Procedural tools and pension reform in the long run: the case of Sweden

References

• Allern, E. H., Bay, A.-H., & Saglie, J. (2013). The new politics of the welfare state? A case study of extra-parliamentary party politics in Norway. European Journal of Social Security, 15(3), 249–272.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. M., Blomqvist, P., & Immergut, E. M. (2008). Sweden: Markets within politics. In D. Béland & B. Gran (Eds.), Public and Private social policy: Health and pension policies in a new era (pp. 169–189). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. M., and Immergut, E. M., “Sweden: After Social Democratic Hegemony.” In E. M. Immergut, K. M. Anderson & I Schulze (eds.) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics, 349–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, N. A. (2013). The pension system in Sweden. Stockholm: Fritze.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., Howlett, M., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2020). Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boada-Penas, M. C., Settergren, O., Erland, E., & Poontavika, N. (2019). Sweden’s fifteen years of communication efforts. Washington DC: World Bank. accessed from August 7, 2020 <http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/245621556880062665/pdf/Sweden-s-Fifteen-Years-of-Communication-Efforts.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2000). The politics of pension reform: Institutions and policy change in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2012). Blame avoidance and credit claiming revisited. In G. Bonoli & D. Natali (Eds.), The politics of the new welfare state (pp. 93–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2019). Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 399–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, P. (2012). Policy as palimpsest. Policy and Politics, 40(3), 423–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. (2018). The idea of policy design: Intention, process, outcome, meaning and validity. Public Policy and Administration, 33(4), 365–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M., Blomqvist, P., & Winblad, U. (2012). Conflict and compliance in Swedish health care governance: Soft law in the ‘Shadow of Hierarchy’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(1), 48–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, J. (2013). A History of the Swedish Pension System. Uppsala: Uppsala Centre for Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, A. (2018). Rethinking the ‘open functional’ approach: Ideas, problem pressure and reform in the contemporary welfare state. Public Administration, 96(3), 528–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. (2010). The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in hard times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1975). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance.. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinterleitner, M. (2017). Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1983). The Tools of Government. London: The Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique Du Canada, 43(4), 412–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in “new governance arrangements”. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the long term: Democracy and the politics of investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., Arndt, C., Lee, S., & Wenzelburger, G. (2018). Policy instruments and welfare state reform. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(2), 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. (2007). Tense layering and synthetic policy paradigms: The politics of health insurance in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 579–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2019). Collaborative governance in health and technology policy: The use and effects of procedural policy instruments. Administration & Society, 51(2), 272–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Gales, P. L. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments?From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2017). On credit and blame: Disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 599–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxbo, K. (2009). ‘Bakom lyckta dörrar - Beslutsprocessen bakom den svenska pensionsreformen 1991-1998ʹ. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 111(3), 257–258.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, U. (2005). Social Democracy Lost - The social democratic party in Sweden and the politics of pension reform, 1978-1998. Stockholm: The Institute for Future Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Marier, P. (2008a). Pension Politics: Consensus and social conflict in ageing societies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marier, P. (2008b). Empowering Epistemic Communities: Specialised Politicians, Policy Experts and Policy Reform. West European Politics, 31(3), 513–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. (2010). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Mjukare broms i pensionssystemet införs år 2017ʹ 2015, Regeringskansliet, accessed from July 8, 2020, <https://www.regeringen.se/artiklar/2015/05/mjukare-broms-i-pensionssystemet-infors-ar-2017>.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (eds). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Campbell, A. (2009). The Delegated Welfare State: Marketizing American Social Provision in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. J. (2013). Path Shifting of the Welfare State: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in Western Europe. World Politics, 65(1), 73–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. (2016). Credit-Claiming or Blame Avoidance? Comparing the Relationship between Welfare State Beliefs and the framing of social policy retrenchment in France and Germany. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 138–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyqvist, A. (2016). Reform and responsibility in the remaking of the Swedish national pension system. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, M. A. (2008). Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palme, J. 2018, Sweden: Adjusting the 2003 “major” pension reform with a new “Deal” in the “Pension Group”, European Social Policy Network.
   Google Scholar
• Pensionsadministrationsutredningen. (2006). Ny pension - Ny administration. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Pensionsåldersutredningen. (2013). Åtgärder för ett längre arbetsliv. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Pensionsarbetsgruppen. (1994). Reformerat Pensionssystem. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Pensionsberedningen. (1990). Allmän Pension. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Pensionsgruppen. (2017). Pensionsgruppens överenskommelse om långsiktigt höjda och trygga pensioner. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, O. (2016). Rational Politics: Commissions of inquiry and the referral system in Sweden. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics (pp. 650–662). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2017). Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoyen, M. A., & Stamati, F. (2013). The political sustainability of the NDC pension model: The cases of Sweden and Italy. European Journal of Social Security, 15(1), 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Settergren, O. (2001). The automatic balance mechanism of the Swedish Pension System - a non-technical introduction. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 4, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Settergren, O. 2010, ‘Impact of the financial and economic crisis on the Swedish pension system - News - ISSA’, Social Security Observer, vol. 10, accessed from January 15, 2020, <https://www.issa.int/en_GB/regions/networks-ien/news/-/asset_publisher/C2vFm0AzasJ9/content/impact-of-the-financial-and-economic-crisis-on-the-swedish-pension-system>.
   Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. (2007). Framing deservingness to win support for welfare state retrenchment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(3), 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke, P. (2006). The politics of welfare state retrenchment: A literature review. Social Policy & Administration, 40(1), 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunden, A. (2006). The Swedish Experience with pension reform. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1), 154–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Pension Agreement and Pension Reform, Translation of Ds 2009:53 2009, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Utredningen om ett upphandlat fondtorg för premiepension. (2019). Ett bättre premiepensionssystem. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, M. H., & Restrepo, D. (2019). The instruments of public policy. A transdisciplinary look. Cuadernos De Administración, 35(63), 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Vis, B. (2016). Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 122–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B., & van Kersbergen, K. (2013). Towards an open functional approach to welfare state change: Pressures, ideas, and blame avoidance. Public Administration, 91(4), 840–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of public policy, 6(4), 371–398.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (2010). Paths and forks or chutes and ladders?: Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy, 30(2), 137–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (2014). Compliance regimes and barriers to behavioral change. Governance, 27(2), 243–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (2016). Privileging policy change? Sustaining automatic stabilizing mechanisms in public pensions. Social Policy and Administration, 50(2), 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K., & Willén, A. (2014). The Swedish pension system after twenty years: Mid-course corrections and lessons. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(3), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G. (2014). Blame avoidance, electoral punishment and the perceptions of risk. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(1), 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G., Jensen, C., Lee, S., & Arndt, C. (2020). How governments strategically time welfare state reform legislation: empirical evidence from five European countries. West European Politics, 43(6), 1285–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar