Globalisation and public policy: bridging the disciplinary and epistemological boundaries

References

• Andreatta, F., & Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2010). Which synthesis? Strategies of theoretical integration and the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Political Science Review, 31(2), 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auguste, D. (2018). Income inequality, globalization, and the welfare state: Evidence from 23 industrial countries, 1990-2009. Sociological Forum, 33(3), 666–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R. H. (1988). Contra contractarianism: Some reflections on the new institutionalism. Politics & Society, 16(2–3), 387–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2020). The exhausted futures of neoliberalism: From promissory legitimacy to social anomy. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(3), 318–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Hall, I. (2011). Global governance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 352–367). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, P., & Wagman, B. (1997). Globalization and the welfare state: four hypotheses and some empirical evidence. Eastern Economic Journal, 23(3), 317–336.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. G. (2005). Producing security: Multinational corporations, globalization, and the changing calculus of conflict, Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2019). Compensation or social investment? Revisiting the link between globalisation and popular demand for the welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 48(3), 427–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J. A. (1997). Across the great divide: Integrating comparative and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 563–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpio, A. (2019). The answer to nationalist fervour isn’t less globalism. It’s more. the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Cazurrra, C., Alvaro, R. M., & Pedersen, T. (2017). Globalization: Rising skepticism.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G., & Prichard, A. (2017). The new anarchy: Globalisation and fragmentation in world politics. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(3), 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (1997). International norms and domestic politics: Bridging the Rationalist—Constructivist divide. European Journal of International Relations, 3(4), 473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W., & Schechter, M. G. (2002). The political economy of a plural world: Critical reflections on power, morals and civilization, Routledge/RIPE series in global political economy RIPE series in global political economy. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history, Power and production. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2019). Inequality in post-industrial societies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. D. (2017). Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics, 17(3), 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city . New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. W. (2012). A critical view of global governance. Swiss Political Science Review, 18(2), 272–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Ohio: Swallow Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2012). The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 339–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Reveiw, 3(1), 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2003). Locating the proper authorities: The interaction of domestic and international institutions. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2007). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M., & Knafo, S. (2020). Introduction: The political economy of managerialism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 763–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2017). Policy transfer in global perspective. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation, Princeton paperbacks. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (2008). Is an alternative globalization possible? Politics & Society, 36(2), 271–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2014). Domestic institutions beyond the Nation-state: Charting the new interdependence approach. World Politics, 66(2), 331–+.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., & Per, L. (2009). Reorganizing the welfare state administration – Partnership, networks and accountability. Public Management Review, 11(3), 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. A., Lake, D. A., & Schultz, K. A. (2010). World politics: Interests, interactions, institutions. New York: W W Norton & Company Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. A., & Rogowski, R. (1996) The impact of the international economy on national policies: An analytical overview. ed. by Keohane, Robert O., and Milner, Helen V.). Internationalization and Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 25–47 .
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J., & Martin, L. L. (2003). International political economy: Global and domestic interactions. In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2000). The lexus and the olive tree; understanding globalization. New York: Anchor Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39(2), 145–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2016). Four ways we can improve policy diffusion research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(1), 8–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32(4), 881–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. (2002). Domestic politics and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J. (1993). Cooperation among nations: Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade (Vol. 2). ed: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grugel, J., & Riggirozzi, P. (2018). Neoliberal disruption and neoliberalism’s afterlife in Latin America: What is left of post-neoliberalism? Critical Social Policy, 38(3), 547–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. (2000). The use and misuse of power analysis in international theory. In Global political economy: Contemporary theories (pp. 53–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 449–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism:The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2006). What’s globalization got to do with it? Economic interdependence and the future of European welfare states. Government and Opposition, 41(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2020). Does capitalism (still) come in varieties? Review of International Political Economy, 27(2), 302–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., McConnell, A., & Perl, A. (2017). Moving policy theory forward: Connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2006). Globalization and the choice of governing instruments: The direct, indirect, and opportunity effects of internationalization. International Public Management Journal, 9(2), 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon &Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. (2011). The future of the liberal world order: Internationalism after America. Foreign Affairs, 90(3), 56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H. (2013). The dynamics of economic globalization and political development on the welfare state in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 23(3), 230–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 40(1), 7–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2013). Hollowing out the ‘nation-state’ and multi-level governance Kennett, Patricia. In Second Edition, A handbook of comparative social policy. Edward Elgar Publishing 11–26 .
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (2018). Theories of policy change and variation reconsidered: A prospectus for the political economy of public policy. Policy Sciences, 51(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (2008). NEOCON NATION: Neoconservatism, c. 1776. World Affairs, 170(4), 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. (1977). Conclusion: Domestic structures and strategies of foreign economic policy. International Organization, 31(4), 879–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2002). Power and governance in a partially globalized world. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2009). The old IPE and the new. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty years of institutional liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., & Milner, H. (Eds.). (1996). Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664168
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1963). Essays in persuasion, the Norton library. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C. P. (1981). Dominance and leadership in the international economy: Exploitation, public goods, and free rides. International Studies Quarterly, 25(2), 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kittel, B., & Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 44(4) 269–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00228.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (2009). Power, the state, and sovereignty: Essays on international relations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuttner, R. (2018). Can democracy survive global capitalism? New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. (2010). Two cheers for bargaining theory: Assessing rationalist explanations of the Iraq war. International Security, 35(3), 7–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A preview of policy sciences, Policy sciences book series. New York: American Elsevier Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Linares, P., Santos, F. J., & Ventosa, M. (2008). Coordination of carbon reduction and renewable energy support policies. Climate Policy, 8(4), 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2010). Theory and methods in political science: Third Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J., & Swank, D. (2004). Does the organization of capital matter? Employers and active labor market policy at the national and firm levels. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 593–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. ([1848] 2000). Manifesto of the communist party, Marx/Engels internet archive. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, K., & Wills, S. (2019). Inequality: An assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35(3), 351–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, W. R. (2005). Power, terror, peace and war: America’s grand strategy in a world at risk. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (1995). The false promise of interanational institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W W Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhard, S., & Potrafke, N. (2012). The globalization-welfare state nexus reconsidered. Review of International Economics, 20(2), 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menz, G. (2017). Comparative political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, S.(2017). Neoliberalism: The idea that swallowed the world. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/aug/18/neoliberalism-the-idea-that-changed-the-world .
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V. (2019). Globalisation, populism and the decline of the welfare state. Survival, 61(2), 91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2016). Neoliberalism– The ideology at the root of all our problems. The guardian. Accessed 20 05 2019 .
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2003). Liberal International relations theory: A scientific assessment. In C. Elman & M. F. Elman (Eds.), International relations theory: appraising the field (pp. 159–204). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. (2011). The future of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Onaran, O., & Boesch, V. (2014). The effect of globalization on the distribution of taxes and social expenditures in Europe: Do welfare state regimes matter? Environment and Planning a-Economy and Space, 46(2), 373–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. M. (2010). The clash of ideas in world politics: Transnational networks, states, and regime change (pp. 1510–2010). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panayotakis, C. (2020). Neoliberalism, the left and the rise of the far right. Democratic Theory, 7(1), 48.
   Google Scholar
• Paster, T. 2009. “Choosing lesser evils: The role of business in the development of the German welfare state from the 1880s to the 1990s.”
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1994). Managing the hollow state. International Journal of Public Administration, 17(3–4), 739–756.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J. (2000). The left strikes back: Class and conflict in the age of neoliberalism. New York: Avalon Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. J., Peterson, H. L., Jones, M. D., Garrard, S. P., & Theresa, V. (2017). There and back again: A tale of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), S13–S46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2015). Varieties of capitalism and varieties of globalization: Comparing patterns of market deregulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(7), 908–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2017). Capital in the twenty-first century. A. Goldhammer Translated by. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. J. A., & Gisela, N. (2007). Neoliberal hegemony: A global critique. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York: Rinehart & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Pontusson, J., & Weisstanner, D. (2018). Macroeconomic conditions, inequality shocks and the politics of redistribution, 1990–2013. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 31–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potrafke, N. (2019). The globalisation-welfare state nexus: Evidence from Asia. World Economy, 42(3), 959–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. A. (2014). State, power, socialism, radical thinkers. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Wallerstein, M. (1988). Structural dependence of the state on capital. The American Political Science Review, 82(1), 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and social democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2003). States and markets: A primer in political economy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the limits of self-government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, M., Howllet, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, A., Hughes, C. E., Lancaster, K., & Hoppe, R. (2018). Using the advocacy coalition framework and multiple streams policy theories to examine the role of evidence, research and other types of knowledge in drug policy. Addiction, 113(8), 1539–1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2012). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (1998). The debate over globalization: How to move forward by looking backward Schott, Jeffrey J. Launching New Global Trade Talks: An Action Agenda. Massachusetts: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (2004). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. O. (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics, Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1996). States, social knowledge, and the origins of modern social policies. Princeton, N.J. New York: Princeton University Press, Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization. 36(2), 379–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (1983). The antinomies of interdependence: National welfare and the international division of labor, The political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Global markets and global governance: The prospects for convergence. In L. W. Pauly, and S. Bernstein (Eds.), Global liberalism and political order: toward a new grand compromise? Albany: State University of New York Press. 23–50 .
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A. (2008). Defining globalisation. World Economy, 31(11), 1471–1502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I., & Wendt, A. (2005). The difference that realism makes - Social-Science and the politics of consent. In I. Shapiro (Ed.), The Flight From Reality (pp. 19–50). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. (2006). Rational choice instituionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, and B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. 23–38 .
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, D. A. (2004). Capital rules: The domestic politics of international regulatory harmonization. International Organization, 58(3), 531–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., Evans, P. B., and Rueschemeyer, D. (1985). Bringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order: Government networks and the disaggregated state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. (2002). Globalization and taxation - Challenges to the Swedish welfare state. Comparative Political Studies, 35(7), 839–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Moloney, K. (2019). The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, A. (2008). The ambiguity of resistance: Opposition to neoliberalism in Europe. Capital & Class, 32(3), 55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., Jerschina, J., & Gorniak, J., Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie. (1992). Beneficial constraints: On the economic limits of rational voluntarism [with] social consciousness and transformation of post-communism in Poland. Cracow: Cracow Academy of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2010). Re-Forming capitalism: Institutional change in the German political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2012). How to study contemporary capitalism? European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes De Sociologie, 53(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson, P. (2011). Bringing capital back in, or social democracy reconsidered: Employer power, cross-class alliances, and centralization of industrial relations in Denmark and Sweden. World Politics, 43(4), 513–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., & Kume, I. (2006). Coordination as a political problem in coordinated market economies. Governance, 19(1), 11–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2012). Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity, Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1990, Studies in social discontinuity. Cambridge, Mass., USA: B. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & X. Theda Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 390). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. (2017). Promoting the policy orientation: Lasswell in context. In F. Fischer, and G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. New York: Taylor & Francis 20–34 .
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, T. C. (2010). The perils of paradigm mentalities: Revisiting Kuhn, Lakatos, and Popper. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 2011. “Policy analysis in global affairs.” Walt’s Blog on the Foreign Policy Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. (1988). Testing theories of alliance formation: The case of Southwest Asia. International Organization, 42(2), 275–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security, 25(1), 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (2008). Realism and international politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A. (2009). The evolution of international society: A comparative historical analysis. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Schlager, E. (2016). The multiple streams approach at the theoretical and empirical crossroads: An introduction to a special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weishaupt, J. T. (2008). “The emergence of a new labor market policy paradigm? Analyzing continuity and change in an integrating Europe.” 3327829, The University of Wisconsin - Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little & Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Yay, G. G., & Aksoy, T. (2018). Globalization and the welfare state. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1015–1040.
   Google Scholar
• Zohlnhöfer, R. (2009). How politics matter when policies change: Understanding policy change as a political problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zunz, O., Schoppa, L., & Hiwatari, N. (2002). Social contracts under stress: The middle classes of America, Europe, and Japan at the turn of the century. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar