How can management of uncertainty in sustainable diversion limits be advanced in the review of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan?

References

• Adams, W. 2015. “Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews”. In H. H. J. Wholey and K. Newcomer, edited by. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. 4. Jossey-Bass. 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandra, J. 2020. “The Science and Politics of Climate Risk Assessment in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin.” Environmental Science & Policy 112: 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascough, J., H. Maier, J. K. Ravalico, and M. Strudley. 2008. “Future Research Challenges for Incorporation of Uncertainty in Environmental and Ecological Decision-Making.” Ecological Modelling 219: 383–399. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bark, R., L. Peeters, R. Lester, N. Pollino, J. Crossman, and J. Kandulu. 2013. “Understanding the Sources of Uncertainty to Reduce the Risks of Undesirable Outcomes in Large-Scale Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Projects: An Example from the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Environmental Science & Policy 33: 97–108. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbal, G. A. 2002. “The Best Available Science for the Management of Anadromous Salmonids in the Columbia River Basin.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59 (12): 1952–1959. doi:10.1139/f02-157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, Biswas, and Bertilsson Likens. (2010). International Review - Final Report in MDBA, Developing the Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Peer Review Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., K. Oliver, and A. Wellstead. 2016. “To Bridge the Divide Between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 399–402. doi:10.1111/puar.12555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carl, J. W. 2007. “Is Adaptive Management Helping to Solve Fisheries Problems?” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36 (4): 304–307. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[304:IAMHTS]2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Colloff, M. J., and J. Pittock. 2022. “Mind the Gap! Reconciling Environmental Water Requirements with Scarcity in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Water 14 (2): 208. doi:10.3390/w14020208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2007. “Water Act 2007.” Compilation No 29. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00539 .
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. Of Drought and Flooding Rains: Inquiry into the Impact of the Guide to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2012. Water Act 2007 – Basin Plan 2012. Compilation No 8, 27 October, Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2021C01067
   Google Scholar
• Crase, L. 2012. “The Murray-Darling Basin Plan: An Adaptive Response to Ongoing Challenges.” Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 31 (3): 318–326. doi:10.1111/j.1759-3441.2012.00187.x.
   Google Scholar
• Crase, L., S. O’Keefe, and B. Dollery. 2013. “Talk is Cheap, or is It? The Cost of Consulting About Uncertain Reallocation of Water in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Ecological Economics 88: 206–213. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSIRO. (2008). Water Availability in the Murray-Darling Basin: AReport from CSIRO to the Australian Government. Australia: CSIRO. https://publications.csiro.au/publications/publication/PIlegacy:530
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., J. Harris, T. Hillman, and K. Walker. 2010. “The Sustainable Rivers Audit: Assessing River Ecosystem Health in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia.” Marine & Freshwater Research 61. doi:10.1071/MF09043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedoose. (2020). Dedoose Version 7.0.23. In SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. https://www.dedoose.com/
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., and R. Biesbroek. 2018. “Nine Lives of Uncertainty in Decision-Making: Strategies for Dealing with Uncertainty in Environmental Governance.” Policy and Society 37 (4): 441–458. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doremus, H. 2004. “The Purposes, Effects, and Future of the Endangered Species Act’s Best Available Science Mandate.” Environmental Law 34: 97–450. doi:10.2307/43267176.
   Google Scholar
• Esch, B. E., A. E. M. Waltz, T. N. Wasserman, and E. L. Kalies. 2018. “Using Best Available Science Information: Determining Best and Available.” Journal of Forestry 116 (5): 473–480. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvy037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. C., F. Davila, A. Toomey, and C. Wyborn. 2017. “Embrace Complexity to Improve Conservation Decision Making.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 1 (11): 1588. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0345-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facione, P., and C. Gittens. 2015. “Mapping Decisions and Arguments.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 30: 17–53. doi:10.5840/inquiryct20153029.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. 2017. Four Corners [Television]. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2007. “Designing Qualitative Research.” doi:10.4135/9781849208826.
   Google Scholar
• Foltinm, C., J. Müller, D. Polansky, P. Novak, and D. Polivaev 2020. Freemind. In http://freemind.sf.net/
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. R., R. Gramling, and D. J. Davidson. 2008. “Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs): Science and the Politics of Doubt.” Sociological Inquiry 78 (1): 2–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00219.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, B., J. Guillaume, and A. J. Jakeman. 2015. “An Iterative Method for Discovering Feasible Management Interventions and Targets Conjointly Using Uncertainty Visualizations.” Environmental Modelling & Software 71: 159–173. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age [Article].” Futures 25 (7): 739–755. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership. 2002. Introducing Effective Water Governance. Sweden: Elanders Novum.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q., J. Pittock, R. Davis, J. Williams, G. Fu, M. Warburton, B. Udall, et al. 2012. “Global Insights into Water Resources, Climate Change and Governance.” Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J., N. Bond, S. Brooks, S. Capon, M. Grace, F. Guarino, C. James, et al. 2020. Murray–Darling Basin Long Term Intervention Monitoring Project: 2018–19 Basin-Scale Evaluation of Commonwealth Environmental Water – Synthesis Report.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B. 2016. “The Australian Murray-Darling Basin Plan: Factors Leading to Its Successful Development.” Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 16 (4): 229–241. doi:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2016.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2019. “Forty Years of Wicked Problems Literature: Forging Closer Links to Policy Studies.” Policy and Society 38 (2): 180–197. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, D. A., T. G. Martin, E. McDonald-Madden, and C. Walters. 2011. “Uncertainty and Adaptive Management for Biodiversity Conservation.” Biological Conservation 144 (4): 1175–1178. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knüsel, B., C. Baumberger, M. Zumwald, D. N. Bresch, and R. Knutti. 2020. “Argument-Based Assessment of Predictive Uncertainty of Data-Driven Environmental Models.” Environmental Modelling & Software 104754. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104754.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. J., S. W. Popper, and S. C. Bankes. 2003. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis. RAND Corporation. doi:10.7249/MR1626.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., T. Ballard, and R. Pancost. 2015. “Uncertainty as Knowledge.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 373: 20140462. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B. 2020. “The Use of ‘Best Available science’ in Environmental and Natural Resources Law.” Precedent 156: 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., J. Davidson, A. Curtis, E. Stratford, and R. Griffith. 2010. “Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management.” Society & Natural Resources 23 (10): 986–1001. doi:10.1080/08941920802178214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2015. “Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 48: 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchau, V., W. Walker, P. Bloemen, and S. Popper. 2019. Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty: From Theory to Practice. 1 ed. Springer Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrandrea, M. D., C. B. Field, T. F. Stocker, O. Edenhofer, K. L. Ebi, D. J. Frame, H. Held. 2010. Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2010). Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Overview. Murray–Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications/archived-information/basin-plan-archives/guide-proposed-basin-plan
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2011a). Socioeconomic Analysis and the draft Basin Plan. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications/archived-information/basin-plan-archives/socio-economic-analysis
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2011b). The Proposed ‘Environmentally Sustainable Level of Take for Surface Water of the Murray–Darling Basin: Method and Outcomes. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications/mdba-reports/proposed-environmentally-sustainable-level-take-surface-water-murray
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2012). Hydrologic Modelling to Inform the Proposed Basin Plan: Method and Results. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications/mdba-reports/hydrologic-modelling-inform-proposed-basin-plan-methods-results
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2015). The SDL Adjustment Assessment Framework for Supply Measures. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications/mdba-reports/sustainable-diversion-limit-adjustment-mechanism-assessment
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2016). The Northern Basin Review: Understanding the economic, social and environmental outcomes from water recovery in the northern basin. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/basin-plan-roll-out/basin-plan-amendments/basin-plan-amendments-northern-basin
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2019). Overview of the Basin-wide environmental watering strategy. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/overview%20of%20the%20basin-wide%20environmental%20watering%20strategy%202019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2020). The 2020 Basin Plan Evaluation. Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/bp-eval-2020-full-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2021). Water resource plans. https://www.mdba.gov.au/basin-plan/water-resource-plans
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A. 2008. “Civic Epistemologies: Constituting Knowledge and Order in Political Communities.” Sociology Compass 2 (6): 1896–1919. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00175.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, A., L. Beesley, L. Locatelli, B. Gersonius, M. R. Hipsey, and A. Ghadouani. 2018. “Adaptation Tipping Points of a Wetland Under a Drying Climate.” Water. 10(2. doi:10.3390/w10020234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Palmer, and K. Richards. 2013. “Enhancing Water Security for the Benefits of Humans and Nature—The Role of Governance.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (6): 676–684. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittock, J., R. Grafton, and J. Williams. 2015. “The Murray-Darling Basin Plan Fails to Deal Adequately with Climate Change.” Water 42: 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Renton, A., and A. Macintosh. 2007. “Computer-Supported Argument Maps as a Policy Memory.” The Information Society 23 (2): 125–133. doi:10.1080/01972240701209300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rist, L., B. M. Campbell, and P. Frost. 2013. “Adaptive Management: Where are We Now?.” Environmental Conservation 40 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892912000240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A., and D. Connell. 2016. “The Evolution and Performance of River Basin Management in the Murray-Darling Basin.” Ecology and Society 21 (3). .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 2nd ed. sage. 10.4135/9781452226651
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.” Environmental Science & Policy 7 (5): 385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., and A. Stirling. 2020. The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2010. “Keep It Complex.” Nature 468: 1029–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. M., N. Bond, N. L. Poff, and N. Byron. 2019. “Towards a Systems Approach for River Basin Management-Lessons from Australia’s Largest River.” River Research and Applications 35 (5): 466–475. doi:10.1002/rra.3242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, M., and J. Rotmans. 2002. “Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling.” Climatic Change 54: 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, A., J. Kirby, Z. Paydar, G. Podger, M. Mainuddin, S. Marvenek, and J. Peña-Arancibia 2008. Uncertainty in River Modelling Across the Murray-Darling Basin: A Report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?pid=procite:5855792e-5b46-4252-b9c0-45bcf961b44e
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. 2019. Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission Report. Government of South Australia. https://cdn.environment.sa.gov.au/environment/docs/murray-darling-basin-royal-commission-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. E., P. Harremoës, J. Rotmans, J. P. Van der Sluijs, M. B. A. Van Asselt, P. Janssen, and M. P. Krayer von Krauss. 2003. “Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support.” Integrated Assessment. doi:10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists. (2020). Assessment of river flows in the Murray-Darling Basin: Observed versus expected flows under the Basin Plan 2012-2019. https://wentworthgroup.org/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Westgate, M. J., G. E. Likens, and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2013. “Adaptive Management of Biological Systems: A Review.” Biological Conservation 158: 128–139. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. K. 2011. “Adaptive Management of Natural Resources—Framework and Issues.” Journal of environmental management 92 (5): 1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar