Leadership in virtual work settings: what we know, what we do not know, and what we need to do

References

• Akinola, M. (2010). Measuring the pulse of an organization: Integrating physiological measures into the organizational scholar’s toolbox. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andressen, P., Konradt, U., & Neck, C. P. (2012). The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811425047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00030-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 93–117). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, G. E. (2008). Examining the relationship between leadership style and project success in virtual projects (Publication No. 3345049). [ Doctoral dissertatio], University of Phoenix. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304310092?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, S. (2010). Study of effective virtual project management through emotional intelligence, empowerment and leadership style in partly and truly global projects. [ Doctoral dissertation], University of Engineering and Technology Taxila. Pakistan Research Repository. https://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/handle/123456789/1415
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Dodge, G. E. (2001). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00062-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on demand – what virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., & Atwater, L. E. (2007). The mediating effects of leadership and interaction style in face-to-face and virtual teams. In S. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance (pp. 143–166). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balwant, P. T. (2017). Stay close! Leader distance, transformational leadership, engagement, and performance in teams. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1(1), 10785. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10785abstract
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y. (2001). The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, T. (2014). The relationship between servant-leadership, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment for virtual employees (Publication No. 3665456). [ Doctoral dissertatio], Northcentral University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1640913318?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Bogler, R., Caspi, A., & Roccas, S. (2013). Transformational and passive leadership: An initial investigation of university instructors as leaders in a virtual learning environment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212474805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. G., Hill, N. S., & Lorinkova, N. N. M. (2021). Leadership and virtual team performance: A meta-analytic investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(5), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1914719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, W. L., & Lee, C. Y. (2013). Virtual team e‐leadership: The effects of leadership style and conflict management mode on the online learning performance of students in a business‐planning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 986–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, K., Wei, K., Howison, J., & Wiggins, A. (2008). Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 44(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2089125.2089127
   Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial information processing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191–233). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. E. D., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta‐analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMartino, V., & Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129(5), 529–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, A. (2018). Nursing leadership and employee satisfaction perception in a virtual work environment. [ Doctoral dissertation], Walden University. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5620/
   Google Scholar
• Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveleth, D. M., & Eveleth, A. B. (2010). Team identification, team performance and leader-member exchange relationships in virtual groups: Findings from massive multi-player online role play games. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvcsn.2010010104
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. C., & Gainey, T. W. (1997). Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: Framing the research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 7(4), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. M., & Harding, M. (2015). The impact of interaction anticipation and incentive type on shared leadership and performance in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 732–741.
   Google Scholar
• Furumo, K., de Pillis, E., & Buxton, M. (2012). The impact of leadership on participation and trust in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Conference on Computers and People Research, 123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallenkamp, J., Picot, A., Welpe, I., Wigand, R., & Riedl, B. (2011). The role of culture and personality in the leadership process in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Silvis, J. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2018). In the eye of the beholder? An eye-tracking experiment on emergent leadership in team interactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. W., Blackwell, C. W., Dominicis, P., & Demerath, N. (2002). Telecommuting in the 21st century: Benefits, issues, and a leadership model which will work. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(4), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071791902008004
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 45–495. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, S., & Wasko, M. (2012). The effects of leader-member exchange on member performance in virtual world teams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(10), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The role of virtual work in understanding the impact of supervisory relationships. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2005(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90025-5
   Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W., Yu, T., & Gimeno, J. (2017). Language and competition: Communication vagueness, interpretation difficulties, and market entry. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2073–2098. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.1150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssle, H. A., Fink, C., Schneiderbauer, R., Toberer, F., Buhl, T., Blum, A., Hassen, A. B. H., Thomas, L., Enk, A., Uhlmann, L., Alt, C., Arenbergerova, M., Bakos, R., Baltzer, A., Bertlich, I., Blum, A., Bokor-Billmann, T., Bowling, J., Braghiroli, N., & Wölbing, P.… Kalloo, A. (2018). Man against machine: Diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Annals of Oncology, 29(8), 1836–1842. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahm, S. (2017). Information sharing and creativity in a virtual team: Roles of authentic leadership, sharing team climate and psychological empowerment. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, 11(8), 4105–4119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, P. D., & Han, G. (2019). Algorithmic leadership: The future is now. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(4), 74–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000228
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Stone, D. L., Johnson, R. D., & Passmore, J. (2017). The psychology of the Internet @ work. In G. Hertel, D. L. Stone, R. D. Johnson, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of the Internet at work (pp. 1–18). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. S., Kang, J. H., & Seo, M. G. (2014). The interactive effect of leader–member exchange and electronic communication on employee psychological empowerment and work outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hite, D. M. (2009). Leader emergence and effectiveness in virtual workgroups: Dispositional and social identity perspectives. [ Doctoral dissertation], University of North Texas. UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc11035/
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Wegge, J. (2008, October 1–2). Shared leadership in virtual teams: The impact of cognitive, affective and behavioural team leadership on team performance [Conference presentation]. In GeNeMe ’08: Gemeinschaften in Neuen Medien. https://tud.qucosa.de/landing-page/?tx_dlf[id]=https%3A%2F%2Ftud.qucosa.de%2Fapi%2Fqucosa%253A27942%2Fmets
   Google Scholar
• Höddinghaus, M., & Hertel, G. (2019, May 29–June 1). Chances and challenges of virtual reality for collaboration at work [Conference presentation]. In 19th European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., Neufeld, D. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2003). Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Research, 34(6), 678–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403257527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., Jestice, R., & Kahai, S. S. (2009). Virtual world collaboration and leadership: Effects on team process and outcomes. In Proceedings of the Mardi Gras Conference, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R., Kahai, S. S., & Jestice, R. (2010). The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jury, A. W. (2008). Leadership effectiveness within virtual teams: investigating mediating and moderating mechanisms. [ Doctoral dissertation], University of Queensland. UQ eSpace. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:152005
   Google Scholar
• Jury, A. W., Bordia, P., & Krebs, S. A. (2005, June 30–July 3). Transformational leadership within virtual teams: Examining the mediating influence of trust and role clarity for performance and knowledge sharing [Conference presentation]. In 6th Australian Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S. (2013). Leading in a digital age: What’s different, issues raised, and what we know. In M. C. Bligh & R. E. Riggio (Eds.), Exploring distance in leader–follower relationships: When near is far and far is near (pp. 63–108). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Leadership style, anonymity, and the discussion of an ethical issue in an electronic context. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 2(2), 1–26. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/article/full-text-pdf/1941&riu=true
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Avolio, B. J., & Sosik, J. J. (2017). E-leadership. In G. Hertel, D. L. Stone, R. D. Johnson, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of the Internet at work (pp. 285–314). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Huang, R., & Jestice, R. J. (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 716–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112462061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Jestire, R., & Huang, R. (2013). Effects of transformational and transactional leadership on cognitive effort and outcomes during collaborative learning within a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J., & Avolio, B. (2013, August 9–13). Effects of transformational leadership and media on collaboration and performance in virtual teams [Conference presentation]. In Academy of Management Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50(1), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00049-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Effects of participative and directive leadership in electronic groups. Group & Organization Management, 29(1), 67–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103252100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway, K. E., Barling, J., Kelley, E., Comtois, J., & Gatien, B. (2003). Remote transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310469589
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., Hertel, G., & Schmook, R. (2003). Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000020
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2017). Digitized communication at work. In G. Hertel, D. L. Stone, R. D. Johnson, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of the Internet at work (pp. 19–37). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, K. R., & Bong, C. H. (2016). A tool for addressing construct identity in literature reviews and meta-analyses. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.3.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. A. Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. (2020). The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101377. Article 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2(3–4), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399209540190
   Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., & Antonakis, J. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62(11), 1587–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709346374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonati, S., Quiroga, B. F., Zehnder, C., & Antonakis, J. (2018). On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 64(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, K. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Ten Years of the leadership quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 459–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00059-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, J. S. (2003). Does distant leadership make a difference? Exploring the effects of leadership and substitutes for leadership on virtual worker performance and satisfaction. [ Master’s thesis], University of Maryland. UMD Theses and Dissertations. https://hdl.handle.net/1903/315
   Google Scholar
• Lyubykh, Z., Turner, N., Hershcovis, M. S., & Deng, C. A meta-analysis of leadership and workplace safety: Examining relative importance, contextual contingencies, and methodological moderators. (2022). Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(12), 2149–2175. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlock, P. E. (2012). The influence of supervisors’ leadership style on telecommuters. Journal of Business Strategies, 29(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.54155/jbs.29.1.1-24
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.24286164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawanda, H. J. (2012). Beyond technology, an analysis of the perceived impact of transformational leadership and contingent rewards as extrinsic motivation on virtual team member satisfaction and leadership effectiveness: A quantitative study (Publication No. 3503075). [ Doctoral dissertation], Capella University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1009050884?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorkle, R. E. (2012). The relationship between full-range leadership and project success In complex projects and virtual project teams (Publication No. 3533501). [ Doctoral dissertation], The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1221014127?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper‐echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199801)19:1<39:AID-SMJ932>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. G. J. (2008). Virtual team member motivation in new product development: An investigation into the influence of leadership behaviors (Publication No. 3274080). [ Doctoral dissertation], Capella University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304721548?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Muethel, M., Gehrlein, S., & Hoegl, M. (2012). Socio‐demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedle, L. (2012). A comparison of LMX, communication, and demographic differences in remote and co-located supervisor-subordinate dyads. [ Doctoral dissertation, DePaul University]. College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/17
   Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., & Balthazard, P. A. (1997). Les- sons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 163–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., Yoo, Y., Alavi, M., Riggio, R. E., & Orr, S. (2004). Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership in non-profits. In R. Riggio E & S. S. Orr (Eds.), Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations (pp. 180–203). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, H. H. (2016). Influences of leadership Behavior on employee engagement within virtual-working environment: A case study of technology Enterprises in Vietnam. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(10), 1666–1674. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2838542
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968467
   Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K., & Kenda, R. (2018). Paradoxical virtual leadership: Reconsidering virtuality through a paradox lens. Group & Organization Management, 43(5), 752–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118794102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K., & Kenda, R. (2022). The impact of virtuality on team effectiveness in organizational and non‐organizational teams: A meta‐analysis. Applied Psychology, 71(3), 1082–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, G., Yeoh, W., Chong, A. Y. L., & Popovič, A. (2019). Business intelligence effectiveness and corporate performance management: An empirical analysis. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 59(2), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1334244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L. P., & You, S. (2018). Are you satisfied yet? Shared leadership, individual trust, autonomy, and satisfaction in virtual teams. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and Practice in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1–2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.48
   Google Scholar
• Ruggieri, S. (2009). Leadership in virtual teams: A comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(8), 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.8.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. R. (2008). Ambassadorial leadership behavior: a research study on influencing virtual team performance (Publication No. 3351564). [ Doctoral dissertation], Stevens Institute of Technology. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304380726?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Salvaggio, T. (2016). Towards a more complete understanding of the effects of the virtual environment on the relationship between leadership style and outcomes of lmx relationships (Publication No. 3690538). [ Doctoral dissertation], Trident University International. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1657347781?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha, X., & Chang, K. T. (2012). Research article the role of leadership and Contextualization on Citizenship behaviors in distributed teams: A relational Capital perspective. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(4), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2188595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. A., DeGeest, D., & Li, A. (2016). Tackling the problem of construct proliferation: A guide to assessing the discriminant validity of conceptually related constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 80–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115598239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinani, F. (2016). The effects of participative leadership practices on job satisfaction for highly skilled virtual teams. [ Doctoral dissertation], Walden University. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/2382
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J. (1997). Effects of transformational leadership and anonymity on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Group & Organization Management, 22(4), 460–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601197224004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1998). Inspiring group creativity: Comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498291001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Avolio, B. J. (1999). Leadership style, anonymity, and creativity in group decision support systems: The mediating role of optimal flow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(4), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S. C., & Chandra, S. (2018). Social presence in virtual world collaboration: An uncertainty reduction perspective using a mixed methods approach. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/11914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(3), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1998.1109047
   Google Scholar
• Van Quaquebeke, N., & Felps, W. (2018). Respectful inquiry: A motivational account of leading through asking questions and listening. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Quaquebeke, N., & Gerpott, F. H. (2023). The now, new, and next of digital leadership: How Artificial intelligence (AI) will take over and change leadership as we know it. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518231181731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, K. D. (2007). Remote management: Traditional leadership behaviors in a contemporary work environment. [ Doctoral dissertation], Kansas State University. K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports. https://hdl.handle.net/2097/432
   Google Scholar
• Wesche, J. S., & Sonderegger, A. (2019). When computers take the lead: The automation of leadership. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford, T., & Moss, S. A. (2009). Transformational leadership in distributed work groups: The moderating role of follower regulatory focus and goal orientation. Communication Research, 36(6), 810–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter, M. J. (2017). The relationship between employee motivation and leadership styles for remote call center representatives in the United States (Publication No. 10689276). [ Doctoral dissertation], Capella University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1986008537?accountid=14597
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. I., & Berntzen, M. N. (2019). Transformational leadership and leader–member exchange in distributed teams: The roles of electronic dependence and team task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspective, 26(4), 66–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900102
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Tremaine, M., Milewski, A. E., Fjermestad, J., & O’Sullivan, P. (2012). Leader delegation in global software teams: Occurrence and effects. Electronic Markets, 22(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0082-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar