Damage, recovery, and the geographies of military–civil entanglements

References

• Anderson, B., & MacFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, V. M., & Catignani, S. (2018). War is where the hearth is: Gendered labor and the everyday reproduction of the geopolitical in the army reserves. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1442736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkin, A. (2012). Bring Me Men: Military masculinity and the benign façade of American empire. Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Bernazolli, R., & Flint, C. (2009). From militarization to securitization: Finding a concept that works. Political Geography, 28(8), 449–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, P. (2019). Mission improbable: The transformation of the British army reserve. Howgate.
   Google Scholar
• Caforio, R. (ed.). (2006). Handbook of sociology of the military. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cancio, R., Kuptsevysh-Timmer, A., & Omori, M. (2020). Perpetual war with the Brother Nation: An analysis of Ukrainian veterans, cultural identity and historical trauma. Journal of War & Culture Studies, 13(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2018.1558536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, M. L. (2022). Queering civil-military relations: The cultural work of recognition, recovery and reproduction [PhD thesis]. Dept. of International Relations, London School of International Relations and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, C., & Duncanson, C. (2020). Whose recovery? IFI prescriptions for post-war states. Review of International Political Economy, 27(6), 1214–1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1677743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandeker, C., & Mason, D. (2001). The British armed services and the participation of minority ethnic communities: from equal opportunities to diversity? The Sociological Review, 49(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defence Intelligence Agency. (2022). Challenges to security in space: Space reliance in an Era of competition and expansion. DIA.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C., & Woodward, R. (2016). Regendering the military: Theorizing women’s military participation. Security Dialogue, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615614137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, T., Dawes, A., Higate, P., Jenkings, K. N., & Woodward, R. (2016). Reserve forces and the transformation of British military organisation: Soldiers, citizens and society. Defence Studies, 16(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2016.1163225
   Google Scholar
• Harris, O. J. T. (2017). Assemblages and scale in archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higate, P., & Cameron, A. (2006). Reflexivity and researching the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X05278171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1957). The soldier and the state. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. J., Woodward, R., Williams, A., Rech, M., Murphy, A., & Bos, D. (2010). Military Occupations: Methodological approaches and the military-academy research nexus. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00340.x
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. N. (2018). Unique adequacy’ in studies of the military, militarism and militarisation. Ethnographic Studies, 15, 38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. N. (2022). Critical veteran researchers’ unique adequacy: Accounting for friendly fire and fratricide. Critical Military Studies, 9(1), 40–58.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. N., Dawes, A., Edmunds, T., Higate, P., & Woodward, R. (2019). Reserve forces and the privatization of the military by the nation state. In O. Swed, & T. Crosbie (Eds.), The sociology of privatized security (pp. 107–136). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S., & Flint, C. (eds.). (2011). Reconstructing conflict: Integrating war and post-war geographies. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J. (ed.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of United Nations peacekeeping operations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, A. (2022). What is quantum entanglement? A physicist explains the science of Einstein’s ‘spooky action at a distance’. The Conversation, 6th October 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvihill, M. (2019). The four minute warning drawing machine: Revealing the assemblages of nuclear deterrence [Newcastle University PhD thesis]. School of Arts and Cultures. https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/4824.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvihill, M. (2021). Purple Haze: The psychedelic sound of nuclear deterrence. Inkstick Media. www.inkstickmedia.com.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., Archer, E. M., Barr, J., Belkin, A., Guerrero, M., Hall, C., & Swain, K. E. O. (2012). Conceptualizing the civil-military gap: A research note. Armed Forces & Society, 38(4), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X12456509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rech, M., Bos, D., Jenkings, K. N., Williams, A., & Woodward, R. (2015). Geography, military geography, and critical military studies. Critical Military Studies, 1(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2014.963416
   Google Scholar
• Sarkesian, S. (1975). The professional army officer in a changing society. Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B.R., & Ben-Ari, E. (2019). Introduction: Rethinking civil-military connections: from relations to entanglements. In B. Refslund Sørensen, & E. Ben-Ari (Eds.), Civil-Military entanglements: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 1–20). Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. (2004). Military geographies. Blackwell Publishers. RGS-IBG book series.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. (2005). From military geography to militarism’s geographies: Disciplinary engagements with the geographies of militarism and military activities. Progress in Human Geography, 29(6), 718–740. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph579oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. (2014). Military landscapes: Agendas and approaches for future research. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 40–61. on-line in. July 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513493219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. (ed.). (2019). A research Agenda for military geography. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., Dawes, A., Edmunds, T., Higate, P., & Jenkings, K. N. (2020). The possibilities and limits of impact and engagement in research on military institutions. Area, 52(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., Dawes, A., Edmunds, T., Higate, P., & Jenkings, K. N. (2022). The use of military reservists’ civilian skills for armed forces. In E. Ben-Ari, & V. Connolly (Eds.), Contemporary military reserves: Between the civilian and military worlds (pp. 146–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., Jenkings, K. N., & Williams, A. J. (2017). Militarisation, universities and the university armed service units. Political Geography, 60, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar