Do teaching innovation projects make a difference? Assessing the impact of small-scale funding

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 221.10.1023/A:1004181331049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, V., & Sampson, A. (2016). Foundation versus innovation: Developing creative education practitioner confidence in the complex blended learning and scope. Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 502–506.10.1080/19415257.2015.1024800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered. Priorities of the Professorate. Los Angeles, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Collie, S. L., & Taylor, A. L. (2004). Improving teaching quality and the learning organisation. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(2), 139–155.10.1080/13583883.2004.9967123
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Torre, E. M., Gómez-Sancho, J. M., & Pérez-Esparrells, C. (2017). Comparing University performance by legal status: A Malmquist-type index approach for the case of the Spanish higher Education system. Tertiary Education and Management, 28(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• De Rijdt, C., Stes, A., van der Vleuten, C., & Dochy, F. (2013). Influencing variables and moderators of transfer of learning to the workplace within the area of staff development in higher education: Research review. Educational Research Review, 8, 48–74.10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saille, S. (2015). Innovating innovation policy: The emergence or ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2(2), 152–168.10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feixas, M., Duran, M. M., Fernández, I., Fernández, A., García San Pedro, M. J., Márquez, M. D., … Lagos, P. (2013). ¿Cómo medir la transferencia de la formación en Educación Superior?: el Cuestionario de Factores de Transferencia [How to measure academic development transfer in higher education?: The Questionnaire of Transfer Factors]. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(3), 219–248.
   Google Scholar
• Gargallo, B., Morera, I., Iborra, S., Climet, M. J., Navalón, S., & García-Félix, E. (2014). Metodología centrada en el aprendizaje. Su impacto en las estrategias de aprendizaje y en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes universitarios [Methodology centered in student learning. Its impact in the learning strategies and in the academic performance of university students]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 72(259), 415–435.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., Holmes, A., & Segal, R. (2002). Funding innovation and disseminating new teaching practices. Milton Keynes: National Co-ordination Team and Teaching Quality Enhancement Fund, The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, B. (2016). Tecnologías digitales e innovación educativa: retos de una relación inevitable [Digital technologies and educational innovation: Challenges of an inevitable relationship]. En J. M. Mominó & C. Sigalés (Coords.),  El impacto de las TIC en educación: más allá de las promesas [The impact of ICT in education: beyond promises] (pp. 157–176). Barcelona: UOC ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, E. F., III. (2005). Holton’s evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 37–54.10.1177/1523422304272080
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programmes. The four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857025012
   Google Scholar
• Marcelo, C., Mayor, C., & Gallego, B. (2011). Evaluación de la innovación educativa [Evaluation of educational innovation]. En C. Marcelo (Coord.). Evaluación del desarrollo profesional docente [Evaluation of the teachers’ profesional development] (pp. 129–150). Barcelona:  Editorial Davinci.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, T., Coll, C., & Onrubia, J. (2007). La evaluación de la calidad de los procesos de innovación docente universitaria. Una perspectiva constructivista [Evaluation of the quality of the processes of university teaching innovation. A constructivist perspective]. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 1, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, L., & Powell, B. (2004). Short-term intervention, long-term gain: Using action research projects for quality improvement in adult and community learning. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Pineda-Herrero, P., Quesada-Pallarès, C., & Ciraso-Calí, A. (2014). Evaluation of training transfer factors: The FET model. In K. Schneider (Ed.), Transfer of learning in organizations (pp. 121–144). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M. S., & Porter, A. C. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 399–416.10.3102/0162373714531851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-Martín, A., & Peirats, J. (2014). Centros educativos inteligentes, luces y sombras sobre las políticas de transferencia tecnológica y las prácticas docentes [Intelligent educational centers, lights and shadows about the policies of technological transfer and the teaching practices]. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y formación del profesorado, 18(3), 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M., Castro, D., &  Feixas, M. (2010). Dimensiones para el análisis de las innovaciones en la universidad. Propuesta de un modelo [Dimensions for the analysis of innovations at university. A model proposal]. Bordón, 62(10), 139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., & Revuelta, F. I. (2013). El bienestar subjetivo ante las buenas prácticas educativas con TIC: su influencia en profesorado innovador [The subjective wellbeing against good educational practices with ICT: its influence in the innovative teacher]. Educación XX1, 16(1), 255–279.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcarro, C. (2003). Evaluación de la calidad de la docencia para su mejora. Revista de la Red Estatal de Docencia Universitaria, 3(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C. (2015). Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 65–79.10.1080/1475939X.2013.822414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar