Dramaturgies for Re-imagining Murray-Darling Basin governing

References

• ACHM. 2014. Cultural Flows, Literature Review. Australian Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Aldred, J. 2019. Licence to Be Bad. How Economics Corrupted Us. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandra, J. 2017. “Risks, Uncertainty and Climate Confusion in the Murray–Darling Basin Reforms.” Economics and Policy 3 (3): 1650038. doi:10.1142/S2382624X16500387.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandra, J. 2019. “Losing the Authority – What Institutional Architecture for Cooperative Governance in the Murray Darling Basin?” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 23 (2): 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2019.1586066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandra, J. 2021. “Navigating the Anthropocene’s Rivers of Risk—climatic Change and Science-Policy Dilemmas in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin.” Climatic Change 165 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03036-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, C., R. Ison, L. Colliver, R. Mumaw, M. Mackay, L. Perez-Mujica, and P. Wallis. 2020. “Jumping off the Treadmill: Transforming NRM to Systemic Governing with Systemic Co-Inquiry.” Policy Studies 41 (4): 350–371. 10.1080/01442872.2020.1726312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananda, J., D. McFarlane, and M. Loh. 2020. “The Role of Experimentation in Water Management Under Climate Uncertainty: Institutional Barriers to Social Learning.” Environmental Policy and Governance 30 (6): 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. 1991. Integrated Catchment Management – a Strategy for Achieving Sustainable and Balanced Use of Land, Water and Related Biological Resources. Brisbane: Queensland Dept. Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• APSC. 2007. Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Productivity Commission. 2017. National Water Reform, Productivity Commission Inquiry Report. No. 87, 19 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., A. McConnell, and A. Stark. 2021. “Dramaturgy and Crisis Management: A Third Act.” Public administration 100 (3): 585–599. doi:10.1111/padm.12775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, D. 2005. “Reading and Performing Uncertainty: Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen and the Postdramatic Theatre.” Theatre Research International 30 (2, July): 139 149. doi:10.1017/S0307883305001148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedoya, R. 2013. “Placemaking and the Politics of Belonging and Dis-Belonging.” GIA Reader 24 (1): Winter 2013. Accessed 29th November 2022. https://www.giarts.org/article/placemaking-and-politics-belonging-and-dis-belonging
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, Q. 2021. Wounded Country: The Murray–Darling Basin – a Contested History. Randwick, Australia: NewSouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff-Mattson, Z., and A. Lynch. 2016. “Adaptive Governance in Water Reform Discourses of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Policy sciences 49 (3): 281–307. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9245-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boal, A.1996 The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy (Reprinted. ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. 1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Vol. 175. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. 1975. The Imaginary Institution of Society (L’institution imaginaire de la société). Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K.B., and R.L. Ison. 2009. “Jumping off Arnstein’s Ladder: Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm for Climate Change Adaptation.” Environmental Policy & Governance 19 (6): 358–373. doi:10.1002/eet.523.
   Google Scholar
• Colloff, M.J., and J. Pittock. 2019. “Why We Disagree About the Murray–Darling Basin Plan: Water Reform, Environmental Knowledge and the Science-Policy Decision Context.” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 23 (2): 88–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2019.1664878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloff, M.J., and J. Pittock. 2022. “Mind the Gap! Reconciling Environmental Water Requirements with Scarcity in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Water 14 (2): 208. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, D. 2011. “Water Reform and the Federal System in the Murray-Darling Basin.” Water Resources Management 25 (15): 3993–4003. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9897-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S.D.N., and H. Wagenaar. 2012. “Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present: Toward an Epistemology of Practice.” The American Review of Public Administration 42 (1): 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011407404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranston, J., and M. Jean-Paul. 2021. “Braiding Indigenous and Racialized Knowledges into an Educational Leadership for Justice.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse, 1–27. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39666-4_120-1.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, J. 2015 Discursive analysis of water reform in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin: “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose”. Paper presented at: International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP) Panel Session T11P03 ‘Discourses in environmental policy – lessons learnt and new perspectives’ 1–4 July Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1964. The Symbolic Use of Politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Essig, L. 2016 The Dramaturgy of Public Policy. Creative Infrastructure Blog. Accessed 29th November 2022. https://creativeinfrastructure.org/2016/04/06/the-dramaturgy-of-policy/.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frayn, M. 1998. Copenhagen. London: Methuen Drama (publisher Bloomsbury).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., and E. Peck. 2007. “Performing Governance: A Partnership Board Dramaturgy.” Public Administration 85 (4): 907–929. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00683.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godden, L., and R. Ison. 2019. “Community Participation: Exploring Legitimacy in Socio-Ecological Systems for Environmental Water Governance.” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 23 (1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2019.1608688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, R.Q., M.J. Colloff, V. Marshall, and J. Williams. 2020. “Confronting a “Post-Truth Water World” in the Murray-Darling Basin.” Australia 13: 28.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1997. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019829333X.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2005. “Setting the Stage: A Dramaturgy of Policy Deliberation.” Administration & Society 36 (6): 624–647. doi:10.1177/0095399704270586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2009. Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and H. eds Wagenaar. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in a Networked Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490934.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. 2022. Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0.
   Google Scholar
• Hentschel, K. 2002. “What History of Science Can Learn from Michael Frayn’s ‘Copenhagen.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 27 (3): 211–216. doi:10.1179/030801802225005590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. 2003. “Symbols, Objects, and Meanings.” In Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by L. T. Reynolds and N. J. Herman-Kinney, 307–325. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollo, T. 2022. Living Democracy. An Ecological Manifesto for the End of the World as We Know It. Sydney: NewSouth.
   Google Scholar
• House Standing Committee on Regional Australia. 2011. “Of Drought and Flooding Rains: Inquiry into the Impact of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan in Regional Australia.” In: House of Representatives, the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: parliamentary proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L. 2013. “In the Spirit of Copenhagen: Innovating in Water Policy Research and Practice.” In Proc. Knowing Water Workshop 27-28th August, Performance Research Unit & Systemic Governance Research Program. Monash Sustainability Institute. Clayton, Australia: Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L. 2016. “Governing in the Anthropocene: What Future Systems Thinking in Practice?” Systems Research & Behavioral Science 33 (5): 595–613. doi:10.1002/sres.2421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L. 2017. Systems Practice: How to Act. In Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity in a Climate-Change World. 2nd ed. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L. 2018. “Governing the Human-Environment Relationship: Systemic Practice.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 33: 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., J. Alexandra, and P.J. Wallis. 2018. “Governing in the Anthropocene: Are There Cyber-Systemic Antidotes to the Malaise of Modern Governance?” Sustainability Science 13 (5): 1209–1223. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0570-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., C. Allan, and KB. Collins. 2015. “Reframing Water Governance Praxis: Does Reflection on Metaphors Have a Role?” Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 33 (6): 1697–1713. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614466.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., K.B. Collins, and B.L. Iaquinto. 2021. “Designing an Inquiry-Based Learning System: Innovating in Research Praxis to Transform Science-Policy-Practice Relations for Sustainable Development.” Systems Research & Behavioural Science 38 (5): 610–624. doi:10.1002/sres.2811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, RL., KB. Collins, and P. Wallis. 2014. “Institutionalising Social Learning: Towards Systemic and Adaptive Governance.” Environmental Science & Policy 53 (B): 105–117. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, RL., A. Grant, and RB. Bawden. 2014. “Scenario Praxis for Systemic and Adaptive Governance: A Critical Framework Environment & Planning C.” Government & Policy 32 (4): 623–640. doi:10.1068/c11327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., N. Röling, and D. Watson. 2007. “Challenges to Science and Society in the Sustainable Management and Use of Water: Investigating the Role of Social Learning.” Environmental Science & Policy 10 (6): 499–511. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., D.B. Russell, and P. Wallis 2009 Adaptive Water Governance and Systemic Thinking for Future NRM – Action Research to Build MDBA Capability. Monash Sustainability Report 09/4. Monash University: Clayton 68p.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., and M. Shelley. 2016. “Editorial. Governing in the Anthropocene: Contributions from Systems Thinking in Practice? ISSS Yearbook Special Issue.” Systems Research & Behavioral Science 33 (5): 589–594. doi:10.1002/sres.2436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., P. Steyaert, P.P. Roggero, B. Hubert, and J. Jiggins 2004 Social Learning for the Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water at Catchment Scale (EVK1-2000-00695SLIM) Final Report. 89p. ( see http://slim.open.ac.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., and E. Straw. 2020. The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking: Governance in a Climate Emergency. Milton Park UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R.L., and P. Wallis. 2011. “Planning as Performance: The Murray–Darling Basin Plan.” Basin Futures. edited by D. Connell and R.Q. Grafton. 399. Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S-H. Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, C., and W. Long. April. 4. 2022. Labor’s Plan for Murray-Darling Basin Angers Upstream States. ABC News https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2022-04-08/murray-darling-basin-plan-labor-angers-upstream-states/100976546.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1986. “Research as Praxis.” Harvard Educational Review 56 (3): 257–277. doi:10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, G., and F. Vanclay 1991. Rural Restructuring in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia: Economic Imperatives and Ecological Consequences. Proc. Rural Sociological Soc, Conference, Columbus, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. J. 2009. “Superwicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future.” Cornell Law Review 94 (5): 1153–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, V. 2017. Overturning Aqua Nullius: Securing Aboriginal Water Rights. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2010. Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Overview. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2011. Delivering a Healthy Working Basin - About the Draft Basin Plan. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2022 Basin Plan Timeline. Murray Darling Basin Authority. Accessed 30th November 2022. https://www.mdba.gov.au/basin-plan/plan-basin/basin-plan-timeline.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. 1997. Places to Intervene in a System. Winter. Whole Earth.
   Google Scholar
• Milly, P.C.D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R.M. Hirsch, Z.W. Kundzewicz, D.P. Lettenmaier, and R.J. Stouffer. 2008. “Stationarity is Dead: Whither Water Management?” Science 319 (5863): 573–574. doi:10.1126/science.1151915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., and M. Hollick. 1993. “Integrated Catchment Management in Western Australia: Transition from Concept to Implementation.” Environmental management 17 (6): 735–743. doi:10.1007/BF02393894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, C., D. Rose, and P. Sullivan. 2010. “From the Other Side of the Knowledge Frontier: Indigenous Knowledge, Social–Ecological Relationships and New Perspectives.” The Rangeland Journal 32 (3): 259. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ10014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmaw, L., R. Ison, H. Corney, N. Gaskell, and I. Kelly. 2022. “Reframing Governance Possibilities for Urban Biodiversity Conservation Through Systemic Co-Inquiry Environmental Policy & Governance.” under review.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R.B., and G. Kallis. 2011. “Coevolutionary Contradictions: Prospects for a Research Programme on Social and Environmental Change.” Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography 93 (4): 289–300. 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00383.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’donnell, E.L., A.C. Horne, L. Godden, and B. Head. 2019. “Cry Me a River: Building Trust and Maintaining Legitimacy in Environmental Flows.” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 23 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2019.1586058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’donnell, E., and E. Macpherson. 2019. “Voice, Power and Legitimacy: The Role of the Legal Person in River Management in New Zealand, Chile and Australia.” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 23 (1): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2018.1552545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” The American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–672. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbekhan, H. 1970. The Predicament of Mankind. Quest for Structured Responses to Growing World-Wide Complexities and Uncertainties. Rome: The Club of Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. “The New Governance: Governing Without Government1.” Political studies 44 (4): 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H.W.J., and M.M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Science 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M.L., S. Maurizi, S. Sassu, G. Seddaiu, O. Zuin, C. Blackmore, and P.P. Roggero. 2017. “Re-Staging La Rasgioni: Lessons Learned from Transforming a Traditional Form of Conflict Resolution to Engage Stakeholders in Agricultural Water Governance.” Water 9 (4): 297. doi:10.3390/w9040297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D.B., and R.L. Ison. 2000. “The Research-Development Relationship in Rural Communities: An Opportunity for Contextual Science.” In Agricultural Extension and Rural Development: Breaking Out of Traditions, edited by R.L. Ison and D.B. Russell, 10–31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, K. 2020. “To My Students: On Open Processes, Social Imaginary and Praxis.” Urgent Pedagogies. https://urgentpedagogies.iaspis.se/to-my-students-on-open-processes-social-imaginary-and-praxis/.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1995. “Knowing-In-Action the New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology.” Change 27 (6): 27–34. doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, P., and J. Jiggins. 2007. “Governance of Complex Environmental Situations Through Social Learning: A Synthesis of Slim’s Lessons for Research, Policy and Practice.” Environmental Science & Policy 10 (6): 575–586. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, P. 2021 Performance VS Performativity. Medium. Accessed 28th November 2022. https://medium.com/social-media-performativity/performance-vs-performativity-7570b7db9fab#:~:text=Is%20performance%20different%20from%20performativity,build%20something%20out%20of%20it.
   Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B., W. Heim, and C. Waterton. 2003. Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, A. 2015. “Constitutional State Structure and Scalar Re-Organization of Natural Resource Governance: The Transformation of Polycentric Water Governance in Spain, Portugal and German.” Land Use Policy 45: 176–188. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and B. Prainsack. 2021. The Pandemic Within - Policy Making for a Better World. Bristol UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, P., and R.L. Ison. 2011. “Appreciating Institutional Complexity in Water Governance Dynamics: A Case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia.” Water Resources Management 25 (15): 4081–4097. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9885-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, P., R.L. Ison, and K. Samson. 2013. “Identifying the Conditions for Social Learning in Water Governance in Regional Australia.” Land Use Policy 31: 412–421. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Water Act 2007”. Act No. 137 of September 2007. Parliament of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1989. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuana, S.L., F. Sengers, W. Boon, M.A. Hajer, and R. Raven. 2020. “A Dramaturgy of Critical Moments in Transition: Understanding the Dynamics of Conflict in Socio-Political Change.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37: 156–170. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunkaporta, T. 2019. Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World. Melbourne, Australia: Text Publishing.
   Google Scholar