The Evolution of Civil Wars Research: From Civil War to Political Violence

References

• Ahmad, A., 2015. The Security Bazaar: Business Interests and Islamist Power in Civil War Somalia. International security, 39 (3), 89–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjona, A., 2016. Rebelocracy: social order in the Colombian civil war. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S., 2010. The trouble with the Congo: local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke, K.M., Cunningham, K.G., and Seymour, L.J.M., 2012. A plague of initials: fragmentation, cohesion, and infighting in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics, 10 (2), 265–283. doi:10.1017/S1537592712000667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcells, L., 2017. Rivalry and revenge: the politics of violence during civil war. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316392737.
   Google Scholar
• Balcells, L., Chen, C., and Pischedda, C., 2022. Do birds of a feather flock together? Rebel constituencies and civil war alliances. International Studies Quarterly, 66 (1), sqab095. doi:10.1093/isq/sqab095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcells, L., Palanza, V., and Voytas, E., 2022. Do transitional justice museums persuade visitors? Evidence from a field experiment. The Journal of Politics, 84 (1), 496–510. doi:10.1086/714765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, N., 2017. Criminal politics: an integrated approach to the study of organized crime, politics, and violence. Perspectives on Politics, 15 (4), 967–987. doi:10.1017/S1537592717002110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, R., 2021. The politics of vigilantism. Comparative Political Studies, 54 (6), 923–955. doi:10.1177/0010414020957692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berens, S. and Karim, S., 2023. Quotidian crime, wartime violence and public goods preferences: evidence from Liberia. Journal of Peace Research. doi:10.1177/00223433231155281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E., Shapiro, J.N., and Felter, J.H., 2011. Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq. Journal of Political Economy, 119 (4), 766–819. doi:10.1086/661983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biberman, Y., 2019. Gambling with violence: state outsourcing of war in Pakistan and India. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S., Friedman, J.A., and Shapiro, J.N., 2012. Testing the surge: why did violence decline in Iraq in 2007? International Security, 37 (1), 7–40. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S., Daxecker, U., and Höglund, K., 2020. Electoral violence: an introduction. Journal of Peace Research, 57 (1), 3–14. doi:10.1177/0022343319889657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, G., et al., 2021. Community policing does not build citizen trust in police or reduce crime in the Global South. Science, 374 (6571), eabd3446. doi:10.1126/science.abd3446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blattman, C., 2009. From violence to voting: war and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review, 103 (2), 231–247. doi:10.1017/S0003055409090212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, E., 2005. Conciliation, counterterrorism, and patterns of terrorist violence. International Organization, 59 (1), 145–176. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, A.I., 2017. Secession and security: explaining state strategy against separatists. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., et al., 2001. Trends in outside support for insurgent movements. Washington, D.C: RAND Corporation. doi:10.7249/MR1405.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., 2007. Deadly connections: states that sponsor terrorism. Illustrated ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.P., 2018. Global governance and local peace: accountability and performance in international peacebuilding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S.C., Mitchell, N.J., and Lowe, W., 2013. States, the security sector, and the monopoly of violence a new database on pro-government militias. Journal of Peace Research, 50 (2), 249–258. doi:10.1177/0022343312464881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederman, L.-E., Wimmer, A., and Min, B., 2010. Why do ethnic groups rebel?: new data and analysis. World Politics, 62 (1), 87–119. doi:10.1017/S0043887109990219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ch, R., et al., 2018. Endogenous taxation in ongoing internal conflict: the case of Colombia. American Political Science Review, 112 (4), 996–1015. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, K., 2005. Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 3 (2), 235–252. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050188.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. and Cunningham, K.G., 2023. Guest editors’ introduction: Nonviolent resistance and its discontents. Journal of Peace Research, 60 (1), 3–8. doi:10.1177/00223433221145542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. and Stephan, M.J., 2011. Why civil resistance works: the strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christia, F., 2012. Alliance formation in civil wars. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K., 2016. Rape during civil war. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/9781501705984.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K. and Nordås, R., 2015. Do states delegate shameful violence to militias? Patterns of sexual violence in recent armed conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (5), 877–898. doi:10.1177/0022002715576748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A., 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56 (4), 563–595. doi:10.1093/oep/gpf064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D.E., 2006. Veto players and civil war duration. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (4), 875–892. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00221.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K.G., 2014. Inside the politics of self-determination. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D.E., Skrede Gleditsch, K., and Salehyan, I., 2009. It takes two: a dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (4), 570–597. doi:10.1177/0022002709336458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, S.Z., 2016. Organized violence after civil war: the geography of recruitment in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, C., 2007. State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C.R. and Reno, W.S., 2014. In harm’s way: African counter-insurgency and patronage politics. Civil Wars, 16 (2), 105–126. doi:10.1080/13698249.2014.927699.
   Google Scholar
• Debos, M. 2016. Living by the gun in Chad: combatants, impunity and state formation, Reprint. Zed Books. 10.5040/9781350221147.
   Google Scholar
• Dorff, C., Henry, C., and Ley, S., 2022. Does violence against journalists deter detailed reporting? Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67 (6), 00220027221128307. doi:10.1177/00220027221128307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, K., Conrad, C.R., and Crabtree, C., 2021. Policing and political violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65 (10), 1641–1656. doi:10.1177/00220027211013083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, K. and Hultman, L., 2007. One-sided violence against civilians in war: insights from new fatality data. Journal of Peace Research, 44 (2), 233–246. doi:10.1177/0022343307075124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibl, F., Hertog, S., and Slater, D., 2021. War makes the regime: regional rebellions and political militarization worldwide. British Journal of Political Science, 51 (3), 1002–1023. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J.D. and Laitin, D.D., 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. The American Political Science Review, 97 (1), 75–90. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E., 2017. Ordinary Jews: choice and survival during the Holocaust. Princeton ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortna, V.P., 2015. Do terrorists win? Rebels’ use of terrorism and civil war outcomes. International Organization, 69 (3), 519–556. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, L.A., 2013. The puzzle of extra-lethal violence. Perspectives on Politics, 11 (2), 410–426. doi:10.1017/S1537592713001060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, S., 2002. Recruitment and allegiance the microfoundations of rebellion. The Journal of conflict resolution, 46 (1), 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, M.J., Pasquale, B.J., and Samii, C., 2014. Civil war and social cohesion: lab-in-the-field evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (3), 604–619. doi:10.1111/ajps.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, N.P., et al., 2002. Armed conflict 1946–2001: a new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39 (5), 615–637. doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., 2001. No other way out: states and revolutionary movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habyarimana, J., et al., 2007. Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? American Political Science Review, 101 (4), 709–725. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, K., 2021. Good times and bad apples: rebel recruitment in crackdown and truce. American Journal of Political Science, 65 (4), 807–825. doi:10.1111/ajps.12555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, H., et al., 2001. Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. The American Political Science Review, 95 (1), 33–48. doi:10.1017/S0003055401000119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B., 2006. Inside terrorism. Rev. and expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L.M. and Stark, A., 2018. How civil wars end: the international system, norms, and the role of external actors. International Security, 42 (3), 127–171. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., 2016. The wartime origins of democratization: civil war, rebel governance, and political regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R., Silverman, D., and Acosta, B., 2022. Friends in the profession: rebel leaders, international social networks, and external support for rebellion. International Studies Quarterly, 66 (1), sqab085. doi:10.1093/isq/sqab085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C., 2023. Counterinsurgency tactics, rebel grievances, and who keeps fighting. American Political Science Review, 1–6. doi:10.1017/S0003055423000059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. and Weinstein, J.M., 2006. Handling and manhandling civilians in civil war. The American Political Science Review, 100 (3), 429–447. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffrey, S., 2023. Special symposium, collective vigilantism in global comparative perspective mechanics of impunity: vigilantism and state-building in Indonesia. Comparative Politics, 55 (2), 287–311. doi:10.5129/001041523X16645492774955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2003. The ontology of ‘political violence’: action and identity in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics, 1 (3), 475–494. doi:10.1017/S1537592703000355.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N. and Kocher, M.A., 2007. How ‘free’ is free riding in civil wars? Violence, insurgency, and the collective action problem. World Politics, 59 (2), 177–216. doi:10.1353/wp.2007.0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, S., 2020. Relational state building in areas of limited statehood: experimental evidence on the attitudes of the police. American Political Science Review, 114 (2), 536–551. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, C., 1996. Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars. International Security, 20 (4), 136–175. doi:10.1162/isec.20.4.136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C., 2004. The micropolitics of social violence. World Politics, 56 (3), 431–455. doi:10.1353/wp.2004.0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, P., 2017. Rebel power: why national movements compete, fight, and win. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501708558.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutz, J., 2010. How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47 (2), 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, M., 2017. Building the rule of war: postconflict institutions and the micro-dynamics of conflict in Eastern DR Congo. International Organization, 71 (2), 281–315. doi:10.1017/S002081831700008X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., 2013. Imperial rule and the politics of nationalism: anti-colonial protest in the French empire. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.M., 2020. Crippling leviathan: how foreign subversion weakens the state. Ithaca New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, B., 2017. Making peace in drug wars: crackdowns and cartels in Latin America. Cambridge; New York, NY Port Melbourne New Delhi Singapore: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J.I., 2020. How insurgency begins: rebel group formation in Uganda and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S.X., 2022. Control, coercion, and cooptation: how rebels govern after winning civil war. World Politics, 74 (1), 37–76. doi:10.1017/S0043887121000174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, J., 2009. Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks?: evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (3), 331–362. doi:10.1177/0022002708330881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, J. and Wilson, I., III, 2009. Rage against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars. International Organization, 63 (1), 67–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, J., Zhou, Y.-Y., and Imai, K., 2020. Can economic assistance shape combatant support in wartime? Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Political Science Review, 114 (1), 126–143. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., 2010. Colonialism and postcolonial development: Spanish America in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Z.C., 2011. Rebel rulers: insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manekin, D. and Mitts, T., 2022. Effective for whom? Ethnic identity and nonviolent resistance. American Political Science Review, 116 (1), 161–180. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P.A., Piccolino, G., and Speight, J.S., 2022. The political legacies of rebel rule: evidence from a natural experiment in Côte d’Ivoire. Comparative Political Studies, 55 (9), 1439–1470. doi:10.1177/00104140211047409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, A.W., 1997. Making race and nation: a comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matanock, A.M., 2017. Electing peace: from civil conflict to political participation. S.l: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matanock, A.M. and Staniland, P., 2018. How and why armed groups participate in elections. Perspectives on Politics, 16 (3), 710–727. doi:10.1017/S1537592718001019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir, A., 2018. What explains counterterrorism effectiveness? Evidence from the U.S. Drone war in Pakistan. International Security, 43 (2), 45–83. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitts, T., 2019. From isolation to radicalization: anti-Muslim hostility and support for ISIS in the West. American Political Science Review, 113 (1), 173–194. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncada, E., 2022. Resisting extortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, W.H., 1998. Repression and dissent: substitution, context, and timing. American Journal of Political Science, 42 (3), 851–873. doi:10.2307/2991732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., 2021. Colonial institutions and civil war: indirect rule and Maoist insurgency in India. Cambridge ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, D. and Howe, K., 2023. Good rebel governance: revolutionary politics and western intervention in Syria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naseemullah, A. and Staniland, P., 2016. Indirect rule and varieties of governance. Governance, 29 (1), 13–30. doi:10.1111/gove.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, L.A., 2018. Covert regime change: America’s secret cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501730658.003.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio, J., Schubiger, L.I., and Weintraub, M., 2021. Legacies of resistance: mobilization against organized crime in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 54 (9), 1565–1596. doi:10.1177/0010414021989761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal, A. and Staniland, P., 2023. Strategy, secrecy, and external support for insurgent groups. International Studies Quarterly, 67 (1), doi:10.1093/isq/sqad001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, R., 2004. At war’s end: building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511790836.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, S.E., 2021. Practical ideology in militant organizations. World Politics, 73 (1), 52–81. doi:10.1017/S0043887120000180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman, W., 2008. Spoiling inside and out: internal political contestation and the Middle East peace process. International Security, 33 (3), 79–109. doi:10.1162/isec.2009.33.3.79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R.D., 2001. Resistance and rebellion: lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, R.D., 2002. Understanding ethnic violence: fear, hatred, and resentment in twentieth-century Eastern Europe. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S.L., 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley, Ca: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B.R., 1993. The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 35 (1), 27–47. doi:10.1080/00396339308442672.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, D.N., 2005. Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravanilla, N., Sexton, R., and Haim, D., 2021. Deadly populism: how local political outsiders drive Duterte’s war on drugs in the Philippines. The Journal of Politics, 84 (2), 1035–1056. doi:10.1086/715257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reno, W., 1998. Warlord politics and African states. Boulder, Colo: Lynner Rienner Publishers. doi:10.1515/9781685853822.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, W., 2011. Warfare in independent Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P., 2016. Ethnic politics and state power in Africa: the logic of the coup-civil war trap. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P.G., 2005. Donor-induced democratization and the privatization of state violence in Kenya and Rwanda. Comparative Politics, 37 (2), 207–227. doi:10.2307/20072883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M.L., 2004. How do natural resources influence civil war? Evidence from thirteen cases. International Organization, 58 (1), 35–67. doi:10.1017/S002081830458102X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., 2001. Do ethnic and nonethnic civil wars have the same causes?: a theoretical and empirical inquiry (Part 1). The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45 (3), 259–282. doi:10.1177/0022002701045003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., 2004. What is civil war? Conceptual and empirical complexities of an operational definition. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48 (6), 814–858. doi:10.1177/0022002704269355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanín, F.G. and Wood, E.J., 2014. Ideology in civil war: instrumental adoption and beyond. Journal of Peace Research, 51 (2), 213–226. doi:10.1177/0022343313514073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubiger, L.I., 2023. One for all? State violence and insurgent cohesion. International Organization, 77 (1), 33–64. doi:10.1017/S0020818323000012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1976. The Moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, R., 2016. Aid as a Tool against Insurgency: Evidence from Contested and Controlled Territory in Afghanistan. The American political science review, 110 (4), 731–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, L.J.M., 2014. Why factions switch sides in civil wars: rivalry, patronage, and realignment in Sudan. International Security, 39 (2), 92–131. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J.N., 2013. The terrorist’s dilemma: managing violent covert organizations. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400848645.
   Google Scholar
• Shesterinina, A., 2016. Collective threat framing and mobilization in civil war. American Political Science Review, 110 (3), 411–427. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, N.A., 2022. Under the gun: political parties and violence in Pakistan. New ed. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009242530.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., 1979. States and social revolutions: a comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D., 2010. Ordering power: contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P. 2012a. Between a rock and a hard place insurgent fratricide, ethnic defection, and the rise of pro-state paramilitaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56 (1), 16–40. doi:10.1177/0022002711429681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2012b. Organizing insurgency: networks, resources, and rebellion in South Asia. International Security, 37 (1), 142–177. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2012c. States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on Politics, 10 (2), 243–264. doi:10.1017/S1537592712000655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2014a. Networks of rebellion: explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2014b. Violence and democracy. Comparative Politics, 47 (1), 99–118. doi:10.5129/001041514813623128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2015a. Armed groups and militarized elections. International Studies Quarterly, 59 (4), 694–705. doi:10.1111/isqu.12195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2015b. Militias, ideology, and the state. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (5), 770–793. doi:10.1177/0022002715576749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2017. Armed politics and the study of intrastate conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 54 (4), 0022343317698848. doi:10.1177/0022343317698848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2021a. Ordering violence: explaining armed group-state relations from conflict to cooperation. Ithaca New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2021b. Leftist insurgency in democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 54 (3–4), 518–552. doi:10.1177/0010414020938096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, J.A., 2016. Violence and restraint in civil war: civilian targeting in the shadow of international law. Reprint ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781107706477.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, A., 2017. Democracy and displacement in Colombia’s civil war. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501713736.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M.A., 2021. Governing for revolution: social transformation in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, S., 2006. The order of genocide: race, power, and war in Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, S., 2015. Making and unmaking nations: war, leadership, and genocide in modern Africa. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/9780801455681.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, R., 2021. Concealing conflict markets: how rebels and firms use state institutions to launder wartime trade. International Organization, 75 (4), 1109–1132. doi:10.1017/S0020818321000205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima, P.Y., 2014. The institutional origins of communal violence: Indonesia’s transition from authoritarian rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139235716.
   Google Scholar
• Tamm, H., 2016 Rebel leaders, internal rivals, and external resources: how state sponsors affect insurgent cohesion. International Studies Quarterly, 60 (4), 599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, R., 2023. Vigilantes and the state: understanding violence through a security assemblages approach. Perspectives on Politics, 21 (1), 209–224 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toft, M.D., 2003. The geography of ethnic violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of Chicago. 2015. Pearson family foundation donates $100 million to university of Chicago, creating institute to confront new era of global conflicts. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/pearson-family-foundation-donates-100-million-university-chicago-creating-institute-confront
   Google Scholar
• Uribe, A.D., 2023. Coercion, governance, and political behavior in civil war. Journal of Peace Research. doi:10.1177/00223433221147939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, B.A., 2004. Final solutions: mass killing and genocide in the twentieth century. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varshney, A., 2002. Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, B.F., 2002. Committing to peace: the successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, B.F., 2009. Reputation and civil war: why separatist conflicts are so violent. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, A., 2021. Counterinsurgents’ use of force and “armed orders” in Naga Northeast India. Asian Security, 17 (1), 119–137. doi:10.1080/14799855.2020.1724099.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L., 1999. Ambiguities of domination: politics, rhetoric, and symbols in contemporary Syria. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J., 2007. Inside rebellion: the politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808654.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., 2004. Votes and violence: electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E.R., 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.J., 2003. Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R.M., 2010. Rebel capability and strategic violence against civilians. Journal of Peace Research, 47 (5), 601–614. doi:10.1177/0022343310376473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar