Towards a co-creative stakeholder engagement in Smart City projects: a life-cycle approach

References

• Albino, V., U. Berardi, and R. M. Dangelico. 2015. “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives.” Journal of Urban Technology 22 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidou, M. 2015. “Smart Cities: A Conjuncture of Four Forces.” Cities 47: 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidou, M. 2017. “The Role of Smart City Characteristics in the Plans of Fifteen Cities.” Journal of Urban Technology 24 (4): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1348880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestrini, M., Y. Rogers, C. Hassan, J. Creus, M. King, and P. Marshall. 2017. “A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement around Urban Issues 1.” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Explore, Innovate, Inspire, 2282–2294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025915
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2012. “Smart Cities, Big Data.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39 (2): 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3902ed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibri, S. E. 2018. “A Foundational Framework for Smart Sustainable City Development: Theoretical, Disciplinary, and Discursive Dimensions and Their Synergies.” Sustainable Cities and Society 38: 758–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolz, K. 2018. “Co-Creating Smart Cities.” The ORBIT Journal 1 (3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29297/orbit.v1i3.66.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2018. “(Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona.” Sustainability 10 (9): 3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I., M. Pérez-batlle, J. Batlle-montserrat, and I. Calzada. 2021. “People-Centered Smart Cities: An Exploratory Action Research on the Cities’ Coalition for Digital Rights.” Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1994861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F. 2019. “Spaces of Visibility in the Smart City: Flagship Urban Spaces and the Smart Urban Imaginary.” Urban Studies 56 (12): 2465–2479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018798597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2018. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (5): 813–830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2019a. “Being a ‘Citizen’ in the Smart City: Up and Down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation in Dublin, Ireland.” GeoJournal 84 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2019b. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (5): 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carè, S., A. Trotta, R. Carè, and A. Rizzello. 2018. “Crowdfunding for the Development of Smart Cities.” Business Horizons 61 (4): 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellina, F., R. Castri, J. V. Simão, and P. Granato. 2020. “Co-creating app-Based Policy Measures for Mobility Behavior Change: A Trigger for Novel Governance Practices at the Urban Level.” Sustainable Cities and Society 53: 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V., and R. Leiringer. 2019. “The Practice of Public Engagement on Projects: From Managing External Stakeholders to Facilitating Active Contributors.” Project Management Journal 51 (1): 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819878346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. 2013. “London Datastore.” In Beyond Transparency: Open Data and the Future of Civic Innovation, edited by B. Goldstein, and L. Dyson, 39–50. Code for America Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107397_11
   Google Scholar
• Concilio, G., J. Marsh, F. Molinari, and F. Rizzo. 2013. “Human Smart Cities: A New Vision for Redesigning Urban Community and Citizen’s Life.” In Knowledge, Information and Creative Support Systems: Recent Trends, Advances and Solutions, edited by A. M. J. Skulimowski, and J. Kacprzyk, 269–278. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., S. Joss, and Y. Dayot. 2018. “The Smart City and Its Publics: Insights from Across six UK Cities.” Urban Research & Practice 11 (1): 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1293150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. T. 1982. “Problem Finding and Solving*.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 16 (2): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175211008726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, T. J., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2021. Urban Futures: Planning for City Foresight and City Visions. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L., and M. Veale. 2018. “Enslaving the Algorithm: From a “Right to an Explanation” to a “Right to Better Decisions”?” IEEE Security & Privacy 16 (3): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehwi, R.J., Holmes H., and Burgess G. 2023. “Shaping smart cities: problem framing, vertical selection and governance in UK smart cities.” Urban Geography Online First: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2235940.
   Google Scholar
• Ehwi, RJ, Holmes H., Maslova S., and Burgess G. 2022. “The ethical underpinnings of Smart City governance: Decision-making in the Smart Cambridge programme, UK.” Urban Studies 59 (4): 2968–2984. 10.1177/00420980211064983.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Anez, V., J. M. Fernández-Güell, and R. Giffinger. 2018. “Smart City Implementation and Discourses: An Integrated Conceptual Model. The Case of Vienna.” Cities 78: 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth, M., M. Brynskov, and T. Ojala. 2015. “Citizens’ right to the digital city urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking.” In Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. R. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Future Cities Catapult. 2016. Smart City Demonstrators: A Global Review of Challenges and Lessons Learned.
   Google Scholar
• Galati, S. R. 2018. “Funding a Smart City: From Concept to Actuality.” In Smart Cities: Applications, Technologies, Standards and Driving Factors, edited by S. McClellan, J. A. Jimenez, and G. Koutitas, 17–40. Cham: Springer Nature..
   Google Scholar
• Galdon, G. 2017, April 25. Technological Sovereignty? Democracy, Data and Governance in the Digital Era. Dossier Citizenship, Internet and Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Font, V. 2021. “Conceptual Technological Framework for Smart Cities to Move Towards Decentralized and User-Centric Architectures Using DLT.” Smart Cities 4 (2): 728–745. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020037.
   Google Scholar
• Giudice, F., G. La Rosa, and A. Risitano. 2006. Product Design for the Environment a Life Cycle Approach.
   Google Scholar
• Giudice, F., G. La Rosa, and A. Risitano. 2006. Product Design for the Environment: A Life Cycle Approach (1st ed.). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomathi, P., S. Baskar, and P. M. Shakeel. 2021. “Concurrent Service Access and Management Framework for User-Centric Future Internet of Things in Smart Cities.” Complex & Intelligent Systems 7: 1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00160-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, N., A. Zwick, Z. Spicer, and N. Carlsen. 2020. “Public Engagement in Smart City Development: Lessons from Communities in Canada’s Smart City Challenge.” Canadian Geographies / Géographies Canadiennes 64 (3): 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12607.
   Google Scholar
• GOV.UK. n.d.. Public Data Group. Crown Copyright. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/public-data-group
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2007. “Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition (Review).” Technology and Culture 43 (3): 614–615. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2002.0124.
   Google Scholar
• Granier, B., and H. Kudo. 2016. “How are Citizens Involved in Smart Cities? Analysing Citizen Participation in Japanese ``Smart Communities''.” Information Polity 21 (1): 61–76. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150367.
   Google Scholar
• Grissemann, U. S., and N. E. Stokburger-Sauer. 2012. “Customer co-Creation of Travel Services: The Role of Company Support and Customer Satisfaction with the co-Creation Performance.” Tourism Management 33 (6): 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. “The Right to the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (4): 939–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review 53 (53): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604819608713449.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2012. “Rebel Cities. from the right to the City to the right to the Urban Revolution.” Eure. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales 40 (119): 289–292. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612014000100013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2014. “Rebel Cities. from the Right to the City to the Right to the Urban Revolution.” Eure. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales 40 (119): 289–292. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612014000100013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? Intelligent, Progressive or Entrepreneurial?” City 12 (3): 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2015. “Critical Interventions Into the Corporate Smart City.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, T., J. H. Chen, H. H. Wei, and Y. C. Su. 2021. “Towards People-Centric Smart City Development: Investigating the Citizens’ Preferences and Perceptions About Smart-City Services in Taiwan.” Sustainable Cities and Society 67: 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., P. J. Robinson, and S. Philpot. 2020. “Type, Tweet, Tap, and Pass: How Smart City Technology is Creating a Transactional Citizen.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (1): 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joss, S., M. Cook, and Y. Dayot. 2017. “Smart Cities: Towards a New Citizenship Regime? A Discourse Analysis of the British Smart City Standard.” Journal of Urban Technology 24 (4): 29–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1336027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinawy, S. N., T. E. El-Diraby, and H. Konomi. 2018. “Customizing Information Delivery to Project Stakeholders in the Smart City.” Sustainable Cities and Society 38: 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2015. “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2016. “The Ethics of Smart Cities and Urban Science.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374 (2083): 20160115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kominos, N. 2015. The Age of Intelligent Cities: Smart Environments and Innovation-for-all (First). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kourtit, K., M. Deakin, A. Caragliu, C. Del Bo, P. Nijkamp, P. Lombardi, and S. Giordano. 2014. “An Advanced Triple Helix Network Framework for Smart Cities Performance.” In Smart Cities: Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition, edited by M. Deakin, 196–217. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, B., A. Vijayakumar, H. Kumar, R. Balaji, A. Ghose, and S. R. Venkatachari. 2018. “Digital Citizen Engagement Framework: An Approach to Citizen Centric Smart Cities of the Future.” Intelligent Environments 23: 28–37. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-874-7-28.
   Google Scholar
• Leeser, R. 2019. Indices of Deprivation 2019 Initial Analysis. London: Datastore.
   Google Scholar
• Leminen, S., M. Rajahonka, and M. Westerlund. 2017. “Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities.” Technology Innovation Management Review 7 (11): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118.
   Google Scholar
• Levenda, A. M., N. Keough, M. Rock, and B. Miller. 2020. “Rethinking Public Participation in the Smart City.” Canadian Geographies / Géographies Canadiennes 64 (3): 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12601.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and M. Deakin. 2010. “The Triple Helix Model and the Meta-Stabilization of Urban Technologies in Smart Cities.” In Physics and Society; Adaptation and Self-Organising System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Lodato, T. J., and C. DiSalvo. 2015. “Issue-Oriented Hackathons as Material Participation.” New Media & Society 18 (4): 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, P., S. Giordano, H. Farouh, and W. Yousef. 2012. “Modelling the Smart City Performance.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (2): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Q., A. K. Parlikad, P. Woodall, G. Don Ranasinghe, X. Xie, Z. Liang, E. Konstantinou, J. Heaton, and J. Schooling. 2020. “Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus.” Journal of Management in Engineering 36 (3): 05020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)me.1943-5479.0000763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, C. 2011. “Property and Citizenship: Conceptually Connecting Land Rights and Belonging in Africa.” Africa Spectrum 46 (3): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/000203971104600304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. R. 2020. “Contesting Digital Futures: Urban Politics, Alternative Economies, and the Movement for Technological Sovereignty in Barcelona.” Antipode 52 (3): 660–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, R., and P. T. I. Lam. 2019. “Investigating the Barriers Faced by Stakeholders in Open Data Development: A Study on Hong Kong as a “Smart City”.” Cities 92: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manville, C., G. Cochrane, J. Cave, J. Millard, K. J. Pederson, R. K. Thaarup, A. Liebe, W. Matthias, R. Massink. 2012. Mapping Smart Cities in the EU. In European Union, Directorate General for Internal Policies.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., and E. Davis. 2019. Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence we Can Trust. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maruf, R. 2023. TikTok users are Making Fun of Congress Members for their Questions to App CEO Shou Chew. CNN Business.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelle, D. 2003. The Right to the City. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohseni, H. 2020. “Public Engagement and Smart City Definitions: A Classifying Model For the Evaluation of Citizen Power in 2025 Tehran.” GeoJournal 86 (3): 1261–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10126-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz, L. A., and M. P. R. Bolivar. 2019. “Using Tools for Citizen Engagement on Large and Medium-Sized European Smart Cities.” In E-Participation in Smart Cities: Technologies and Models of Governance for Citizen Engagement. Public Administration and Information Technology. Vol. 34. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murrer, S. 2021. Milton Keynes’ Famous Robots Spread Their Wings to Deliver in Cambridgeshire. MKCitizen. https://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/people/milton-keynes-famous-robots-spread-their-wings-to-deliver-in-cambridgeshire-3385249.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, T., and T. A. Pardo. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602.
   Google Scholar
• Ogie, R. I. 2016. “Adopting Incentive Mechanisms for Large-Scale Participation in Mobile Crowdsensing: From Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework.” In Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences. Vol. 6. City: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-016-0080-3
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. “Co-creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (3): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, R., J. M. Schultz, and K. Crawford. 2019. “Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice.” New York University Law Review 94 (2): 192–233. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3333423#.
   Google Scholar
• Rominiecka, M. 2008. “Non-verbal Cues in Politics: An Analysis of Gestural Signals Sent by American and European Politicians.” Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44 (2): 247–263. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-008-0012-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2015, November 24. Who Owns our Cities – and why This Urban Takeover Should Concern Us All. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/nov/24/who-owns-our-cities-and-why-this-urban-takeover-should-concern-us-all.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., and M. Graham. 2017. “An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information.” Antipode 49 (4): 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., and T. Lodato. 2019. “From Smart Cities to Smart Citizens: Searching for the “Actually Existing Smart Citizen” in Atlanta, Georgia.” In Creating Smart Cities, edited by C. Coletta, L. Evans, L. Heaphy, and R. Kitchin, 144–152. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., M. Zook, and A. Wiig. 2015. “The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsamados, A., N. Aggarwal, J. Cowls, J. Morley, H. Roberts, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi. 2019. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. New Urban Agenda. Habitat III, Quito, 17-20 October 2016. ISSN: 978-92-1-132731-1. Available at: https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A. H., and M. S. Poole. 1995. “Explaining Development and Change in Organizations.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 510–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51 (5): 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, M., W. Lafayette, and K. Roark. 2018. “Potential for Participatory Big Data Ethics and Algorithm Design : A Scoping Mapping Review.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference Volume 2, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• William, C., R. Webster, L. Charles, C. Webster, R. William, and C. Leleux. 2018. “Smart Governance: Opportunities for Technologically-Mediated Citizen Co-Production C. William R. Webster and Charles Leleux, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling.” Information Polity 23 (1): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K. S. 2019. “Whose Right to the Smart City.” In The Right to the Smart City, edited by P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonia, and R. Kitichin, 27–41. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., M. Tewdwr-Jones, and R. Comber. 2019. “Urban Planning, Public Participation and Digital Technology: App Development as a Method of Generating Citizen Involvement in Local Planning Processes.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46 (2): 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317712515.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, A., M. Barker, L. Hudson, and A. Seffah. 2020. “Supporting Smart Citizens: Design Templates for co-Designing Data-Intensive Technologies.” Cities 101: 102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, A., D. Gooch, J. Cavero, R. Umar, and G. Kortuem. 2019. “Removing Barriers for Citizen Participation to Urban Innovation.” In The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, edited by M. de Lange, and M. de Waal, 153–170. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_8
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, A., G. Kortuem, and J. Cavero. 2015. Urban Data in the Primary Classroom: Bringing Data Literacy to the UK Curriculum. Data Literacy Workshop. http://oro.open.ac.uk/43855/%5Cnhttp://oro.open.ac.uk/43855/1/webSci-CR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., and M. Kamruzzaman. 2018. “Does Smart City Policy Lead to Sustainability of Cities?” Land Use Policy 73: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar