Iterative urban design and transport simulation using Sketch MATSim

References

• Allen, P. M. 2012. “Cities: The Visible Expression of Co-Evolving Complexity.” In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design, edited by J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, and E. Tan, 67–89. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_5.
   Google Scholar
• The Aspen Institute. 2017a. “Bloomberg Aspen Initiative on Cities and Autonomous Vehicles.” 2017. http://avsincities.bloomberg.org/
   Google Scholar
• The Aspen Institute. 2017b. “Taming the Autonomous Vehicle - A Primer for Cities.” Long Island City, New York: Bloomberg Philanthropies. https://www.bbhub.io/dotorg/sites/2/2017/05/TamingtheAutonomousVehicleSpreadsPDFreleaseMay3rev2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D., and R. Hickman. 2013. “Transport Futures: Thinking the Unthinkable.” Transport Policy 29 (September): 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Bankes, S. C. 1993. “Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis.” Operations Research 41 (3): 435–449. doi:10.1287/opre.41.3.435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2008. “Fifty Years of Urban Modeling: Macro-Statics to Micro-Dynamics.” In The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems, edited by S. Albeverio, D. Andrey, P. Giordano, and A. Vancheri, 1–20. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD. doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-1937-3_1.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2013. The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2018. Inventing Future Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., and S. Marshall. 2012. “The Origins of Complexity Theory in Cities and Planning.” In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, edited by J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, and E. Tan, 21–45. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_3.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E., S. R. Lerman, and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. 2017. Planning the Mobile Metropolis: Transport for People, Places and the Planet. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., F. le Clercq, and T. Straatemeier. 2008. “Urban Transportation Planning in Transition.” Transport Policy New Developments in Urban Transportation Planning 15 (2): 69–72. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff, J., N. Soeffker, and M. Maciejewski. 2016. “A Framework for Agent Based Simulation of Demand Responsive Transport Systems.” August. http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-5760
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M. G., and R. Crane. 2001. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bösch, P. M., F. Becker, H. Becker, and K. W. Axhausen. 2018. “Cost-Based Analysis of Autonomous Mobility Services.” Transport Policy 64 (May): 76–91. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, R. H. 1973. “Transportation, Automation, and Societal Structure.” Proceedings of the IEEE 61 (5): 518–525. doi:10.1109/PROC.1973.9107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2020. “To Truly ‘Live’, Urban Design Needs Accessible Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Urban Design 25 (1): 5–9. doi:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Liveable Cities. 2016. “Creating Liveable Cities through Car-Lite Urban Mobility.” Singapore: Centre for Liveable Cities. https://www.clc.gov.sg/docs/default-source/books/carlite-urban-mobility-finalreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., M. Balmer, and K. W. Axhausen. 2009. “Large Scale Use of Collective Taxis: A Multi-Agent Approach.” Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung 594: 17. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005916505
   Google Scholar
• Cidell, J., and D. Prytherch. 2015. “Transportation, Mobilities, and Rethinking Urban Geographies of Flow.” In Transport, Mobility, and the Production of Urban Space, edited by J. Cidell and D. Prytherch. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. C. 2014. “Why Simulate Cities?” GeoJournal 79 (2): 129–136. doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9499-5.
   Google Scholar
• Clewlow, R. R., and G. S. Mishra. 2017. “Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States.” October. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82w2z91j
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. 2001. “Dare to Dream: Bringing Futures into Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (4): 372–383. doi:10.1080/01944360108976246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, X., Z. Li, and S. Li. 2017. “5G Software Defined Vehicular Networks.” IEEE Communications Magazine 55 (7): 87–93. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1601144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., T. Ryley, and R. Dingwall. 2014. “Beyond ‘Predict and Provide’: UK Transport, the Growth Paradigm and Climate Change.” Transport Policy 32 (March): 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.006.
   Google Scholar
• Grignard, A., L. Alonso, P. Taillandier, B. Gaudou, T. Nguyen-Huu, W. Gruel, and K. Larson. 2018. “The Impact of New Mobility Modes on A City: A Generic Approach Using ABM.” In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX, edited by A. J. Morales, C. Gershenson, D. Braha, A. A. Minai, and Y. Bar-Yam, 272–280. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_29.
   Google Scholar
• Gruel, W., and J. M. Stanford. 2016. “Assessing the Long-Term Effects of Autonomous Vehicles: A Speculative Approach.” Transportation Research Procedia, Towards future innovative transport: visions, trends and methods 43rd European Transport Conference Selected Proceedings, 13 ( January): 18–29. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Guhathakurta, S. 2002. “Urban Modeling as Storytelling: Using Simulation Models as a Narrative.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (6): 895–911. doi:10.1068/b12857.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L. 1996. “Understanding the Link between Urban Form and Nonwork Travel Behavior.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 15 (3): 183–198. doi:10.1177/0739456X9601500303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996. “Cities as Movement Economies.” URBAN DESIGN International 1 (1): 41–60. doi:10.1057/udi.1996.5.
   Google Scholar
• Horni, A., K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen. 2016. “Introducing MATSim.” In The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, edited by A. Horni, K. Nagel and K. W. Axhausen, 3–8. London: Ubiquity Press. doi:10.5334/baw.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, A. 2005. “Integrated Transport Planning in the UK: From Concept to Reality.” Journal of Transport Geography 13 (4): 318–328. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, B. 2013. Planning Sustainable Transport. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203436066.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., D. Levinson, and A. El-Geneidy. 2008. “Models of Transportation and Land Use Change: A Guide to the Territory.” Journal of Planning Literature 22 (4): 323–340. doi:10.1177/0885412207314010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isserman, A. M. 1985. “Dare to Plan: An Essay on the Role of the Future in Planning Practice and Education.” The Town Planning Review 56 (4): 483–491. doi:10.3828/tpr.56.4.g24261722hq10208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Reissue edition. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, K. 2012. “A Configurational Approach to Analytical Urban Design: ‘Space Syntax’ Methodology.” URBAN DESIGN International 17 (4): 297–318. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klügl, F., and A. L. C. Bazzan. 2012. “Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation.” AI Magazine 33 (3): 29. doi:10.1609/aimag.v33i3.2425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. 2010. “Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis.” Design Issues 26 (1): 15–28. doi:10.2307/20627839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B. 1973. “Requiem for Large-Scale Models.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39 (3): 163–178. doi:10.1080/01944367308977851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligtenberg, A., M. Wachowicz, A. K. Bregt, A. Beulens, and D. L. Kettenis. 2004. “A Design and Application of A Multi-Agent System for Simulation of Multi-Actor Spatial Planning.” Journal of Environmental Management Modelling land use change and environmental impact 72 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T.-K., W. C. Lau, and C. T. Loh. 1983. “New Towns in Singapore.” In Place to Live: More Effective Low Cost Housing in Asia, edited by Y. M. Yeung, 27. Ottawa: IDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., M. Zhang, and T. Xu. 2020. “A Conceptual Framework and Implementation Tool for Land Use Planning for Corridor Transit Oriented Development.” Cities 107 (December): 102939. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102939.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, R. 2021. “Open Source Tools for Geographic Analysis in Transport Planning.” Journal of Geographical Systems 23 (4): 547–578. doi:10.1007/s10109-020-00342-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. 2015. “Transport’s Digital Age Transition.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 8 (2): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., and C. Davidson. 2016. “Guidance for Transport Planning and Policymaking in the Face of an Uncertain Future.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 88 (June): 104–116. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, M. 2016. “Dynamic Transport Services.” In The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, edited by A. Horni, K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen, 145–152. London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/baw.23
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, T. 2020. “An Urban Design Response to the Technological Shift in Transportation: How to Conduct Urban Design with Vehicle Automation, Sharing and Connectivity.” Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich. doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000448978.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, T., and K. W. Axhausen. 2021. “How Will the Technological Shift in Transportation Impact Cities? A Review of Quantitative Studies on the Impacts of New Transportation Technologies.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3013. doi:10.3390/su13063013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. 2005. Streets and Patterns. Abingdon, UK: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S., and Y. Gong. 2009. “WP4 Deliverable Report: Urban Pattern Specification.” London, UK: University College London. http://www.suburbansolutions.ac.uk/documents/WP4DeliverableReportNov2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McNally, M. G. 2007. “The Four-Step Model.” In Handbook of Transport Modelling, edited by D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, Vol. 1, 35–53. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/9780857245670-003.
   Google Scholar
• Meyboom, A. 2019. Driverless Urban Futures: A Speculative Atlas for Autonomous Vehicles. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., M. Snelder, B. van Arem, B. van Wee, and H. de Almeida Correia. 2017. “Development of Automated Vehicles in the Netherlands: Scenarios for 2030 and 2050.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 17 (1). doi:10.18757/ejtir.2017.17.1.3180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motieyan, H., and M. S. Mesgari. 2018. “An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Sustainable Urban Planning from Land Use and Public Transit Perspectives.” Cities 81 (November): 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.018.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D. 2001. “SYMPOSIUM: Putting the Future in Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (4): 365–367. doi:10.1080/01944360108976244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., J. Andersen, M. S. Nicolaisen, and A. Strand. 2014. “Transport Modelling in the Context of the ‘Predict and Provide’ Paradigm.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 14: 2. doi:10.18757/ejtir.2014.14.2.3020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navidi, Z. 2019. “Modelling the Impacts of Demand Responsive Transport Systems on Mobility.” Melbourne: University of Melbourne. http://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/227158
   Google Scholar
• Ortúzar, J. D. D., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling Transport. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. 1995. “From ‘Predict and Provide’ to ‘Predict and Prevent’?: Pricing and Planning in Transport Policy.” Transport Policy 2 (1): 43–49. doi:10.1016/0967-070X(95)93245-T.
   Google Scholar
• Pas, E. I., and S. L. Principio. 1997. “Braess’ Paradox: Some New Insights.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 31 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00024-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearman, A. D. 1988. “Scenario Construction for Transport Planning.” Transportation Planning and Technology 12 (1): 73–85. doi:10.1080/03081068808717361.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, P., A. Banos, and C. Pettit. 2017. “Agent-Based Modelling for Urban Planning Current Limitations and Future Trends.” In Agent Based Modelling of Urban Systems, edited by M.-R. Namazi-Rad, L. Padgham, P. Perez, K. Nagel, and A. Bazzan, Vol. 10051, 60–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51957-9_4.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. 2012. “Complexity Theories of Cities: Implications to Urban Planning.” In Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design, edited by J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, and E. Tan, 221–244. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_13.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J., and E. Krawczyk. 2011. “Imagineering City Futures: The Use of Prospective through Scenarios in Urban Planning.” Futures 43 (7): 642–653. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.-P., C. Comtois, and B. Slack. 2013. The Geography of TransportSystems. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge. https://transportgeography.org/media/e-book/
   Google Scholar
• Sevtsuk, A. 2014. “Networks of the Built Environment.” In Decoding the City: Urbanism in the Age of Big Data, edited by D. Offenhuber and C. Ratti, 144. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y., S. Kaplan, and S. Hakkert. 2003. “Scenario Building as a Tool for Planning a Sustainable Transportation System.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 8 (5): 323–342. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(03)00020-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, R., and R. Newkirk. 1998. “Visioning: Did Anybody See Where It Came From?” Journal of Planning Literature 12 (4): 407–416. doi:10.1177/088541229801200402.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Arem, B., A. A. Ackerman, T. Chang, W. Riggs, A. Wegscheider, S. Smith, and S. Rupprecht. 2019. “Building Automation into Urban and Metropolitan Mobility Planning.” In Road Vehicle Automation 6, edited by G. Meyer and S. Beiker, 123–136, Lecture Notes in Mobility. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M., and F. Fuerst. 1999. “Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art.” TRANSLAND Project Deliverable. Dortmund: Institut für Raumplanung Fakultät Raumplanung, Universität Dortmund. https://www.academia.edu/30627131/Land-Use_Transport_Interaction_State_of_the_Art
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S., A. Crooks, and M. Batty. 2017. “Transportation in Agent-Based Urban Modelling.” In Agent Based Modelling of Urban Systems, edited by M.-R. Namazi-Rad, L. Padgham, P. Perez, K. Nagel, and A. Bazzan, Vol. 10051, 129–148. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51957-9_8.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., and D. Levinson. 2004. “Agent-Based Approach to Travel Demand Modeling: Exploratory Analysis.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1898 (1898): 28–36. doi:10.3141/1898-04.
   Google Scholar