Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study

References

• Albury, D. (2011). Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation. Australian Journal of Public Administration,70(3), 227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, A., Assalino, M., Oldani, G., Toso, C., & Berney, T. (2017). Procurement professionalization: A mandatory step to improve the availability and quality of whole pancreas grafts. Transplant International, 30(2), 115–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand—Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38(8), 1235–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2009). Powering Ideas: An innovation Agenda for the 21st Century, (edited by). Industry Department of Innovation, Science and Research Canberra, ACT
   Google Scholar
• Bali, A. S., & Halpin, D. R. (2021). Agenda-Setting instruments: Means and strategies for the management of policy demands. Policy and Society, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali, A. S., Howlett, M., Lewis, J., & Ramesh, M. (2021b). Introduction to the special issue: Primary and secondary aspects of substantive and procedural instruments in a policy mix. Policy & Society, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Bali, A. S., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2021a). Unpacking policy portfolios: Primary and secondary aspects of tool use in policy mixes. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1907653
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. (2011). Measuring public innovation in the Nordic countries (MEPIN). Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, P. (2006). Government procurement as a policy tool in South Africa. Journal of Public Procurement, 6(3), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Callea, G., Armeni, P., Marsilio, M., Jommi, C., & Tarricone, R. (2017). The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices. Social Science & Medicine, 174, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicot, J., & Matt, M. (2018). Public procurement of innovation: A review of rationales, designs, and contributions to grand challenges. Science & Public Policy, 45(4), 480–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., & Alsos, G. A. (2020). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Conditions for complex innovations: Evidence from public organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 820–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36(7), 949–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 414–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation theory. In C. Edquist, L. Hommen, & L. Tsipouri (Eds.), Public technology procurement and innovation (pp. 5–70). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1725–1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., Georghiou, L., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2015). The meaning and limitations of public procurement for innovation: a supplier’s experience. In C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, & J. Edler (Eds.),Public procurement for innovation (pp. 1–34). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41(10), 1757–1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Amry, A. (2018). Professionalization of public buyers: Determining primordial effectiveness of public order. European Scientific Journal, 14(22), 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, (EC). 2018. Guidance on innovation procurement. Commission notice. Commission notice. C(2018)3051 final, Brussels: 15/5/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P. (2021). Metagovernance and migration policy in the asia pacific region: Policy tools, steering capacity and the bali process on people smuggling, trafficking in persons and related transnational crime. Policy and Society, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C. (2018). More voice, less exit: Sub-federal resistance to international procurement liberalization in the European Union, the United States and Canada. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(11), 1686–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A. (1990). Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy. Int Rev Appl Econ, 4(2), 182–198.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisetti, C. (2017). Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandia, J., & Meehan, J. (2017). Public procurement as a policy tool: Using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 302–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameduddin, T., Fernandez, S., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). Conditions for open innovation in public organizations: Evidence from Challenge. gov. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, A. (2021). Procedural tools and pension reform in the long run: The case of Sweden. Policy and Society, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2008). Public procurement and innovation: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 8(3), 17–56.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2017). Policy tools and their role in policy formulation: Dealing with procedural and substantive instruments. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of Policy Formulation (pp. 96–111). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. 2018. “Thirty years of instrument research: What have we learned and where are we going?”.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2010). Public procurement as an industrial policy tool: An option for developing countries? Journal of Public Procurement, 10(3), 368–404.
   Google Scholar
• Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, bureaucratic legalism, and innovative attitudes in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2014). Public procurement and innovation: Theory and practice. In V. Lember, R. Kattel, & T. Kalvet (Eds.), Public procurement, innovation and policy: International perspectives (pp. 13-34). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. CA Sage: Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S., & Marklund, P. O. (2013). Green public procurement as an environmental policy instrument: Cost effectiveness. Environmental Economics, 4(4), 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• McCrudden, C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural resources forum, 28 (4), 257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., & Desouza, K. D. (2013). Implementing open innovation in the public sector: The case of Challenge. gov. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 882–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, F. A., & Lehoux, P. (2020). The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement. Research Policy,49(7), 104075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017a). Government at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, (2017b). “Developing public procurement capacities in Europe” Author, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. Public Procurement. Available at https://www.oecd.org/gov/public-procurement
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Tutu, E., Offei–Nyako, K., Ameyaw, C., & Ampofo, K. T. (2014). Conflict of interest and related corrupt practices in public procurement in Ghana. International Journal of Civil Engineering Construction and Estate Management, 1(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2000). Policy instruments and public management: bridging the gaps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10(1), 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, O. H., Lember, V., Scherrer, W., & Robert, Å. (2016). 10 the role of private actors in public sector innovation. In J. Torfing & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming Public Governance (pp. 197–214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rainville, A. (2017). Standards in green public procurement–A framework to enhance innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1029–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. (2009). Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: The role of institutions. Science & Public Policy, 36(5), 349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M., Phillips, W., & Bakker, E. (2011). Public procurement of innovations, diffusion and endogenous institutions. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(5), 452–468.
   Google Scholar
• Sahni, N. R., Wessel, M., & Christensen, C. 2013. Unleashing breakthrough innovation in government: Stanford social innovation review, 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2005). Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations (pp. 86–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, A., & Yates, S. (2021). Public inquiries as procedural policy tools. Policy and Society, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taeihagh, A. (2017). Crowdsourcing: A new tool for policy-making? Policy Sciences, 50(4), 629–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, K. V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9–50.
   Google Scholar
• Torbica, A., & Cappellaro, G. (2010). Uptake and diffusion of medical technology innovation in Europe: What role for funding and procurement policies? Journal of Medical Marketing, 10(1), 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2016). Complexity of Innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Management Review, 18(3), 392–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torugsa, N. A., & Arundel, A. (2017). Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies. Research Policy, 46(5), 900–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, M. (2008). A guide to modern econometrics. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vivona, R., Demircioglu, M. A., & Raghavan, A. (2021). Innovation and Innovativeness for the Public Servant of the Future: What, Why, How, Where, and When. In H. Sullivan & H. Dickinson (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant (pp. 1643–1664). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wibowo, R. (2019). Impact of procurement professionalization on the efficiency of public procurement. Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 11(3), 228.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (2000). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar