Speaking the Right Language: Transnational Rule and Symbolic Power in Dialogue Forums

References

• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Vincent Pouliot. 2014. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 889–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113512702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel, Vincent Pouliot, Emanuel Adler, and Vincent Pouliot, eds. 2011. “International Practices: Introduction and Framework.” In International Practices, 3–35, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise, and Paul Langley. 2004. “Ambiguities of Global Civil Society.” Review of International Studies 30 (1): 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504005844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderl, Felix. 2022. Broken Solidarities: How Open Global Governance Divides and Rules. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderl, Felix, Christopher Daase, Nicole Deitelhoff, Jannik Pfister, Philip Wallmeier, and Victor Kempf, eds. 2019. Rule and Resistance Beyond the Nation State. Contestation, Escalation, Exit. London / New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005a. “Power in Global Governance.” In Power in Global Governance, edited by Michael Barnett, and Raymond Duvall, 1–32. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005b. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, Jens. 2006. “Making Sense of Global Civil Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Jacqueline, ed. 2014. “Governing Failure.” In Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance, i–ii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/governing-failure/governing-failure/15641E8816856EABE2666AC1605B0D81.
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, Magdalena, Jonas Tallberg, and Anders Uhlin. 2010. “Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 16 (1): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01601006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Language and Symbolic Power. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2017. ‘Zur Ökonomie Des Sprachlichen Tauschs’. In Sprache, edited by Franz Schultheis and Stephan Egger, 1. Aufl., 107–78. Schriften Schriften Zur Kultursoziologie 1. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. 2010. Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coni-Zimmer, Melanie, Nicole Deitelhoff, and Diane Schumann. 2023. “The Path of Least Resistance: Why International Institutions Maintain Dialogue Forums.” International Affairs 99 (3): 941–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Andrew F, and Vincent Pouliot. 2015. “How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715576007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daase, Christopher, and Nicole Deitelhoff. 2019. “Opposition and Dissidence: Two Modes of Resistance Against International Rule.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218808312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dany, Charlotte. 2012. Global Governance and NGO Participation : Shaping the Information Society in the United Nations. New York / London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2012. “Leere Versprechungen? Deliberation Und Opposition Im Kontext Transnationaler Legitimitätspolitik.” In Der Aufstieg Der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung Und Kritik Politisch-Ökonomischer Ordnungen, edited by Anna Geis, Frank Nullmeier, and Christopher Daase, 27:63–80. Leviathan Sonderband 40. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Duvall, Raymond D., and Arjun Chowdhury. 2011. “Practices of Theory.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler, and Vincent Pouliot, 335–354, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew. 2013. Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization. Illustrated Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew. 2018. “Professionalizing Protest: Scientific Capital and Advocacy in Trade Politics.” International Political Sociology 12 (3): 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoratti, Catia, and Anders Uhlin. 2022. “The Interplay Between Delegitimation and Legitimation: Civil Society Protest and the Responses of Global Governance Institutions.” In Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Practices, Justifications, and Audiences, edited by Magdalena Bexell, Christer Jönsson, and Anders Uhlin, 96–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, Jennifer. 2015. Die Selbstlegitimation Internationaler Institutionen: G8 Und G20 Im Vergleich. Frankfurt am Main / New York: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, Jennifer, and Henning Schmidtke. 2016. “The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Institutions’ Legitimation Strategies.” Review of International Studies 42 (3): 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross Stein, Janice. 2011. “Background Knowledge in the Foreground: Conversations About Competent Practice in “Sacred Space”.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler, and Vincent Pouliot, 87–107, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hack, Regina. 2017. “Deliberation Als Reaktion Auf Protest? Das Zivilgesellschaftliche Dialogforum Der WTO.” Zeitschrift Für Internationale Beziehungen 24 (1): 37–67. https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2017-1-37.
   Google Scholar
• Hack, Regina. 2020. Dialog im Reaktionsrepertoire von WTO und G7/G8: Die Einrichtung von deliberativen Dialogforen in Reaktion auf Protest. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, Erin, Holly Ryan, and James Scott. 2017. “Power, Knowledge and Resistance: Between Co-Optation and Revolution in Global Trade.” Review of International Political Economy 24 (5): 741–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1324807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene. 2011. “Performing Practices: A Poststructuralist Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler, and Vincent Pouliot, 280–309, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holthaus, Leonie. 2021. “Practice Theory and the Opening Up of International Organizations.” Global Studies Quarterly 1 (3): ksab020.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen. 2015. “Multilateral Trade Governance as Social Field: Global Civil Society and the WTO.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (6): 1128–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1066696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, Christer, and Jonas Tallberg, eds. 2010. Transnational Actors in Global Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kissling, Claudia, and Jens Steffek. 2008. “CSOs and the Democratization of International Governance: Prospects and Problem.” In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?, edited by Jens Steffek, Claudia Kissling, and Patrizia Nanz, 208–218. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, Merje. 2015. “Symbolic Power in Diplomatic Practice: Matters of Style in Brussels.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715574914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipschutz, Ronnie D. 2005. “Global Civil Society and Global Governmentality: Or, the Search for Politics and the State Amidst the Capillaries of Social Power.” In Power in Global Governance, edited by Michael Barnett, and Raymond Duvall, 229–248. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Birgit. 2013. “Introduction - Lifting the Veil of Harmony. Anthropologists Approach International Organisations.” In The Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy-Making in Multilateral Organisations, edited by Birgit Müller, 1–20. Anthropology, Culture and Society. London: PlutoPress.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, Deepak. 2021. ““Hanging Out” While Studying “Up”: Doing Ethnographic Fieldwork in International Relations.” International Studies Review 23 (4): 1300–1327. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanz, Patrizia, and Jens Steffek. 2004. “Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams, eds. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 71. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, Christopher L. 2013. Transnational Civil Society and the World Bank. Investigating Civil Society’s Potential to Democratize Global Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.10579781137277619.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, Christopher L., and Anders Uhlin. 2014. “Civil Society Influence on International Organizations: Theorizing the State Channel.” Journal of Civil Society 10 (2): 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2014.921102.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. 2008. “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization 62 (2): 257–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2018. “Global Governance in Practice.” Global Policy 9 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2023. Global Policymaking: The Patchwork of Global Governance. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian, and Michael Zürn. 2020. “Authority, Politicization, and Alternative Justifications: Endogenous Legitimation Dynamics in Global Economic Governance.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (3): 583–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1650796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. 2003. “Grundelemente Einer Theorie Sozialer Praktiken / Basic Elements of a Theory of Social Practices.” Zeitschrift Für Soziologie 32 (4): 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2003-0401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas. 2002. “Transnational Actors and World Politics.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 256–274. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2011. Building Global Democracy?: Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. 1st ed. Cambridge, New York, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2012. “A More Inclusive Global Governance? The IMF and Civil Society in Africa.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18 (2): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01802004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, Ole Jacob. 2017. “Recognition and Liquid Authority.” International Theory 9 (2): 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, Ole Jacob, and Iver B. Neumann. 2006. “Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power.” International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondarjee, Maïka. 2021. “Collective Learning at the Boundaries of Communities of Practice: Inclusive Policymaking at the World Bank.” Global Society 35 (3): 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1835833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens. 2018. “Deliberation and Global Governance.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory, by Jens Steffek, edited by Chris Brown and Robyn Eckersley, 439–452. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens, and Ulrike Ehling. 2008. “Civil Society Participation at the Margins: The Case of the WTO.” In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance, edited by Jens Steffek, Claudia Kissling, and Patrizia Nanz, 95–115. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens, Claudia Kissling, and Patrizia Nanz, eds. 2008. Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Basingstoke [England]; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, David L. 2019. “The Heavy Hands of the State.” Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 48 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118815498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Christer Jönsson, Thomas Sommerer, and Theresa Squatrito. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations. Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, and Anders Uhlin. 2011. “Civil Society and Global Democracy: An Assessment.” In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, edited by Daniele Archibugi, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, and Raffaele Marchetti, 210–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, and Michael Zürn. 2019. “The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework.” The Review of International Organizations 14 (4): 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, John B. 1992. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Language and Symbolic Power, edited by John B. Thompson, 1–31. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Karen. 2014. “Participation and Subjectification in Global Governance: NGOs, Acceptable Subjectivities and the WTO.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (2): 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813518257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlin, Anders, and S. Kalm. 2015. Civil Society and the Governance of Development: Opposing Global Institutions. 2015th ed. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, Christian. 2018. “Enacting a Parallel World: Political Protest Against the Transnational Constellation.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 100–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael. 2017. “From Constitutional Rule to Loosely Coupled Spheres of Liquid Authority: A Reflexive Approach.” International Theory 9 (2): 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4 (1): 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar