Computer‐based and Face‐to‐face Collaborative Argumentation in Secondary Schools in England and Finland

References

• Allegretti, C.L., and Frederick, J.N., 1995. A model for thinking critically about ethical issues, Teaching of Psychology 22 (1995), pp. 46–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., and Kanuka, H., 1997. On‐line forums: new platforms for professional development and group collaboration, Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication 3 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Backley, P., Saxton, M., and Sillince, J.A.A., 1999. "ADS in the curriculum: results of interviews with secondary school teachers". Royal Holloway: University of London; 1999, Working Paper, Management School,.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Quignard, M., Van Amelsvoort, M., Lund, K., Salminen, T., Litosseliti, L., and Munneke, L., 2002. "A framework for analysing pedagogically oriented computer‐mediated debates: Rainbow". 2002, Cahiers de recherche/Research Report IC–3–2002. Université Lumière Lyon 2, Équipe Interaction & Cognition..
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M., 1989. "Intentional learning as a goal of instruction". In: Resnick, L.B., ed. Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989. pp. 361–392.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, Z., 1997. Computer conferencing and the online classroom, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 3 (1997), pp. 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., 2003. Learning to chat: tutor participation in synchronous online chat, Teaching in Higher Education 8 (2003), pp. 247–261.
   Google Scholar
• 1999. Dillenbourg, P., ed. Collaborative Learning. Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon; 1999, Advances in Learning and Instruction Series.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, L., and Wellman, B., 1995. "Social impacts of electronic mail in organization: a review of the research literature". In: Burleson, B.R., ed. Communication Yearbook. Vol. 18. London: Sage; 1995. pp. 434–453.
   Google Scholar
• Keltinkangas‐Järvinen, L., 2000. Tunne itsesi, suomalainen. Porvoo: WSOY; 2000, [Know yourself, Finn].
   Google Scholar
• Opetusministeriö, 2002. "Lukiokoulutuksen Kehittämistyöryhmän muistio [Report of the planning committee of secondary education]". Helsinki: Opetusministeriö; 2002, Opetusministeriön työryhmien muistioita 9:2002.
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., and Laurinen, L., 2001a. "Vuorovaikutusta verkossa ja suullisesti – yhteisöllisen argumentoinnin ja kriittisen ajattelun edistäminen [Interaction through network and face‐to‐face—fostering collaborative argumentation and critical thinking]". In: Sallila, P., and Kalli, P., eds. Verkot ja teknologia aikuisopiskelun tukena [Networks and technology in support of adult education]. Jyväskylä: Gummerus; 2001a. pp. 152–176, Aikuiskasvatuksen 42. vuosikirja. Kansanvalistusseura ja Aikuiskasvatuksen Tutkimusseura,.
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., and Laurinen, L., 2001b. Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face‐to‐face environments, Instructional Science 29 (2001b), pp. 127–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., and Laurinen, L., 2002. "Written or spoken debate—which one to use in teaching argumentation?". In: Pantzar, E., ed. Perspectives on the Age of the Information Society. Reports of the Information Research Programme of the Academy of Finland 6. Tampere: Tampere University Press; 2002. pp. 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., Hunya, M., and Litosseliti, L., 2002. Argumentation skills of secondary school students in Finland, Hungary and United Kingdom. Presented at paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Argumentation (ISSA), 25–28 June.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W., and Beaumont, G., 2003. A dialogic approach to argumentation: using a chat room to develop early adolescent students’ argumentative writing, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 47 (2003), pp. 146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Board of Education, 1994. Framework Curriculum for the Senior Secondary School. Helsinki: National Board of Education; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D.R., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C., and Webb, B., 1996. An experiment in group learning technology: evaluating critical thinking in face‐to‐face and computer supported seminars, Interpersonal Computing and Technology 4 (1996), pp. 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Olaniran, B.A., 1994. Group performance in computer‐mediated and face‐to‐face communication media, Management Communication Quarterly 7 (1994), pp. 256–281.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkington, R.M., and Parker‐Jones, C.H., 1996. Interacting with computer based simulation: the role of dialogue, Computers and Education 27 (1996), pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualifications And Curriculum Authority, 1999. "National Curriculum online". 1999, online at http://www.nc.uk.net (see also http://www.qca.org.uk) (accessed November 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, A., and Matheson, M.P., 2000. "Evaluating and investigating learning through collaborative argumentation: an empirical study". UK: Institute of Educational Technology, Open University; 2000, Dialogue and Design for New Media Research Group Technical Report DDRG–01–01,.
   Google Scholar
• SCALE Project, 2002a. "European Commission". 2002a, project No IST–1999–10664. Deliverables 1 & 2, online at http://www.euroscale.net/ (accessed August 2002).
   Google Scholar
• SCALE Project, 2002b. "European Commission". 2002b, project No IST–1999–10664. Deliverable 8, online at http://www.euroscale.net/ (accessed August 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., and Weidenmann, B., 2003. Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance, Journal of Educational Media 28 (2–3) (2003), pp. 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Weger, H., and Aakhus, M., 2003. Arguing in internet chat rooms: argumentative adaptations to chat room design and some consequences for public deliberation at a distance, Argumentation and Advocacy 40 (2003), pp. 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wesp, R., and Montgomery, K., 1998. Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena, Teaching of Psychology 25 (4) (1998), pp. 275–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar