Presentation of thermodynamic and dynamic modules methods to investigate the effect of nano hydrated lime on moisture damage of stone matrix asphalt

References

• Arabani, M., and G.H. Hamedi. 2011. “Using the Surface Free Energy Method to Evaluate the Effects of Polymeric Aggregate Treatment on Moisture Damage in hot-mix Asphalt.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 23 (6): 802–811. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asli, H.H., M. Arabani, and Y. Golpour. 2020. “Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Based on a Geospatial Information System (GIS).” Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering 28 (2): 36–42. doi:10.2478/sjce-2020-0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barazi Jomoor, N., M. Fakhri, and M.R. Keymanesh. 2019. “Determining the Optimum Amount of Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) in Warm Stone Matrix Asphalt Using Dynamic Creep Test.” Construction and Building Materials 228: 116736. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargegol, I., et al. 2015a. “Comparison and Evaluation of Fatigue Behavior of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Containing Different Recycled Additives.” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE) 1 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Bargegol, I. Mohammad Nikookar, Reza Vatani Nezafat, Esmat JafarpourLashkami, and Arash M. Roshandeh, et al. 2015b. “Timing Optimization of Signalized Intersections Using Shockwave Theory by Genetic Algorithm.” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering 1:160–167.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., E. Masad, D. Little, R. Lytton, et al. 2006. “Limits on Adhesive Bond Energy for Improved Resistance of hot-mix Asphalt to Moisture Damage.” Transportation Research Record 1970 (1): 2–13. DOI:10.1177/0361198106197000101.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, D, et al. 2002. “Use of Surface Free Energy Properties of the asphalt-aggregate System to Predict Moisture Damage Potential (With Discussion).” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 71.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, D. 2003. Surface Free Energy of asphalt-aggregate System and Performance Analysis of Asphalt Concrete Based on Surface Free Energy. A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Das, B.P., and A.K. Siddagangaiah. 2021. “Moisture Damage Analysis Based on Adhesive Failure in Asphalt Mixtures.” International Journal of Pavement Engineering 1–11. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1862840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A, et al. 2014. “Moisture Susceptibility Evaluation of Nanosize Hydrated Lime-Modified Asphalt–Aggregate Systems Based on Surface Free Energy Concept.” Transportation Research Record 2446 (1): 52–59. DOI:10.3141/2446-06.
   Google Scholar
• Dougan, C.E., et al. 2003. E*-Dynamic Modulus Test Protocol: Problems and Solutions. University of Connecticut. Connecticut Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R.J., and C.J. van Oss. 1992. “The Modern Theory of Contact Angles and the Hydrogen Bond Components of Surface Energies.” In Modern Approaches to Wettability, 1–27. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamedi, G.H., F.M. Nejad, and K. Oveisi. 2016. “Estimating the Moisture Damage of Asphalt Mixture Modified with Nano Zinc Oxide.” Materials and Structures 49 (4): 1165–1174. doi:10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedi, G.H. 2018. “Investigating the Use of Nano Coating over the Aggregate Surface on Moisture Damage of Asphalt Mixtures.” International Journal of Civil Engineering 16 (6): 659–669. doi:10.1007/s40999-016-0143-x.
   Google Scholar
• Hamedi, G.H, et al. 2019. “Applying Asphalt Binder Modifier in Reducing moisture-induced Damage of Asphalt Mixtures.” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 25 (11): 2039–2056.
   Google Scholar
• Hefer, A., and R. Little. 2005. “Towards Quantification of Adhesion and Water Stripping in Bituminous Materials Using Modern Surface Energy Theory.” SATC 2005 65 (8): 206–115.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, J., et al. 2009. Development of a Database for Surface Energy of Aggregates and Asphalt Binders. TX United States: Texas A&M University System.
   Google Scholar
• Javidannia, G., et al. 2021. “Generative Design Workflow for Seismic-Efficient Architectural Design of Tall Buildings; A Multi-object Optimization Approach.“ SimAUD. ACM Digital Library Journal 12 (1): 138–146 .
   Google Scholar
• Kakar, M.R., M O. Hamzah, M N. Akhtar, D. Woodward, et al. 2016. “Surface Free Energy and Moisture Susceptibility Evaluation of Asphalt Binders Modified with surfactant-based Chemical Additive”. Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 2342–2353. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavussi, A., and P. Barghabani. 2014. “The Influence of Nano Materials on Moisture Resistance of Asphalt Mixes.” Study of Civil Engineering and Architecture 3: 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kavussi, A., A. Karimi, and M. Mohsen. 2017. “Evaluating the Moisture Resistance of Foam Warm Mix Asphalt Using Image Processing Method.” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE) 3 (2): 106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Khedmati, M., A. Khodaii, and H.F. Haghshenas. 2017. “A Study on Moisture Susceptibility of Stone Matrix Warm Mix Asphalt.” Construction and Building Materials 144: 42–49. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2007. Investigation of the Effects of Lime on the Performance of HMA Using Advanced Testing and Modeling Techniques. Vol. 69. Department of Civil Engineering, NC State University.
   Google Scholar
• Nemati, R., and E.V. Dave. 2018. “Nominal Property Based Predictive Models for Asphalt Mixture Complex Modulus (Dynamic Modulus and Phase Angle).” Construction and Building Materials 158: 308–319. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstokke, D.W., and B.D. Zumbo. 2010. “A New Nonparametric Levene Test for Equal Variances.” Psicológica 31 (2): 401–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyamuhokya, T.P., S. Romanoschi, X. Hu, A. Abdullah, L F. Walubita, et al. 2016. “Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship between HMA Compressive and Tensile Dynamic Modulus”. Construction and Building Materials 128: 461–470. DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourfalatoun, S., and E.E. Miller. 2021. “User Perceptions of Automated Truck-Mounted Attenuators: Implications on Work Zone Safety.” Traffic Injury Prevention 22 (5): 413–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S.-H., and A. Kavussi. 2020. “The Role of Nanomaterials in Reducing Moisture Damage of Asphalt Mixes.” Construction and Building Materials 239: 117827. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakanlou, F., H. Shirmohammadi, and G.H. Hamedi. 2018. “Investigating the Effect of Filler Types on Thermodynamic Parameters and Their Relationship with Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Mixes.” Materials and Structures 51 (2): 39. doi:10.1617/s11527-018-1166-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiorgi, C., P. Tataranni, A. Simone, V. Vignali, C. Lantieri, G. Dondi, et al. 2018. “Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) with Crumb Rubber according to A New dry-hybrid Technology: A Laboratory and Trial Field Evaluation”. Construction and Building Materials 182: 200–209. DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, B.D. 2004. Evaluation of Moisture Damage within Asphalt Concrete Mixes. Civil Enginnering Department, Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J, et al. 2011. “Size Effect of Sub nano-scaled Hydrated Lime on Selected Properties of HMA.” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 4 (4): 252.
   Google Scholar
• Venudharan, V., and K.P. Biligiri. 2015. “Estimation of Phase Angles of Asphalt Mixtures Using Resilient Modulus Test.” Construction and Building Materials 82: 274–286. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, H., Q. Dai, and Z. You. 2015. “Chemo-physical Analysis and Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation of Moisture Susceptibility of Nano Hydrated Lime Modified Asphalt Mixtures.” Construction and Building Materials 101: 536–547. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar