The Enduring Influence of The Logic of Violence in Civil War

References

• Alves, J.A., 2018. The anti-black city: police terror and black urban life in Brazil. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, E.D., 2006. Drugs & Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: trafficking, social networks, and public security. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, E.D., 2013. The impacts of differential armed dominance of politics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48 (3), 263–284. doi:10.1007/s12116-013-9137-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, E.D., 2017. Criminal enterprises and governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arjona, A., 2016. Rebelocracy: social order in the Colombian civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arjona, A., 2017. Civilian cooperation and non-cooperation with non-state armed groups: the centrality of obedience and resistance. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 28 (4–5), 755–778. doi:10.1080/09592318.2017.1322328.
   Google Scholar
• Balcells, L., 2017. Rivalry and revenge: the politics of violence during civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316392737.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, N., 2017. Criminal politics: an integrated approach to the study of organized crime, politics, and violence. Perspectives on Politics, 15 (4), 967–987. doi:10.1017/S1537592717002110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, N., 2022. The logic of criminal territorial control: military intervention in Rio de Janeiro. Comparative Political Studies, 55 (5), 789–831. doi:10.1177/00104140211036035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christia, F., 2012. Alliance formation in civil wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K., 2016. Rape during civil war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A., 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56 (4), 563–595. doi:10.1093/oep/gpf064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Córdova, A., 2022. Living in gang-controlled neighborhoods: impacts on electoral and nonelectoral participation in El Salvador. Latin American Research Review, 54 (1), 201–221. doi:10.25222/larr.387.
   Google Scholar
• Correa-Cabrera, G., 2017. Los Zetas inc.: criminal corporations, energy, and civil war in Mexico. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, S.Z., 2016. Organized violence after civil war: the geography of recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durán-Martínez, A., 2015. To kill and tell?: state power, criminal competition, and drug violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (8), 1377–1402. doi:10.1177/0022002715587047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanigan, S.T., 2012. Terrorists next door? A comparison of Mexican drug cartels and middle eastern terrorist organizations. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24 (2), 279–294. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.648351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, L.A., 2009. Killing neighbors: webs of violence in rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M., 2012. New and old wars: organised violence in a global era. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2001. “New” and “old” civil wars: a valid distinction. World Politics, 49 (October), 99–118. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0022.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies In Comparative Politics).
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2012. Micro-level studies of violence in civil war: refining and extending the control-collaboration model. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24 (4), 658–668. doi:10.1080/09546553.2012.701986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2015. How civil wars help explain organized crime–and how they do not. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (8), 1517–1540. doi:10.1177/0022002715587101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, O., 2017. Resisting war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, J., 2018. Resilient communities: non-violence and civilian agency in communal war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, B., 2015. The logic of violence in criminal war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (8), 1486–1516. doi:10.1177/0022002715587100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing, B., 2020. Conceptualizing criminal governance. Perspectives on Politics, 19 (3), 854–873. doi:10.1017/S1537592720001243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing, B. and Denyer Willis, G., 2019. Legitimacy in criminal governance: managing a drug empire from behind bars. American Political Science Review, 113 (2), 584–606. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B., Franco-Vivanco, E., and Melo, V., 2020. Killing in the slums: social order, criminal governance, and police violence in Rio de Janeiro. American Political Science Review, 114 (2), 552–572. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarenko, T., 2004. The crime-terror continuum: tracing the interplay between transnational organised crime and terrorism. Global Crime, 6 (1), 129–145. doi:10.1080/1744057042000297025.
   Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Z.C., 2011. Rebel rulers: insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moncada, E., 2013. The politics of urban violence: challenges for development in the global south. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48 (3), 217–239. doi:10.1007/s12116-013-9133-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncada, E., 2022. Resisting extortion: victims, criminals, and states in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108915328.
   Google Scholar
• Mosinger, E., 2019. Control and collaboration: simulating the logic of violence in civil war for political science students. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52 (3), 543–548. doi:10.1017/S1049096519000222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, S.E., 2013. Organizing rebellion: rethinking high-risk mobilization and social networks in war. American Political Science Review, 107 (3), 418–432. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R.D., 2001. Resistance and rebellion: lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B.J., 2018. Terrorist tactics by criminal organizations: the Mexican case in context. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12 (1), 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., 2015. En la niebla de la guerra: “Los ciudadanos ante la violencia criminal organizada”. Mexico City, DF: CIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Shesterinina, A., 2016. Collective threat framing and mobilization in civil war. American Political Science Review, 110 (3), 411–427. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarbek, D., 2014. The social order of the underworld: how prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2012. States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on Politics, 10 (2), 243–264. doi:10.1017/S1537592712000655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2014. Networks of rebellion: explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2017. Armed politics and the study of intrastate conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 54 (4), 459–467. doi:10.1177/0022343317698848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, A., 2017. Democracy and displacement in colombia’s civil war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501713736.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, S., 2008. The order of genocide. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teiner, D., 2020. Cartel-related violence in Mexico as narco-terrorism or criminal insurgency. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14 (4), 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcür, G.M., 2016. Ordinary people, extraordinary risks: participation in an ethnic rebellion. American Political Science Review, 110 (2), 247–264. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 1985. War making and state making as organized crime. In: P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. Bringing the state back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–191. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628283.008.
   Google Scholar
• Trejo, G. and Ley, 2020. Votes, drugs, and violence: the political logic of criminal wars in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108894807.
   Google Scholar
• Viterna, J., 2013. Women in war: the micro-processes of mobilization in El Salvador. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J.M., 2007. Inside rebellion: the politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808654.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J.M. and Humphreys, M., 2008. Who fights? The determinants of participation in civil war. American Journal of Political Science, 52 (2), 436–455. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., 2004. Votes and violence: electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511510458.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.J., 2003. Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zedong, M., 2000. On guerrilla warfare. Champagne, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar