Earthly intermundia: office space in the works of Charles Dickens

References

• Armstrong, Isobel. 2013. “Theories of Space and the Nineteenth-Century Novel.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 17: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.671.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Sukanya. 2020. “Writing Bureaucracy, Bureaucratic Writing: Charles Dickens, Little Dorrit, and Mid-Victorian Liberalism.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 75 (2): 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2020.75.2.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brake, Laurel. 2001. “Star Turn Magazine, Part-Issue, and Book Serialisation.” Victorian Periodicals Review 34 (3): 208–227.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, Michel. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life (1980). Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, Jay. 2003. Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: The Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Philip. 1990. “Some Narrative Devices in ‘Bleak House’.” Dickens Studies Annual 19:125–146. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44371761.
   Google Scholar
• Delespinasse, Doris Stringham. 1968. “The Significance of the Dual Point of View in Bleak House.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 23 (3): 253–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/2932554.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 1855. “Prince Bull. A Fairy Tale.” Household Words 11 (256): 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 1991a. Bleak House (1852–53). London: Mandarin.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 1991b. Sketches by Boz (1833–36). London: Mandarin.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 1996. Great Expectations (1860–61). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 2004. David Copperfield (1849–50). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 2008. Dombey and Son (1846-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 2009. The Pickwick Papers (1836–37). London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, Andrew. 1995. “Managing the House in ‘Dombey and Son’: Dickens and the Uses of Analogy.” Studies in Philology 92 (3): 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzman, J. M., and Kristin Parvizian. 2014. “Hegel’s Geist – Immodestly Metaphysical!” In Chapter 29 in The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism, edited by C. Altman Matthew, 603–625. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gardey, Delphine. 2001. La dactylographe et l’expéditionnaire: Histoire des employés de bureau 1890–1930. Paris: Belin.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, Germain, ed., 1802. Recherches sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations.Translated by Adam Smith and X. An. Vol. 5. Paris: H. Agasse.
   Google Scholar
• Gomel, Elana. 1996. “The Body of Parts: Dickens and the Poetics of Synecdoche.” The Journal of Narrative Technique 26 (1): 48–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, Jonathan H. 1997. “Representing Pickwick: The Novel and the Law Courts.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 52 (2): 171–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2933906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelman, Don. 1981. “Introduction: The Idea of Bureaucratic Organization.” Social Analyses 9:5–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23159536.
   Google Scholar
• Hankins, Gabriel. 2015. “The Objects of Ethics: Rilke and Woolf with Latour.” Twentieth Century Literature 61 (3): 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-3153979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzfeld, Michael. 1992. The Social Production of Indifference – Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, Audrey. 1998. “David Copperfield and Bleak House: On Dividing the Responsibility of Knowing (1991).” In New Casebooks – Bleak House, edited by Jeffrey Tambling, 163–182. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kafka, Ben. 2012. The Demon of Writing – Powers and Failures of Paperwork. New York: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1914. Critique of Judgement (1790). 2nd ed. Translated by J.H. Bernard. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, Ralph. 2012. Bureaucrats and Bourgeois Society – Office Politics and Individual Credit in France, 1789–1848. Houndmills, Baskingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1986. “Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.” In Vol. 6 of Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, edited by H. Kuklick, 1–140. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Maurice S. 2019. Overwhelmed: Literature, Aesthetics, and the Nineteenth-Century Information Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckhurst, Roger. 2019. Corridors: Passages of Modernity. London: Reaktion.
   Google Scholar
• Lucretius. 1969. On the Nature of Things. Translated by Martin Ferguson Smith. London: Sphere.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital –Volume 1 (1867), Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1992. Capital – Volume 2 (1885), Translated by David Fernbach. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. A. 1998. “Discipline in Different Voices: Bureaucracy, Police, Family, and Bleak House (1988).” In New Casebooks – Bleak House, edited by Jeffrey Tambling, 87–127. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Monnier, François, and Guy Thuillier. 2010. Histoire de la Bureaucratie – Vérités et Fictions. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, Suvendrini. 1990. “Wholesale, Retail and for Exportation: Empire and the Family Business in ‘Dombey and Son’.” Victorian Studies 33 (4): 603–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postone, Moishe. 2003. Time, Labor, and Social Domination – A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory (1993). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Leah. 2012. How to do Things with Books in Victorian Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, Kenneth. 1988. “Kant on the Ideality of Space.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1988.10717177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Carl K. Y. 1992. “Hegel’s Theory of Modern Bureaucracy.” The American Political Science Review 86 (2): 381–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour – A Critique of Epistemology (1970). Translated by Martin Sohn-Rethel. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, William. 1824. An Inquiry into the Principles of the Distribution of Wealth. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ure, Andrew. 1835. The Philosophy of Manufactures. London: Charles Knight.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, Jonathan. 2008. The Rise of the Office Clerk in Literary Culture, 1880–1939. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Irene E. 1985. “Charles Dickens, Hans Christian Andersen, and ‘The Shadow’.” Dickens Quarterly 2 (4): 124–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar