284
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How water features: negotiating and reassembling the sociomaterial politics of central Californian groundwater

Pages 218-233 | Received 31 Jan 2019, Accepted 15 Jul 2023, Published online: 24 Jul 2023

References

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press.
  • Aladjem, D., & Sundling, D. (2015). Marketing the sustainable groundwater management act: Applying economics to solve California’s groundwater problems. Natural Resources & Environment, 30(2), 1–4.
  • Alaniz, R., Olson, L., Harootunian, G., Lawless, C., Ayeb-Karlsson, S. R., Barthelt, C., Pompeii, B. J., Brillinger, R., Conn, D., Contreras, D., Gaudi, F., Lundquist, T., Drexler, D., Fiegel, G. L., Francis, H. H., Gibson, J., Greene, C., Henly-Shepard, S., Houck, D., … Armour, I. (2016). Policy brief: Goals for 2020: The California drought and the San Joaquin valley. National Security Council, The White House.
  • Anderson, M. B., Ward, L., McEvoy, J., Gilbertz, S. J., & Hall, D. M. (2016). Developing the water commons? The (post)political condition and the politics of ‘Shared Giving’ in Montana. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 74, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.002
  • Ballard, K. (2016, March 3). City joins groundwater agency. Porterville Recorder.
  • Beveridge, R., Huesker, F., & Naumann, M. (2014). From post-politics to a politics of possibility? Unravelling the privatization of the Berlin water company. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 51, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.021
  • Birkenholtz, T. (2009). Groundwater governmentality: Hegemony and technologies of resistance in Rajasthan’s (India) groundwater governance. Geographical Journal, 175(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00327.x
  • Birkenholtz, T. (2015). Recentralizing groundwater governmentality: Rendering groundwater and its users visible and governable. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1058
  • Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., & Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage, actor-networks and the challenges of critical urban theory. In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people, not for profit: critical urban theory and the right to the city (pp. 117–137). Routledge.
  • Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–358). Princeton University Press.
  • Cole, S. (2016, July 21). Council approves rate increase. Porterville Recorder.
  • Delina, L. L. (2018). Whose and what futures? Navigating the contested coproduction of Thailand’s energy sociotechnical imaginaries. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.045
  • Department of Water Resources. (2014). Casgem groundwater basin prioritization. Department of Water Resources.
  • Eastern Tule Groundwater Sustainability Agency Joint Powers Authority. (2017, March 16). Meeting of the Authority Board of Directors.
  • Eastern Tule Groundwater Sustainability Agency Joint Powers Authority. (2018, April 10). Meeting of the Authority Board of Directors.
  • Editorial. (2014, April 13). California needs overdraft protection for its dwindling groundwater supplies. Sacramento Bee. Retrieved March 15, 2020, from, www.sacbee.com/opinion/editorials/article2595 526.htm.
  • Elkins, R. (2016, April 14). City water rates to rise. Porterville Recorder.
  • Franks, J. (2010). Boundary organizations for sustainable land management: The example of Dutch environmental co-operatives. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.011
  • Haggerty, J. H. (2007). ‘I’m Not a Greenie but … ’: Environmentality, eco-populism and governance in New Zealand: Experiences from the Southland Whitebait Fishery. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.11.002
  • Hernandez, Y., Barbosa, P., Corral, S., & Rivas, S. (2018). An institutional analysis to address climate change adaptation in Tenerife (Canary Islands). Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.017
  • Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge.
  • Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
  • Jons, H. (2011). Centres of calculation. In J. Agnew & D. N. Livingstone (Eds.), The Sage handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 158–170). Sage Publications.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: An essay on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
  • Leahy, T. C. (2016). Desperate times call for sensible measures: The making of the California sustainable groundwater management act. Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal, 9(1), 5–40.
  • Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66, 745–758.
  • Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x
  • Paneque Salgado, P., Corral Quintana, S., Guimaraes Pereira, A., del Moral Intarte, L., & Pedregal Mateos, B. (2009). Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives: A case in the Costa del Sol (Málaga). Ecological Economics, 68(4), 990–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.008
  • Rancière, J. R. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Recorder, P. (2016a, June 20). Rate hike protests slowly trickle in. Porterville Recorder.
  • Recorder, P. (2016b, May 2). City to begin water rate hike process. Porterville Recorder.
  • Samuels, S. R. (2016). Treading water: Resource and legal regulatory scarcity in the assessment of groundwater withdrawals in California. University of California at Los Angeles M.U.R.P. dissertation.
  • Smith, J. M., & Tidwell, A. S. D. (2016). The everyday lives of energy transitions: Contested sociotechnical imaginaries in the American west. Social Studies of Science, 43(6), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716644534
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antimonies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728
  • University of California, Davis. (2015). The 2014 sustainable groundwater management Act: A handbook to understanding and implementing the Law. Water Education Foundation.
  • University of California, Davis. 2021. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. University of California, Davis, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Retrieved May 7, 2021, from, http://groundwater.ucdavis.edu/SGMA/
  • Ward, L., Anderson, M. B., Gilbertz, S. J., McEvoy, J., & Hall, D. M. (2017). Public stealth and boundary objects: Coping with integrated water resource management and the post-political condition in Montana’s portion of the Yellowstone river watershed. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 83, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.017
  • Zavala, J. (2016, December 16). Mathis shines light on east Porterville. Porterville Recorder.
  • Zizek, S. (1999). The Ticklish subject – The absent centre of political ontology. Verso.