Democratic Practices in MERCOSUR and the OAS: What Space for Transnational Civil Society?

References

• Adler, Emmanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory 3 (1): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALOP (Asociacion Latinoamericana de Organizaciones de Promotion al Desarollo). 2009. El Mercosur Ciudadano. Retos Para una Nueva Institucionalidad. Montevideo: Manuel Carball.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Rodney. 2001. Legitimating Identities. The Self-Presentation of Rulers and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billerbeck, Sarah von. 2020. ““Mirror, Mirror On the Wall:” Self-Legitimation by International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 64: 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botto, Mercedes. 2014. “Civil Society, Labor Movements and the Challenge to Capitalist Regional Integration.” In Civil Society and World Regions: How Citizens Are Reshaping Regional Governance in Times of Crisis, edited by Lorenzo Fioramonti, 49–64. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, Philippe. 2017. “The Practice Approach in Global Politics.” Journal of Global Securities Studies 2 (2): 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogx001.
   Google Scholar
• Brasset, James, and Eleni Tsingou. 2011. “The Politics of Legitimate Global Governance.” Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.495297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero Santos, Sergio. 2011. “El Proceso de Integracion Regional del Mercosur: Que Papel Juegan los Factores Ideacionales?” PhD diss., Madrid: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Departamento de Ciencia Politica y Relaciones Internacionales. https://repositario.uam.es/xmlui/handle/10486/7824.
   Google Scholar
• CISC. 2007. Report on Civil Society Participation in International Organizations, CP/CISC 314/07. Washington, D.C.: OAS.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Ian. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Laurie. 2003. Civil Society Participation in the Inter-American System: The Case of the Organization of American States. Ottawa: FOCAl.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Inter-American Summits Management and Civil Society Participation in OAS Activities. 2019. “Civil Society Registry”. OAS, Permanent Council. http://www.oas.org/en/ser/dia/civil_society_registry.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo Permanente. 1999. “Directrices Para la Participación de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil en las Actividades de la OEA”, CP/RES. 759 (1217/99). 15 December.
   Google Scholar
• Dany, Charlotte. 2014. “Janus-faced NGO Participation in Global Governance: Structural Constraints for NGO Influence.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 20: 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02003007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Departamento de Asuntos Internacionales. 2010. Compilacion de las Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Civil Presentadas a la Organización de los Estados Americanos y al Proceso de Cumbres de las Americas Sobre los Temas de la Agenda Interamericana 2002-2009. Washington, D.C.: OEA.
   Google Scholar
• Departamento de Asuntos Internacionales. 2014. “Boletin Informativo: 11° Foro Hemisferico de la Sociedad Civil y Actores Sociales y Sesion Especial de la Comision Sobre la Gestion de Cumbres Interamericanas y Participacion de la Sociedad Civil en las Actividades de la OEA (CISC)”. 24 April. Washington, D.C.:OAS.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus, Henning Schmidtke, and Tobias Weise. 2020. “The Rise of Democratic Legitimation: Why International Organizations Speak the Language of Democracy.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (3): 714–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119882488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus, Antonia Witt, Ina Lehmann, Ellen Reichel, and Tobias Weise. 2005. International Organizations Under Pressure. Legitimating Global Governance in Challenging Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Donatella, Della Porta, and Sidney J. Tarrow, eds. 2005. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowan &Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Drieschova, Alena, Ted Hopf, and Christian Bueger, eds. 2021. Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, Eva, and Anders Uhlin, eds. 2010. Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re-Examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Erthal, Carvalho, and Juliana de. 2005. Democracia, Sociedade Civil e Mercosul: O Caso do Foro Consultativo Economico e Social, Documento de Trabajo. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/libros/becas/2005/alcajov/erthal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Falchetti, Roberto. 2005. “La Réforme Institutionnelle du Mercosur: Quel Avenir Pour le Forum Consultatif économique et Social du Mercosur?.” Droit et Société 25: 83–92. https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.059.0083.
   Google Scholar
• Fioramonti, Lorenzo. 2014. Civil Society and World Regions: How Citizens Are Reshaping Regional Governance in Times of Crisis. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, Edward A. 2011. “Nothing Succeeds Like Access? NGO Strategies Towards Multilateral Institutions “Nothing Succeds Like Access? NGO Strategies Towards Multilateral Institutions”.” Journal of Civil Society 7 (2): 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.573670.
   Google Scholar
• Follestal, Andreas, and Simon Hix. 2006. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard, Kelly. 2014. “ASEAN and Civil Society Activities in ‘Created Spaces’: The Limits of Liberty ASEAN and civil society in ‘created spaces’: the limits of liberty“.” The Pacific Review 27 (2): 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.882395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godsäter, Andreas. 2015. “Civil Society and Regional Governance: Knowledge, Communication and Advocacy around the Southern African Development Community.” Journal of Civil Society 11 (2): 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2015.1024948.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoratti, Catia, and Anders Uhlin. 2018. “Civil Society Protest and the (De)Legitimation of Global Governance Institutions.” In Legitimacy in Global Governance: Sources, Processes and Consequences, edited by Jonas Tallberg, Karin Bäckstrand, and Jan Aart Scholte, 134–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2007. “Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (3): 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00467.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronau, Jennifer, and Henning Schmidtke. 2016. “The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Institutions’ Legitimation Strategies.” Review of International Studies 42: 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Rodney Bruce. 2013. International Organization and Global Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haunss, Sebastian. 2007. “Challenging Legitimacy: Repertoires of Contention, Political Claims Making, and Collective Action Frames.” In Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, edited by Achim Hurrelmann, Stefen Schneider, and Jens Steffek, 156–172. Houndsmill, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, Monica. 2011. The Organization of American States (OAS). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holthaus, Leonie. 2021. “Practice Theory and the Opening Up of International Organizations.” Global Studies Quarterly 1: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221135049.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrelmann, Achim, Stefen Schneider, and Jens Steffek. 2007. “Introduction: Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics.” In Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, edited by Achim Hurrelmann, Stefen Schneider, and Jens Steffek, 1–16. Houndsmill, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Insulza, José M., and Albert R. Ramdin. 2010. Manuel for Civil Society Participation in OAS Activities. Washington, D.C.: OAS. https://www.oas.org/en/ser/dia/civil_society/docs/Manuel_SC_Participation-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, Kanishka, and Garry Rodan. 2007. “Beyong hybrid regimes: more participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia.” Democratization 14 (5): 773–794.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta, and Birgit Locher, eds. 2009. Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Junne, Gerd C.A. 2001. “International Organizations in a Period of Globalization: New (Problems of) Legitimacy.” In Legitimacy of International Organizations, edited by Jean-Marc Coicaud, and Veijo Heiskanen, 189–220. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalm, Sara, Lisa Strömbom, and Anders Uhlin. 2019. “Civil Society Democratising Global Governance? Potentials and Limitations of “Counter-Democracy.” Global Society 33 (4): 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2019.1640189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalm, Sara, and Anders Uhlin. 2015. Civil Society and the Governance of Development: Opposing Global Institutions. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lessard, Geneviève. 2011. “Civil Society Interactions Within the Inter-American Institutional Framework: Two Case Studies in Promoting the Strengthening of the Human Rights System”, Quebec Journal of International Law, Special Edition: 165-82.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, Gordon. 2020. “Dynamics of Legitimation in Regional Organisations: The OAS and Non State Actors.” Global Society 34 (4): 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1756230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, Gordon. 2021. “Input Legitimation Dynamics in Regional Organizations: Mercosur and Civil Society.” International Politics 58: 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00255-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico. 1998. “Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards.” European Law Journal 4 (1): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00040.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, Viera, R. José, Carolina Albuquerque, and Federico Gomensoro. 2011. “Mercosul Social e Participativo: A Ampliaçao de Esfera Publica Regional.” In Mercosur 20 Anos, edited by Gerardo Caetano, 136–160. Montevideo: CEFIR.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Peter. 2022. “The Organization of American States: In Brief”, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, R47230, 1 September. https://crsreports.congress.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Moavro, Horacio, Pedro Orieta, and Ricardo Parera. 1997. “Les Instituciones del Mercosur,” Working Paper No. 3. Buenos Aires: Fundacion Konrad Adenauer.
   Google Scholar
• Montequin, Adriana. 2007. “El Foro Constutivo Economico y Social del Mercosur: Un Analysis de su evolucion, percepciones y expectativas de la Seccion Argentina.” Cuadernos de Politica Exterior Argentina 88: 1–143.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew. 2004. “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis.” Government and Opposition 39: 336–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00126.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OEA. 2009. “Agenda, Foro Hemisferico de la Sociedad Civil en Preparacion para la Assemblea General de la OEA y la Quinta Cumbre de las Americas”. 3–4 March. Washington, D.C.: OEA.
   Google Scholar
• Palestini, Stefano and Erica Martinelli. 2022. “Enforcing People’s Right to Democracy: Transnational Activism and Regional Powers in Contemporary Inter-American Relations.” European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221135049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permanent Council. 1997. “Status of non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the OAS,” CP/RES. 704, doc. Off CP. 24 July.
   Google Scholar
• Permanent Council. 2003. “Strategies for Increasing and Strengthening Participation by Civil Society Organizations in OAS Activities,” CP/RES. 840 (1361/03), doc. Off. CP. 26 March.
   Google Scholar
• Permanent Council. 2004. “Specific Fund to Support the Participation of Civil Society Organizations in OAS Activities and in the Summits of the Americas Process”, CP/RES. 864 (1413/04), doc.off. CP. 27 April.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, Simona. 2010. The Theory of Multilevel Governance. Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2018. “Global Governance in Practice.” Global Policy 9 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raton Sanchez, Michelle. 2007. “Is There Any Room for Input and Control Legitimacy by Civil Society in Mercosur?” In Closing or Widening the Gap? Legitimacy and Democracy in Regional Integration Organizations, edited by Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann, and Ana van del Vleuren, 117–133. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2005. Globalization, a Critical Introduction. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2011. “Towards Greater Legitimacy in Global Governance.” Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.545215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aar. 2012. “A More Inclusive Global Governance? The IMF and Civil Society in Africa.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18: 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01802004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretaria del Proceso de Cumbres. 2003. “Informe Sobre la Participación de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil en las Actividades de la OEA,” OEA/Ser. G, CP/CISC- 17/03. Washington, D.C: OEA.
   Google Scholar
• Secretario General. 2010. Informe Anual del Secretario General. Washington, D.C.: OAS.
   Google Scholar
• Serbin, Andrès. 2011. Regionalization in New Scenarios: Democratic Deficit and Civil Society Participation in South American Regionalism. Buenos Aires: Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Economicas y Sociales (CRIES).
   Google Scholar
• Shamsie, Yasmine. 2000. Engaging with Civil Society. Lessons from the OAS, FTAA and Summits of the Americas. Ottawa: The North South Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, Jerome. 1969. “The Limits of Legitimation in International Organizations: The Organization of American States and the Dominican Crisis.” International Organization 23 (1): 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300025522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, William C., and Roberto P. Korzeniewicz. 2007. “Insiders, Outsiders, and the Politics of Civil Society.” In Governing the Americas. Assessing Multilateral Institutions, edited by Gordon Mace, Jean-Philippe Thérien, and Paul Haslam, 151–172. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens. 2013. “Explaining Cooperation Between IGOs and NGOs – Push Factors, Pull Factors, and the Policy Cycle.” Review of International Studies 39 (4): 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens, and Kristina Hahn. 2010. “Introduction: Transnational NGOs and Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation.” In Evaluating Transnational NGOs. Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation, edited by Jens Steffek, and Kristina Hahn, 1–20. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Summits Secretariat. 2004-2005. Technical Profile: The Inter-American Civil Society Partnership Initiative. Washington, D.C.: OAS.
   Google Scholar
• Take, Ingo. 2012. “Legitimacy in Global Governance: International, Transnational and Private Institutions Compared.” Swiss Political Science Review 18 (2): 220–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2012.02064.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, and Theresa Squatrito. 2016. “Democratic Memberships in International Organizations: Sources of Institutional Design.” The Review of International Organizations 11: 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9227-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, and Christer Jönsson. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tholen, Berry. 2007. “RIOs, Legitimacy and Democracy. A Conceptual Clarification.” In Closing or Widening the Gap? Legitimacy and Democracy in Regional Integration Organizations, edited by Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann, and Ana van der Vleuten, 16–31. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlin, Anders. 2016. Civil Society and Regional Governance: The Asian Development Bank and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlin, Anders. 2019. “Legitimacy Struggles in Global Governance: Legitimation and Delegitimation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.” Sage Open 9 (3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019870203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajner, Daniel F., and Arie M. Kacowicz. 2018. “The Quest for Regional Legitimation: Analyzing the Arab League’s Legitimizing Role in the Arab Spring.” Regional & Federal Studies 28 (4): 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1451846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Forsberg, Stacey. 2000. Adapting to a New PlayingField? Civil Society Inclusion in the Hemisphere's Multilateral Processes. Ottawa: FOCAL.
   Google Scholar