Government ideology and the implementation of civil war peace agreements

References

• Ahamadov, Anar K. and James Huges, 2019. ‘Ideology and Civilian Victimization in Northern Ireland’s Civil War’. Irish Political Studies 35(4), 531–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, Philip and Glenn Palmer, 2009. ‘Politics or the Economy? Domestic Correlates of Dispute Involvement in Developed Democracies’. International Studies Quarterly 53(4), 955–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badran, Ramzi, 2014. ‘Intrastate Peace Agreements and the Durability of Peace’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 31(2), 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartusevičius, Henrikas and Svend-Erik Skaaning, 2018. ‘Revisiting Democratic Civil Peace: Electoral Regimes and Civil Conflict’. Journal of Peace Research 55(5), 625–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer and Patrick Walsh, 2001. ‘New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’. The World Bank Economic Review 15(1), 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Christine and Laura Wise, 2022. ‘Peace Processes and Their Agreements’. In Contemporary Peacemaking: Peace Processes, Peacebuilding and Conflict, eds. Roger Mac Ginty and Anthony Wanis-St. John. Springer Nature, Gewerbestrasse, 381–406.
   Google Scholar
• Berrebi, Claude and Esteban F. Klor, 2008. ‘Are Voters Sensitive to Terrorism? Direct Evidence from the Israeli Electorate’. American Political Science Review 102(3), 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli, Andrew, Allan Dafoe and Robert F. Trager, 2019. ‘Is There a War Party? Party Change, the Left-Right Divide, and International Conflict’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63(4), 950–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, Johannes and Niklas Potrafke, 2020. ‘Does a Change of Government Influence Compliance with International Agreements? Empirical Evidence for the NATO Two Percent Target’. Defence and Peace Economics 31(7), 743–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böller, Florian, 2022. ‘Fuelling Politicisation: The AfD and the Politics of Military Interventions in the German Parliament’. German Politics, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braniff, Máire, 2012. ‘After Agreement: The Challenges of Implementing Peace’. Shared Space 14, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brender, Agnes, 2018. ‘Government Ideology and Arm Exports’. ILE Working Paper No. 21. Institute of Law and Economics: University of Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Lawrence Ezrow and Michael D. McDonald, 2010. ’Ideology, Party Factionalism and Policy Change: An Integrated Dynamic Theory’. British Journal of Political Science 40(4), 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakma, Anurug, 2023. ‘Leadership Changes and Civil War Peace Agreements: Does Who Comes to Power Influence the Implementation?’ International Peacekeeping 30(1), 24–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, Joe, 2010. ‘Ideological Fractionalization and the International Conflict Behaviour of Parliamentary Democracies’. International Studies Quarterly 54(4), 965–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, Joe, 2014. ‘Hawks, Doves and International Cooperation’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58(7), 1311–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul and Nicholas Sambanis, 2002. ‘Understanding Civil War: A New Agenda’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1), 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danzell, Orlandrew E, 2011. ‘Political Parties: When Do They Turn to Terror?’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(1), 85–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Donder, Philippe and Jean Hindriks, 2007. ‘Equilibrium Social Insurance with Policy-Motivated Parties’. European Journal of Political Economy 23(3), 624–640.
   Google Scholar
• De Mesquita, Beuno Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson and James D. Morrow, 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• DeRouen, Karl, Jr, Mark J. Ferguson, Samuel Norton, Young Hwan Park, Jenna Lea and Ashley Streat-Bartlett, 2010. ‘Civil War Peace Agreement Implementation and State Capacity’. Journal of Peace Research 47(3), 333–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy Toft, Monica, 2002. ‘Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War’. Security Studies 12(2), 82–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, Allard and Feike Fliervoet, 2021. ‘Fuelling Factionalism? The Impact of Peace Processes on Rebel Group Fragmentation in Civil Wars’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 65(4), 788–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. and David D. Laitin, 2003. ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’. American Political Science Review 97(1), 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjelde, Hanne, Carl Henrik Knutsen and Håvard Mokleiv Nygård, 2021. ‘Which Institutions Matter? Re-Considering the Democratic Civil Peace’. International Studies Quarterly 65(1), 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• François, Abel, Raul Magni-Berton and Simon Varaine, 2021. ‘Revolutionary Attitudes in Democratic Regimes’. Political Studies 69(2), 214–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getmansky, Anna and Thomas Zeitzoff, 2014. ‘Terrorism and Voting: The Effect of Rocket Threat on Voting in Israeli Elections’. American Political Science Review 108(3), 588–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt and Brian A. Noesk, 2009. ‘Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5), 808–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary D. and Amanda A. Licht, 2018. ‘Domestic Politics and Changes in Foreign Aid Allocation: The Role of Party Preferences’. Political Research Quarterly 71(2), 284–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco, Joseph M., Christopher F. Gelpi and T. Camber Warren, 2009. ‘When Preferences and Commitments Collide: The Effect of Relative Partisan Shifts on International Treaty Compliance’. International Organization 63(2), 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, Ferdinand A., Jyotirmoy Podder and Abu Zafar M. Shahriar, 2017. ‘Performance of Microfinance Institutions: Does Government Ideology Matter?’ World Development 100, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, Mehmet, Aimee Arias and Jeffrey Morton, 2020. ‘Women and War: Women’s Rights in Post-Civil War Society’. Civil Wars 22(2–3), 224–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzell, Caroline A., Mathew Hoddie and Donald Rothchild, 2001. ‘Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables’. International Organizations 55(1), 183–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauenstein, Matthew and Madhav Joshi, 2020. ‘Remaining Seized of the Matter: UN Resolutions and Peace Implementation’. International Studies Quarterly 64(4), 834–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeau, Louis M., François Pétry and Moktar Lamari, 2001. ‘Left-Right Party Ideology and Government Policies: A Meta-Analysis’. European Journal of Political Research 40(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarland, Julie, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård, Scott Gates, Emilie Hermansen and Vilde Bergstad Larsen, 2020. ‘How Should We Understand Patterns of Recurring Conflict?’ Conflict Trends 3, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Madhav, Sung Yong Lee and Roger Mac Ginty, 2017. ‘Built-In Safeguards and the Implementation of Civil War Peace Accords’. International Interactions 43(6), 994–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, Madhav and Jason Michael Quinn, 2015. ‘Implementing the Peace: The Aggregate Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Peace Duration After Intrastate Armed Conflicts’. British Journal of Political Science 47(4), 869–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, Madhav, Jason Michael Quinn and Patrick M Regan, 2015. ‘Annualized Implementation Data on Comprehensive Intrastate Peace Accords, 1989–2012’. Journal of Peace Research 52(4), 551–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerreth, Johannes, Jason Quinn, Madhav Joshi and Jaroslav Tir, 2022. ‘International Third Parties and the Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreements After Civil War’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 67(2–3), 494–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Eun Kyung, 2019. ‘Issue Ownership and Strategic Policy Choice in Multiparty Africa’. Politics & Policy 47(5), 956–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, Michael T. and Skyler Cranmer, 2007. ‘Testing the “Dick Cheney” Hypothesis: Do Governments of the Left Attract More Terrorism Than Governments of the Right?’ Conflict Management and Peace Science 24(4), 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, Michael T. and Patricia Sullivan, 2010. ‘Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? Partisanship, Approval, and the Duration of Major Power Democratic Military Interventions’. The Journal of Politics 72(3), 616–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, Jana, Werner Krause and Piia Bränfors, 2018. ‘Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace’. International Interactions 44(6), 985–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liendo, Nicolás and Jessica Maves Braithwaite, 2018. ‘Determinants of Colombian Attitudes Toward the Peace Process’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 35(6), 622–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, Magnus, 2016. ‘Conflict Management Capabilities of Peace-Brokering International Organizations, 1945–2010: A New Dataset’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 33(2), 198–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, 2010. ‘No War, No Peace: Why so Many Peace Processes Fail to Deliver Peace’. International Politics 47(2), 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, 2022. ‘Time, Sequencing and Peace Processes’. In Contemporary Peacemaking: Peace Processes, Peacebuilding and Conflict, eds. Roger Mac Ginty and Anthony Wanis-St. John. Springer Nature, Gewerbestrasse, 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Maekawa, Wakako, Barış Arı and Theodora-Ismene Gizelis, 2019. ‘UN Involvement and Civil War Peace Agreement Implementation’. Public Choice 178(3–4), 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, Ifat, 2003. ‘Peace-Building with the Hawks: Attitude Change of Jewish-Israeli Hawks and Doves Following Dialogue Encounters with Palestinians’. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 27(6), 701–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, T. David, 2009. ‘International Relations Theory and How Civil Wars End’. International Interactions 25(3), 341–351.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, T. David and J. Michael Greig, 2017. ‘State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace After Civil War’. International Interactions 43(6), 967–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, Michaela, Brett Ashley Leeds and Naoko Matsumura, 2016. ‘Measuring Change in Source of Leader Support: The CHISOLS Dataset’. Journal of Peace Research 53(2), 259–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, Michaela and Burcu Savun, 2009. ‘Fostering Peace After Civil War: Commitment Problems and Agreement Design’. International Studies Quarterly 53(3), 737–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, Michaela and Jessica L. P. Weeks, 2019. ‘Hawks, Doves, and Peace: An Experimental Approach’. American Journal of Political Science 63(1), 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, Jonathan Leader, 2019. ‘Ideology and Armed Conflict’. Journal of Peace Research 56(5), 635–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Fuerte, Manuela, 2018. ‘Why Oppose a Peace Agreement? The Relationship Between Belief Systems, Informational Shortcuts, and Attitudes Towards the 2016 Referendum in Colombia’. Available at: https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/handle/1992/40729
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Glenn, Tamar London and Patrick Regan, 2004. ‘What’s Stopping You? The Sources of Political Constraints on International Conflict Behaviour in Parliamentary Democracies’. International Interactions 30(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland, 2010. ‘Saving Liberal Peacebuilding’. Review of International Studies 36(2), 337–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, Therése, Stina Högbladh and Magnus Öberg, 2019. ‘Organized Violence, 1989–2019’. Journal of Peace Research 57(4), 597–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potrafke, Niklas, 2010. ‘The Growth of Public Health Expenditures in OECD Countries: Do Government Ideology and Electoral Motives Matter?’ Journal of Health Economics 29(6), 797–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbun, Brian C, 2004. Partisan Interventions: European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans. Cornell University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, Patrick M., 1996. ‘Conditions of Successful Third-Party Intervention in Intrastate Conflicts’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40(2), 336–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckman, Kirssa Cline and Jessica Maves Braithwaite, 2020. ‘Changing Horses in Midstream: Leadership Changes and the Civil War Peace Process’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 37(1), 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandal, Nukhet and Neophytos Loizides, 2013. ‘Center-Right Parties in Peace Processes: “Slow Learning” or Punctuated Peace Socialization?’ Political Studies 61(2), 401–421.
   Google Scholar
• Sanı´n, Francisco Gutie´rrez and Elisabeth Jean Wood, 2014. ‘Ideology in Civil War: Instrumental Adoption and Beyond’. Journal of Peace Research 51(2), 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sela, Avraham, 2009. ‘Difficult Dialogue: The Oslo Process in Israeli Perspective’. Macalester International 23, 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, Stephen John and Donald Rothchild, 2013. ‘Peace Operations: From Short-Term to Long-Term Commitment’. In Beyond the Emergency: Development within UN Peace Missions, ed. Jeremy Ginifer. New York: Routledge, 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Stravers, Andrew, 2018. ‘Pork, Parties and Priorities: Partisan Politics and Overseas Military Deployments’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 38(2), 156–177.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit and Natalia Letki, 2009. ‘When Left is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe’. American Political Science Review 103(4), 555–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, Kai M, 2012. ‘Ideology and Violence in Civil Wars: Theory and Evidence from Mozambique and Angola’. Civil Wars 14(4), 546–567.
   Google Scholar
• Toft, Monica Duffy, 2002. ‘Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War’. Security Studies 12(2), 82–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgovnik, Efraim, 2000. ‘Strategies Under a New Electoral System: The Labor Party in the 1996 Israeli Elections’. Party Politics 6(1), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugarriza, Juan E. and Matthew J. Craig, 2013. ‘The Relevance of Ideology to Contemporary Armed Conflicts: A Quantitative Analysis of Former Combatants in Colombia’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 57(3), 445–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreeland, James Raymond, 2008. ‘The Effect of Political Regime on Civil War: Unpacking Anocracy’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(3), 401–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Barbara F., 2004. ‘Does Conflict Beget Conflict? Explaining Recurring Civil War’. Journal of Peace Research 41(3), 371–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Barbara F., 2009. ‘Bargaining Failures and Civil War’. Annual Review of Political Science 12(1), 243–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten, Guy D. and Laron K. Williams, 2011. ‘Buttery Guns and Welfare Hawks: The Politics of Defense Spending in Advanced Industrial Democratic Countries’. American Journal of Political Science 55(1), 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Reed M. and Jakana L. Thomas, 2017. ‘Women on the Frontline: Rebel Group Ideology and Women’s Participation in Violent Rebellion’. Journal of Peace Research 54(1), 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank, 2022. ‘World Development Indicators’. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar