Are we ahead of the trend or just following? The role of work and organizational psychology in shaping emerging technologies at work

References

• Anthony, C., Bechky, B. A., & Fayard, A.-L. (2023). “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a system view to explore the future of work. Organization Science, 34(5), 1672–1694. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avison, D., Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2001). Controlling action research projects. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840110384762
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. In G. Johannsen & J. E. Rijnsdorp (Eds.), Analysis, design and evaluation of man–machine systems (pp. 129–135). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-029348-6.50026-9
   Google Scholar
• Bankins, S., Ocampo, A. C., Marrone, M., Restubog, S. L. D., & Woo, S. E. (2023). A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(2), 159–182. job.2735. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (2016). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. In L. P. Willcocks, C. Sauer, & M. C. Lacity (Eds.), Enacting research methods in information systems: Volume 2 (pp. 169–190). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29269-4_7
   Google Scholar
• Beer, P., & Mulder, R. H. (2020). The effects of technological developments on work and their implications for continuous vocational education and training: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J. M., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). Capturing Value from Artificial Intelligence. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9(4), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2023.0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkers, H. A., Rispens, S., & Le Blanc, P. M. (2023). The role of robotization in work design: A comparative case study among logistic warehouses. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(9), 1852–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2043925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171562251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhillar, D., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). An eye for artificial intelligence: Insights into the governance of artificial intelligence and vision for future research. Business & Society, 61(5), 1197–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221080959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, C. W. (2000). Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied Ergonomics, 31(5), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00009-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg,& J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2014). Why the Fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0188-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, F. E. (1959). Characteristics of socio-technical systems: A critical review of theories and facts about the effects of technological change on the internal structure of work organisations; with special reference to the effects of higher mechanisation and automation. Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Human Resources Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (2017). From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816681350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (2023). Supporting human-AI teams: Transparency, explainability, and situation awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1951). Human engineering for an effective air-navigation and traffic-control system. National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gasteiger, N., Hellou, M., & Ahn, H. S. (2023). Factors for personalization and localization to optimize Human–robot interaction: A literature review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(4), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00811-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grote, G. (2023). Shaping the development and use of artificial intelligence: How human factors and ergonomics expertise can become more pertinent. Ergonomics, 66(11), 1702–1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2278408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grote, G., Ryser, C., Wāler, T., Windischer, A., & Weik, S. (2000). KOMPASS: A method for complementary function allocation in automated work systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1999.0289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000075
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, W. (2022). Arbeitsgestaltung bei Digitalisierung: Merkmale menschzentrierter Gestaltung informationsverarbeitender Erwerbsarbeit. Zeitschrift Für Arbeitswissenschaft, 76(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-022-00302-0
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., & Scallen, S. F. (1996). The future of function allocation. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 4(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480469600400406
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, D. (2013). Job types and job quality in Europe. Human Relations, 66(4), 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712456407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. F., Smith, R. S., Smythe, J. T., & Varon, R. K. (2009). Challenge-based learning: An approach for our time. The New Media Consortium. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182083/
   Google Scholar
• Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(2), 113–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000054335
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, A., Brandl, J., & Aust, I. (2019). Handling tensions in human resource management: Insights from paradox theory. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 33(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218810312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers, R. N., & Marin, S. (2021). Theory and technology in organizational psychology: A review of technology integration paradigms and their effects on the validity of theory. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-060843
   Google Scholar
• Langer, M., & König, C. J. (2021). Introducing a multi-stakeholder perspective on opacity, transparency and strategies to reduce opacity in algorithm-based human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, M., & König, C. J. (2023). Introducing a multi-stakeholder perspective on opacity, transparency and strategies to reduce opacity in algorithm-based human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, M., König, C. J., & Busch, V. (2021). Changing the means of managerial work: Effects of automated decision support systems on personnel selection tasks. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(5), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09711-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, M., & Landers, R. N. (2021). The future of artificial intelligence at work: A review on effects of decision automation and augmentation on workers targeted by algorithms and third-party observers. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 106878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, M., Oster, D., Speith, T., Hermanns, H., Kästner, L., Schmidt, E., Sesing, A., & Baum, K. (2021). What do we want from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)? – a stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research. Artificial Intelligence, 296, 103473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matza, L. S., Stewart, K. D., Lloyd, A. J., Rowen, D., & Brazier, J. E. (2021). Vignette-Based Utilities: Usefulness, Limitations, and Methodological Recommendations. Value in Health, 24(6), 812–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, S. E., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2014). Understanding human management of automation errors. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 15(6), 545–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2013.817625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D’Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021). Algorithmic fairness: Choices, assumptions, and definitions. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 8(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2003). Work Design. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (1st ed., pp. 423–452). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei1217
   Google Scholar
• Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Burdick, M. D., & Heers, S. T. (1996). Automation Bias, Accountability, and Verification Behaviors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40(4), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129604000413
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, E. (1983). Participative systems design: Practice and – ProQuest. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 4(1), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. J., & Irwin, J. (2014). ‘Defining what we do – all over again’: Occupational identity, technological change, and the Librarian/Internet-search relationship. The Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 892–928. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, J. C., Hailstorks, R., Aiken, L. S., Pfund, R. A., Stamm, K. E., & Christidis, P. (2016). Undergraduate study in psychology: Curriculum and assessment. American Psychologist, 71(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 52(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Andrei, D. M., & Van den Broeck, A. (2019). Poor work design begets poor work design: Capacity and willingness antecedents of individual work design behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(7), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1171–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Van Den Broeck, A., & Holman, D. (2017). Work design influences: A synthesis of multilevel factors that affect the design of jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 267–308. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., Ososky, S., Grove, J., & Jentsch, F. (2011). From tools to teammates: Toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1491–1495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551310
   Google Scholar
• Reverberi, C., Rigon, T., Solari, A., Hassan, C., Cherubini, P., & Cherubini, A. (2022). Experimental evidence of effective human–AI collaboration in medical decision-making. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18751-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, A., Heinrich, P., Stocker, A., & Schwabe, G. (2018). Digital work design: The interplay of human and computer in future work practices as an interdisciplinary (grand) challenge. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0534-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, I., Waizenegger, L., Seidel, S., Morana, S., Benbasat, I., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). Collaborating with technology-based autonomous agents: Issues and research opportunities. Internet Research, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2019-0503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (third edition ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmeier, S. (2009). Concepts of e-HRM consequences: A categorisation, review and suggestion. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symon, G., & Clegg, C. (2005). Constructing identity and participation during technological change. Human Relations, 58(9), 1141–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705058941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, L. M. (2022, December 1). Introducing High School Students to Human Factors Engineering. https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/psychology-teacher-network/introductory-psychology/human-factors-engineering
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems: A conceptual framework and an action research program. Ontario Ministry of Labour, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulfert, A.-S., Antoni, C. H., & Ellwart, T. (2022). The role of agent autonomy in using decision support systems at work. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulfert, A.-S., Georganta, E., Centeio Jorge, C., Mehrotra, S., & Tielman, M. L. (2023). Shaping a multidisciplinary understanding of team trust in human-AI teams: A theoretical framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2200172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoelen, E. M., van den Bosch, K., & Neerincx, M. (2021). Becoming team members: Identifying interaction patterns of mutual adaptation for human-robot Co-learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.692811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wächter, H., Modrow-Thiel, B., & Roßmann, G. (1989). Prospektive Arbeitsgestaltung – Das Verfahren ATAA. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 3(4), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700228900300402
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, P. E., Older Gray, M. T., & Clegg, C. W. (2002). A sociotechnical method for designing work systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 44(3), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffgramm, M., Tijink Saxion, T., Disberg- Van Geloven, M., & Corporaal, S. (2021). A collaborative robot in the classroom: Designing 21st Century engineering education together. Education Theory and Practice, 21(16), 177–187.
   Google Scholar