Joining networked society: integrating Academic Service-Learning into formal school

References

• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (1): 164–180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. 2006. “Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective.” Human Development 49 (4): 193–224. doi:10.1159/000094368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batane, T., R. Engeström, K. Hakkarainen, D. Newnham, P. Nleya, and J. Virkkunen. 2012. “Dilemmas of Promoting Expansive Educational Transformation through Information and Communication Technologies (Icts) in Botswana.” In The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012) Sydney, Australia. edited by J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, and P. Reimann. International Society of the Learning Sciences,127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, K. 2003. “Consequential Transitions.” In Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary Crossing, edited by T. Tuomi-Gröhn and Y. Engeström, 39–61, Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., O. Erstad, J. Herman, S. Raizen, M. Ripley, M. Miller-Ricci, and M. Rumble. 2012. “Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. Patrick, Griffin, Barry, McGaw, Esther, Care.” In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, 17–66. Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. 2005. “Perspectives on International Schools and the Nature and Extent of Local Community Contact.” Journal of Research in International Education 4 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1177/1475240905050290.
   Google Scholar
• Celio, C. I., J. Durlak, and A. Dymnicki. 2011. “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Service-Learning on Students.” The Journal of Experiential Education 34 (2): 164–181. doi:10.5193/JEE34.2.164.
   Google Scholar
• Cipolle, S. 2010. Service-Learning and Social Justice. Engaging Students in Social Change. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., E. L. Amel, and D. P. Gerwien. 2009. “Teaching and Learning in the Social Context: A Meta-Analysis of Service Learning’s Effects on Academic, Personal, Social, and Citizenship Outcomes.” Teaching of Psychology 36 (4): 233–245. doi:10.1080/00986280903172969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. M. 2009. School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Your Handbook for Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). 2016. National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: FNBE.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., and J. Quinn. 2016. Coherence: The Right Drivers in Action for Schools, Districts and Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Furco, A. 2010. “The Community as a Resource for Learning: An Analysis of Academic Service-Learning in Primary and Secondary Education.” In The Nature of Learning, Using Research to Inspire Practice, edited by H. Dumond, D. Istance, and F. Benavides, 227–249. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264086487-12-en.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., L. Hietajärvi, K. Alho, K. Lonka, and K. Salmela-Aro. 2015. “Sociodigital Revolution: Digital Natives Vs Digital Immigrants.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. D. Wright, 918–923. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26094-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., T. Palonen, S. Paavola, and E. Lehtinen. 2004. Communities of Networked Expertise: Professional and Educational Perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and D. Shirley. 2009. The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. San Francisco, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, M., and S. McIntosh. 2018. “International Education: The Transformative Potential of Experiential Learning.” Oxford Review of Education 44 (4): 403–413. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1402757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, M. G. 2016. “Reflecting on Service-Learning Experiences: A Three-Stage Model.” In Reflecting on Service-Learning in Higher Education. Contemporary Issues and Perspectives, edited by M. G. Hickey, 45–55. Lexington Books: Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Hietajärvi, L., K. Lonka, K. Hakkarainen, K. Alho, and K. Salmela-Aro. 2020. “Are Schools Alienating Digitally Engaged Students? Longitudinal Relations between Digital Engagement and School Engagement.” Frontline Learning Research 8 (1): 33–55. doi:10.14786/flr.v8i1.437.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., K. Gutierrez, S. Livingstone, B. Penuel, J. Rhodes, K. Salen, J. Schor, J. Sefton-Green, and S. C. Watkins. 2013. Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2016. “Youth Voice, Media, and Political Engagement.” In By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism, edited by H. Jenkins, L. Gamber-Thompson, N. Kligler-Vilenchik, S. Shresthova, E. Soep, and A. M. Zimmerman. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. 2012. “Reinterpreting the Historicity of the Nordic Model.” Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2 (4): 21. doi:10.19154/njwls.v2i4.2303.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, T., and J. Lavonen. 2017. A New Wave of Learning in Finland : Get Started with Innovation! Singapore: Springer, 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_24 .
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann, S. 2009. Interviews. Second ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, D. 2018. The Wiley International Handbook of Service-Learning for Social Justice. Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and K. Trigwell. 2000. “Variatio Est Mater Studiorum.” Higher Education Research & Development 19 (3): 381–395. doi:10.1080/07294360020021455.
   Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., and R. Mulder. 2011. “Innovative Work Behaviour in Vocational Colleges: Understanding How and Why Innovations are Developed.” Vocations and Learning 4 (1): 63–84. doi:10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickelsson, R. 2019. “Harnessing Horses in Social Pedagogy: Equine-Assisted Social Education in a School Context.” International Journal of Social Pedagogy 8 (1): 4. doi:10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2019.v8.x.003.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hair, M., U. Reitzug, J. Cate, R. Averso, L. Atkinson, D. Gentry, G. Garn, and J. Gaetane. 2005. “Networking for Professional Learning Communities: School-University-Community Partnerships Enhance Student Achievement.” In Network Learning for Educational Change, edited by W. Veugelers and M. O’Hair. Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom: Open University Press. 72–97.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn (Volume III): Students’ Engagement, Drive and Self-Beliefs. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201170-en.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, M., and J. Goicoechea. 2000. “Sociocultural and Constructivist Theories of Learning: Ontology, Not Just Epistemology.” Educational Psychologist 35 (4): 227–241. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, G., and J. Payne. 2004. Key Concepts in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, P., A. L. Davidson, and H. T. Cao. 1991. “Students’ Multiple Worlds: Negotiating the Boundaries of Family, Peer, and School Cultures.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 22 (3): 224–250. doi:10.1525/aeq.1991.22.3.05x1051k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A. 2019. “Expanding the Context of Pedagogical Activity to the Surrounding Communities.” Psychology & Society 11 (1): 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M. H., R. C. Sanderson, C. I. Celio, J. E. Grant, I. Choi, C. C. George, and K. Deane. 2013. “Service-Learning in Early Adolescence: Results of a School-Based Curriculum.” The Journal of Experiential Education 36 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1177/1053825913481580.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Third Edition ed. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salmela-Aro, K., J. Muotka, K. Alho, K. Hakkarainen, and K. Lonka. 2016. “School Burnout and Engagement Profiles among Digital Natives in Finland: A Person-oriented Approach.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 13 (6): 704–718. doi:10.1080/17405629.2015.1107542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scales, P., E. Roehlkepartain, M. Neal, J. Kielsmeier, and P. Benson. 2006. “Reducing Academic Achievement Gaps: The Role of Community Service and Service-Learning.” The Journal of Experiential Education 29 (1): 38–60. doi:10.1177/105382590602900105.
   Google Scholar
• Silander, P., S. Riikonen, P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, and K. Hakkarainen In press.“Learning Computational Thinking in Phenomenon-based Co-creation Projects – Perspectives from Finland”.Computational Thinking Education in K-12: Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Physical Computing, edited by S.-C. Kong and H. Abelson, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinervo, S., K. Sormunen, K. Kangas, K. Hakkarainen, J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, T. Korhonen, and P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen. 2020. “Elementary School Pupils’ Co-inventions: Products and Pupils’ Reflections on Processes.” International Journal of Technology Design and Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09577-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. 2019. “Radical-Transformative Agency: Continuities and Contrasts with Relational Agency and Implications for Education.” Frontiers in Education 4. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00148.
   Google Scholar
• van Goethem, A., A. van Hoof, C. B.orobio de, M. van Aken, and D. Hart. 2014. “The Role of Reflection in the Effects of Community Service on Adolescent Development: A Meta-Analysis.” Child Development 85 (6): 2114–2130. doi:10.1111/cdev.12274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., R. E. Dahl, and C. S. Dweck. 2018. “Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 (1): 101–122. doi:10.1177/1745691617722620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fifth ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar