancet, 370(9585), 449–455.
  • Gupta, S., & Xu, H. (2010). Examining the relative influence of risk and control on intention to adopt risky technologies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(4), 22–37.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  • Hansen, S.D., Dunford, B.B., Boss, A.D., Boss, R.W., & Angermeier, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 29–45.
  • Harris, R., Dempsey, E., Murray, D., Woodworth, S., O’raghallaigh, P., & Adam, F. (2022). Towards a blueprint for decision support in connected health: Scenarios in maternal and child health. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(S1), 60–76.
  • Hastall, M.R., Dockweiler, C., & Mühlhaus, J. (2017). Achieving end user acceptance: Building blocks for an evidence-based user-centered framework for health technology development and assessment. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 13–25). Cham: Springer.
  • He, Y., He, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022). Technology acceptance in socially assistive robots: Scoping review of models, measurement, and influencing factors. Journal of Health Engineering, 2022. 1–10.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  • Hoffmann, M., Wensing, M., Peters-Klimm, F., Szecsenyi, J., Hartmann, M., Friederich, H.C., & Haun, M.W. (2020). Perspectives of psychotherapists and psychiatrists on mental health care integration within primary care via video consultations: Qualitative preimplementation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e17569.
  • Hogg, M.A. (2007). Uncertainty–identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 69–126). Academic Press.
  • Holden, R.J., & Karsh, B.T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172.
  • Hong, W., Chan, F.K., Thong, J.Y., Chasalow, L.C., & Dhillon, G. (2014). A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 111–136.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
  • Hoque, M.E., Rahman, F., Ahamed, S.I., & Park, J.H. (2010). Enhancing privacy and security of RFID system with serverless authentication and search protocols in pervasive environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 55(1), 65–79.
  • Hsu, M.H., & Kuo, F.Y. (2003). The effect of organization-based self-esteem and deindividuation in protecting personal information privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(4), 305–320.
  • Huang, Y., & Yang, C. (2020). A metacognitive approach to reconsidering risk perceptions and uncertainty: Understand information seeking during COVID-19. Science Communication, 42(5), 616–642.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937–3954.
  • Jaschinski, C., Allouch, S.B., Peters, O., Cachucho, R., & Van Dijk, J.A. (2021). Acceptance of technologies for aging in place: A conceptual model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e22613.
  • Johanson, J.C. (2000). Correlations of self-esteem and intolerance of ambiguity with risk aversion. Psychological Reports, 87(2), 534.
  • Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago University Press.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
  • Kang, R., Dabbish, L., Fruchter, N., & Kiesler, S. (2015). “My data just goes everywhere”: User mental models of the Internet and implications for privacy and security. In Eleventh symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS 2015), Ottawa, Canada, 39–52.
  • Kaplan, D. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (Vol. 10). Sage Publications.
  • Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C.M. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781–804.
  • Kay, A.C., Whitson, J.A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A.D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 264–268.
  • Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474.
  • Klenk, M., & Duijf, H. (2021). Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: Who is (not) free to go? Ethics and Information Technology, 23(1), 69–77.
  • Kondylakis, H., Katehakis, D.G., Kouroubali, A., Logothetidis, F., Triantafyllidis, A., Kalamaras, I., Votis, K., & Tzovaras, D. (2020). COVID-19 mobile apps: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e23170.
  • Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018). The problem with morality: Impeding progress and increasing divides. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12(1), 218–257.
  • Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Lewandowsky, S., Garrett, P.M., Herzog, S.M., Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2021). Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–19.
  • Krüger, N., Behne, A., Beinke, J.H., Stibe, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2022). Exploring user acceptance determinants of COVID-19-tracing apps to manage the pandemic. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 18(1), 1–27.
  • Lanseng, E.J., & Andreassen, T.W. (2007). Electronic healthcare: A study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self‐diagnosis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(4), 394–417.
  • Lauriola, P., Martín-Olmedo, P., Leonardi, G.S., Bouland, C., Verheij, R., Dückers, M.L., van Tongeren, M., Laghi, F., van den Hazel, P., Gokdemir, O., Segredo, E., Etzel, R., Abelsohn, A., Bianchi, F., Romizi, R., Miserotti, G., Romizi, R., Bortolotti, P., Vinci, E. … Zeka, A. (2021). On the importance of primary and community healthcare in relation to global health and environmental threats: Lessons from the COVID-19 crisis. BMJ Global Health, 6(3), e004111.
  • Lau, J.T., Yang, X., Wong, E., & Tsui, H.Y. (2006). Prevalence and factors associated with social avoidance of recovered SARS patients in the Hong Kong general population. Health Education Research, 21(5), 662–673.
  • Leung, L., & Chen, C. (2019). E-health/m-health adoption and lifestyle improvements: Exploring the roles of technology readiness, the expectation-confirmation model, and health-related information activities. Telecommunications Policy, 43(6), 563–575.
  • Li, T., Cobb, C., Yang, J.J., Baviskar, S., Agarwal, Y., Li, B., Bauer, L., & Hong, J.I. (2021). What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 75, 101439.
  • Lin, J.S.C., & Chang, H.C. (2011). The role of technology readiness in self‐service technology acceptance. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 424–444.
  • Lin, M.Y.C., Do, B.R., Nguyen, T.T., & Cheng, J.M.S. (2021). Effects of personal innovativeness and perceived value of disclosure on privacy concerns in proximity marketing: Self-control as a moderator. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 310–327.
  • Lin-Hi, N., & Blumberg, I. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance, global governance, and sustainable profits: Lessons learned from BP. Corporate Governance, 11(5), 571–584.
  • Lin-Hi, N., Hörisch, J., & Blumberg, I. (2015). Does CSR matter for nonprofit organizations? Testing the link between CSR performance and trustworthiness in the nonprofit versus for-profit domain. Voluntas, 26(5), 1944–1974.
  • Lin, C.H., Shih, H.Y., & Sher, P.J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641–657.
  • Lodder, P., Denollet, J., Emons, W.H., Nefs, G., Pouwer, F., Speight, J., & Wicherts, J.M. (2019). Modeling interactions between latent variables in research on type D personality: A Monte Carlo simulation and clinical study of depression and anxiety. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(5), 637–665.
  • Lunney, A., Cunningham, N.R., & Eastin, M.S. (2016). Wearable fitness technology: A structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114–120.
  • Lu, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019). Exploring the emotional antecedents and outcomes of technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 153–169.
  • Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355.
  • Marhefka, S.L., Turner, D., & Lockhart, E. (2019). Understanding women’s willingness to use e-Health for HIV-related services: A novel application of the technology readiness and acceptance model to a highly stigmatized medical condition. Telemedicine and E-Health, 25(6), 511–518.
  • Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 87–96.
  • Materia, F.T., Faasse, K., & Smyth, J.M. (2020). Understanding and preventing health concerns about emerging mobile health technologies. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(5), e14375.
  • Matt, C. (2022). Campaigning for the greater good? How persuasive messages affect the evaluation of contact tracing apps. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(1–2), 189–206.
  • Megnin-Viggars, O., Carter, P., Melendez-Torres, G.J., Weston, D., & Rubin, G.J. (2020). Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence. Plos One, 15(10), e0241473.
  • Milchram, C., Van de Kaa, G., Doorn, N., & Künneke, R. (2018). Moral values as factors for social acceptance of smart grid technologies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2703.
  • Milliken, F.J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143.
  • Miltgen, C.L., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 103–114.
  • Morley, J., Cowls, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps. Nature, 582(7810), 29–31.
  • Munzert, S., Selb, P., Gohdes, A., Stoetzer, L.F., & Lowe, W. (2021). Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(2), 247–255.
  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2003). Modeling interactions between latent and observed continuous variables using maximum-likelihood estimation in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes, 6(1), 1–9.
  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2019). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nadal, C., Sas, C., & Doherty, G. (2020). Technology acceptance in mobile health: Scoping review of definitions, models, and measurement. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(7), e17256.
  • Neuberg, S.L., & Newsom, J.T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113–131.
  • Nguyen, N.T., & Biderman, M.D. (2008). Studying ethical judgments and behavioral intentions using structural equations: Evidence from the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 627–640.
  • Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, T.C.A.H., & Tran, C.D. (2021). Exploring individuals’ adoption of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps: A mixed-methods approach. Library Hi Tech, 40(2), 376–393.
  • Nickel, P.J. (2020). Disruptive innovation and moral uncertainty. Nanoethics, 14(3), 259–269.
  • O’Callaghan, M.E., Buckley, J., Fitzgerald, B., Johnson, K., Laffey, J., McNicholas, B., Nuseibeh, B., O’Keefe, D., O’Keefe, I., Razzaq, A., Rekanar, K., Richardson, I., Simpkin, A., Abedin, J., Storni, C., Tsvyatkova, D., Walsh, J., Welsh, T., & Glynn, L. (2021). A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the republic of Ireland. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 190(3), 863–887.
  • Olarte-Pascual, C., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., Reinares Lara, E., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2021). From wearable to insideable: Is ethical judgment key to the acceptance of human capacity-enhancing intelligent technologies? Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106559.
  • Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.
  • Pavlou, P.A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
  • Pelegrín-Borondo, J., Arias-Oliva, M., Murata, K., & Souto-Romero, M. (2020). Does ethical judgment determine the decision to become a cyborg? Journal of Business Ethics, 161(1), 5–17.
  • Pelegrín-Borondo, J., Reinares Lara, E., & Olarte-Pascual, C. (2017). Assessing the acceptance of technological implants (the cyborg): Evidences and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 104–112.
  • Peltz, R., Avisar-Shohat, G., & Bar Dayan, Y. (2007). Differences in public emotions, interest, sense of knowledge and compliance between the affected area and the nationwide general population during the first phase of a bird flu outbreak in Israel. The Journal of Infection, 55(6), 545–550.
  • Pies, I., Schreck, P., & Homann, K. (2021). Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: Using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate. Review of Managerial Science, 15(3), 779–811.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
  • Pomfret, L., Previte, J., & Coote, L. (2020). Beyond concern: Socio-demographic and attitudinal influences on privacy and disclosure choices. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5–6), 519–549.
  • Porter, C.E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999–1007.
  • Praveen, S.V., & Ittamalla, R. (2022). General public’s attitude toward governments implementing digital contact tracing to curb COVID-19 – a study based on natural language processing. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 18(5), 485–490.
  • Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448.
  • Qin, B. (2021). Research on the application of intelligent speech recognition technology in medical big data fog computing system. Journal of Decision Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1980943
  • Ram, S., & Sheth, J.N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5–14.
  • Ramtohul, I. (2015). The adoption of e-health services: Comprehensive analysis of the adoption setting from the user’s perspective. Health Policy and Technology, 4(3), 286–293.
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://cran.r-project.org.
  • Reidenbach, R.E., & Robin, D.P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.
  • Reinares Lara, E., Olarte-Pascual, C., & Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2018). Do you want to be a cyborg? The moderating effect of ethics on neural implant acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 43–53.
  • Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., & Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800.
  • Rindfleisch, T.C. (1997). Privacy, information technology, and health care. Communications of the ACM, 40(8), 92–100.
  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  • Rosenberg, N. (2010). Studies on science and the innovation process. World Scientific Publishing.
  • Schmitt, G. (1986). Ethics, economics, and institutional innovations. Staff Papers Series, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
  • Semiz, B.B., & Semiz, T. (2021). Examining consumer use of mobile health applications by the extended UTAUT model. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(1), 267–281.
  • Shea, K., & Effken, J.A. (2008). Enhancing patients’ trust in the virtual home healthcare nurse. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 26(3), 135–141.
  • Shishah, W., & Alhelaly, S. (2021). User experience of utilising contactless payment technology in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Decision Systems, 30(2–3), 282–299.
  • Siffels, L.E. (2020). Beyond privacy vs. health: A justification analysis of the contact-tracing apps debate in the Netherlands. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(1), 99–103.
  • Small, C., & Lew, C. (2021). Mindfulness, moral reasoning and responsibility: Towards virtue in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(1), 103–117.
  • Smith, G. (2008). Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 501717.
  • Smith, J.R., Hogg, M.A., Martin, R., & Terry, D.J. (2007). Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 769–792.
  • Sollie, P. (2007). Ethics, technology development and uncertainty: An outline for any future ethics of technology. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 5(4), 293–306.
  • Soper, D.S., Demirkan, H., & Schlicher, J. (2022). Analytics and IT in the response to COVID-19: A research framework and lessons for the future. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(1–2), 7–18.
  • Stanaland, A.J., Lwin, M.O., & Murphy, P.E. (2011). Consumer perceptions of the antecedents and consequences of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 47–55.
  • Steptoe, A. (2019). Happiness and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 339–359.
  • Stewart, C., Konstantellou, A., Kassamali, F., McLaughlin, N., Cutinha, D., Bryant-Waugh, R., Simic, M., Eisler, I., & Baudinet, J. (2021). Is this the ‘new normal’? A mixed method investigation of young person, parent and clinician experience of online eating disorder treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Eating Disorders, 9(1), 1–11.
  • Straub, E.T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.
  • Subbian, V., Solomonides, A., Clarkson, M., Rahimzadeh, V.N., Petersen, C., Schreiber, R., DeMuro, P.R., Dua, P., Goodman, K.W., Kaplan, B., Koppel, R., Lehmann, C.U., & Senathirajah, Y. (2021). Ethics and informatics in the age of COVID-19: Challenges and recommendations for public health organization and public policy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(1), 184–189.
  • Suchanek, A., & Entschew, E.M. (2018). Ethical focal points as a complement to accelerated social change. Humanistic Management Journal, 3(2), 221–232.
  • Sveiby, K.-E., Gripenberg, P., & Segercrantz, B. (2012). The unintended and undesirable consequences. Neglected by innovation research. In K.-E. Sveiby, P. Gripenberg, & B. Segercrantz (Eds.), Challenging the innovation paradigm (pp. 61–85). Routledge.
  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins College Publishers.
  • Tang, C.S.K., & Wong, C.Y. (2004). Factors influencing the wearing of facemasks to prevent the severe acute respiratory syndrome among adult Chinese in Hong Kong. Preventive medicine, 39(6), 1187–1193.
  • Tao, D., Wang, T., Wang, T., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., & Qu, X. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106147.
  • Thatcher, J.B., & Perrewé, P.L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–396.
  • Timmermans, S., & Kaufman, R. (2020). Technologies and health inequities. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 583–602.
  • Treviño, L.K., & Nelson, D.A. (1999). Managing business ethics (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  • Turja, T., Taipale, S., Niemelä, M., & Oinas, T. (2022). Positive turn in elder-care workers’ views toward telecare robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(4), 931–944.
  • Van den Bos, K. (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 197–217.
  • Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E.A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). Academic Press.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186–204.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  • Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A.G. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 227–243.
  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R.J., & Weitz, B.A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.
  • Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management, 44(2), 206–215.
  • Weaver, G.R., & Clark, C.E. (2015). Behavioral ethics, behavioral governance, and corruption in and by organizations. In P. Hardy, P. M. Heywood, & D. Torsello (Eds.), Debates of corruption and integrity (pp. 135–158). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Welsh, T., Rekanar, K., Abbas, M., Chochlov, M., Fitzgerald, B., Glynn, L., Buckley, J. (2020). Towards a taxonomy for evaluating societal concerns of contact tracing apps. In 7th International Conference on Behavioural and Social Computing (BESC), Bournemouth, United Kingdom (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
  • Williams, G. (2008). Responsibility as a virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(4), 455–470.
  • Williams, L.J., Cote, J.A., & Buckley, M.R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462–468.
  • Xu, Z. (2019). An empirical study of patients’ privacy concerns for health informatics as a service. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 297–306.
  • Yang, H.D., & Yoo, Y. (2004). It’s all about attitude: Revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38(1), 19–31.
  • Youn, S. (2008). Parental influence and teens’ attitude toward online privacy protection. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(3), 362–388.
  • Zeeb, H., Pigeot, I., & Schüz, B. (2020). Digital public health-an overview. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 63(2), 137–144.
  • Zhang, X., Han, X., Dang, Y., Meng, F., Guo, X., & Lin, J. (2017). User acceptance of mobile health services from users’ perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 42(2), 194–206.
  • Zhong, X., & Yuan, K.H. (2011). Bias and efficiency in structural equation modeling: Maximum likelihood versus robust methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 229–265.
  • Zhu, Z., Liu, Y., Che, X., & Chen, X. (2018). Moderating factors influencing adoption of a mobile chronic disease management system in China. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 43(1), 22–41.
  • Zmud, R.W. (1979). Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Management science, 25(10), 966–979.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.