Automating public administration: citizens’ attitudes towards automated decision-making across Estonia, Sweden, and Germany

References

• Aidukaite, J. (2006). The formation of social insurance institutions of the Baltic States in the post-socialist era. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706065597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananny, M. (2016). Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Science, Technology and Human Values, 41(1), 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. F., & Dawes, S. (1991). Government information management: A primer and casebook. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, R., Kaun, A., & Nikunen, K. (2021). Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., Leigh Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broomfield, H., & Reutter, L. (2022). In search of the citizen in the datafication of public administration. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 20539517221089302. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221089302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, H., & Reutter, L. M. (2021). Towards a data-driven public administration: An empirical analysis of nascent phase implementation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 25(2), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i2.7117
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. M. (2007). Understanding e-government benefits: An examination of leading-edge local governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2000). The making of citizens. Young people, news, and politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, F. G. (2004). The future of the welfare state: Crisis myths and crisis realities. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, A. (2009). The electronic state: Estonia's new media revolution. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v5i1.122
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. (2000). Political participation in the United States. Congressional Quarterly Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L. (2022). The datafied welfare state: A perspective from the UK. In A. Hepp, J. Jarke, & L. Kramp (Eds.), New perspectives in critical data studies: The ambivalences of data power (pp. 145–165). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Warne, H. (2018). Data scores as governance: Investigating uses of citizen scoring in public services. Retrieved from Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., & Kaun, A. (2020). Datafication and the welfare state. Global Perspectives, 1(1), 12912. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12912
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, S, & Schulz, W. (2019). The general data protection regulation and automated decision-making: Will it deliver? Retrieved from Gütersloh.
   Google Scholar
• DuGay, P. (2005). The values of bureaucracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, K. D. (2003). State and local e-government: Prospects and challenges. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, L., Stamm, I., & Liebermann, W. K. (2019). The crowd in crowdsourcing: Crowdsourcing as a pragmatic research method. First Monday, 24, 10. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i10.9206
   Google Scholar
• Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies. The Computer Journal, 62(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2018). Declaration of Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence. Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/communities/en/node/1286/document/eu-declaration-cooperation-artificial-intelligence (Accessed 14 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection Directive), L119, 4 May 2016, implementation date 25 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. (1996). The 'Southern' model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2016). Algorithm. In B. Peters (Ed.), Digital keywords: A vocabulary of information, society and culture (pp. 18–30). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, B, & Flaxman, S. (2016). EU regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation". Paper presented at the ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N., Araujo, T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). Who is the fairest of them all? Public attitudes and expectations regarding automated decision-making. Computer Law & Security Review, 39, 105456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmus, V., Lauristin, M., Opermann, S., & Vihalemm, T. (2020). Researching Estonian transformation: Morphogenetic reflections. Tartu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapoglu, T., & Masso, A. (2021). Attaining security through algorithms: Perspectives of refugees and data experts. In J. B. Wiest (Ed.), Theorizing criminality and policing in the digital media Age (pp. 47–65). Emerald Publishing. (Studies in Media and Communications).
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New Media and Society, 20, 2099–2106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Velkova, J. (2018). Sweden. Retrieved from Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser-Bril, N. (2020). Austria's employment agency rolls out discriminatory algorithm, sees no problem. AlgorithmWatch. Retrieved from: https://algorithmwatch.org/en/story/austrias-employment-agency-ams-rolls-out-discriminatoryalgorithm/ (accessed 11 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. (2016). Post, mine, repeat: Social media data mining becomes ordinary. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 2053951714528481. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2016). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4653–4670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818779750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larasati, Z. W., Yuda, T. K., & Syafa'at, A. R. (2022). Digital welfare state and problem arising: An exploration and future research agenda. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2022-0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, A. (2005). Public service ethics in a changing world. Futures, 37(2-3), 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tonurist, P. (2019). Technological capacity in the public sector: The case of Estonia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 214–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. (2020). Embedding technological transformation: The welfare state and citizen attitudes toward technology. European Political Science Review, 12(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, J., Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2022). The media welfare state: A citizen perspective. European Journal of Communication, 37(3), 330–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomborg, S., Kaun, A., & Scott Hansen, S. (2023). Automated decision-making: Toward a people-centred approach. Sociology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1999). Introductory essay: The social shaping of technology. In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Männiste, M., & Masso, A. (2018). The role of institutional trust in Estonians’ privacy concerns. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 10(2), 22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Männiste, M., & Masso, A. (2020). ‘Three drops of blood for the devil’: Data pioneers as intermediaries of algorithmic governance ideals. Mediální Studia | Media Studies, 14(1), 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Masso, A., Chukwu, M., & Calzati, S. (2022). (Non)negotiable spaces of algorithmic governance: Perceptions on the ubenwa health app as a ‘relocated’ solution. New Media & Society, 24(4), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221079027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masso, A., & Kasapoglu, T. (2020). Understanding power positions in a new digital landscape: Perceptions of Syrian refugees and data experts on relocation algorithm. Information, Communication & Society, 23(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1739731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masso, A., Lauristin, M., Opermann, S., & Kalmus, V. (2020). Masso, Anu; Lauristin, Marju; Opermann, Applying the morphogenetic perspective for the analysis of Estonian social transformations. In Kalmus, Veronika; Lauristin, Marju; Opermann, Signe; Vihalemm, Triin (Ed.). Researching Estonian.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V, & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. (2002). Civic literacy: How informed citizens make democracy work. University Press of New Engl.
   Google Scholar
• Mjös, O. J., Syvertsen, T., Moe, H., & Enli, G. S. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosco, V. (2017). Becoming digital: Toward a post-internet society. Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, D. E. (2007). Technology matters. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'neill, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oorschot, W. v., Opielka, M., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2008). Culture and welfare state: Values and social policy in comparative perspective. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, 52(2017), 4–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Pan, J. (2020). Welfare for autocrats: How social assistance in China cares for its rulers: How social assistance in China cares for its rulers (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. J., & Nielsen, C. V. (2016). Improving survey response rates in online panels: Effects of Low-cost incentives and cost-free text appeal interventions. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314563916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentzold, C., & Fölsche, L. (2020). Data-driven campaigns in public sensemaking: Discursive positions, contextualization, and maneuvers in American, British, and German debates around computational politics. Communications, 45(s1), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0125
   Google Scholar
• Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019). Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, D., Schultz, J., Crawford, K., & Whittaker, M. (2018). Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability. Retrieved from New York: https://ainowinstitute.org/aiareport2018.pdf (accessed 14 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Reutter, L. (2022). Constraining context: Situating datafication in public administration. New Media & Society, 24(4), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221079029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2006). Democracy past and future. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in the age of distrust. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., & Langbort, C. (2016). When the algorithm itself is a racist: Diagnosing ethical harm in the basic components of software. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4972–4990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff, D., Jackson Schiff, K., & Pierson, P. (2022). Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence. Public Administration, 100(3), 653–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiølin, K. (2020). Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science, 50(4), 542–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J.-H., & Weichert, T. (2012). Datenschutz: Grundlagen, Entwicklungen und Kontroversen: Vol. Band 1190. bpb, Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J., & Rieder, G. (2021). Trusting the Corona-Warn-App? Contemplations on trust and trustworthiness at the intersection of technology, politics and public debate. European Journal of Communication, 36(4), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211028377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy. From membership to management in American civic life. University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spielkamp, M. (2018). Automating society: Taking stock of automated decision-making in the EU. Retrieved from Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Sumpter, D. (2018). Outnumbered: From Facebook and Google to fake news and filter-bubbles - the algorithms that control our lives. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review, 13(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (2004). Class, attitudes and the welfare state: Sweden in comparative perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolnoki, G., & Hoffmann, D. (2013). Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Economics and Policy, 2(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Tammpuu, P., & Masso, A. (2018). ‘Welcome to the virtual state’: Estonian e-residency and the digitalised state as a commodity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417751148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammpuu, P., Masso, A., Ibrahimi, M., & Abaku, T. (2022). Estonian E-residency and conceptions of platform-based state-individual relationship. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 26(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2022.1.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What's valued most? Similarities and differences between the organisational values of the public and the private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism, and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12, 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hootegem, A., Abts, K., & Meuleman, B. (2021). The welfare state criticism of the losers of modernization: How social experiences of resentment shape populist welfare critique. Acta Sociologica, 64(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699321994191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale, M, & Brass, I. (2019). Administration by algorithm? Public management meets public sector machine learning. In K. Yeung & M. Lodge (Eds.), Administration by algorithm? Public management meets public sector machine learning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihalemm, P., Lauristin, M., Kalmus, V., & Vihalemm, T. (eds.). (2017). Eesti ühiskond kiirenevas ajas. Uuringu ‘Mina. Maailm. Meedia’ 2002-2014 tulemused. [Estonian society and the acceleration of time. Results of the survey ‘Me, the Media, and the World’ 2002-2014]. Tartu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic government: Towards a New Public Analytics? Paper presented at the Ethical and Social Challenges posed by Artificial Intelligence, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor.
   Google Scholar
• Zarsky, T. (2015). The trouble with algorithmic decisions: An analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Science, Technology and Human Values, 41(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar