365
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What matters in the local adaptation of Western social innovation to China: deep core beliefs, institutional boundary conditions or managerial practices?

&
Pages 136-151 | Received 16 May 2022, Accepted 27 Sep 2023, Published online: 11 Oct 2023

References

  • Alders, P. 2015. “Self-Managed Care Teams to Improve Community Care for Frail Older Adults in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Care Coordination 18 (2–3): 57–61.
  • Béland, D. 2016. “Ideas and Institutions in Social Policy Research.” Social Policy and Administration 50 (6): 734–750.
  • Béland, D., et al. 2018. “Instrument Constituencies and Transnational Policy Diffusion: The Case of Conditional Cash Transfers.” Review of International Political Economy 25 (4): 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1470548.
  • Benson, D., and A. Jordan. 2011. “What Have We Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited.” Political Studies Review 9 (3): 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x.
  • Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1999. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” Theories of the Policy Process 169.
  • Betz, J., and D. Neff. 2017. “Social Policy Diffusion in South Asia.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 10 (1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2016.1258520.
  • Chan, H. S., and K. W. Chow. 2007. “Public Management Policy and Practice in Western China.” The American Review of Public Administration 37 (4): 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006297552.
  • Cheung, A. B. L. 2005. “The Politics of Administrative Reforms in Asia: Paradigms and Legacies, Paths and Diversities.” Governance 18 (2): 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00275.x.
  • Common, R. K. 1998. “Convergence and Transfer: A Review of the Globalisation of New Public Management.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 11 (6–7): 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559810244356.
  • Dahlgren, L., and M. Fallsberg. 1991. “Phenomenography as a Qualitative Approach in Social Pharmacy Research.” Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy 8: 150–156.
  • Demircioglu, M. A., and D. B. Audretsch. 2017. “Conditions for Innovation in Public Sector Organizations.” Research Policy 46 (9): 1681–1691.
  • De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209.
  • Dimaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 147–160.
  • Dobbin, F., B. Simmons, and G. Garrett. 2007. “The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?” Annual Review of Sociology 33 (1): 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507.
  • Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–23.
  • Foster, K. W. 2016. “Chinese Public Policy Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovations: An Initial Exploration.” Chinese Public Administration Review 3 (1/2): 1. https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v3i1/2.51.
  • Gilardi, F. 2016. “Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (1): 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015608761.
  • Glaser, B., and E. Medeiros. 2007. “The Changing Ecology of Foreign Policy-Making in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of “Peaceful Rise”.” The China Quarterly 190: 291–310.
  • Hall, P. 1993. “Policy Paradigm, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy in Britain.” Comparative Politics 3 (April): 275–296.
  • Hartley, J. 2005. “Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present.” Public Money and Management 25 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x.
  • Hartley, J., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2013. “Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136.
  • Heclo, H. 1974. Modern Social Policies in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • James, O., and M. Lodge. 2003. “‘The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer” and “Lesson Drawing” for Public Policy Research’.” Political Studies Review 1: 179–193.
  • Jans, W., et al. 2015. “Mandatory Innovation in a Decentralised System: The Adoption of an e-Government Innovation in Dutch Municipalities.” Acta Politica 51 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.36.
  • Jenson, J. 2010. “Diffusing Ideas for After Neoliberalism. The Social Investment in Europe and Latin America.” Global Social Policy 10 (1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1771/1468018109354813.
  • Jing, Y. 2012. “From Stewards to Agents?” Public Performance & Management Review 36 (2): 230–252. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360204.
  • Jing, Y., et al. 2021. “Nonprofit Contracting and Partnership in Elderly Care: A Comparison Between China and The Netherlands.” Global Public Policy and Governance, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00009-8.
  • Jing, Y., and T. Gong. 2012. “Managed Social Innovation: The Case of Government-Sponsored Venture Philanthropy in Shanghai.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 71 (2): 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00767.x.
  • Johansen, F., and S. van den Bosch. 2017. “The Scaling-Up of Neighbourhood Care: From Experiment towards a Transformative Movement in Healthcare.” Futures 89: 60–73.
  • Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley.
  • Kreitzer, M. J., et al. 2015. “Buurtzorg Nederland: A Global Model of Social Innovation, Change, and Whole-Systems Healing.” Global Advances in Health and Medicine 4 (1): 40–44. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2014.030.
  • Kuipers, B. S., et al. 2014. “The Management of Change in Public Organizations: A Literature Review.” Public Administration 92 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040.
  • Kvist, J., and B. Greve. 2011. “Has the Nordic Welfare Model Been Transformed?” Social Policy and Administration 45 (2): 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00761.x.
  • Leichsenring, K. 2015. ““Buurtzorg Nederland” – Ein innovatives Modell der Langzeitpflege revolutioniert die Hauskrankenpflege.” Krankenpflege 20 (8): 20–24.
  • Lijphart, A. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Liu, T., and L. Sun. 2015. “An Apocalyptic Vision of Ageing in China.” Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 48 (4): 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-014-0816-5.
  • Ma, L. 2013. “The Diffusion of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese Municipal Police Bureaus.” Public Management Review 15 (2): 288–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.691010.
  • Manning, N. 2001. “‘The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 67 (2): 297–312.
  • Marsh, D., and M. Evans. 2012. “Policy Transfer: Coming of Age and Learning from the Experience.” Policy Studies 33 (6): 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.736795.
  • Meier, C., A. Rutherford, and C. Avellaneda. 2017. Comparative Public Management: Why National, Environmental, and Organizational Context Matters. Georgetown University Press.
  • Mertha, A. 2009. “”Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process.” The Chinese Quarterly 200: 995–1012.
  • Monsen, K. A., and J. de Blok. 2013. “Buurtzorg. Nurse-Led Community Care.” Creative Nursing 19 (3): 122–127.
  • Monsen, K., and J. DeBlok. 2013. “Buurtzorg Nederland.” AJN, American Journal of Nursing 113 (8): 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000432966.26257.97.
  • Nandram, S., and N. Koster. 2014. “Organizational Innovation and Integrated Care: Lessons from Buurtzorg.” Journal of Integrated Care 22 (4): 174–184.
  • Obinger, H., C. Schmitt, and P. Starke. 2013. “Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer in Comparative Welfare State Research.” Social Policy & Administration 47 (1): 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12003.
  • Osborne, S. P., and K. Brown. 2005. Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. London: Routledge.
  • Osborne, S. P., and L. Brown. 2011. “Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK. The Word that Would be King?” Public Administration 89 (4): 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x.
  • Pawson, R., J. Tilley, and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London, California, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Powell, W., and P. Dimaggio, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
  • Rogers, E. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: The free press.
  • Rothstein, B. 2015. “The Chinese Paradox of High Growth and Low Quality of Government: The Cadre Organization Meets Max Weber.” Governance 28 (4): 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12128.
  • Sabatier, P. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and The Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21: 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.
  • Sabatier, P. A., and H. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
  • Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25.
  • Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2011. “Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” Administration & Society 43 (8): 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768.
  • Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2012. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” The Innovation Journal 17 (1): 1–14. Available at: https://vpn.utm.my/docview/1362242870?accountid=41678.
  • Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2017. “Metagoverning Collaborative Innovation in Governance Networks.” The American Review of Public Administration 47 (7): 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016643181.
  • Stepan, M., and A. Müller. 2012. “Welfare Governance in China ? A Conceptual Discussion of Governing Social Policies and the Applicability of the Concept to Contemporary China *.” Journal of Cambridge Studies 7 (4): 54–72.
  • Stone, D. 2012. “Transfer and Translation of Policy.” Policy Studies 33 (6): 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.695933.
  • Sugiyama, N. B. 2008. “Theories of Policy Diffusion.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007300916.
  • Tolbert, P. S., and L. G. Zucker. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383.
  • van Gerven, M. 2019. “Narrative Stories in Chinese Characters: Political Framing of Ageing and the Welfare Reform in China.” Policy and Society 00 (00): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1658693.
  • van Gerven, M., and W. Yang. 2017. “Teaching the Dragon? The Diffusion of European Unions’s Social and Employment Policies to China.” In Managing International Connectivity, Diversity of Learning and Changing Labour Markets, edited by K. H. Mok, 245–261. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1736-0
  • van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2018. “Facilitating Conditions for Boundary-Spanning Behaviour in Governance Networks.” Public Management Review 20 (4): 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1302248.
  • Voorberg, W., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
  • Walker, R. M. 2006. “Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government.” Public Administration 84 (2): 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x.
  • Weyland, K. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics 57 (02): 262–295. doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0019.
  • Worthley, J. 1984. “Public Administration in the People’s Republic of China: An Overview of Values and Practices.” Public Administration Review 44 (6): 518–523. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110414.
  • Wu, J., L. Ma, and Y. Yang. 2013. “Innovation in the Chinese Public Sector: Typology and Distribution.” Public Administration 91 (2): 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x.
  • Yuan, H. 2013. “Theorising the Variability of Response to International Diffusion: China’s Reaction to the Social Dimension of Globalisation in Eu_China relationship.” In UACES Conference, 1–31. Leeds.
  • Zhang, Y., and X. Zhu. 2019. “Multiple Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion in China.” Public Management Review 21 (4): 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1497695.
  • Zhao, R., Z. Wu, and C. Tao. 2016. “Understanding Service Contracting and Its Impact on NGO Development in China.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (5): 2229–2251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9714-3.
  • Zhu, X. 2014. “Mandate Versus Championship: Vertical Government Intervention and Diffusion of Innovation in Public Services in Authoritarian China.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.798028.