Deconstructing human-canine relations in Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs

References

• Abram, David. 2010. Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Carol J. 1990. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Carol J. 2018. Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals (1994). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Richard. 2015. The Plague Dogs. [ 1977]. London: Rock the Boat.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Richard, and Ronald. Lockley. 1982. Voyage Through the Antarctic. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, Karla. 2002. “’Good Dog’: The Stories We Tell About Our Canine Companions and What They Mean for Humans and Other Animals.” Papers on Language and Literature: A Journal for Scholars and Critics of Language and Literature 38 (4): 351–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretero-González, Margarita. 2021. “Empathy Through Interspecies Transcreation.” Women’s Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2021.1987899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collado Rodríguez, Francisco. 1988. “Beyond Satire: Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs.” The International Fiction Review 15 (1): 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, Marion W. 2009. “Dog Stories Reconsidered.” Society & Animals 17 (4): 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1163/106311109X12474622855228.
   Google Scholar
• DeMello, Margo. 2012. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeMello, Margo, ed. 2013. Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, Josephine. 2016. The Aesthetics of Care: On the Literary Treatment of Animals. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Eccleshare, Julia. 2016. “Richard Adams Obituary.” The Guardian. December 27. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/dec/27/richard-adams-obituary.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Barbara. ed. 2002. In Nature's Name: An Anthology of Women's Writing and Illustration, 1780–1930. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour, Michael. 2020. Creative Compassion, Literature and Animal Welfare. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höing, Anja. 2015. “Snit’s a Good Dog. Dogs’ Innate Duty in Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs.” In Who’s Talking Now. Multispecies Relations from Human and Animals’ Point of View, edited by Chiara Blanco and Bel Deering, 69–76. Oxford: Interdisciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höing, Anja. 2017. “Unreliability and the Animal Narrator in Richard Adams’s the Plague Dogs.” Humanities 6 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6010006.
   Google Scholar
• Höing, Anja. 2020. “Devouring the Animal Within: Uncanny Otherness in Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs.” In Gothic Animals: Uncanny Otherness and the Animal With-Out, edited by Ruth Heholt and Melissa Edmundson, 54–74. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hollindale, Peter. 1988. “Ideology and the Children’s Book.” Signal 55 (1): 3–22. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1312018968?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Peter. 1984. “Childist Criticism: The Subculture of the Child, the Book and the Critic.” Signal 43 (1): 42–59. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1312047046?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.
   Google Scholar
• Lockley, Ronald. 1964. The Private Life of the Rabbit: An Account of the Life History and Social Behaviour of the Wild Rabbit. London: Andre Deutsch.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Hadas. 2016. “An Ecocritical Approach to Cruelty in the Laboratory.” Journal of Animal Ethics 6 (2): 223–233. https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.6.2.0223.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, Mary. 1984. Animals and Why They Matter. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, Euan. 2011. “Interview: Richard Adams.” Structo 6:12–14. https://structomagazine.co.uk/interviews/richard-adams/.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Kelly. 2009. Animal Lessons: How They Teach Us to Be Human. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, Richard. 1975. Victims of Science: The Use of Animals in Research. London: Davis-Poynter.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter. 1990. Animal Liberation. [ 1975]. London: Pimlico.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, Kate. 2005. “The Beast in Literature: Some Initial Thoughts.” Comparative Critical Studies 2 (3): 303–309. https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2005.2.3.303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinfen, Ann. 1984. In Defence of Fantasy: A Study of the Genre in English and American Literature Since 1945. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1984. Dominance and Affection: The Making of Pets. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar